Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Voltrader

A Stylish Study of Price

Recommended Posts

When I first started trading, I used to beat myself up when my equity curve was either losing money or not growing consistently like I wanted it to. Consequently, I would constantly search for better entries, better systems etc. It finally dawned on me that there was a strong correlation to my equity curve and ES (S&P mini futures) volatility. My pnl would increase rapidly during periods of high volatility and would remain stagnant in periods of sideways or up-grinding markets.

 

Contrary to pundits and pushy trading educators, traditional (albeit boring) academic finance can be a value-added tool in the retail trader’s arsenal. Stephen J Taylor introduced the notion of Stylized Facts, which provide great insight into our basis for understanding volatility and the best scenarios for intraday trading. In Asset Price Dynamics, Volatility, and Prediction Taylor lists some Stylized Facts for intraday returns:

  • Intraday returns have a fat-tailed distribution, whose kurtosis increases at the frequency of price observations increases.

  • Intraday returns from traded assets are almost uncorrelated, with any important dependence usually restricted to a negative correlation between consecutive returns.

  • There is a substantial positive dependence among intraday absolute returns, which occurs at many low lags and also among returns separated by an integer number of days.

  • The average level of volatility depends on the time of day, with a significant intraday variation.

  • There are short bursts of high volatility in intraday prices that follow major macroeconomic announcements.

 

What can we learn professor Taylor’s study? One, its really important to break intraday trading in futures or equities into timeframes. Traders make money by being on the correct side of substantial price fluctuations; however, if one is trading during a period of low volatility the likelihood of profitable scalp trading is very low. Two, bursts of volatility following major macroeconomic events can offer savvy traders great opportunities to take advantage of technical chart patterns. Thirdly, we also know that volatility comes in bunches. Meaning that there is a strong likelihood that periods of larger price movement tend to cluster together.

 

Lastly, traders can use this to extrapolate the best times of day for a particular style of trading. For example, during the first hour (initial balance) traders might use a scalping strategy as a opposed to a trend following strategy, while in the afternoon a trader might be better served to hop on the established trend for the day.

 

In conclusion, if retail traders can align strategies with probable periods of high and low volatility they will see their overall equity curve increase exponentially.

 

Green Trading,

Voltrader

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As much as I get annoyed with academics, I really think that what Taylor discussed can be used to make money. For example, I allocated some of my capital to a strategy that just trades the afternoons and looks to ride trends if they exist. I sometimes like to scour the literature for ways to improve my trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gee Mitsubishi give the guy a chance - he has come one with what seems like something that is actually based in some factual breakdown of the markets.

In summary maybe it shows using facts/analysis - not subjective reasoning - you should have patience and be selective in the markets and that you dont have to trade all the time - wait for the right opportunities.

If the books on Amazon are anything to go by it seems a little more scientific. Now it may be academic and academics dont usually do that well in the markets however the point of academia is usually to expand knowledge and ideas not make money.

 

It seems to me that if if the first criticism you have is that "tell me something I dont already know" then you think you are the expert on everything.

 

(voltrader - before you get flamed - beware that if you are selling anything thats fine but you should register as such, I say as I noticed Green Trading in your sign off...whats that.)

 

Otherwise as I like to read about new things as well as stir up Mitsuibishi sometimes this thread might be interesting, or it might have all been said and done before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Green Trading"

is just a signature i use that means profitable trading. As far as the rude response, it just proved to me that I shouldn't get involved in forum discussions.This was my first to the community and probably will be my last. I was trying to offer a different perspective on day trading seeing as how most retail traders blow out over and over. It seemed to me that the reason most people struggled was the fact that they viewed trading in a non-scientific manner. I'm not saying you need to be a quant because i'm not, but to have such a foul attitude about very relevant information speaks volumes.

 

It perplexes me how somehow can expect to succeed in a chaotic complex market without looking for repeatable "stylistic properties". The reason that option traders trade the volatility surface is because it mean reverts. Mean Reversion is a predictable pattern. Gambling day in day out and shunning academic info is willful ignorance at best.

 

All I was trying to do was contribute to the community, if its not well received then so be it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

...

 

... as I noticed Green Trading in your sign off...whats that.

 

...

 

 

 

I've interpreted it as "Profitable Trading to you guys!" :)

 

 

(An alternative would be "Trade agricultural futures!"... but that did not make sense to me :stick out tongue: )

 

 

EDIT: Did not see Voltrader's reply yet. It was published with a time lag as his posts are still moderated.

Edited by karoshiman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Voltrader - please do get involved. there are plenty here and elsewhere that do carry on like internet fascists, but its all part of the game, there are also plenty of interested participants who may also not agree with you, but that should help clarify even your own thoughts/ideas. - as in trading you have to have thick skin. dont forget - the majority who trade in the market are often wrong, and things can be misinterpreted....

