Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

MadMarketScientist

This Is Why There Are No Jobs in America

Recommended Posts

Awesome article ... MMS

---------------------------

 

I'd like to make you a business offer.

 

Seriously. This is a real offer. In fact, you really can't turn me down, as you'll come to understand in a moment…

 

Here's the deal. You're going to start a business or expand the one you've got now. It doesn't really matter what you do or what you're going to do. I'll partner with you no matter what business you're in – as long as it's legal.

 

But I can't give you any capital – you have to come up with that on your own. I won't give you any labor – that's definitely up to you. What I will do, however, is demand you follow all sorts of rules about what products and services you can offer, how much (and how often) you pay your employees, and where and when you're allowed to operate your business. That's my role in the affair – to tell you what to do.

 

Now in return for my rules, I'm going to take roughly half of whatever you make in the business each year. Half seems fair, doesn't it? I think so. Of course, that's half of your profits.

 

You're also going to have to pay me about 12% of whatever you decide to pay your employees because you've got to cover my expenses for promulgating all of the rules about who you can employ, when, where, and how. Come on, you're my partner. It's only "fair."

 

Now… after you've put your hard-earned savings at risk to start this business, and after you've worked hard at it for a few decades (paying me my 50% or a bit more along the way each year), you might decide you'd like to cash out – to finally live the good life.

 

Whether or not this is "fair" – some people never can afford to retire – is a different argument. As your partner, I'm happy for you to sell whenever you'd like… because our agreement says, if you sell, you have to pay me an additional 20% of whatever the capitalized value of the business is at that time.

 

I know… I know… you put up all the original capital. You took all the risks. You put in all of the labor. That's all true. But I've done my part, too. I've collected 50% of the profits each year. And I've always come up with more rules for you to follow each year. Therefore, I deserve another, final 20% slice of the business.

 

Oh… and one more thing…

 

Even after you've sold the business and paid all of my fees… I'd recommend buying lots of life insurance. You see, even after you've been retired for years, when you die, you'll have to pay me 50% of whatever your estate is worth.

 

After all, I've got lots of partners and not all of them are as successful as you and your family. We don't think it's "fair" for your kids to have such a big advantage. But if you buy enough life insurance, you can finance this expense for your children.

 

All in all, if you're a very successful entrepreneur… if you're one of the rare, lucky, and hard-working people who can create a new company, employ lots of people, and satisfy the public… you'll end up paying me more than 75% of your income over your life. Thanks so much.

 

I'm sure you'll think my offer is reasonable and happily partner with me… but it doesn't really matter how you feel about it because if you ever try to stiff me – or cheat me on any of my fees or rules – I'll break down your door in the middle of the night, threaten you and your family with heavy, automatic weapons, and throw you in jail.

 

That's how civil society is supposed to work, right? This is Amerika, isn't it?

 

That's the offer Amerika gives its entrepreneurs. And the idiots in Washington wonder why there are no new jobs…

 

Regards,

 

Porter Stansberry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awesome article ... MMS

---------------------------

 

I'd like to make you a business offer.

 

Seriously. This is a real offer. In fact, you really can't turn me down, as you'll come to understand in a moment…

 

Here's the deal. You're going to start a business or expand the one you've got now. It doesn't really matter what you do or what you're going to do. I'll partner with you no matter what business you're in – as long as it's legal.

 

But I can't give you any capital – you have to come up with that on your own. I won't give you any labor – that's definitely up to you. What I will do, however, is demand you follow all sorts of rules about what products and services you can offer, how much (and how often) you pay your employees, and where and when you're allowed to operate your business. That's my role in the affair – to tell you what to do.

 

Now in return for my rules, I'm going to take roughly half of whatever you make in the business each year. Half seems fair, doesn't it? I think so. Of course, that's half of your profits.

 

You're also going to have to pay me about 12% of whatever you decide to pay your employees because you've got to cover my expenses for promulgating all of the rules about who you can employ, when, where, and how. Come on, you're my partner. It's only "fair."

 

Now… after you've put your hard-earned savings at risk to start this business, and after you've worked hard at it for a few decades (paying me my 50% or a bit more along the way each year), you might decide you'd like to cash out – to finally live the good life.

 

Whether or not this is "fair" – some people never can afford to retire – is a different argument. As your partner, I'm happy for you to sell whenever you'd like… because our agreement says, if you sell, you have to pay me an additional 20% of whatever the capitalized value of the business is at that time.

 

I know… I know… you put up all the original capital. You took all the risks. You put in all of the labor. That's all true. But I've done my part, too. I've collected 50% of the profits each year. And I've always come up with more rules for you to follow each year. Therefore, I deserve another, final 20% slice of the business.

 

Oh… and one more thing…

 

Even after you've sold the business and paid all of my fees… I'd recommend buying lots of life insurance. You see, even after you've been retired for years, when you die, you'll have to pay me 50% of whatever your estate is worth.

 

After all, I've got lots of partners and not all of them are as successful as you and your family. We don't think it's "fair" for your kids to have such a big advantage. But if you buy enough life insurance, you can finance this expense for your children.

 

All in all, if you're a very successful entrepreneur… if you're one of the rare, lucky, and hard-working people who can create a new company, employ lots of people, and satisfy the public… you'll end up paying me more than 75% of your income over your life. Thanks so much.

 

I'm sure you'll think my offer is reasonable and happily partner with me… but it doesn't really matter how you feel about it because if you ever try to stiff me – or cheat me on any of my fees or rules – I'll break down your door in the middle of the night, threaten you and your family with heavy, automatic weapons, and throw you in jail.

