Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

futurebondtrader

Whats the Largest Return Any Trader Ever Made/ How Much Do Top Solo Traders Make?

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

While there has been endless publicity about hundred million dollar and billion dollar hedge fund managers, to anyone's knowledge:

 

1. In terms of account growth, what has the biggest percent growth ever been for a solo trader?

 

2. To anyone's knowledge, how much do top solo futures traders make?

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10.17.02 ... a new trader just starting out was given his 1st account to manage.

10.17.02 .... $75,000 ... opening balance

10.17.03 ... $862,980 ... 1 yr later.

 

04.15.03 ... he was given another account to manage.

04.15.03 ... $25,000 ... opening balance

11.14.03 ... $247,000 ... date he released this info.

 

This info was in the public domain for a short time before it was deleted because of the personal attacks he received over posting it. I trust it is true. I insist anyone who recognizes this trader honor him by refusing to identify him. I'm posting these results because they inspire me. Everyone looking for inspiration deserves to see inspiring results like this. These results are from automated strats he wrote based upon just about zero knowledge of trading combined with what he learned in 3 yrs of studing programming at a public college.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,

 

While there has been endless publicity about hundred million dollar and billion dollar hedge fund managers, to anyone's knowledge:

 

1. In terms of account growth, what has the biggest percent growth ever been for a solo trader?

 

2. To anyone's knowledge, how much do top solo futures traders make?

 

Thanks

 

 

To my knowledge the biggest percentage return published so far is Larry Williams' > 11,000% return in a one year period, turning $10k into $1.1m in that futures competition.

 

Although this is all very interesting, it's of no value to any other individual trader, nor what any hedge fund make per year.

 

The only thing that is relevant is how much YOU and YOUR METHOD are able to make per year.

 

It's like asking what the performance metrics of Tiger Woods are in Golf... how will this help you if you start golfing? Even if you have much more talent than Tiger Woods and are prepared to train smarter and harder than he did in all aspects of the game (incl. mental), then such comparison would only limit you to be as good as he was and not better...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the professionals day traders I've spoke too make consider anywhere from 30% to 50%+ a solid return. None of the most credible people I spoke too mentioned making over around 50% to 80%. You can look at World Cup to see what those traders are doing in their accounts.

 

I consider 30% a good base level return because most people don't want to experience more then 30% DD and a 30% return at a 1:1 reward/risk. Speaking of returns without risk doesn't tell you anything.

 

I consider also consistently making 30% on risk per day a top of the line return. This gives about a 4x return to the account size -- if risk is kept below 5% which is aggressive. Many consider the 4:1 reward/risk ratio an excellent goal. Few will manage better then 2x. Long term among tracked CTA funds, few manage a sharpe above 1. A 1 sharpe will translate closely to a 1 calmar or 1:1 -- in other words there aren't many funds that can do better then the 1:1 ratio.

 

Of course, some traders may have an excellent run and do a lot more. I don't think it is useful to compare yourself to those though. Traders at firms may do better but I know some of those managers and they aren't making as much as you'd think.

 

One futures firm said a good trader will do 250k before splits... so after splits you're making a good salary but not getting rich. A top stock prop firm told me that a new trader will do good to make 50k in the first year.

 

As for Larry.. he made his returns by scaling up his size. It is possible to do some amazing returns if one scales up size as the account grows. Most people don't want to experience those type of swings though...

 

 

2. To anyone's knowledge, how much do top solo futures traders make?

Thanks

Edited by Predictor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an 18 mth run trading 1 Jan 2006 to 30 June 2007.

333 days traded with total profit Aud $1,497,527. Ave $4497 per day.

After brokerage costs of around $250,000 per year with Comsec Aot desk in Aus.

Was one of their largest private traders at that time.

That was my best return over a set period.

Before that I had some average years and some good years.

Probably doesn't compare with some of the guys from the US though.

But I was trading from a few home computers with a trainee and occasionally my wife.

The edge I had at that time is a lot smaller nowadays with the HFT guys.

I trade now online with a few pro traders from Aus in the Fx and futures markets.

Just thought this can show that it is possible if you can develop an edge over a large sample size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem that my attitude to all this would be the opposite of most.

 

1. Trading my own money I want the low volatility of returns that most fund managers target in order to attract investors. Whereas most independent traders tend to quote 'being able to take on greater risks to achieve larger returns' as a benefit of not trading other people's money.

