Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

GlassOnion

Are New Traders Who Are Successful Hated ?

Recommended Posts

  BlueHorseshoe said:
You'll find something like that here:

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/day-trading-scalping/13811-daytraders-do-you-know-your-enemy.html

 

I don't pretend to be any kind of an expert on these things - I'm just slowly trying to piece together a picture of how they operate within this thread.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Thanks mate. Will see you over there on that thread too.

 

Richard

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Ingot54 said:
IFurther, you need to understand that you are embarking on a journey that potentially can destroy your family life, and estrange you from many of the things you currently enjoy - including your health.

 

This is impossible. In six months, this is either working for me, or I pull the plug. Let's call it a "stop loss" on my pursuit of trading in stocks as a profession. Now, if in six months this isn't working, and instead of stopping I decide that I am going to drag this out for six years, then yes, all of the above could possibly come to pass. But it would be irresponsible of me, and in my opinion, plain crazy of me to continue to bang my head obsessively against the wall insisting that I was going to "make it as a trader" in spite of clear and compelling evidence to the contrary. This message board community seems to be populated by a good number of such "head-bangers."

 

I appreciate the time and effort you put into your response to me. I would respectfully point out that many of the issues you raise are non-issues for me and were covered in earlier posts of mine, e.g. I am my own boss, and I haven't had a boss since the last one fired me when I was eighteen. That was 26 years ago and I was 18.

 

Based upon your post, I could say to you the same thing to you that I said to another individual who responded to me yesterday:

 

  40draws said:
That statement of yours indicates to me that your experience and your approach to this businesss, and probably your view of life generally, is vastly different from my own. [The concerns raised in your response] are foreign to the manner in which I have approached and structured my study. Such a difference likely will lead to a vastly different result.

 

I'm not passing judgement. I am just noting a difference between us that strongly implies to me that if it were possible to graph your journey and my own from a common temporal beginning, our paths would almost immediately, and necessarily, diverge.

 

I thank you for your concern. But I think that your response is perhaps better intended for you and your situation, rather than mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  40draws said:
This is impossible. In six months, this is either working for me, or I pull the plug ...

This message board community seems to be populated by a good number of such

"head-bangers."

 

I appreciate the time and effort you put into your response to me. I would respectfully

point out that many of the issues you raise are non-issues for me and were covered in

earlier posts of mine ...

 

Based upon your post, I could say to you the same thing to you that I said to another

individual ...

 

I thank you for your concern. But I think that your response is perhaps better intended

for you and your situation, rather than mine.

Cheers, 40draws.

 

My situation isn't that I am a head-banger ... and you didn't say I was - just that the

forum has a good number of them. Quite an insight for a novice trader.

 

I am beginning to form a view here, that perhaps you have been involved in trading

before, despite your assertion that your response is relatively a new thing. You certainly

have a pretty good grip on how to handle yourself in terms of trading terminology, and

somehow, quite early in the piece you have sifted through all of the thousands of

market strategies and come up with the Wyckoff approach. That in itself is an amazing

insight, normally the discovery of a more experienced and mature trader, than that of a

complete novice.

 

Some of the attitudes you espouse are normally reserved for those who have done

their time in the markets. I wouldn't be at all surprised if you turn out to become a very

highly successful Wyckoff trader.

 

If you haven't been involved in attempting to trade before, then it seems you may have

a natural head-start on the head bangers. Your forum etiquette, for a start, is well-oiled,

and you handle yourself well, as well as managing your detractors skilfully.

 

My own situation is that I wanted something that would enable me to make the

transition from a working life, to something that would provide a cash flow in my

coming non-working life. I never had a wealth/trading for a living goal, and I am not

interested in time-based goals.

 

To that end I remain a student ... and have not set a time deadline for myself. The

deadline I have set is when I feel I have exhausted all of my opportunities to learn, and

that hasn't happened yet. On the contrary, as I am trading better than break even now, I

look forward to raising my position size, reducing risk, and improving my reward:risk.

 

I expect this process to endure, and my bottom line to mature.

