Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

CType

"Think I Need a Bigger Account"

Recommended Posts

Well I almost hate to ask this, but would like to hear your suggestions nonetheless.

 

In the many books and post I have read, one thing always stands out. "Don't trade with money you can't afford to lose." Not sure I like the idea of losing any money, but I get the idea. I can't afford to lose much so my account is very small. The good news is that I haven't lost my money, the bad news is it's not exactly growing either. The problem is if I apply money management to position sizing the number of shares are so small that just covering commissions can take several days. This makes me think I'll need to break some rules and just take my chances.

 

I could:

1. Increase my risk from 1% to 2% or more.

2. Always buy no less than 100 shares, and just run tight stops.

3. Stop being so cheap and put money I can't afford to lose in the account.

 

Are there any strategies for small accounts? Is there a minimun practicle account size?

I suppose it's really too small for swing trading, but It's going to have to do.

 

Thanks

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget the 1%/2% risk.. it doesn't mean anything without probabilities..

 

Futures are probably better for small accounts.. you need leverage..

 

 

  CType said:
Well I almost hate to ask this, but would like to hear your suggestions nonetheless.

 

In the many books and post I have read, one thing always stands out. "Don't trade with money you can't afford to lose." Not sure I like the idea of losing any money, but I get the idea. I can't afford to lose much so my account is very small. The good news is that I haven't lost my money, the bad news is it's not exactly growing either. The problem is if I apply money management to position sizing the number of shares are so small that just covering commissions can take several days. This makes me think I'll need to break some rules and just take my chances.

 

I could:

1. Increase my risk from 1% to 2% or more.

2. Always buy no less than 100 shares, and just run tight stops.

3. Stop being so cheap and put money I can't afford to lose in the account.

 

Are there any strategies for small accounts? Is there a minimun practicle account size?

I suppose it's really too small for swing trading, but It's going to have to do.

 

Thanks

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You could start putting money aside until you have enough in an account (that you can afford to lose). There will still be plenty of trading opportunities in one or two years time, so there's really no rush. Whereas on the other hand, if you do rush, and in some way overtrade, then you probably won't be able to exploit whatever opportunities exist further down the line.

 

Having said all that, the Predictor's recommendation that you investigate futures is, depending on your trading style, probably a good one.

 

Hope that's helpful,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll go through small accounts trading futures very quickly unless you are very lucky.

No matter how good you are, given the unknowns, there is going to be an element of luck to your trading, because there is an element of luck to everyone's trading. Since you are new, you will likely experience more bad luck than you will good luck as you fumble your way around against traders who have a huge amount more experience than you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  CType said:

The problem is if I apply money management to position sizing the number of shares are so small that just covering commissions can take several days. This makes me think I'll need to break some rules and just take my chances.

 

(below is just my personal opinion and a general rant)

It is a good question Bill, and I think one of the most often abused cons in the industry.

 

the percentage returns quoted on accounts.

 

As mentioned, leverage is what most of these things rely on. And leverage can build an account or destroy it quickly.

Most quoted returns quote it off the minimum margin required to fund a position. Well IMHO that is the only industry that tries this con on.

 

Lets put it in a real life scenario.....

Have you ever seen a bank tell you, make 100%s on your money?

Well if you buy a house for 100,000 with 5% down and the market for houses rises to 200,000 (as the past has shown it can) supposedly your account has grown by 20 times.....

 

Hence dont fall into the trap of thinking every one turns small accounts into big ones.....dont get me wrong - it can be done, however you do need luck, big balls and the reality is its more likely not to work. Like many industries you still need money to make money, and using leverage is another tool if you can get that right.

 

Re your options....These only benefit you IF you get lucky and hit a string of winners early......and are effectively the same thing no matter what you do - you are just using more leverage in all cases as the one thing that does not change is the base amount in the account.....and this is the problem you have..

"

1. Increase my risk from 1% to 2% or more.

2. Always buy no less than 100 shares, and just run tight stops.

3. Stop being so cheap and put money I can't afford to lose in the account. "

 

 

There are spread betting and CFD options available to use, whereby you can modify and tailor make your quantities, alternatively you could take the time, build a proper consistent track record and then be prepared to increase the leverage at a later time.....risk it when everything is n your favour....as it can be done.

