Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

horace

A Question Concening Volume at Bid and Volume at Ask

Recommended Posts

Thanks Cruiser,

 

I understand the difference between market orders and limit orders, but can you expand more on the value (if any) of using the ask-bid ratio in day trading.

 

If you believe that the ratio has value, could you explain it please.

 

Sorry - I don't look at the bid/ask ratio at all. I put my attention to price action and market internals.

 

I occasionally watch the bid ask numbers once I'm already in a trade but never have gotten a lot of info from it as price can easily move counter-intuitively in relation to the number and span of bids and offers.

 

I trade emini index futures in the day session so the bid & offer volumes and spreads from moment to moment aren't that important to me as I'm already familiar with the characteristics of fill and slippage on orders during the time frames I usually trade. Occasionally, I'll trade stocks (mostly Nasdaq 100 stocks) based on various scans and when I do I'll end up trading stocks I'm not all that familiar with so the bid/ask levels up and down the scale are more important to get an idea of what kind fills and slippage might occur. But I'd pay even less attention to the bid/ask ratios close to current price for stocks as the market makers for the stocks might be playing all sorts of games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
price can easily move counter-intuitively in relation to the number and span of bids and offers

 

Finally! Someone that's actually studied this subject! Thank you.

Price normally moves counter-intuitively to the sum of the bid ask info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
with some common sense.

 

 

I'm not interested in "common sense", mate, I'm interested in what is actually the case. It's actually the case that in Post #19 you state:

 

The bid/ask should have a queue. This is something you should be watching as well that no one has mentioned yet. You need to see what is waiting to get filled and if they are getting absorbed.

 

. . . when in Post #3 I had already stated:

 

"In other words, comparing volume at bid with volume at ask might not be that informative; try comparing volume at ask with depth of book at ask, and volume at bid with depth of book at bid."

 

Now I bet when you come home from your other job that isn't trading you jump onto your comp and replay the day and think to yourself that it is the same thing.

 

Within my platform order book data cannot be collected historically; it is only available to be streamed and then stored at the time it is created. Therefore the data that can be used to backtest is the same data that would have been available at the time of trading.

 

Can you see how you're continuing to talk drivel here, "Colonel"?

 

You are probably thinking that its fine because you have been trading in sim in replayed markets for so long and making progress after all these years.

 

Don't trade in sim; don't trade intraday fella - now how do you like them apples?

 

 

Volume is not the stuff on the ladder. Volume is the amount traded or the contracts traded.

 

 

Yes, thanks for the basic definition of volume. If you read post #3 you'll see that it's perfectly clear that I know what volume is. Not sure why this should even be a point of doubt.

 

 

The queue isn't the orders on the ladder. Its not orders on the DOM either (if you call a ladder a dome).

 

 

Call it what you like (I never look at it, so I don't care). It doesn't change the fact that the statement above is completely incorrect - the orders on the ladder/DOM are the queue/depth of book.

 

Because maybe you didn't think I mentioned your post and gave you the credit you think you deserve or earned?

 

No "Colonel", I'm angry because you explicitly claimed that nobody had stated something (suggesting that everyone else in the thread was perhaps a little less enlightened than you), when in fact I had clearly stated it in the third post.

 

If you are going to make money with this then you are best off getting up early and being ready before the open.

 

No need to get up early, I live in the UK. Nor do I understand references to "the Bush league team" :)

 

My point still stands, "Colonel" - you made a claim that was incorrect regarding the contents of previous posts in the thread, and you claimed that certain data was not available for backtesting when in fact it is.

 

Now when are you going to admit that you made two incorrect statements in your last post?

 

 

BlueHorseshoe

Edited by MadMarketScientist
language

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Finally! Someone that's actually studied this subject! Thank you.

Price normally moves counter-intuitively to the sum of the bid ask info.

 

The value of this information is not in predicting price movement, it's in knowing relative liquidity around the prices you trade.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The value of this information is not in predicting price movement, it's in knowing relative liquidity around the prices you trade.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

What is gained by learning/knowing the relative liquidity?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not BlueHorseshoe but I try to bring my own answer.

 

Price moves because there is an imbalance between:

- demand of liquidity (market orders)

- supply of liquidity (limit orders).

 

For instance, if there is more BUY market orders coming in the market than the numbers of limit SELL orders waiting in first level of the DOM, all this first level of the DOM will be "eaten", and price will increase by one tick.

 

So liquidity is key. Because it is the basis of price movement.

 

Just my opinion.

 

Nicolas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What is gained by learning/knowing the relative liquidity?