 

It is good for you to be putting all of this in print - it will be sobering indeed for you ... or

the readers ... or both ... in days to come. I have a feeling you will be posting your

success, rather than your farewell. I'd be surprised if you are not already successful,

and the next 140 days will be nothing short of a delight.

 

Thanks for bringing us along with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote
My situation isn't that I am a head-banger ... and you didn't say I was - just that the

forum has a good number of them. Quite an insight for a novice trader.

 

I wonder whether I am a "head-banger"? The problem is that "successful" isn't really a measured outcome. If you mean being able to turn a very modest but consistenet profit trading a limited number of markets in a limited style, then I am not a head-banger. If you mean having drawdowns and a risk profile that I am not really comfortable with, and then constantly searching for ways to improve these, then I most certainly am a head-banger. And it's been two-and-a-half years now . . . Please can someone tell me whether I should continue or quit? :)

 

Rather than just saying "successful", mightn't it be more helpful to have in mind a specific goal? Also, could a learning goal be more helpful than a profit goal? What if you reached the end of six months and hadn't made any money, but towards the end you felt you had gained several specific insights that would enable you to make great progress in your trading if you were to continue? At the end of six months I would be more interested in knowing what definite progress you have made than what your P&L shows.

 

  Quote
Your forum etiquette, for a start, is well-oiled,

and you handle yourself well, as well as managing your detractors skilfully.

 

I did a bit of a double-take myself when I first read 40Draws posts. More than just etiquette, there's a manifest lack of ego at play - this is always very refreshing on TL! As far as trading psychology goes, it will probably be of great service to 40Draws.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  GlassOnion said:
I read a lot of stories on here about how people had to go through this long, torturous process to become successful at trading Forex. It's so common that it almost seems like there's a union mentality about the whole thing. You know, the whole "you gotta pay your dues" and "you gotta get crapped on a lot before being successful" type of thinking. You can see written in between the lines of what people post here.

 

If someone was successful right out of the gate, I have to wonder if they should just keep it to themselves. My guess is that those who have already made up their minds that nobody can go from zero to making a living at this game in 6 months would call someone a liar who decided to share their success after actually pulling it off. After all, it's natural human psychology to tear down what something that doesn't jive with one's pre-conceived notions than to challenge their one's own beliefs.

 

nobody hates you. they either don't believe you, or they believe you, but simply know that 6 months is simply not nearly enough time to prove that one can make a living trading, regardless of method or knowledge or strategy or plan. Unless of course you've made enough to retire on for life in that 6 months. in which case, congratulations!

 

however, if you continue this for several more years, bought a house, a car or two, done some travel, maybe made a few investments outside the market with your profits....

ya, then most who you meet will not hate, but possibly admire or even envy you. and then you can tell them you made money right off the bat. and you'll be all the more special for it.

 

i do wish you much continued success however.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  karoshiman said:
..........

It has been difficult for me, as it took me some time to build a customized method which meets my risk/return parameters, in which I believe 100% and which suits my personality best. There is so much BS out there, as you have already mentioned. And in fact, like BlueHorseShoe mentioned, in today's world, there is actually too much information, so that it's difficult for a newbie to distinguish good from bad......

 

Your discontent is helping you get at the heart of the confusion. The greatest inspirations come from 'unlearning' what you think is correct. Trying to navigate through the oceans of available knowledge to find 'right knowledge' is difficult. Take the easy way: intuition, common sense, etc. You can save yourself a lot of time and effort tapping into the wisdom of others and more importantly, yourself.

 

To quote from Jed McKenna's Notebook: "The truth is always simple, and never lends itself to any debate or interpretation."

 

  40draws said:
........

"Read all the books": I've read twenty-six books, or about 4.25/week. Most of these are pretty quick reads, well-written, and thus easily and quickly understood. If a book was not easily understood, if it was poorly written, or if I found myself struggling to make sense of it, I closed it and never looked back. At least six books fit that criteria, so technically I read twenty or so books, and started but failed to finish six or so. I'm about done with the books,...................

+1. Emphasis added.

