Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Stolen Content From Traders Laboratory

Recommended Posts

I have recently found our content on our boards stolen and posted in this board here: GeckoStockTrader - the fastest, simplest most risk-free way of making a profit from the worlds stock markets! - General Forums - Stocks and Markets Talk -

 

I have contacted the website and have demanded to remove them immediately. If you spot any websites that are posting our content without credit, please notify us. This is clearly a violation of copyright as well as the members of the board who are credited for every post they make.

 

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I guess they panicked and flipped out when I wrote them a very strict email. 30min after I sent them an email, they cleared out their entire forum. Now its blank with nothing on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea I would love that. Something I can put at the bottom right corner of the videos. I played around with word trying to make a watermark text but they turned out extremely ugly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not surprised Soul. Just make sure you have a good letter ready to go, preferably from an attorney.

 

People will do just about anything on the internet to make a few bucks, incl taking anything from another site.

 

If you do the videos in Camtasia, I think there's some ways to watermark, add logo's, etc. to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you should verbally state "copyright..." in every video

 

similarly, in posts you want to copyright...

 

merely writing copyright on your text with date and name is sufficient under the law to establish copyright

 

i am not sure what the law says about audio, but saying copyright 2007 John Doe could not hurt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Copyright is automatic on any written or recorded material. You don't have to write "copyright". You can do to scare people off but it's not necessary. Copyright laws are fairly uniform all over the world because of international treaties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest davinagirlie

Firstly, you should know work as a professional internet copyright legal advisor to many high-profile web 2.0 (that is to say user-driven content sites). I tell you this so we start on a level playing field.

 

Secondly, to the issue in hand. I have these points to raise:

 

a). This site actively broadcasts every single post in real-time via an RSS feed, this is not waiting for the user to find them but in fact actively 'pushing' content into the public domain via a channel that's very name (RSS = Really Simple Syndication for those unaware) , promotes the dissemination and sharing of its content, namely this forum's user posts. If James of Arizona does not want other users to take advantage of his RSS feed he should not broadcast it.

 

b). Accusations of 'stealing content' should be used only when you are sure that the statement or context is correct. You see there is a dilemma with your accusation, and not only for the reason stated above.

 

The only content that appeared on the afore mentioned site was the user post, no code or industrially sensitive material.

 

Now herein lies a problem: do you own the post that is posted to your site?

 

If you do then you can be held libel and responsible for its content, and by definition you would be held responsible for the comments of all your users. So if a terribly offensive post was posted on your forum, degrading any section of the population, you would personally be held accountable as YOU OWN THE POST. Even if you delete it immediatley someone could 'video the site'as you have alledgedly done in order to prove your 'guilt'.

 

Now thats only if you own the post or content.

 

If you do not own the post, then nobody is stealing your content because you don't ówn' it in the first place. I suggest you think hard before commencing any legal avenues sir, as i may bite you on your rear. The best way to prevent the poaching of your posts is to not broadcast them via RSS. You can't have your cake and eat it these days.

 

Thats just my professional advice. Ignore if you like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your literacy doesn't seem great for a "professional internet copyright legal advisor" and your legal knowledge seems even worse. The fact is that the author of a copyright work is the owner and you need the owner's permission to publish it.

 

If you want to talk big maybe you should put away your copy of "Law for Dummies" and get some proper legal advice. Oh and learn the difference between "libel" and "liable".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Firstly, you should know work as a professional internet copyright legal advisor to many high-profile web 2.0 (that is to say user-driven content sites). I tell you this so we start on a level playing field.

 

Secondly, to the issue in hand. I have these points to raise:

 

a). This site actively broadcasts every single post in real-time via an RSS feed, this is not waiting for the user to find them but in fact actively 'pushing' content into the public domain via a channel that's very name (RSS = Really Simple Syndication for those unaware) , promotes the dissemination and sharing of its content, namely this forum's user posts. If James of Arizona does not want other users to take advantage of his RSS feed he should not broadcast it.

 

b). Accusations of 'stealing content' should be used only when you are sure that the statement or context is correct. You see there is a dilemma with your accusation, and not only for the reason stated above.

 

The only content that appeared on the afore mentioned site was the user post, no code or industrially sensitive material.

 

Now herein lies a problem: do you own the post that is posted to your site?

 

If you do then you can be held libel and responsible for its content, and by definition you would be held responsible for the comments of all your users. So if a terribly offensive post was posted on your forum, degrading any section of the population, you would personally be held accountable as YOU OWN THE POST. Even if you delete it immediatley someone could 'video the site'as you have alledgedly done in order to prove your 'guilt'.

 

Now thats only if you own the post or content.

 

If you do not own the post, then nobody is stealing your content because you don't ówn' it in the first place. I suggest you think hard before commencing any legal avenues sir, as i may bite you on your rear. The best way to prevent the poaching of your posts is to not broadcast them via RSS. You can't have your cake and eat it these days.

 

Thats just my professional advice. Ignore if you like.

 

Thanks for the reply. With regards to some things you say...I would assume video and audio copyright laws for internet based content remains quite similar. The video content here is an "original work of authorship" which would be protected under the copyright laws. If someone takes a video, does not give proper credits to where the video came from or claims it as their own, then YES it is against the law.

 

Regarding RSS, I suppose you hadn't spoken with youtube.com about their RSS feeds?

 

And please please please learn to use certain words correctly. Libel and liable are not the same. That is a term a legal advisor would very certainly not get wrong.

 

PS, for my background, I worked in music publishing in Nashville. I was there when Dreamworks got bought out, Warner Chappell's VP was fired, when the whole industry was turning upside down because of internet based content. I'm very aware of copyright laws and try to stay abreast of all the latest happenings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest davinagirlie

You need to stand down sir, as I have the correct UK spelling of 'libel' which is to be libelous please look it up.

