Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

GCB

Just What is a TPO?

Recommended Posts

I know it means "Time Price Opportunity," but that doesn't really mean a lot to me. Perhaps I am dense. Anyway, I'd like to know how one might determine "a TPO" from a price/volume chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A TPO is simply a letter marking out where price has been in 30 minute increments. To determine how to derive it, you could just look at 30 minute bars and give each a letter, A, B, C...and then squish them all together so it forms a profile.

 

Hope I explained it ok...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GCB, TPO is basically just a term used in market profile that represents the letters plotted for the profile. Instead of saying alphabet, market profile refers to it as TPO. A TPO print in the first 30minute will show the "A" alphabet plotted in each price level it trades during the first 30min. The next half hour TPO would be a "B".

 

At the end of the day, you count how many TPO's or alphabet exist above or below the POC. If there are more TPO counts above the POC we have seller control while more TPO counts below the POC indicates buyer control.

 

For example, if you take a look at the YM 30min chart from todays session.. you will see how the A, B, C, D period could not lift above the previous period. 9:30-10:00 would be A, 10:00-10:30 would be B, 10:30-11:00 would be C, and 11:00-11:30 would be D period. B period could not lift above A period, C period could not lift above B period, and D period could not lift above C period. This indicates a market that is not willing to auction higher. Instead it was showing weakness as the profile developed.

 

So picture this:

 

A

A

AB

ABC

ABCD

ABCD

D

D

 

This is just a very simple profile picture of the first 4 half hour periods on of trading on YM. Notice the profile showing weakness?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sort of get it. But value area is supposed to be the area where the most amount (70%) of trading took place, so it seems like you would need to know volume as well, and if you don't know the exact volume at each specific price, I don't see how you can figure this. I don't understand how this information can be derived from a 30 minute chart. I know ant's program does it, I just don't understand how, which is another way of saying I still don't know, from a technical programming standpoint, what a TPO is.

 

In contrast, I wrote a program which can derive value area and POC from a price and volume chart, and it does so accurately, but only if the chart is a one-tick chart, because only then do you know how to precisely assign each bit of volume with the price it actually traded at. Anything more than one tick and you don't actually know at what price the volume traded, so how can you accurately know where 70% of the volume actually traded?

 

Say, for example, you have a completely symmetrical downtrending 30-minute chart. It looks like a staircase going down, each stair the same size and having taken the same time to form. Imagine that, however, the afternoon session actually traded twice as much volume as the morning session. Where would the value area be, and how would you calculate it, given that you don't know exactly at what price all the volume traded?

 

The reason I was to know this is because I actually want to write my own MP indicator, because ant's is a little buggy for me. I asked ant this same question, but he didn't answer.

 

Anyway, there's something I'm still not getting about TPO. But thanks for the replies, guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GCB,

 

As the trading session progresses, the developing profile adjusts itself as well. The value area is derived by looking at the POC.The POC is the price level where the most activity has taken place. If the markets decide to sell off, the POC will adjust itself lower and lower. For example:

 

Profile from A - D period:

 

A

ABC

ABC

ABCD (longest line of TPO: current POC)

BCD

CD

D

 

Now as the day progresses and the markets sell-off.... Profile from A to H period:

 

A

ABC

ABC

ABCD

BCDEF

CDEFGH (notice how the POC moved lower)

DEFGH

GH

GH

H

 

Dalton refers to calculating the value area as this:

 

""First identify the price at which the greatest volume occurred. Then, sum the volumes occurring at the two prices directly above the high-volume price and compare it to the total volume of the two prices below the high-volume price. The dual price total with the highest volume becomes part of the value area. This process continues until 70% of the volume is reached." - From Mind Over Markets -

 

Here is a thread simplying this calculation: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/f6/calculating-value-area-345.html

 

Indicators such as the the 5 period moving average will take plot a line of the average close of the last 5 bars. Now what this does not do is take into account the volume (supply vs demand) and time per bar. Therefore Dalton would refer to it as "incomplete". Market profile is based on time, price, and volume. Time can be seen with the number of TPO's that take place at certain levels.

 

When alot of TPO's are clustered up in one area, you can see that price is finding value and spending alot of time within this area. Buyers and sellers are in agreement. When price shoots through a known support or resistance point on high volume, we see price spending little time at these levels. Hence we get single print TPO's. For volume, let's say the market is in a trading range. If there is less TPO counts at the upper range of this bracket, we are seeing buyers drying up.

 

Hope this clears it up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote

""First identify the price at which the greatest volume occurred. Then, sum the volumes occurring at the two prices directly above the high-volume price and compare it to the total volume of the two prices below the high-volume price. The dual price total with the highest volume becomes part of the value area. This process continues until 70% of the volume is reached." - From Mind Over Markets -

 

Yes, this is precisely what my program does. I got the methodology from the thread you cite, and it works. But again, I don't see how you can know "the price at which the greatest volume occured" with a thirty-minute chart, or for that matter, a one-minute chart. Only a one-tick chart will tell you precisely where the volume occured. With any other period chart you are taking averages, which leads to fuzzy results.

 

I asked ant about it and he said he doesn't use volume, he uses TPOs, which is why I asked the question "what's a TPO." I asked him and he never responded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as i understand it, market profile originally used time essentially as a proxy for price, since volume at price data was not readily available realtime.

 

it is a pretty decent proxy.

 

but

 

in my experience volume at price (segmented over time) is more useful, especially when taking into account the 24 hr market action. market can stay in a narrow price range for hours in globex session with very little volume. clearly, that does not show the kind of price acceptance as when thousands of shares are crossing hands at the same level during the day.

 

i constantly compare my volume POC and time POC to try to discern the differences during different day types and which is more reliable.

 

now that we have realtime access to tick data, i think volume at price is much more useful. this goes along with my general understanding of pit action, wherein time is not what matters nearly as much as volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GCB, you're right. You need to have TPO's calculated on a tick by tick basis, showing up on a 30min time frame. I have no idea about coding or its difficulties, but thats why I pay for a Market Profile charting package. I know it's going to correct, and I dont have to worry. If you're a good coder, then you've got about a million steps on me :) I haven't got the faintest clue on how to code stuff, so I dont know if it's easy or not.

 

You're right in that to get the value area, you need to know volume. To get the POC, you need only time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.