  BlueHorseshoe said:
I wonder whether I am a "head-banger"? The problem is that "successful" isn't really a measured outcome. If you mean being able to turn a very modest but consistenet profit trading a limited number of markets in a limited style, then I am not a head-banger. If you mean having drawdowns and a risk profile that I am not really comfortable with, and then constantly searching for ways to improve these, then I most certainly am a head-banger. And it's been two-and-a-half years now . . . Please can someone tell me whether I should continue or quit? :)

 

Rather than just saying "successful", mightn't it be more helpful to have in mind a specific goal? Also, could a learning goal be more helpful than a profit goal? What if you reached the end of six months and hadn't made any money, but towards the end you felt you had gained several specific insights that would enable you to make great progress in your trading if you were to continue? At the end of six months I would be more interested in knowing what definite progress you have made than what your P&L shows.

......

 

People asking abstract questions but expecting concrete answers. Blue is correct in wanting a clearer (more solid definition) of things like success. And I can concur that profit goal may not be the only attainable goals here, although for most speculative traders it is (or in my opinion should be) one of the primary factors that is used to evaluate the effectiveness of a trading system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Ingot54 said:
Quite an insight for a novice trader ... I am beginning to form a view here, that perhaps you have been involved in trading before ... despite your assertion that your response is relatively a new thing. You certainly have a pretty good grip on how to handle yourself in terms of trading terminology, and somehow, quite early in the piece you have sifted through all of the thousands of market strategies and come up with the Wyckoff approach. That in itself is an amazing insight, normally the discovery of a more experienced and mature trader, than that of a complete novice.

 

 

As I said, my interest in day trading was sparked by a chance viewing of an early morning infomercial for a day trading school. I actually contacted the school, and my conversation with the admissions counselor left me with two take aways. First, he was trying hard to sell me, and I do not respond well to the hard sell. Second, from his pitch, it became apparent that learning to "read the tape" was, according to his pitch, the critical skill component of learning to trade.

 

A google search of "tape reading" and "reading the tape," and a little discernment applied to what I was reading as I investigated the results quickly acquainted me with Wyckoff and Neill. You would I agree, I suppose, that one cannot immerse oneself in the study of a field and not quickly come to terms with the vocabulary of its participants. Less than two months ago, I was vaguely aware of "ticker tape," mostly as it related to parades. I have a much more comprehensive view of "the tape" now than I did then. Much of that has to do with the fact that I in addition to Wyckoff and Neill and Raschke, I also read a few basic textbooks on the financial markets. I knew nothing when I started. More importantly, I knew that I knew nothing and that I needed to learn what these financial markets were about before I started to engage them on an active basis.

 

As far as having "sifted through thousands of market strategies," I have really explored only one - the one that was my first introduction to this business: "Learning how to read the tape." I have encountered other systems in my reading. I have been fortunate in that I read everything with a eye toward how does it relate to what I have learned about price movement and volume.

 

I have indeed been invested in the markets for quite some time. I have Keogh accounts as well as non-retirement savings that have been invested in mutual funds for some years. As a matter of fact, my recently funded trading account began as a $60,000 investment with a Merrill Lynch broker in a group of diversified mutual funds over 13 years ago. In 13 years, that $60,000 had "grown" to $58,155.29. So I am not new to being a market participant. I am new to be an active and informed participant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@40draws >...As a matter of fact, my recently funded trading account began as a $60,000 investment with a Merrill Lynch broker in a group of diversified mutual funds over 13 years ago. In 13 years, that $60,000 had "grown" to $58,155.29. So I am not new to being a market participant. I am new to be an active and informed participant.<

 

A great example of the wonders of 'buy and hold', thanks.

 

I like many others have lost significant sums of retirement money through so-called safe and conservative mutual funds. Thanks to the corrupt banking 'pros' of course. That's what drove me to trade for myself earlier this year. A monkey could have done a better job of investing, assuming 50/50 choices, than my 'personal wealth' advisors. Have what's left in cash at the moment and it's earning more than the last few years by going nowhere. What a joke.

 

Wishing you and all the greatest success.

 

Richard

Hong Kong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.