Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Supply vs Demand

Recommended Posts

Why do price lift and why do price decline? It has nothing to do with indicator crosses or price pattern breakouts. It is a simply law of supply vs demand. If there are more sellers price will decline until selling dries up and finds buyers interested in price. Price lifts because there is more demand and will continue to lift until buyers start to find price unfair.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=880&stc=1&d=1172592869

 

End result for ER2. Feb. 27, 2007.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=882&stc=1&d=1172605337

ersupply.jpg.5188b9618529da49bfe21038ed7f4020.jpg

erendresult.jpg.b9668e7dae59d5d53b8672f2bbfcd92d.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice.

 

The markets are moved by imbalances of Supply and Demand.

 

Here's a look at the Euro.

 

First, Markets do not like Wide spread, high volume or ultra high volume bars that close up. Why? Because of the possibility of Professional Selling into the bar. As VSA teaches, strength comes in on down bars and weakness comes in on up bars.

 

I have placed pink lines at some areas of Resistance. These are areas of supply. Some traders have gone long at these levels. Their only hope going forward is to get out at break even. Hence, if price moves back into these areas, we would expect to see them sell (SUPPLY).

 

Professional Money knows this. So what do they do if they know prices are going to rise? They have to absorb the supply (buy). Now if they are buying high, they certainly expect prices to go higher.

 

Note the first bar with a green arrow. This is a wide spread bar but the volume is not that high. This is a "healthy" up bar. That is, this is the kind of up bar the market likes. The lack of ultra high or high volume lessens the chance of hidden selling within the bar.

 

Now check out the very next bar. If you think this is weakness you are wrong. This is absorption volume (volume is ultra high). Note that this bar trades through the resistance tops and the POC (yellow line). THIS IS PUSHING THRU SUPPLY. PROFESSIONAL MONEY WANTS TO KEEP THE LONGS FROM SELLING (SUPPLY). SO THEY RAPIDLY MARK PRICES UP. IN THIS BAR, THE MOVE IS TO LOCK TRADERS IN, NOT KEEP TRADERS OUT.

 

The late shorts now have to buy back their positions, placing more order flow on the dominant side (up side) and further hurting themselves.

 

The next bar is key. Note that it closes up on less volume. Had this bar been down, then we would have to think there was actually Selling in that bar by the Smart Money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not talk much about it, as I don't really like indicators.

 

Wyckoff Effort IndeX (WEX)

 

Volume = Activity= Effort=Order Flow

Price=Result

 

The basic idea comes from Wyckoff. It measure the amount of effort to rise and the amount of effort to fall. Effort is the volume and is seen thru the open/close relationship. Open<Close Effort to Rise. Open>Close Effort to Fall.

 

What is nice about this is there are no parameters or averages involved. It simply sums up Effort to Rise until it sees Effort to Fall. Note that a "doji" a sign of indecision is summed up as both Effort to Rise and Effort to Fall.

 

For those who like such things, this tool is good for divergence.

 

Note on the attached chart the Effort to Fall as prices moves down towards and then thru the lower portion of the Value Area.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=889&stc=1&d=1172655071

 

p.s. For those familiar with Ensign Software, this is also known as VolumeSum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said, I don't really like indicators. But here is an example of the WEX showing divergence.

 

Notice how we are making lower lows but the Effort to Fall is not as great. In Physics, when the momentum is slowing down, they say the momentum in the opposite direction is increasing. Here we can SEE that as the Effort to Fall decreases, the Effort to Rise increases.

 

In fact, we move to VSA. The first large wide spread bar (in the rectangle) closes lower than the previous bar, closes near the middle of its range and has high volume. THERE IS PROFESSIONAL DEMAND (BUYING) IN THIS BAR. Note also that we close just above the lower purple, Value Area low line. We would expect to see some support at this level.

 

The next bar does indeed move higher on lower volume. Then on the next bar we see a narrow range bar that closes near its highs on volume less than the previous two bars: No Demand. The Smart Money is not yet ready for higher prices. One more thing needs to be done.....

 

On the very next bar, we get a 'test'. The Professional Money is testing for sellers (supply) underneath the market. While the volume is a bit higher than we would like to see, the bar does indeed trade lower than the previous bar and close near its highs. Again, notice that the test bar trades down to just outside the Value Area Low (lower purple line).

 

The last bar in the rectangle is an up bar (higher than previous bar's close) and confirms the 'test'.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=895&stc=1&d=1172697959

 

While the indicator shows divergence at this level, the key to getting in tune with the market is reading price and volume. In truth, an indicator only trader may have gotten in sooner. But the Volume Spread Analysis user knows why he is getting in when he gets in: Supply and Demand imbalances brought about by Professional Money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ok Pivot, interesting concept as to setup, my question on this example is where would be your exact entry (timing) what exact criteria to pull the trigger..... cheers Walter.

 

Once the 'test' is confirmed. That is the close of the up bar after the possible 'test' bar. Which makes it a 'test' bar. So close of the confirmation bar/open of next bar.

 

criteria? That's it. Professional Money showing itself at a support/resistance area-the Value Area Low.

 

Track Professional Money then jump on their coattails. The when and the why from previous post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pivot, your entry would effectively be at close of the fifth bar in the box you highlighted, as the confirmation of the test for supply. It is confirmation because it is an up bar (price closed above the close of the previous bar).

