Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Tasuki

TICK Flat Price Rises How Do They Do This?

Recommended Posts

This is a painfully simple question---price rises, TICK (advancing issues minues declining issues) remains flat. How do they do this? If price is going up, you'd think there would be more buyers than sellers, which you'd thnk (well, I would think) would mean that there were more advancing issues than declining issues, so the $TICK should go up as price goes up. But it doesn't always work that way, strangely. So, how come price is rising but there are no more buyers than sellers? The more general way of stating this question would be---why does the $TICK sometimes give false signals?

Thanks, Tasuki

5aa7112552491_howdotheydothis.thumb.png.b8ef9f4cda6d52d08d95a5ccefd3c0d4.png

Edited by Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

There are various possible answers to your question . . .

 

  1. Firstly, what 'price' are you talking about? You seem to be charting the ES. The ES/S&Ps track 500 stocks, whereas the $TICK symbol tracks, if I remember rightly, over 3000 stocks - pretty much everything that trades on the NYSE in fact. There is no real reason to expect on to perfectly follow the other.
     
  2. Looking at your chart, I'm not sure if your question is more literal? The $TICK is an aggregate of said stocks; therefore it is banded (rather like an oscillator such as the stochastic or RSI). The maximum value that it could possibly assume would be that of all the stocks it contains (so something like 3000). Similarly it has a minimum value. The ES doesn't have a maximum value (though it does have a minimum). Remember, the $TICK is just the number of stocks that are ticking up or down, not how much they're up or down by - the market obviously reflects how much they're up or down by.
     
  3. There are other complications connected to how the $TICK is calculated, but I can't remember them. There was a great Steenbarger blog post on TraderFeed about the $TICK though - try googling for it?

Finally, I'd be very careful about how you use the $TICK in your trading - I've tried to build all sorts of strategies around it and never found anything that showed much of an edge.

 

Hope that helps,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tasuki said:
This is a painfully simple question---price rises, TICK (advancing issues minues declining issues) remains flat. How do they do this? If price is going up, you'd think there would be more buyers than sellers, which you'd thnk (well, I would think) would mean that there were more advancing issues than declining issues, so the $TICK should go up as price goes up. But it doesn't always work that way, strangely. So, how come price is rising but there are no more buyers than sellers? The more general way of stating this question would be---why does the $TICK sometimes give false signals?

Thanks, Tasuki

 

Your chart does not correlate with your question. The $TICK in your chart is not flat. In fact, it moves ABOVE and BELOW (back n forth) to the zero. In fact, I measured, the $TICK had more ticks ABOVE the zero line that correlates to your rising blue trendline you've drawn along the higher price lows on your chart. To be exact, since 1155hr on your chart, the $TICK spent 2.5x more above the zero line than below the zero line.

 

Simply, it seems like you're having problems visually comparing the $TICK subgraph to the price chart that's above it.

 

By the way, I trade the Emini futures too. The $TICK is great to help with price direction analysis. For example, if the $TICK spent most of its time ABOVE the zero line...I would ignore any Short signal I got and instead concentrate on any Long signal that may appear. Yet, I don't use the $TICK for trade signals. I tried and couldn't find any usefulness that way except for using it for price direction analysis as mentioned.

Edited by wrbtrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:

Finally, I'd be very careful about how you use the $TICK in your trading - I've tried to build all sorts of strategies around it and never found anything that showed much of an edge.

 

 

So did I. Stopped wasting time after a while. Probably no algorithmic strategy possible with it. It maybe helpful in discretionary, if somebody finds it useful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  ns6 said:
So did I. Stopped wasting time after a while. Probably no algorithmic strategy possible with it. It maybe helpful in discretionary, if somebody finds it useful.

