Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

2012 Summer Olympics

Recommended Posts

Here at Traderslaboratory we have a good representation of many countries around the world.

It's natural to assume that most people like seeing their home country win.

What I would like to know, is if there is any particular team, or athlete, from your home country that you would like to see do well?

 

Me, I would like to see Anna Tunnicliffe, ( Sailing Team ), and the women's soccer, ahh, I mean Futbol team do well. aside from that I always follow Track and Field, did a bit of running in school.

 

Who are you cheering for ?

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

olympic.jpg.20027ed8c75b4363e030b5a460001a99.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here at Traderslaboratory we have a good representation of many countries around the world.

It's natural to assume that most people like seeing their home country win.

What I would like to know, is if there is any particular team, or athlete, from your home country that you would like to see do well?

 

Me, I would like to see Anna Tunnicliffe, ( Sailing Team ), and the women's soccer, ahh, I mean Futbol team do well. aside from that I always follow Track and Field, did a bit of running in school.

 

Who are you cheering for ?

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I'm not cheering for anyone.

 

Massive areas of the north of England are depressed, god-forsaken, post-industrial wastelands - the expenditure on three weeks of people in London chasing balls, throwing sticks and things around, and splashing about in over-chlorinated water is completely unjustifiable in my opinion. If only this money could have been spent on genuine regeneration . . . It's exactly the same sort of mindset that led to subprime - spend the money on having a good time now rather than think ahead.

 

Not that I want to be a killjoy or anything!

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not taking sides, however.....

The Olympics Will Lose London Tourism Money - Forbes

 

I have zero interest in the hype and ceremony and shudder at the organisational skills that will accompany the events. (A taxi driver told my partner that the olympic organisers sent out forms to them telling them "to avoid disruptions and minimise issues during the games, ideally you should try and work from home"), but i do think like ANY project good can come from it, and if money is spent wisely then who knows, maybe it will be ok. (has anyone asked what happens to the planes that are shot down over London by the missles on the buildings roofs over here??) ;)

 

Otherwise, I managed to snag some tickets to the boxing (courtesy a friend), and will be supporting the paralympians instead, I will likely watch it in the back ground but that is it. (very un Australian not to be a rabid sports follower, but seriously how many atheltics events do you watch in between the 4 years - prefer other sports)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
not taking sides, however.....

The Olympics Will Lose London Tourism Money - Forbes

 

I have zero interest in the hype and ceremony and shudder at the organisational skills that will accompany the events. (A taxi driver told my partner that the olympic organisers sent out forms to them telling them "to avoid disruptions and minimise issues during the games, ideally you should try and work from home"), but i do think like ANY project good can come from it, and if money is spent wisely then who knows, maybe it will be ok. (has anyone asked what happens to the planes that are shot down over London by the missles on the buildings roofs over here??) ;)

 

Otherwise, I managed to snag some tickets to the boxing (courtesy a friend), and will be supporting the paralympians instead, I will likely watch it in the back ground but that is it. (very un Australian not to be a rabid sports follower, but seriously how many atheltics events do you watch in between the 4 years - prefer other sports)

 

 

Between the 4 years . . hmmm.

 

Occasional Formula 1

 

Isle of Mann TT

 

The America's Cup ( once every 4 years ).

 

And . . . . if the Yankee's make the Series.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have zero interest in the hype and ceremony and shudder at the organisational skills that will accompany the events. (A taxi driver told my partner that the olympic organisers sent out forms to them telling them "to avoid disruptions and minimise issues during the games, ideally you should try and work from home"),

 

Hahaha! According to the organisers Joe Allen is also English (Welsh international footballer playing for 'Team GB'). Plus they have already insulted the North Koreans by using the South Korean flag! Unbelievable. Still, Mitt Romney called Ed Miliband "Mr Leader". Dumbass. (I know technically he's the leader of the opposition, but nobody else wanted the job!)

 

Anyway, I hope 'Team GB' does well. I won't particularly follow it but I might watch a bit here and there. In spite of other comments, I think it is a good thing to have the olympics. I know it's expensive and a big disruption, but also it gives people a bit of pride (or shames them into doing things better) and inspires many especially young people. Maybe Mystic should arrange a "trading olympics" instead of the standard forex comp. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I watched the Opening Ceremony on TV on Friday night.:offtopic: It was great.