 

Understanding liquidity around a price means that you can make better judgements about how to execute your own orders and, depending on your goals, whether to execute orders.

 

Coming from you, I'm assuming that you're asking this question for the benefit of others?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Understanding liquidity around a price means that you can make better judgements about how to execute your own orders and, depending on your goals, whether to execute orders.

 

Coming from you, I'm assuming that you're asking this question for the benefit of others?

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I really wanted to know what you used it for.

 

I try to estimate what traders may do next which means , no matter how I slice it, I am trying to estimate or predict behavior and determine if that is what I need to happen next or if it ok for it to happen next, given a particular trade I am in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I really wanted to know what you used it for.

 

I try to estimate what traders may do next which means , no matter how I slice it, I am trying to estimate or predict behavior and determine if that is what I need to happen next or if it ok for it to happen next, given a particular trade I am in.

 

My apologies, MightyMouse - you caught me in a bad mood there!

 

I am currently working through a series of questions relating to liquidity, orderflow, position in queue, and efficient execution. I haven't made use of any of this in my trading before as I traded from daily charts and found that execution had a fairly negligble impact. I'm now considering day-trading strategies, where I have become convinced that a thorough understanding of all the above would be very helpful indeed.

 

If you want a specific example of how then I'll provide one.

 

Hope that answers your question.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ZDO

 

Can you describe the tests you ran and the results you found as they would be helpful to me.

thanks

 

No lag time response... whew - almost missed this question forever...answer won't be of much help either :)

 

Generally, backtesting was done on various bhvrs of the cells coming into price pivots.

It got very number crunchy... in the ES well over 2000 stack instances had to be included coming into a pivot... later tweaked around with some GA and a few other things ... but generally... with the raw numbers - Nothing reliable was found

 

Around this whole topic ... using the book is a skill that can be developed. Much like tape reading though it takes a certain type of mental aptitude (ie savant like strangeness ;)) to be able to scan it day in and day out and know when to act, etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When ES is rising on the TF greater than my trading frame, I wait for a pullback and then enter on rising momentum when the price breaks out of the pullback/congestion.

Also, I dredge up the supply /demand zones and these add weight to the pullbacks as price enters these zones.

Given that a lot of traders are doing the same thing, I wonder if better knowledge of ask-bid on my part would give me an edge or just give me a headache.

 

Hi Horace,

 

You're correct in thinking that there will be a lot of traders doing the same thing. I'm currently reading "Street Smarts", which is rather an old book now, and that contains strategies such as 'the Anti' which aim to exploit exactly what you describe.

 

Here is an idea that may be useful to you that might allow you to improve the profitability of your approach without worrying about the bid-ask. This is especially relevant if you're trading the ES, as it often struggles to produce sustained moves, even when the pattern you describe works perfectly.

 

Rather than wait for price to break out of the congestion (ie a reconfirmation of the original trend), establish a position as the pullback occurs. Buy the pullback; not the breakout that follows it. Sometimes this will mean that there is an adverse excursion after you have entered a position, but your actual fill price is unlikely to be worse than it would if you seek a confirmation breakout move, and sometimes it will be better.

 

I've attached a chart showing what I mean.

 

I hope that suggestion is of some help to you.

 

BHS is there an algo available for what you are suggesting that reads dtn IQ data

 

Not that I'm aware of, but you could easily program one, or pay someone to program one for you, or ask someone on the forum who can program for your platform very, very nicely if they would do it for free. I've had absolutely shed loads of free help from people on TL with programming queries, and what you're after isn't very complicated to produce.

 

BlueHorseshoe

5aa711345a2b3_PullbackEntry.thumb.gif.b84eea299465e69aa437fabb7d808d30.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... Price moves because there is an imbalance between:

- demand of liquidity (market orders)

- supply of liquidity (limit orders).

 

For instance, if there is more BUY market orders coming in the market than the numbers of limit SELL orders waiting in first level of the DOM, all this first level of the DOM will be "eaten", and price will increase by one tick....

 

 

Well put! I’ve been hitting at this here and there lately – in my experience, far more traction is available in understanding market order flow than is available in understanding (appearing and disappearing) stacks of standing orders

 

ie and roughly

market order flows help me to work price movement

other types of / limit order flows help me to work price stability

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
    • META stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 507.48, 557.84 at https://stockconsultant.com/?META
    • TMUS T-Mobile stock, watch for a top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?TMUS
    • KULR KULR Technology stock watch, pullback to 1.25 triple support area with bullish indicators at https://stockconsultant.com/?KULR
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.