 

2. If I was trading other people's money and, hypothetically, could do so on a completely unregulated basis with no question of repercussions, then I would swing for the fences with money management in the way that Larry Williams did in the competition. It's other people's money - what would I care about the volatility of returns or risk profile? There's no real downside, for me, and unlimited upside.

 

What do others make of this? Is this a logical conclusion, or should I be working with the other sociopaths at Goldman?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you Bluehorseshoe on your comment.

During the 18mth period my volatility and draw downs apart from the odd brain fade were very low.

I built my account up day by day with low risk and trained our 20yr old babysitter/childcare to trade my account alongside me.

I think it is the consistency of the trading approach with an edge over a large sample size that is important.

Edited by Plugger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... I think it is the consistency of the trading approach with an edge over a large sample size that is important.

 

You're absolutely right. You can't make BIG money without trading size. To be able to trade size you need consistency. Having an edge, and making small consistent gains - then adding a contract after the margin (or 2 x the margin) has been made, is the key to adding size and exploiting the edge.

 

The discussion of return as a percentage of account means nothing when trading futures IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I had an 18 mth run trading 1 Jan 2006 to 30 June 2007.

333 days traded with total profit Aud $1,497,527. Ave $4497 per day.

After brokerage costs of around $250,000 per year with Comsec Aot desk in Aus.

Was one of their largest private traders at that time.

That was my best return over a set period.

Before that I had some average years and some good years.

Probably doesn't compare with some of the guys from the US though.

But I was trading from a few home computers with a trainee and occasionally my wife.

The edge I had at that time is a lot smaller nowadays with the HFT guys.

I trade now online with a few pro traders from Aus in the Fx and futures markets.

Just thought this can show that it is possible if you can develop an edge over a large sample size.

Plugger - I used to live on the Sunshine Coast, and attended Davin Clarke's free trading info evenings at Kawana Community Centre.

 

Your numbers sound very, very similar to Davin's. The numbers I heard from a "reliable source" were that Davin paid Commsec $330,000 commish between 1st July and end September ... probably around 2006 or 2007. Davin is now in the USA I believe, where he is involved in the teaching/coaching side of the markets these days.

 

Like you, Davin made many rapid trades in a relatively short period. I am thinking that if you are not Davin Clarke, then you must know him or know of him.

 

The effort was extraordinary for the times, as was yours.

 

Well done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's me.

Back on the Sunny Coast now after some prop trading in Atlanta US with Alexander Tzarvaras.

Those meetings that I ran were fun but time constraints became a factor.

Hope your trading has been going well Ingot.

Saw the post about trader returns and thought I should write that good returns are possible but require the hard yards and a bit of independent thinking that most can't commit to.

A hard way to make an easy dollar.

Think the commissions to Comsec got up to the half mill + over a 2yr period.

The chrissy presents were a bit stingy only a dozen beers on one of those years.

Lucky I'm a beer fan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's me.

Back on the Sunny Coast now after some prop trading in Atlanta US with Alexander Tzarvaras.

Those meetings that I ran were fun but time constraints became a factor.

Hope your trading has been going well Ingot.

Saw the post about trader returns and thought I should write that good returns are possible but require the hard yards and a bit of independent thinking that most can't commit to.

A hard way to make an easy dollar.

Think the commissions to Comsec got up to the half mill + over a 2yr period.

The chrissy presents were a bit stingy only a dozen beers on one of those years.

Lucky I'm a beer fan.

 

You forgot to mention ... they don't have our surf!

 

There are still a few traders on the Sunny Coast, though I have not rubbed shoulders with too many. I corresponded with Youri from Wurtulla today - didn't know he was there (Russian bloke) - he may have been around in your earlier times?

 

Awhile ago I stopped looking for a strategy and decided to master what I am already doing. That sort of focus pays in spades ... only wish I had done it 6 years earlier!

 

Will look you up when I am next on the coast - I still have family there and am possibly moving back before Chrissy.

 

Keepacoldieinnafridge!

 

Nice to touch base again. I have followed a bit of your work through different people with good blogs who linked to you (Lance Beggs is one). Also wondering about Chris Shea - is he still in the coaching business? His book deserved far more exposure and popularity than it received - an excellent beginners starting point to get the head around the market's tricks.

