Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

:::grimReaper:::

Treasury Futures: Why at Such a High Premium?

Recommended Posts

Happy to be corrected by someone with good fundamental knowledge. Meantime this is the best I can do for you:

 

You are not quite comparing apples with apples.

On the one hand you are quoting the price of an actual tangible 5-Year bond with 0.625% coupon, effective yield 0.77%, price 99-135 (Bloomberg states the coupon is 0.625).

 

On the other hand you are quoting a 5-Year bond futures contract for which the underlying is a notional 5-Year bond yielding 6%... hence your 123 price being well above 99.

 

Extra detail from CBOT:

"The invoice price equals the futures settlement price times a conversion factor, plus accrued interest. The conversion factor is the price of the delivered note ($1 par value) to yield 6 percent."

 

Extra detail from CBOT:

"The conversion factor represents the price at which $1 face value of the deliverable grade issue, if transacted and settled during the futures contract delivery month, would yield 6 percent."

http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/interest-rates/files/CL-100_TFDPBrochureFINAL.pdf

page 23

 

Just as an aside, Bund futures (FGBL) contract specifications from Eurex states that the underlying notional bond has 100,000EUR value and a coupon of 6%. (Coupon, that time, not yield as per USTY, but seems similar concept)

 

I don't think im a million miles wrong with this answer,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ninja. I think you might have the right answer, but can you elaborate mathematically about the "6% yield." Still a little confused:crap:. For example, I thought market prices for bonds mathematically determine the yield, but here it seems like CBOT set the yield to 6%.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, the futures contracts are standardized at a 6% coupon security with a $100 face value . The price of 123 represents the value of a 5 year treasury note with a coupon of 6% that is yielding 0.77% + cost of carry. The price of a bond moves inverse to its yield. So as yield drops from 6% to 0.77% the price of the bond or note moves from 100 to 123. For more info google DV01, "bond duration" and yield to maturity.

 

Im simplifying here, in reality there is a little more to it. Firstly amount that the bond rises in relation to the yield is a convex function. If you want to find out more about this google "bond convexity", you need to understand some basic calculus. Secondly, the underlying for the futures contract is based on a basket of similar bonds. The price represents to cheapest to deliver of the bonds in the basket.Google "Cheapest to deliver" or "CTD treasury futures"

 

This might help: U.S. Treasury Futures Conversion Factor Look-Up Tables

 

Basically all the info you need you can find on CME website and wikipedia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Conceptually, fixed 6% coupon makes sense but my #s don't tie.

 

As of Friday, ZF closed at 124-225 and according to Bloomberg, 5 Yr Treasury traded around 100-5.5, yielding 0.59%

 

According to my calculations, 5 Yr Treasury that pays 0.625 coupon yields 0.607% (close enough to 0.59 I guess). But when I calculate the yield of ZF trading at 124-225 at 6% coupon, I get 3.09%, much higher than 0.607%. Why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm still a dove regarding crypto trading. Not because of the instruments traded, but because of the lack of market centralization. It reminds me of the early days of forex trading where no broker-dealers offered trade clearing via the interbank market. This is basically betting against "the house" which is its own captive market-maker, has its own one-off price feed, and has its own one-off trade execution policies. As a side note, I always opt out of broker-dealers' arbitration clauses within 30 days of account opening pursuant to the U.S. Federal Arbitration Act. Unscrupulous broker-dealers and platform sellers don't even provide opt-out terms in their trading/subscription agreements, but it still exists pursuant to federal statutes and federal court precedent. Sierra Chart also collects unspent platform subscription deposits from traders in their website's online "wallet." This subjects them not only to FINRA liability but CFPB liability as well. I figuratively atom bombed Sierra Chart with this info and they refunded all platform fees and data fees that I ever paid to them before I closed my Sierra Chart account. On a more general note, virtually all broker-dealers are either partnered with, or straight up are, Wall Street investment banks and hedge funds. These are the folks that refer to retail traders as "cannon fodder" and "fish food." To me, any broker-dealer is nothing more than a counterparty to a series of my transactions. If I find any reason not to trust a broker-dealer, I'm out. Crypto trading, as it presently exists, fits the bill. Crypto owning/investment might be a different story, but I'm strictly a trader.
    • Consider this... While a human trader has emotions, a bot does not. All a human trader needs to do to code a statistically profitable strategy on a good emotional day. And it can be coded for any timeframe, intraday or overnights.
    • Well said. Broker-dealers that aren't connected to centralized exchanges or the prime interbank exchanges are, in fact, casinos--where nothing extends beyond "the house."
    • My latest trick... After successfully live trading forex for years, switch to trading futures in the U.S. Chicago Mercantile Exchanges. Futures spreads are generally 1 or 2 ticks with no swaps, and data fees and commission fees are fixed. As a caveat, leverage changes throughout every day based on international sessions, so this is not for small accounts. 
    • @analyst75, I am just dying for you to write a sequel... Why Some Young People Prefer to Live Alone.😂
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.