Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Recommended Posts

Traders who implement an out-of-the-money naked call strategy are betting that the market price of an option's underlying asset will fall. The technique involves selling an out-of-the-money call option, hoping that it will expire out-of-the money. Traders who use this type of bear option strategy do not need cash to enter the market. However, the terms of their call sale will limit their profit potential. On the contrary, an investor's loss potential is infinite. If the market price rallies, traders who use this strategy will incur large monetary losses.

 

Moneyness Review for Calls

 

Out-of-The Money (OTM) = Strike price (more than) Market Price

In-The-Money (ITM) = Strike price (less than) Market Price

At-The-Money (ATM) Strike price (equals) Market Price

 

How to Carry Out An Out-Of-The-Money Naked Call Strategy

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=29065&stc=1&d=1337681446

 

Disney stock is worth $48 (market price) in June.

1) Trader sells the call option: DISJul50($3)

- 100 shares of Disney stock

- Strike Price $40, out-of-the-money (OTM), expiring in 30 days

- Premium Cost of $3

3) Trader receives a $300 credit when entering the market. [$300 (received from call buyer)]

Total cost to enter the market: -$300

 

Result one: Disney stock rises (rallies) to $68 in July.

a) The call option sold expires ITM, and the investor who bought the trader's call option exercises his or her right to buy 100 shares at $50.

b) The trader purchases 100 Disney shares in the open market to cover the short sale, paying $6800, and then sells the shares to the buyer, receiving $5000.

c) The trader loses a total of $1500 after adding the premium credit taken when entering the market to the loss. [-$1500 = $1800 (loss from call) + $300 (credit to enter market)]

 

Result two: Disney stock falls (crashes) to $28 in July.

a) The call option sold expires worthless. (OTM)

b) The trader's profits totals $300 after keeping the credit earned when entering the market.

 

Result three: Disney stock rises (moderately) to $53 in July.

a) The call option sold expires ITM, and the investor who bought the trader's call option exercises his or her right to buy 100 shares at $40.

b) The trader purchases 100 Disney shares in the open market to cover the short sale, paying $5300, and then sells the shares to the buyer, receiving $5000.

c) The trader loses a total of $0 after adding the premium credit taken when entering the market to the loss. [$0 = $300 (loss from call) + $300 (credit to enter market)]

 

Advantages and Disadvantages in Carrying Out An Out-Of-The-Money Naked Call Strategy

 

Pluses: The upside to this type of strategy is that investors do not need cash to enter the market. They are betting that the asset's market value will crash and the call will expire OTM, allowing them to keep the credit earned when entering the market. Traders can also use the credit to offset losses in moderate bull markets or to reduce total loss if the underlying asset's value rallies.

 

Minuses: The downside in using an out-of-the-money naked call strategy is that it exposes traders to infinite potential losses when the market rallies, since any asset's market price could theoretically rise as much as demand permits. The method also limits the trader's profit potential to only the premiums that he or she receives when entering the market.

out-of-the-money-naked-call.gif.7556bcefd207d05fa30b54ba5921837f.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm still a dove regarding crypto trading. Not because of the instruments traded, but because of the lack of market centralization. It reminds me of the early days of forex trading where no broker-dealers offered trade clearing via the interbank market. This is basically betting against "the house" which is its own captive market-maker, has its own one-off price feed, and has its own one-off trade execution policies. As a side note, I always opt out of broker-dealers' arbitration clauses within 30 days of account opening pursuant to the U.S. Federal Arbitration Act. Unscrupulous broker-dealers and platform sellers don't even provide opt-out terms in their trading/subscription agreements, but it still exists pursuant to federal statutes and federal court precedent. Sierra Chart also collects unspent platform subscription deposits from traders in their website's online "wallet." This subjects them not only to FINRA liability but CFPB liability as well. I figuratively atom bombed Sierra Chart with this info and they refunded all platform fees and data fees that I ever paid to them before I closed my Sierra Chart account. On a more general note, virtually all broker-dealers are either partnered with, or straight up are, Wall Street investment banks and hedge funds. These are the folks that refer to retail traders as "cannon fodder" and "fish food." To me, any broker-dealer is nothing more than a counterparty to a series of my transactions. If I find any reason not to trust a broker-dealer, I'm out. Crypto trading, as it presently exists, fits the bill. Crypto owning/investment might be a different story, but I'm strictly a trader.
    • Consider this... While a human trader has emotions, a bot does not. All a human trader needs to do to code a statistically profitable strategy on a good emotional day. And it can be coded for any timeframe, intraday or overnights.
    • Well said. Broker-dealers that aren't connected to centralized exchanges or the prime interbank exchanges are, in fact, casinos--where nothing extends beyond "the house."
    • My latest trick... After successfully live trading forex for years, switch to trading futures in the U.S. Chicago Mercantile Exchanges. Futures spreads are generally 1 or 2 ticks with no swaps, and data fees and commission fees are fixed. As a caveat, leverage changes throughout every day based on international sessions, so this is not for small accounts. 
    • @analyst75, I am just dying for you to write a sequel... Why Some Young People Prefer to Live Alone.😂
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.