 

Cheers mate ... sorry to take the thread off-topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,

 

While there has been endless publicity about hundred million dollar and billion dollar hedge fund managers, to anyone's knowledge:

 

1. In terms of account growth, what has the biggest percent growth ever been for a solo trader?

 

2. To anyone's knowledge, how much do top solo futures traders make?

 

Thanks

 

Marty Schwartz (interviewed in the best selling book, market wizards) averaged 25% ROI per MONTH, for several years in a row, while never suffering more than a 3% drawdown from month end to month end, on a multimillion dollar account. This was published in his interview in this book, he also wrote a book called pit bull about his experience trading, and his account was audited because he did become a CTA, so it's not just a claim, or a rumor, but it's been validated. He also entered several trading competitions that used real money (he used his own personal account), and he won I believe 4 out of 5 years with unbelieveable returns.

 

That's an ROI of approx. 1,400%+ per year, for years in a row, without more than a few percent draw down.

 

This is the best i've ever heard of with real money, that can and has been independently verified.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How about top retail discretionary futures traders, if you are, and of those traders you know, what kind of average % returns do you consistently make?

 

Do you mean per day, week, month, year. Trading futures is all about making income for me, not return. I'd have to calculate return on what?? Margin, Risk$? Leveraged amount?

 

Let's say the ES is at 1400 and its point value is $50. Therefore each contract is worth $70,000. So trading one contract if you made $35000 in a year - a good and possible target in my opinion - it would amount to 50% of the leverage amount. But on the basis of margin at $5000 per contract it would be 700%.

 

What is the point of asking these questions. Will it give you something to shoot for in your mind? I suspect that you may be wondering how much is possible to see whether it is an activity which is something you wish to pursue. In my experience - pursuing this activity for strictly financial reasons is not an effective way to go about it and is going to lead to poor results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you mean per day, week, month, year. Trading futures is all about making income for me, not return. I'd have to calculate return on what?? Margin, Risk$? Leveraged amount?

 

Let's say the ES is at 1400 and its point value is $50. Therefore each contract is worth $70,000. So trading one contract if you made $35000 in a year - a good and possible target in my opinion - it would amount to 50% of the leverage amount. But on the basis of margin at $5000 per contract it would be 700%.

 

What is the point of asking these questions. Will it give you something to shoot for in your mind? I suspect that you may be wondering how much is possible to see whether it is an activity which is something you wish to pursue. In my experience - pursuing this activity for strictly financial reasons is not an effective way to go about it and is going to lead to poor results.

 

Day, week, month, year, doesn't matter, if you have one, you can calculate the rest.

 

Comparison against margin, leverage, contract value, etc is not too useful in futures. I mean income, return against account value.

 

I already know I wish to pursue, as I have been for years and am comfortable with my reasons. The point, is simply to know. If we are discussing what the top institutional traders have achieved, why not discuss what the top retail traders achieve?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Day, week, month, year, doesn't matter, if you have one, you can calculate the rest ...

... The point, is simply to know. If we are discussing what the top institutional traders have achieved, why not discuss what the top retail traders achieve?

The question was valid, and of interest generally, n00btrader - thanks for asking it.

 

But the best answer you might get was in post #5 of the thread, by Plugger - a trader I have met once or twice, and for whom I would vouch. I also know people with whom he was associated in training at a very high level.

 

They held an annual retreat at the old Hyatt Regency, Coolum beach on the Sunshine Coast (now the Palmer Resort I think it might be called now.) Back then - 2006 onwards - if you were making $750k minimum pa you qualified for the Super-Trader retreat at the resort.

 

I think Plugger could clarify how many traders attended - - I fell a bit short of the qualifying mark myself ... :(:(

 

Have included a couple of pics of the resort, for dreamers ... plus a link to Google Satellite of the area if interested in motivating yourself for a half-decent vacation!

 

http://tinyurl.com/cbllkgk

5aa7113cd4f83_PalmerHyattResort.JPG.093bb731fcf116c5c5feb46de1ddca7c.JPG

5aa7113cdbc61_PalmerHyattResort_2.thumb.jpg.ff3b63dd6b14308d8510577ee0875671.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It would seem that my attitude to all this would be the opposite of most.