 

I treat it like an oscillator and use divergences which are quite reliable to signal the end of a trend and the start of a new one

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No sure if this helps at this point but as mentioned above $TICK is based on a different basket of underlying stocks than the ES contract. In Tradestation, the $TIKSP is similar to the $TICK but it is baed on the 500 stocks comprising the S&P 500 (same as the ES contract). I used to only watch the $TICK, now I watch both. Many times they move in unison but many times they do not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bakrob99 said:
I treat it like an oscillator and use divergences which are quite reliable to signal the end of a trend and the start of a new one

 

That's mostly how I use the TICK myself. If I suspect that a new trend is starting but the TICK remains bearish, I won't attempt a long. This is why I was so surprised to see the TICK not rising as price rose (see my chart). However, as wrbtrader pointed out, the TICK did spend most of its time above zero---I was just expecting it to rise along with price (it does, sometimes), and as Bluehorseshoe noted, the correlation between the ES and the TICK is weak at best, so I was expecting too close of a correlation.

 

Thanks to everyone for your fine critiques of my query.

 

Tasuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote
why does the $TICK sometimes give false signals?

The implied strategy is trying to exploit something that isn't an edge in it's present formulation.

 

  Quote
correlation between the ES and the TICK is weak at best

The ability to discern strong correlation in weak data is a viable skill well worth the effort it takes to acquire.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:

 

 

Finally, I'd be very careful about how you use the $TICK in your trading - I've tried to build all sorts of strategies around it and never found anything that showed much of an edge.

 

Hope that helps,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Really? how about in a "trendless" or "ranging" or "choppy" day, the ES makes a new high, but the TICK and the NQ fail to make a new high... it's a pretty darn good signal to short the ES. If it's the NQ that makes a new high, but both the ES and the TICK fail to make a new high, then short the NQ. One can often pick the high or low of the day this way (regular trading session of course).

 

It doens't work if you have a very strong move that day, either up or down. But in ranging or otherwise trendless conditions, it works great. I imagine one could use an ATR calculation to determine if it's a range expansion day, as well as maybe wait to trade such strategies until after the first hour establishes market tone, and don't trade if it's been a very obvious bullish or bearish first hour, but...yea, i actually used it just the other day in fact.

 

Oh, combine with the TRIN as well for better signals. Trin above 1.1, Tick fails to make a new high, ES makes a new high, short it. TRIN below 0.9, TICK fails to make a new low, ES makes a new low, go long, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's true that the $TICK is not perfectly correlated with price moves. I have not found anything that is perfectly correlated with price moves. Here are some Tradestation ticker symbols:

 

  • $TICK - NYSE all stocks
  • $TCKSP - SP500
  • $TICKC - Composite $TICK across different exchanges
  • $TIKI - DOW stocks

 

  • $ADVI - DOW Advancing Issues
  • $DECLI - DOW Declining Issues
  • $ADV - NYSE Advancing Issues
  • $DECL - NYSE Declining Issues

 

  • $UVOL - NYSE Up Volume
  • $DVOL - NYSE Down Volume
  • $UVOLSP - SP Up Volume
  • $DVOLSP - SP Down Volume
  • $UVOLI - Dow Up Volume
  • $DVOLI - DOW Down Volume
  • $AUVOLI - Dow Alternative Up Volume
  • $ADVOLI - DOW Alternative Down Volume

 

There is also data for AMEX, NASDAQ, Russell, SP400, ARCX, OPRA.

 

As far as using the $TICK, or any of the internals data as indicators, it's not just a matter of simple divergences. There could be a higher $TICK high at a peak, instead of a lower $TICK high, but a lower CLOSE on the $TICK at the peak. There could be a higher $TICK high, but a divergence on the Advance/Decline. There are many possible combinations. There are patterns that are reliable. A decision also needs to be made about what might take priority. If there is a huge divergence on volume, I might use that as the most valid signal.

 

Here is an example of a VOL divergence today. The DOW volume has just gone positive, and had a higher low, the price of the YM went lower. Right at that point, at 11:15am the price of the YM goes into an uptrend.

 

So there is a divergence. Price went lower, DOW volume did not go lower.

5aa711442a108_DOWVolDiverge.thumb.jpg.acd6145e07cb511e358e6542794467cd.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.