Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

[Trends, Balance Areas, and Stop Placements]

Recommended Posts

Please Read First:

 

"The stronger the trend, the greater the distance between successive balance areas. As the auction ages, this distance decreases. In the late stages of a trend, price may continue to rise but the next balance area will often be resting on top of or within the prior, lower balance area."

 

- James Dalton from Markets In Profile -

 

CLICK HERE TO VIEW VIDEO

 

 

Charts created by Tradestation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also playing around with a new concept on stop loss placement on Trends. Here is another technique.

 

From Don Jones's book on Value-Based Power Trading (pg 139), he uses a more longer term technique for position traders (minimum of 10 days).

 

1) There is no target price at the beginning of a trend. The stop-loss price for a trend is 1.5 octants from entry.

2) The initial stop-loss point is maintained until the first node forms.

3) After one or more nodes have formed, the trade is exited when price returns to the mid-point of the prior node.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  WinSum said:
I'm also playing around with a new concept on stop loss placement on Trends. Here is another technique.

 

From Don Jones's book on Value-Based Power Trading (pg 139), he uses a more longer term technique for position traders (minimum of 10 days).

 

1) There is no target price at the beginning of a trend. The stop-loss price for a trend is 1.5 octants from entry.

2) The initial stop-loss point is maintained until the first node forms.

3) After one or more nodes have formed, the trade is exited when price returns to the mid-point of the prior node.

 

Winsum : are there any indicators to see does octants on a chart, would be interesting to have a visual aid to follow does octants... wich sounds pretty logic to create a trailing sistem... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have always had "a problem" with the concept of risk/reward as defined by stop size vs. target size. The CW (which I think is wrong) is that a lower risk/reward is "better". In other words, risking 20 pts to make 10 pts is not an intelligent trade.

 

I think IN GENERAL that has merit. However, I have several setups that set a smaller initial target than the stop, and thus would have a "risk/reward" ratio of 2 or greater. Now, that is somewhat problematic since I scale out, but the point is the same.

 

What matters in addition to (so called) risk/reward in stop distance is the positive expectancy of the setup.

 

If you have a setup that has 90% winning trades, with a 3/1 risk/reward ratio (in terms of stops to target distance), is that a "bad" risk/reward.

 

Clearly not. If you crunch the #'s that trade has high positive expectancy.

 

I agree that there are a # of concepts about stops and none is necessarily better. I like to consider the average true range of the timeframe I am trading because I find that using a # related to that metric is going to generally keep you from getting stopped out by "noise".

 

Good video, btw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In regards to the octant thang.

 

Most charting programs have a Fib tool that will draw lines at ratios of a outlined range. The classic #'s are 38.2% 50% etc.

 

However, if your charting package allows you to use user modifiable percentages, then you just need to set the retracement at multiples of 12.5%

 

.125 is 1/8 so, that will draw lines at the octants

 

it's kind a down and dirty technique, but it works

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I have a TPO Overlay Demand Curve that I use to see the market profile structure but I do the Octet calculation by hand because my programming skill is limited.

 

The ODC allows me to see the previous Balance Area nodes and its POC, so I know where the stop losses are likely to be located for trend traders.

 

The interpretation is that the break-out Trend has come back into Value and a Stopping Point of the Trend has been created and the market will now transition from Imbalance back into Balance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, prior to last week, most ppl would agree the market was in an Uptrend.

 

If you bring up a TPO chart on the Russell 2000 from 12/7/06 to 2/23/07, you can see a node forming on the top of the uptrend. From 831.90 to 821.30, the node was developing into a bell curve profile. If the uptrend was going to continue, it would break out of this balance area and continue its move up.

 

There was a node below that and the POC was at 817.60. If price comes back into the POC of the prior node, this would be the uptrend has stopped and trend traders should be alerted and have their protective stop losses in place. They will no longer be bias long.

 

People who were pullback buyers on 2/27/04 got clobbered because the other time frame buyers were no longer bias long. The price has gapped down below the prior node's midpoint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soultrader,

 

Thank you for this interesting concept. I am trying to get a sense of how to define "balance areas"... Is there an indicator that would help outline or define the balance areas or would you explain a little further what the criteria is for a balanced area?

 

thanks

Jennifer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest cooter
  WinSum said:

People who were pullback buyers on 2/27/04 got clobbered because the other time frame buyers were no longer bias long.

 

Yep, and if you set your stops around the GAPPs (generally accepted pivot points), look for them to get hit more often than not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Jennifer said:
Soultrader,

 

Thank you for this interesting concept. I am trying to get a sense of how to define "balance areas"... Is there an indicator that would help outline or define the balance areas or would you explain a little further what the criteria is for a balanced area?

 

thanks

Jennifer

 

Im not sure about indicators but look for congestion areas. In other words, the markets will move and then take a breather. Trend > range > trend > range.

 

How would you define a congestion area? Its really up to you... might be when price touches the same S&R twice, when price rotates back and forth at a reference forth, etc...

 

I dont use strict rules for what defines a balance area or not. I just eyeball it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A Balance Area will look like a Normal Distribution.

 

If you show the picture below to a Market Profile trader, they will say the market is in "Balance". It's has a Normal Distribution profile and it closed back into middle of the chart at the end of the day.

 

MP traders don't need indicator to see balance area, they can just eyball it.

 

It just takes screen time to be able to recognize it.

Balance.thumb.png.4ee500e14d57d1854841b299ad27ea95.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi...

 

Would it be possible to look at the volume distribution for each bar and then to use a consolidation or cluster of trading within a tight range with several consecutive bar to begin to identify a base?

 

I guess I am trying to think of a way to build an indicator that will map out bases. Does that make sense or am I going down the wrong path?

 

thanks

Jennifer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds good, test it out to see if it will work for you.

 

The only exception to your concept on how to identify a Balance with using "tight range" don't fit. "Tight Range" are begging for a Break-out and are not a stable balance area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WinSum....

 

So I am not sure I understand what you are saying... Is a "Balance Area" seen as a stable area or is it seen as a break out begging to happen? I would think that both would perhaps be true since essentially every breakout comes from a balance area or some sort... correct?

 

To begin to define what is a balance area we have to define it from a trend or just basic "chop"... so my thought would be to define it as a tight range of consolidated volume/trading over a given period of time. Does that sound ok so far?

 

Jennifer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Jennifer said:
WinSum....

 

So I am not sure I understand what you are saying... Is a "Balance Area" seen as a stable area or is it seen as a break out begging to happen? I would think that both would perhaps be true since essentially every breakout comes from a balance area or some sort... correct?

Jennifer

 

Correct, Market goes from Balance to Imbalance and back into Balance and then back to Imbalance again.

 

I use Market Profile to see developing Balanced Area, if your indicator is similiar, then I would agree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Jennifer said:
WinSum....

 

So I am not sure I understand what you are saying... Is a "Balance Area" seen as a stable area or is it seen as a break out begging to happen? I would think that both would perhaps be true since essentially every breakout comes from a balance area or some sort... correct?

 

To begin to define what is a balance area we have to define it from a trend or just basic "chop"... so my thought would be to define it as a tight range of consolidated volume/trading over a given period of time. Does that sound ok so far?

 

Jennifer

 

Yes Jennifer, that could also be called Coils or rectangles, now that is derived from price action itself, I think the "term" balance area cand be used also for being inside vah and val.... so in that case you will be monitoring the break outside vah and val.... not a price action coil.... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.