 

1. Trading my own money I want the low volatility of returns that most fund managers target in order to attract investors. Whereas most independent traders tend to quote 'being able to take on greater risks to achieve larger returns' as a benefit of not trading other people's money.

 

2. If I was trading other people's money and, hypothetically, could do so on a completely unregulated basis with no question of repercussions, then I would swing for the fences with money management in the way that Larry Williams did in the competition. It's other people's money - what would I care about the volatility of returns or risk profile? There's no real downside, for me, and unlimited upside.

 

What do others make of this? Is this a logical conclusion, or should I be working with the other sociopaths at Goldman?

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

Actually... if your trading other peoples money, you don't want to do that. Here's why:

If you start your year off managing $1 million, and make even a 30% ROI your first year, with a drawdown that never exceeds 10%... you will charge your 1%, plus 20% of profits. You will make about $70,000

 

And, you will also get probably $10 - $100 milllion to manage in your second year. For this year, you will make 30% ROI, drawdown never over 10%, and you chart 1% plus 20% of profits. You will make between $700,000 - $7 million. by the end of that second year.

 

If you do this, you will be get about $200 million - $350 million to manage in your third year. For this year, you will make 30% ROI, drawdown never over 10%, and you charge 1% plus 20% of profits. You will make between $14 million and $24.5 million that year. In your third year. Starting with $1 million. 3 years later, you can very realistically be on track to make $14 - $24 million

 

Remember, with that type of return and low drawdown, you will have more money than you can imagine being thrown at you. Trust me. I know. The world can be a very, very, very rich place with money to give to you if you show a couple of guys some good numbers for a year or so. Because those guys have friends. And their friends have stupid money. And so do their friends, and so on... and every single one of them wants to make 30% per year with no more than a 10% draw down. Every Single One. Period.

 

If you trade your own money, you would need to acheive an ROI of about 230% - 290% per year, if you start with $1,000,000, and want to make $14 - $24 in your 3rd year.... mind you, if your drawdowns average 10% of your annual return.... well, lets just say you'll come close each year to wiping out your account while you kill yourself to make that type of ROI.

 

If you trade other peoples money, you can literally make $14 - $24 million per year by the end of your 3rd year, by acheiving only a 30% ROI, and an extremely pleasing drawdown of only 10% at any given time.

 

You don't swing for the fences because you don't get money from one person one time. You go for singles and base hits because you get money from many rich people, all the time, and that list is always growing, never dropping, if you can get that type of risk adjusted return.

 

If you can do that, it's better than almost any rich person can do with big money anywhere else. So that's why your phone will ring every single day with someone who wants to give you millions.

 

No joke. Sounds nuts. It's true. And it's why you prefer base hits to home runs if you trade OPM

 

FTX.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only metric that matters is the P/L statement over the entire lifetime of a trader. Impressive gains over a two or five year period matter nothing if subsequent losses erase those gains. Consistency is the most important factor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,

 

While there has been endless publicity about hundred million dollar and billion dollar hedge fund managers, to anyone's knowledge:

 

1. In terms of account growth, what has the biggest percent growth ever been for a solo trader?

 

2. To anyone's knowledge, how much do top solo futures traders make?

 

Thanks

 

I dont have stats but I have a friend who have been trading 15 years 'solo' ie his own account and now worth 100 mil+ trading futures.

 

this is the secret though - you dont have 'retail' accounts.

 

when you get to a level, you need leverage. you know you dont want to keep a load of margin in your account to cover exchange margins. What you do is consider your account balance as your 'ultimate stop'. You have reserve cash in a bank account else where - that used to pay interest lol. You go to a professional broker (crosslands, advantage, etc) and they will give you extra leverage and give you limits based on position size. retail traders will have a position limit determined by acct balance.

 

eg retail trader with 50k trading at $500 intraday margin can trade 100 lots max

with an agreement pro/retail may have 50k in their account but has agreed a 300 lot limit.

 

Obviously to do this, the fcm/broker must know you well (confidence you know what youre doing), you need a good track record etc. Its in their interest of course, because the more you trade, the more they make.

 

They (fcm) will ALWAYS look at their risk first of course. If you dont respect the extra leverage and start to lose say 50% of your account, they may well withdraw the limit or block you until you have more funds wired in.

 

The broker provides extra leverage.Its part of their business model.

 

This is similar to how it works in prop firms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.