 

Given your mention of options you may have a lot more to offer than others.

 

The green trading mention now seems so obvious. :doh: karoshiman is smarter than me.

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I for one would welcome a discussion about returns in relation to volatility, and anyone who has attempted to quantify this would have my ear. I feel that my positive equity curve ( not "making winning trades", mind you,) has also been related to "Goldilocks" volatility- not too little, not to much,but juuuust right, which is a weak link in my trading. If someone has explored this issue and wanted to share, it would be a valuable contribution to the community.

Cheers,

Brookwood

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope Volttrader comes back and posts his thots. Unfortunately, there are many whose sole purpose is to criticize others rathen than ask Q and learn.. What a pity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As far as the rude response, it just proved to me that I shouldn't get involved in forum discussions.This was my first to the community and probably will be my last.

 

Think of a discipline like martial arts where there are defined levels of progress. Depending upon your achievement and progress you get a colored belt and different degrees. You decided to share, so you achieved a level higher than most. Now you are saying that you are going to quit, which is okay, depending upon the reason. If you want to continue except for the negative feedback, is that a good reason? Very few people will get to 'level 1' and share anything. Even fewer will get to 'Level 2', and keep going against the difficulties. What level do you want to operate in or achieve?

 

Unfortunately the natural human mind doesn't seem to honor overcoming criticism from others. We can become passive and allow others to control our destiny. That's not a good thing. I'm not saying that is what you are doing, but if it is, I hope you consider whether that's the way you want to live your life or not.

 

It can be a good and valid tactic to just quit and move on, depending upon each person's needs and abilities. But at least consider what level you want to operate in and achieve. There are few leaders and many followers. Leader's don't have to be 'Type A', hard driving personalities. The world might be a better place if we had fewer of those people at the top of the power structure.

 

I'm not saying it's bad to quit and move on, I'm just saying that we often get easily discouraged and quit, without considering a couple of things. All I'm saying is to consider what level you want or are able to operate on; how unfortunate it would be if you are meant to be a leader, and quit; and who do you want controlling you life and your future?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Think of a discipline like martial arts where there are defined levels of progress. Depending upon your achievement and progress you get a colored belt and different degrees. You decided to share, so you achieved a level higher than most. Now you are saying that you are going to quit, which is okay, depending upon the reason. If you want to continue except for the negative feedback, is that a good reason? Very few people will get to 'level 1' and share anything. Even fewer will get to 'Level 2', and keep going against the difficulties. What level do you want to operate in or achieve?

 

Unfortunately the natural human mind doesn't seem to honor overcoming criticism from others. We can become passive and allow others to control our destiny. That's not a good thing. I'm not saying that is what you are doing, but if it is, I hope you consider whether that's the way you want to live your life or not.

 

It can be a good and valid tactic to just quit and move on, depending upon each person's needs and abilities. But at least consider what level you want to operate in and achieve. There are few leaders and many followers. Leader's don't have to be 'Type A', hard driving personalities. The world might be a better place if we had fewer of those people at the top of the power structure.

 

I'm not saying it's bad to quit and move on, I'm just saying that we often get easily discouraged and quit, without considering a couple of things. All I'm saying is to consider what level you want or are able to operate on; how unfortunate it would be if you are meant to be a leader, and quit; and who do you want controlling you life and your future?

 

 

Man... these are some deep thoughts and deductions as a response to his tiny comment... :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.........

In conclusion, if retail traders can align strategies with probable periods of high and low volatility they will see their overall equity curve increase exponentially.....

How does one do that? It is easy enough to say high volatility follows low volatility follows high volatility round and round.

 

But timing is everything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Green Trading"

is just a signature i use that means profitable trading. As far as the rude response, it just proved to me that I shouldn't get involved in forum discussions.This was my first to the community and probably will be my last. I was trying to offer a different perspective on day trading seeing as how most retail traders blow out over and over. It seemed to me that the reason most people struggled was the fact that they viewed trading in a non-scientific manner. I'm not saying you need to be a quant because i'm not, but to have such a foul attitude about very relevant information speaks volumes.

 

It perplexes me how somehow can expect to succeed in a chaotic complex market without looking for repeatable "stylistic properties". The reason that option traders trade the volatility surface is because it mean reverts. Mean Reversion is a predictable pattern. Gambling day in day out and shunning academic info is willful ignorance at best.

 

All I was trying to do was contribute to the community, if its not well received then so be it.