As neither Golf, or Cricket, are Olympic sports I have only a passing interest.

I do support Rodger Federer.

Now I ask myself. How can I make some money from the Olympics?

Will the pound go up?

In 2010, while the rest of the world economies were suffering, South Africa was very active staging the Soccer World Cup.There was no recession.

And suddenly it was over and the market collapsed.

I think the same will happen to Britain.

I expect some strength in the pound from early August.:2c:Third quarter GDP will improve.

Then be careful. The fourth quarter will be a train smash.And very cold.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The world does not deserve to hold games of any sort. I can't 't avoid watching when it's on TV at work ... and yes I'd be hypocritical if I said I didn't enjoy them.

 

But I can't conscience the spending of this money to run "games" when even one child in the world is starving.

 

Now you can spin that any way you choose - it doesn't affect me.

 

The facts do.

 

While the staging of this feel-good-fest is not a bad thing - it's a great healer of nations and a wonderful psychological circuit-breaker from the tremendous pressures placed on the planet by a handful of financiers who need to brought to heel (but will never be, because the regulator is just as corrupt).

 

But we need to get our priorities right, and be making real progress to clean up the planet in every way, before we can feel good about ouselves.

 

I hope every nation gains from the games, and I hope those who hold an opposite view ... or a more accommodating view to mine ... really enjoy them.

 

Under better circumstances I would too. I'm just not in the mood to celebrate "games" while brothers and sisters suffer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Between the 4 years . . hmmm.

 

Occasional Formula 1

 

Isle of Mann TT

 

The America's Cup ( once every 4 years ).

 

And . . . . if the Yankee's make the Series.

 

but these are not syncronised swimming, archery, athletics, gymnastics and badminton :)

I love when people get hyped about the Olympics and then dont care about the sports.....yesterday watched a bit of gymnastics review - the first time since pre WWII that team GB qualified for the mens gymnastics (or something similar). Home crowd, good team, Olympics - the seats were mainly empty. ...., then walking home last night after being out, as well as being in the pub with some friends before hand....every TV was tuned to the beach volleyball......need I say more :)

 

Plus - Isle of Mann TT - fantastic!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The world does not deserve to hold games of any sort.

 

But I can't conscience the spending of this money to run "games" when even one child in the world is starving.

 

..........

But we need to get our priorities right, and be making real progress to clean up the planet in every way, before we can feel good about ouselves.

 

Under better circumstances I would too. I'm just not in the mood to celebrate "games" while brothers and sisters suffer.

 

so is this about the starving children, the greedy bankers, the fact that people play games and it forms an important part of any countries culture, the waste of money or it might be something that makes people feel good......what a downer ingot (I thought i was bad - welcome back to TL).....I hope you volunteered to help in some horrible places before you decided to start trading :)

 

maybe you could combine them and come up with something like the hunger games, or something like banker throwing to the starving masses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Siuya - good to be back mate.

 

I think though, that you might re-read what I wrote.

 

You are close to misrepresenting what I said - I didn't infer that the games were a bad thing - only that current priorities are back-to-front.

 

You don't play games in front of people why are crying, and to me - apparent ONLY to me - this is not something I would do. Let's bring the poor and starving of the world and give them a front seat. Let's feed them at the same tables as the officials.

 

Because those who are suffering are not in sight, does not make it OK to be celebrating ANYTHING to the extent of these ostentatious games. I other places of the world, austerity is being imposed on people through no fault of their own. In still other places, austerity is all they have ever known.

 

If that is a downer - then too bad - it is also a fact.

 

You selected parts of my post to quote, while leaving other bits out. I would like to say that I am pleased with your choice - those are EXACTLY the parts I wanted to highlight - thank you.

 

By the way - I am unsure that ANY country has EVER made a profit from the games, despite spending billions to stage them. The official figures spin it differently, I am certain. Maybe those billions would make some difference to someone in another place?

