Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Predictor

Exploring Averaging And Hammer Trades

Recommended Posts

Averaging down or simply averaging is the idea that a trader can achieve a better overall price by working orders over time. The basic idea is that it is approximately but not precisely possible to bound price.

 

Averaging does allow a trader to improve their entry and refine it as the market moves against them. However, there is a cost to naive averaging which is that the traders risk increases with the improved position. This large increase in total risk at the worst time is generally why averaging is frowned upon among professional traders.

 

Even so, the benefits to achieving a better cost basis would help many traders. If a trading method could somehow be developed that would allow a trader to improve their cost basis without increasing their directional risk then such a method could form a powerful method for trading. The goal would be to find a method to constantly revise our opinion of value without increasing our directional risk and without the risks of taking realized losses that occur with stop losses.

 

One discretionary method that I developed to achieve this purpose was a method that I called Hammer Trading (or Hedging) which involved trading correlated instruments both long and short at the same time. First, I do not think this method as I originally developed it worked well. It required too much skill and may have appeared to work simply because it kept me in the game longer, working harder. Let me warn you that the technique that I'm sharing is extremely difficult to make work and most would lose if they were to try this method. I caution against it.

 

First, it is assumed that one can predict the market's direction. The method doesn't provide an edge in itself but assumes that one already has an edge.

 

The idea for the hammer trade is that I have a directional bias and enter a normal directional trade. But, imagine the trade starts to go against me. Instead of taking a stop loss, I will take an opposite trade in a correlated instrument. In an ideal world I could just clone the original instrument. The idea is that I can hedge out the directional risk against my open position while booking closed profits. Some say this is the equivalent of being flat, and they have a point. But, my perspective is that at least when it works it allows the trader to improve their entry without increasing the risk. In essence when this technique works, the closed profits offset the open drawdown making it such that even the slightest recovery will result in booking a net profit.

 

This is a great method in theory but remember requires an extreme level of trading performance. I named the technique "hammer trading" because closing out one side results in taking a directional risk on the other side, aka dropping the hammer.

 

Hammer Trading Gotchas

 

Ballooning

There are many things that can go wrong. For example, I may change my overall bias from long to short. This means that I have to change the ratios of my short and long exposures. But, let's say I change my mind again which means I must increase size yet again to get the a directional exposure on the "other side". This overloading can easily lead to an out-of-control phenomena I've termed ballooning. The effect is to increase the risk and make it harder to exit the trade gracefully. Ballooning can be controlled by capping the max size regardless of the delta.

 

Pinning

Pinning occurs when both positions get trapped in a loss. This is a stressful situation even though one rationally knows that one side must yield a profit.

 

Spread Widening

Sometimes the spread between the instruments can widen. On some days, I've seen the NQ/ES spread widen to over 1%. This is a danger because it means that losses on both sides can grow unexpectedly and larger then anticipated.

 

Failed Hammer Drop

The failed hammer drop means that I fail to close out the scalp profits at the proper time. In other words, the original trade starts to work but I wasn't able to get out of the scalp. The hedge loss can grow larger then the original trade if not careful

 

Bad Hammer Drop

The bad hammer drop means dropping the hedge and the trend continuing to run against one. Again, the method is not an edge if my analysis is wrong.

 

Extreme Trends

This method is not as suitable for markets that show strong trends, such as crude oil. The reason for this is that its not possible to book the profits fast enough during strong sustained trend direction.

 

The "Hammer Trading" technique does work beautifully when it works but there are just too many things that can go wrong. The method may work but it doesn't work very well.

 

The concept of averaging does allow one to refine their entry position without the risks of taking realized losses that occur with traditional stop losses. However, the cost of this averaging is the proportional increase of risk. A trading method designed to take advantage of refining ones position without increasing directional risk could form a powerful structure for short term trading. I imagine such a structure would have to involve going long and short multiple instruments such as to achieve a degree of delta neutrality. It would require finding a way of offsetting new long positions with new short positions.

 

-

Curtis

http://themarketpredictor.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.