 

Also if you read my post and actually take it in, from the top of the thread, the argument is whether or not the owner of the forum owns the post.

 

And if you can read the english language I am agreeing with you. The owner is the author. Not the forum administrator. Therefore the forum admin has no say what happens to a post especially when he broadcasts it via RSS.

 

Step down, and look up 'libel' in a law dictionary. Check it in MS Word if you are really interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Davinagirlie-

 

BTW, every RSS also broadcast's "where" the original content comes from and also gives credit to the original author.

 

 

Interview - Rob Kasunic, US Copyright Office

.

.

.

SP: What is the rule of thumb for using content from other copyright owners when republishing online? Does the Copyright office have basic recommendations?

 

Unless there is a particular exemption in the Copyright Act for the particular use intended, get permission.

 

While there are many discussions these days about the allegedly diminishing nature of fair use in the digital environment, many use the term "fair use" very loosely. Fair use is a case-by-case determination of whether a particular use is reasonable under the circumstances, such that a reasonable copyright owner would not require permission for the use.

 

In making a fair use determination for each particular use of a copyrighted work, there are four factors that must be considered (see section 107 in the Copyright Act).

 

One of the most important factors to consider is the effect of the use on the potential market for the copyrighted work. In the digital environment, the potential effect of posting a work on the Internet can be to completely destroy the market for the work. Therefore, aside from certain very limited uses, such as a short quotation, a criticism, comment or parody of a work, of some other very limited, reasonable use, obtaining permission is the only safe course of action.

 

The Internet actually makes obtaining permission easier in certain circumstances through, for example, the Copyright Clearance Center, ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, or the Harry Fox Agency. It should also be understood that even if a person believes his or her intended use is a fair use, if the copyright owner disagrees with the assessment, copyright infringement litigation is one way the dispute might be resolved. It generally makes sense to obtain permission before using or republishing someone else's work online.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest davinagirlie

But as I said every single poster would have to take action against the so-called offender, not the forum admin because he does not own this post or any others posted on this forum. If he does what is to stop me posting terrible LIBELOUS content and he take the hit for it?

 

THAT IS MY POINT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You need to stand down sir, as I have the correct UK spelling of 'libel' which is to be libelous please look it up.

 

Also if you read my post and actually take it in, from the top of the thread, the argument is whether or not the owner of the forum owns the post.

 

And if you can read the english language I am agreeing with you. The owner is the author. Not the forum administrator. Therefore the forum admin has no say what happens to a post especially when he broadcasts it via RSS.

 

Step down, and look up 'libel' in a law dictionary. Check it in MS Word if you are really interested.

 

You are totally full of s**t. There's no such thing as "held libel". Libel is defamatory content in permanent form or broadcast. You can be guilty of libel but you can't be held libel. Held liable I think you meant. Surely a professional legal adviser would know that. I know a thing or two about English law so feel free to look that one up in "Law for Dummies".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest davinagirlie

Maybe you should stop trying to rip into me personally and think about my perfectly reasonable post, really trying to upstage me in a legal spelling contest is just deflecting the issue. You are really boring me. Look at the message, not the delivery, unless however you are right. ???

 

Oh and I know a thing or two about s**theads. (Moderator - if you are going to ban me you need to ban him too because he said it first... lol)

 

<<< feels like such a child saying that, but thinks she should drop down to the same level in order to get a point across.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please try to keep this debate in a civilized manner by not using personal attacks or obscenity or I may have to delete the posts. Thanks for cooperating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe if you admitted who you were instead of pretending to be a professional legal adviser people would treat you with more respect. You haven't been libelled you've been asked to remove content you had no permission to copy which is perfectly justified.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RSS debate:

 

<<<Laws and Technology Collide

Most people publishing content via RSS support republication of feeds. Because the technology is fairly new, the laws and legalities are still murky. It is assumed that content in RSS is protected by copyright laws but let us not forget the Internet is global and their is not a centralized body governing what is right or what is wrong. Not only does law and technology collide the laws of different countries, those creating the feed and those displaying the contents of the feed may contradict each other. It is for this reason, I would advise that publishers using RSS to assume that the contents of their RSS feeds will be syndicated and replicated.

 

 

Tips and Tricks to Protect Your Feed.

That is not to say there are not things that can be done to protect feeds. At the end of the day being proactive is the best way to protect intellectual property.

 

 

Part of feed protection is ensuring that appropriate credit is given, this can be arranged by including a copyright assignment in the final line of the Item Description field.

 

 

Additionally you can include links back to your website in the Item description field.

 

 

Use teaser copy in the RSS feed's Item description field, linking back to your website which contains the full contents of the post.

 

 

At the end of the day, protecting the contents of a feed can be daunting and limiting. Controlling your contents to ensure appropriate credit and links are included is critical. >>>

 

 

So at the point where where the proper credit of the contents of the feed are stripped out and passed off as ones own "content" is where the line is crossed. Not sure what happened in this case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest davinagirlie

thankyou torero, and KNYYT, thats all I was trying to say, I understand that I have a bias audience here, but they need to understand the nature of RSS and as I stated earlier in this thread it can all be resolved by either killing the feed or, following KNYYT's advice.

 

Also I would like to point out that 511 loyal readers of this forum have signed up to geckostocktrader since this thread was started.

 

Hmmmmmm????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But as I said every single poster would have to take action against the so-called offender, not the forum admin because he does not own this post or any others posted on this forum. If he does what is to stop me posting terrible LIBELOUS content and he take the hit for it?

 

THAT IS MY POINT

 

That is the correct way to use libelous, FYI. One can be held liable for libelous comments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And also, the forum admin is the person in those videos. He owns the videos, so it is HIS content. If proper credit was not given to him, then it is considered "stealing".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.