 

That's how civil society is supposed to work, right? This is Amerika, isn't it?

 

That's the offer Amerika gives its entrepreneurs. And the idiots in Washington wonder why there are no new jobs…

 

Regards,

 

Porter Stansberry

 

MMS, I think we need to label you a vendor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it was an article about estate planning with life insurance.

 

It has many elemenets of truth in it which is why it pisses you off when you read it. In fact I think he missed quite a few items that add to the anti-business theme.

 

Say all you want about America, but we have the best variety of women anywhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ahhh Porter.....

I have to love the free market capitalists who think that the government is what causes them to have all these problems and why its not worth setting up a business.

These are the same people who then generally expect someone to pay for the roads and transport for their products, supply a steady form of policing so that their business is not looted, and ensure that people dont dump toxic waste in their water supply......

....and correct me if I am wrong. American seems to have done pretty well from the mix of government intervention into their economy. Did he complain when the US subsidized industries to help them get going, or when farmers needed to survive help stay on the land. Is he up in arms about the fact that many farmers still get subsidies when they are not needed.

Isn't America the land where the very rich pay less tax than the secretaries ;)

If that is truly what he believes - then he should either a....get a job and let somone else pay him, or b....join the government.

 

(dont worry I hate paying taxes as well, but i also understand that someone has to pay for things.....maybe he should focus his attention on wastage, unnecessary bureaucratic and inefficient systems - otherwise he is just another Occupy Wall street hippy in suit)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.......

Say all you want about America, but we have the best variety of women anywhere.

 

I think once you've passed through Thailand or Columbia, you might change your mind. But I'm thinking more accessibility vs variety.

 

ahhh Porter.....

I have to love the free market capitalists who think that the government is what causes them to have all these problems and why its not worth setting up a business.

These are the same people who then generally expect someone to pay for the roads and transport for their products, supply a steady form of policing so that their business is not looted, and ensure that people dont dump toxic waste in their water supply......

....and correct me if I am wrong. American seems to have done pretty well from the mix of government intervention into their economy. Did he complain when the US subsidized industries to help them get going, or when farmers needed to survive help stay on the land. Is he up in arms about the fact that many farmers still get subsidies when they are not needed.

Isn't America the land where the very rich pay less tax than the secretaries ;)

If that is truly what he believes - then he should either a....get a job and let somone else pay him, or b....join the government.

 

(dont worry I hate paying taxes as well, but i also understand that someone has to pay for things.....maybe he should focus his attention on wastage, unnecessary bureaucratic and inefficient systems - otherwise he is just another Occupy Wall street hippy in suit)

The Westernized countries have the infrastructure for serious and scalable business. But the emerging economies have the simpler, stress-free lifestyle. The wise people pick the best of both worlds whenever possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Westernized countries have the infrastructure for serious and scalable business. But the emerging economies have the simpler, stress-free lifestyle. The wise people pick the best of both worlds whenever possible.

 

is that why so many of them wish to migrate to the USA? ;) must be to pay the higher taxes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think once you've passed through Thailand or Columbia, you might change your mind. But I'm thinking more accessibility vs variety.

 

 

The Westernized countries have the infrastructure for serious and scalable business. But the emerging economies have the simpler, stress-free lifestyle. The wise people pick the best of both worlds whenever possible.

 

You are living in la la land? I suggest you go to Africa and see the "stress-free lifestyle" of the emerging economies with people starving and not having basic services. No fresh running water, no electricity, no medicine, the list goes on and on and on. To me that is hell, not simpler, stress free.

Edited by MadMarketScientist
no personal attacks please - thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What useless fox news talking points.

NAFTA, severe debt recession, and the rich "job creators" shipping jobs off-shore might have a little somethin' somethin' to do.

 

Bush incredulously promoted out-sourcing. (True story) While in India (some nuclear treaty) in Feb, 2006 Bush said clearly to an Indian audience "out-sourcing is perfectly OK" WOW?! My own president said that?! WOW?! The Indian audience was at first stunned then cheered wildly. Bush literally forgot where he was. That our Dubya?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What useless fox news talking points.

NAFTA, severe debt recession, and the rich "job creators" shipping jobs off-shore might have a little somethin' somethin' to do.

 

Bush incredulously promoted out-sourcing. (True story) While in India (some nuclear treaty) in Feb, 2006 Bush said clearly to an Indian audience "out-sourcing is perfectly OK" WOW?! My own president said that?! WOW?! The Indian audience was at first stunned then cheered wildly. Bush literally forgot where he was. That our Dubya?!

 

That reminds me - everything is relative - in 2009 I was in Kolkata (Calcutta) India a very socialist province and we walked past a government building with a big protest sign outside it.....

"Stop outsourcing Indian jobs"

We did not have a camera but wish we had taken a picture.....I think they were worried about outsourcing to East Asia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That reminds me - everything is relative - in 2009 I was in Kolkata (Calcutta) India a very socialist province and we walked past a government building with a big protest sign outside it.....

"Stop outsourcing Indian jobs"

We did not have a camera but wish we had taken a picture.....I think they were worried about outsourcing to East Asia.

 

I love your perspective.

I wonder if the Indian Prime Minister would be caught in (somewhere) East Asia telling an East Asian crowd that "(Indian) out-sourcing is perfectly OK!" ? I think that the Indian PM is much too smart for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.