 

On fx forums one can get criticized for giving good ideas on trading, and many entries are talking pure BS. Maybe you shouldn't get discouraged by that, accept that as normal and join the party. Suggest, don't reply to attacker, he has no right to do attacking, neither the right to tell you what you should present as fx material, he is just a naughty punk and not worth to reply to. So, if someone reject you for innocent and good entries, simply don't reply

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on Voltrader,

Lets hear some more about mean reversion and Professor Talor

Thanks

bobc

PS The Manhatten project had about 2000 "experts" to develop the atomic bomb.

I guess thats why mitsubishi hates "experts". He's Japanese.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading, in its nutshell, is about dealing with volatility. If there is no volatility, there isn't much trading opportunities around. With that said, the question is always to find the right moment and right price to enter a market where you can clearly define the risk associated with the trading action. Of course, scientific method is useful to identity such opportunities in a systematic matter, but the question is always there. How can we consistently generate alpha based on your method. Based on your description on Dr. Taylor, I get a sense several techniques can be deployed to analyze the hypothesis. Time series models and simply covariance analysis can all be used to do that. So what did you use, Voltrader?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's nothing in my comment that was an attack on the OP.Wonder what the response would have been had i done so?

 

:offtopic:( All the above)

 

 

This is the beautiful thing about interpretations. :doh: and the rule of unintended consequences.

Unfortunately M, thats how a lot of things on the net are taken, especially when as a first post to a thread starter. I think every one has been guilty of it at some stage, and I also agree with your assessment about experts...its just that as a community, discussions need to be encouraged and then dissected, for good or bad....otherwise the community dies.

It seems that we are three pages into it and no more vol trader. I have not read the books /studies he mentions, and it seems no one else reading here has either and so it may have died before any value was uncovered or debunked. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
stylish..i don't know.But no substance beyond what we already know.You admit that yourself.Maybe this prof could team up with Rande -then we can all play spot the difference.Jeez i hate experts.:roll eyes: Nothing
mitsubishi must hate himself :rofl::rofl::haha::haha:::cool::)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
...I really think that what Taylor discussed can be used to make money...

 

Taylor is absolutely correct and I've been using volatility analysis is the futures markets since the later 80's with success. It's important to understand the price action one is trading involving how volatility changes (volatility analysis) throughout the trading day to be able to exploit it with different trade approaches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Taylor is absolutely correct and I've been using volatility analysis is the futures markets since the later 80's with success. It's important to understand the price action one is trading involving how volatility changes (volatility analysis) throughout the trading day to be able to exploit it with different trade approaches.

 

Hi wrbtrader,

Seeing that voltrader has gone back to Belize (thats where Patuca stays),what about you telling us how volality analysis works.

Kind regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Patuca- Do i really need to batter you over the head with your own canoe paddle?

You miserable little attention junkie.You really are a proactive waste of space. :roll eyes::)

LOL that is a great post mitsubishi. I can't help but like you! Good sense of humor.:applaud:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Patuca you old fox.You still posting? That cannot be right,you're dead.I distinctly remember running you over on your bike with an articulated lorry,leaving tyre tread patterns embedded in your face....Oh dear.i must have forgot to tell you.I am opening a new restaurant "Road Kill Bar And Grill" It tastes better than it sounds,but in your case we're just feeding your bones to the dogs. I just can't risk health and safety closing us down in the first week.:);)
don't you think that is a little overkill? thats it. i am not giving out anymore of my trading secrets such as go long when my motorcycle shifts from 1st to second gear and get out of your position when i hit the final gear. Or go short when I begin gearing down and cover when i am in first gear. you on your own mitsubishi you little snail..go back to polishing your emini cooper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
don't you think that is a little overkill? thats it. i am not giving out anymore of my trading secrets such as go long when my motorcycle shifts from 1st to second gear and get out of your position when i hit the final gear. Or go short when I begin gearing down and cover when i am in first gear. you on your own mitsubishi you little snail..go back to polishing your emini cooper.

 

Well, after a tough day at the coal face, I can relax with mitsubishi/patuca correspondence.And it looks like they are getting quite friendly :offtopic:

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

now now now mitsubishi for someone who understood george douglass taylor on first read and hates experts i am quite surprised at your latest trading tactic. but there may be some justification for such a tactic. i am trying to help you here mitsubishi. perhaps the pic will give a possible explanation for using such a tactic.

 

btw what happened to our friend mr felton? i dared him with the mitsubishi black box trading challenge and he is not answering back??

 

captain bob good to see you again. whats it like over there?

 

well it may be getting time to ride off in the sunset...or visit some other country. the high and mighty USA is getting boring. been here a few months. too many egotistical people here...

 

i may have to write a book on "Humility and How I Obtained It"

fart_150.jpg.8cd9d5551b3b10705b4b9df1467a1a3d.jpg

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.