 

But as I mentioned - they ARE a good psychological circuit-breaker in the midst of a deteriorating world. And for a few weeks, they do stroke the ego and make a very small percentage of people ecstatically happy.

 

I just can't join in with the "fun." I do spend quite a bit of effort to make a difference, and I have volunteered to help in some horrible places, but that is personal, and no one really gives a toss about it - and rightly so. It doesn't affect them, or add to their bottom line.

 

And of course, the world is all about the bottom line, isn't it?

 

Re your last line:

I hope you volunteered to help in some horrible places before you decided to start trading :)

I could ask you the same thing - when did you volunteer to help in some horrible places? But that's none of my business.

 

China swept millions from their homes to create a showpiece for the 2008 spectacle. Was that "in the spirit of the games"?

 

Games?

 

Anyway - as I am on my own here, and I have rained on a very important parade, I think it prudent for me to desist from further comment.

 

Yes ... I'm back :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

H Ingot,

I dont think Siuya misrepresented anything.It was pretty straight forward.

The Games give the nations of the world a chance to see the big picture, the different cultures,ideas,dress,all sorts of things beside just playing games. And perhaps take back some good to their own country .

At the moment I am watching Womens Hockey. Now this has got to be a waste of TV time. But its my choice. New Zealand v. Australia. Mystic asks us who we are cheering for.I have no preference but the little blond No. 6 in the short black skirt is very nice.

Oh dear ! New Zealand are up 1-0. No wonder you are feeling a bit low.;)

Kind regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
H Ingot,

I dont think Siuya misrepresented anything.It was pretty straight forward.

The Games give the nations of the world a chance to see the big picture, the different cultures,ideas,dress,all sorts of things beside just playing games. And perhaps take back some good to their own country .

At the moment I am watching Womens Hockey. Now this has got to be a waste of TV time. But its my choice. New Zealand v. Australia. Mystic asks us who we are cheering for.I have no preference but the little blond No. 6 in the short black skirt is very nice.

Oh dear ! New Zealand are up 1-0. No wonder you are feeling a bit low.;)

Kind regards

bobc

It's just a loss, Bob ... traders know how to take 'em :)

 

Thanks for lightening me up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway - as I am on my own here, and I have rained on a very important parade, I think it prudent for me to desist from further comment.

 

You're not on your own - a frivolous and self-indulgent waste of money without a doubt.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here at Traderslaboratory we have a good representation of many countries around the world.

It's natural to assume that most people like seeing their home country win.

What I would like to know, is if there is any particular team, or athlete, from your home country that you would like to see do well?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I spent the entire weekend watching the olympic games… I'm feeling a little guilty at accomplishing little else. It's been 100 plus degrees here for the past month, and with no rain, the city smells of hot asphalt… the best place to be is indoors out of the heat. Laying on the couch, nursing a scotch, and watching television… it's not normal weekend fare at my house, but I can slip into that mode with little fuss. I don't follow sports closely enough to have athletes that I would follow, so all the names are new to me and I don't care who wins.

 

Olympics; good or bad?

 

Cities spend millions on the bidding process alone; to host the olympic games costs billions. The host city is on the hook with a schedule and a deadline… cost overruns will escalate the costs by 50%. I find it hard to understand why these cities line up for the chance, but they do. From studies that I've read it's an iffy proposition that the total cost will be recouped by increased economic activity. There are long term benefits to be had, but if poorly planned and/or executed the opportunity may be squandered. The goal of regeneration of depressed areas is a good selling point, but the only true benefit comes with the improvement in infrastructure and access to the area (the sporting facilities usually go underutilized). Business investment will flow into an improved area such as this, but the timeline is uncertain, and it depends on the overall economy and the business cycle.

 

These studies all estimate that hosting the olympic games is a net positive for the host city, but the gains aren't easily quantified and take years to play out. The bottom line is, that all this could've been achieved more efficiently by just spending the money on infrastructure. Often, infrastructure projects never get off the ground and can't be sold politically. The main benefit: it accomplishes a project on a time line, that once started, can't get sidelined for political reasons. Maybe that's good enough reason to host the olympics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.