Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

madspeculator

If I Were to Develop a Trading System Today .....

Recommended Posts

Numerous books, websites, and “trading gurus” [correctly] prophesize the relationship between trading profits and trading plans. Although they all clearly and eloquently list the ingredients of a trading system: Risk Management, Exit, Entry, etc., there is no article that this author is aware of which talks about HOW (i.e., the process) to develop a system and the areas where one should focus when performing ORIGINAL research or where existing indicators might fit within the grand scheme of things.

 

This article is an attempt to fill that void. The author wishes he had access to such an article when he was a noob many many years ago. For a seasoned trader, everything in this article will be obvious, for she has internalized all these steps. However, for those struggling traders and noobs, this information might be beneficial.

 

Note: To this author, a trading “system” or a trading “plan” are synonymous. Hence the words “plan” and “system” will be used interchangeably.

 

Bias: We are all speculators. Unlike hedgers, our reason to engage with the market is based on our opinion of the market -- for outright traders it is our opinion on market direction; for options traders it could be market direction or lack there of, or volatility; for spreaders it is the direction of the spreads. Our opinion or bias can be derived from fundamental analysis, technical analysis or a hybrid of both.

 

Note: The definition of technical analysis is debatable with the “holier than thou” quants insisting that mathematical models based on price-action and/or volume are NOT technical analysis. However, according to this author, anything that is not fundamental analysis IS technical analysis and that is the definition used in this article. This author practices technical analysis as per the above definition even though he uses mathematical models based on hetrodox economic theory.

 

All trades should be motivated by a trader’s bias. Hence, the first order of business when developing a trading plan is to objectively measure a trader’s market bias. Numerous indicators exist that provide a basis for a trader to establish her bias. Should the trader not be happy with any existing indicator, then the trader should develop indicators to objectively measure her market bias.

 

The identification of Bias can be dynamic (i.e., identified as the market evolves) or static (i.e, based on previous price action). The complexity increases as one moves from static to dynamic identification.

 

Practical Note for noob: The old trading adage “Trend is your friend” is very true. However, should you decide to engage in original research, don’t limit yourself to identification of “trend”. This author trades outrights based on the author’s bias on price volatility and volume distribution.

 

Stop, and Exit: Once you have identified your market bias, you need to identify the following:

  1. Stop area;

  2. Exit Criteria;

 

The easiest of these areas to identify is the Stop area, yet many noobs and poorly capitalized traders choose a “bad” stop area only to see their other wise good trade prematurely stopped out. The key to selecting a “good” Stop area is to select a support/resistance that is properly formed and is visible to a higher time frame. A noob should reread the previous sentence and reflect on it: think why that is important. Such a selection of Stop area would allow for a smaller position size than a trader would want but it will prevent premature exits. As a trader gains experience in understanding market dynamics, she will seldom let price reach the Stop area.

 

The identification of Exit Criteria defines you as a trader. This is the reason why one finds numerous articles and books on entries and not much information on exits. Research exits based on your tolerance and personality. You will note that the author has mentioned Exits not as a “area” but as a “criteria” (unlike entry and stops which are “areas”), and the author has used plural (criteria) instead of singular (criterion). The noob would be wise to spend a lot of his time researching exit criteria.

 

Risk Management:

Numerous good books and articles are available on risk management. So the author will not rehash the same information here. However, this author suggests the following methodology for risk management:

 

  1. Identify the amount of capital you want to risk per trade, x% (usually all good risk management books tell you a percentage between 1 and 3. It is up to the trader but understanding the reasoning, based on principles of probability, for suggesting such risk capital is vital);

  2. Fix the position size you want to trade (as a noob,
    do not
    calculate position size based on entry price and stop area. Always fix your position size up front).

  3. Based on the Stop Area calculate your Entry Area.

 

Entry Area:

Entry areas are NOT entry “setups”. This is the area where a trader should contemplate an entry should price reach this point/area. Too many noobs spend inordinate amount of time exploring entry “setups” without understanding when those “setups” might work.

 

If, based on the market dynamics, the trader expects to get an entry better than the entry at Entry Area, she might at her discretion do so. Doing so will not only requires experience in understanding market dynamics but also lower the risk per trade.

 

According to this author, there are three take aways about entry:

 

  1. Only enter trades in concert with one’s market Bias;

  2. Patiently wait for price to approach the Entry Area;

  3. Do not spend time researching entry “setups”.

 

Note on Trade Management:

 

All the books a trader might have studied and the countless hours she might have spent in front of the screen to understand market dynamics should be used NOT to come up with an entry “set up” but to manage the trade once entered.

 

Most of the time, if the entry is aligned with one’s market bias, and if such market bias is the view held by majority, the trade will work. When that happens the trader might take some heat, but the trade will eventually be a winner. However, there will be times when one’s market bias is not the view held by majority or the market bias changes due to changes in market conditions. These are the times when one will have to manage one’s trade. A trader will not know before hand of such changes, but as a noob gains experience in gauging market dynamics she will be able to detect such changes.

 

Note on Trading Psychology:

 

Do not fall for the hyperbole that “fear” stifles traders and hence it requires consultations with Trading Coaches/Psychologists. Trading coaches who advertise based on such “fear” are not being forthright.

 

Fear of trading can arise due to a lack of confidence in the trading system. Such fear can only be mitigated if one makes the trading system her “own”. The only way to do it is to UNDERSTAND one’s trading system -- why it works, when it is expected to fail, etc. The easiest way to understand YOUR trading system is for YOU to build or re-build it!!!! No psychologist can help a trader here.

 

Fear of trading can also arise due to the human tendency of risk aversion. As humans we are very bad in making decisions under uncertainty (assessing probabilities) and make very predictable mistakes. A way to overcome this fear is understand the theory of probability and decision making under uncertainty. There are a lot of books on this topic which might be of help (look up the works of Tversky & Kahneman; the author found the books by Mark Douglas insightful. The author has no affiliations with any of the mentioned authors). If you needs help in this area, you should seek help but before you do so please ask yourself if you REALLY want to be a trader. Trading is NOT for everyone.

 

Final Note:

 

Once a trading system is found to have a positive expectation based on backtests, the trader using that system must become an execution machine: for the edge in that system is only as good as the trader’s discipline to execute that plan. Even better, a trader should strive to automate her system if possible.

 

 

Short Summary:

 

If the author were to start all over again with the knowledge he has gathered over time, he will conduct original research or use existing indicators to:

 

  1. Measure Bias;

  2. Devise Exit Criteria; and

  3. Understand market dynamics so as to manage trades better.

 

He wouldn’t have spent ages trying to come up with the “best” entry setup or trying to understand market dynamics to get a “good” entry.

 

“Learn all you can from the mistakes of others.* You won't have time to make them all yourself.”
* ~Alfred Sheinwold

 

Good trading!

 

-MadSpeculator.

Edited by madspeculator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.