 

Here is a question for you to ponder......how do people really make money

the top hedge fund managers who return 25% year on year.....did not become billionaries due to the returns on their own money - they did it because they used other peoples money to get more leverage (with little risk).

(a 1mill account compounding at 25% pa, with no withdrawals (you have to live) gets to about 85mill in 20 years....from memory))

Even for other industries......other business owners either use leverage in terms of capital to buy inventory, plant etc,

some leverage other people to do the work and take a clip.

Very few manage to strike it rich with an app they wrote in their back yard....

 

Leverage can help and destroy.....and no matter how you wish to pretend risk is control one way or the other....this is the key (and tough) issue for small accounts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My 2 Cents: As a beginner (less than 2-3 years experience) you should stay as far away from futures as you can especially if you have a small account. I was in the same situation you find yourself in and I decided to go with Mini Forex and started trading 2-3 lots at a time. I focused only on the best setups and started a journal (you also read that in all the books but almost nobody *hint* actually takes the time). My strategy is very simple I take a small profit after a couple of pips and the rest gets set to breakeven, if it turns into a runner great if not you at least have a small profit if you trade one big future contract you will often see your paper profits fade away which is the one thing I cannot stand in trading. If you consistently trade that way your account will grow in no time but you have to forget about that 1% Risk mumbo-jumbo.. If I see a big opportunity I am willing to risk far more than one percent but if the trade goes against me I would never allow it to actually hit my emergency stop.

 

If you decide to stay with equities than don't focus on the money you are actually making. Just focus on steadily growing your account and building a track record. If you made a couple thousand trades and you are clearly profitable you will get a job at a prop firm and they will happily provide you with enough leverage.

 

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  CType said:
This makes me think I'll need to break some rules and just take my chances.

 

I could:

1. Increase my risk from 1% to 2% or more.

2. Always buy no less than 100 shares, and just run tight stops.

3. Stop being so cheap and put money I can't afford to lose in the account.

 

Are there any strategies for small accounts? Is there a minimun practicle account size?

I suppose it's really too small for swing trading, but It's going to have to do.

 

I have a small account (anything below 25k is small, the first goal should be the day-trading margin requirement) and feel your pain.

 

1. Small account holders trading stocks will find it near impossible to risk 1% if they want to make a profit and include commissions into the calculation. You are likely looking at closer to 3-5% (possibly upto 10%) risk per trade.

 

2. Tight stops means lowering your win:loss ratio as your trade no longer have the proper room to 'breathe'. I would never ever recommend tight stops for the initial trade entry.

 

Two techniques that can help is to either:

(a) place entry/stops a a lower time frame, i.e. trade the daily set entry/stops in the 15 mins or

(b) scale into the trade. Initial half as it goes your way add half while looking for a solid trend run.

 

I personally use (a) with good results.

 

3. Only you can determine if that is psychologically sound. Would you worry so much that you start meddling ? Lose sleep ? Act rashly ?

 

As other posters commented you can also consider leveraging. Options is the next logical step for most stock traders however my favourite credit spreads forces me to take on 9-10% risk per trade.

 

Two other leverage instruments are Forex and Futures. I have a great love for Futures and do very well paper trading a large account but found it near impossible live trading with a small account. At the lowest you are risking $5/tick. It doesn't take much too blow up your account.

 

Instead I now trade Forex on a mini because it gives me finer control over how much risk I want to take. It allows me to scale from a couple of cents per pip to a few dollars.

 

However Forex and Futures are more day trades in comparison to swing trades. To continue swinging options would be the more appropriate instrument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your input.

 

Futures and spread betting (I had to look up spread betting). I don't know anything about either of those so that could be a dangerous path to take, but I'll look into them. The leveraging just has so much downside risk. Meaning I could lose more than I have in the account. That I could lose sleep over.

 

I hadn't thought about buying half on entry, with a proper stop, then adding if it move in my favor. This I will try.

 

Overall it looks like I'm just going to have to add more to it. To limit the anxiety I'll pull the plug if I lose my initial amount.

 

I knew there wasn't going to be an easy answer. Thank you for not throwing me off the bridge for my lack of education.

 

Bill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.