 

When you wait for this 'test and confirmation' to occur, sometimes it does not, and price runs up quickly from your support level. Is this a scenario you accept, and look for the 'test and confirm' setup elsewhere or at another time or level of support or resistance?

 

When you wait for the full 'test and confirm' setup to occur, price will move away from support, thus increasing your risk and decreasing your potetnial reward.

 

When you have the initial indication of possible strength coming in on that wide spread, high volume down bar, do you ever enter at the close of that bar, and set your protection stop loss exits such that you allow for the possibility of a test?

 

I suppose if you considered entering 'early' on the high volume down bar, you could: 1) trade a partial position and re-enter the remainder on the test if it happened, or 2) trade a full position and have a quicker profit target for a portion of your position, and if the profit target is hit, adjust your stops to consider the possibility of the test and securing a break even trade.

 

I am interested in how you might manage this trade and what your experience has shown to be recommended.

 

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pivot, your entry would effectively be at close of the fifth bar in the box you highlighted, as the confirmation of the test for supply. It is confirmation because it is an up bar (price closed above the close of the previous bar).

 

Yes. Sorry if that was unclear. There is a reason that the rectangle contains these 5 bars. Each bar plays a role in the set-up.

 

If there is not an up bar in the next two bars after a test, the test has failed and the market is weak. Yes, one must wait for confirmation.

 

Think of it as a candle pattern. On another forum, there is an excellent thread on hammers. The author makes this point: a hammer is a hammer line UNTIL the pattern is complete THEN AND ONLY THEN does it become a hammer pattern. And in some of those patterns, the hammer comes before the completion of the hammer pattern. That is, the hammer itself is not always the last bar in the set-up.

 

When you wait for this 'test and confirmation' to occur, sometimes it does not, and price runs up quickly from your support level. Is this a scenario you accept, and look for the 'test and confirm' setup elsewhere or at another time or level of support or resistance?

 

If there is not an up bar in the next two bars there are two options:

 

1. Understand that no up bar means the market is weak. Thus look for reasons (more) to now be a seller and a place to sell.

 

2. Wait for another test that is confirmed to go long. If the market is actually strong, there will be another test or shake out. Or maybe you will see a wide spread bar on ultra high volume that closes down. We know this bar is potentially strong. Then you see a No Supply bar. This is an off-shoot of a 'test'.

 

When you wait for the full 'test and confirm' setup to occur, price will move away from support, thus increasing your risk and decreasing your potential reward.

 

I like to see them at support in order to use that area for stop placement. However, if I have to wait for full 'test and confirm', a good place to put a stop is always just below the low of the test bar. By definition, the Smart Money did not find any sellers below this level (at that time). Therefore, if price trades lower than that, something has changed.

 

I think most people look at reward incorrectly. How much can be gained in a trade is not truly known until after the trade ends. I do not use profit targets, as that is speculating on the future when it is not necessary to do so. So I will stay in the trade until the market takes me out.

 

I look at like this:

 

1. assume we have a market that has moved from 10 to 20.

2. one enters at 20. This is after a 100% rise.

3. if the market moves to 110 then the trader has gotten in within the first 10% of the move.

4. The risk was a pull back to 10, so the risk/reward is 10/100.

 

But suppose the market only moved up to 25. The risk/reward would be 10/5. Yes, a trader will not be a trader for long with this risk/reward. BUT ONE DOES NOT KNOW HOW FAR THE MARKET WILL GO. THE FUTURE IS UNKNOWN AND NOT KNOWABLE.

 

This is why in this case, one would not want to wait until the market moved back to 10. At about 15-13, a trader should recognize he is on the wrong side of the trade. Why wait for the stop to be hit?

 

On the opposite side, if you are in tune with the market, grab every pip/tick/hand/point it is willing to give you. Will you get every last point? No. The market will turn around and eventually stop you out. But one need not be concerned with getting in at the bottom and getting out at the top. The middle is where the reward is at.

 

To the extent that there is an element of control, that control comes on the risk side. Good stop placement, Willingness to admit one is wrong and get out, and precise trade entry all combine for some modicum of risk control. Reward will take care of itself.

 

When you have the initial indication of possible strength coming in on that wide spread, high volume down bar, do you ever enter at the close of that bar, and set your protection stop loss exits such that you allow for the possibility of a test?

 

No.

 

You have to wait and see what happens. Does the next bar close up? IF there was buying on the down day then the next day should be up. But the next bar could be Down. Wide spread down days with ultra high volume can be either : 1. Pressure to Fall (p. 166) or 2. Hidden buying. You have to wait and see what the market does with that volume the next day.

 

Now, Tom Williams, the father of VSA, would enter on the close. He is the exception rather than the rule. Most prefer to wait for the confirmation on the next bar. If we are talking about Stopping volume or a Selling Climax.

 

Generally, looking for the test or a no supply bar after the initial buying bar offers the best low risk entry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to wait and see what happens. Does the next bar close up? IF there was buying on the down day then the next day should be up. But the next bar could be Down. Wide spread down days with ultra high volume can be either : 1. Pressure to Fall (p. 166) or 2. Hidden buying. You have to wait and see what the market does with that volume the next day.

 

Hi, may I know which document are you referring to when you say p.166?

 

Are there supposed to be charts attached? I only see the first 2 charts on this threads. The rest seems to be referring to some drawings but no picture there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.