Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Simple Trend Trade

Recommended Posts

We have all heard "The Trend is Your Friend". But, have you ever wondered how and when to jump in? Here's a simple way.

 

For this example I am using Aud/USD because it is clearly in a down trend.

1 hour time frame. 200 sma for visual reference, if price is below the 200 sma we are trending down. Stochastic 30, 10, 10. Above 80 on the Stoch is overbought, below 20 is oversold. On MT4 I had to superimpose the 80/20 lines.

 

In a downtrend, we wait for the Stoch to become overbought. We enter on a nice solid bearish candle. Not a Doji, Not a Morning Star or a Ringo Star.

 

S/l will go just above the most recent high. TP will be 10 pips above the next support area. In this case I had to move to a Daily to find support, It is the red horizontel line on the chart @9873. So we will round up to 9885. The red vertical line is where we entered.

If, as is the case here, the 200 sma moves down below your S/L, adjust your S.L to the 200.

 

In effect what we are doing is shorting a bounce.

 

Never risk more than .5% R?R should always be at least 1:1 Backtest before trading "Live", people lose money trading Forex.

scotts.thumb.gif.184b7ce06cb4fafcb1816e6c23e7c410.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mysticforex,

 

Thanks for the charts.

 

I"m curious if you were aware of any fundamental reasons, economic reasons for the Forex AUDUSD currency down trend when you were making your technical analysis regardless if those reasons had or had no impact on your technical analysis. ???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Mysticforex,

 

Thanks for the charts.

 

I"m curious if you were aware of any fundamental reasons, economic reasons for the Forex AUDUSD currency down trend when you were making your technical analysis regardless if those reasons had or had no impact on your technical analysis. ???

 

My main technical reason for looking at A/U was the fact that it was overbought by 2 or 3 standard deviations, But that's technical and beyond the scope of this thread.

 

Fundamentally the Chinese economy is slowing a bit, or, at least feared to be slowing. Oz is a major exporter to China. Also, Euro weakness against the Greenback usually translates into Aussie weakness against the $$$.

 

 

Here is a chart and what I posted on AUD back on 4/10/12

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/forex-trading-laboratory/11460-audusd-11.html

aud.thumb.gif.6aae20f2c6ec9e4aa80471afc4b815b4.gif

Edited by Mysticforex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. GBP/CHF has caught my eye today...

 

I mentioned in another thread I would like to see G/C close above 15000, and buy on a retrace and shoot for 15100. I may have my chance.

 

On the 1 hour chart below we have price above the 200 sma, trending up. The stoch is oversold, below 20. So on the stoch coming out of oversold, and a nice bullish candle I would like to buy this pair. TP @15090. If the most recent low remains intact we would have a pretty tight stop. 14970. We will have to wait and see if oppurtunity presents itself.

gcscot.thumb.gif.892c2a6fa98cf222a01209544e19e041.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mysticforex.....totally agree with your logic. I mostly trade the AUD/USD Futures on a 30min timeframe and the high probability trades are always selling into supply/resistance in a downtrend and buying support/demand in an uptrend. Sounds easy but as always the task is to correctly identify trend as well as support/resistance. Personally I use linear regression to define slope and TSI to identify overbought/oversold conditions. Nothing magical about what I use, it's the logic behind it which is important. I also accept that all my indicators will work well except for that last time at the turn of the trend but even then a bit of divergence can also serve to exercise caution. In the business of keeping trading as simple as possible I would say that the majority of my focus is trying to accurately identify trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Identifying trends and entering on pullbacks is a sound methodology and works well in most markets (especially the stock indices) - I never understand why more people don't trade like this.

 

As others have pointed out, correctly determining both the trend and an overbought/oversold condition are the two main difficulties here (they're also the only real input variables, which is good because it reduces the risk of curve-fitting).

 

For currencies the trend filter (SMA) needs to be appropriately selected - because these markets often produce strong trending moves, either a very short (eg 30) sma or a longer (eg 200 as suggested by MysticForex) SMA works well. In the indices you'd want something inbetween (eg 80sma). Also, using the directional slope of the SMA often produces much better results than a price/sma relative measure.

 

For identifying short term overbought/oversold conditions nothing but the most recent past matters - shorten the lookback for oscillators such as the stochastics, rsi, cci, to between 2-5 periods. There is absolutely no edge in a 14-period stochastic. If a 2-period stochastic sounds an unlikely proposition then go to the data and test what I'm saying in the market you want to trade.

 

Hope that helps.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The goal is to find people who are willing to pay you.

 

Taking a trade in the direction of the trend isn't going to help if there aren't people who are willing to pay you in the timeframe you are trading. Given a timeframe, it is frequently a better strategy to get paid by the people who are trying to take a trade in the direction of the trend. Hence, you can make money taking trades trading against the trend.

 

Do not be mistaken by what it means to trade against the trend. It is not the same as countertrend trading.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The goal is to find people who are willing to pay you.

 

Taking a trade in the direction of the trend isn't going to help if there aren't people who are willing to pay you in the timeframe you are trading. Given a timeframe, it is frequently a better strategy to get paid by the people who are trying to take a trade in the direction of the trend. Hence, you can make money taking trades trading against the trend.

 

Do not be mistaken by what it means to trade against the trend. It is not the same as countertrend trading.

 

I think what you describe is pretty much what MysticForex's method aims to exploit, isn't it?

 

The concept would be to buy a short term downtrend/breakdown, buying a position from those who are shorting this short term downtrend, in favour of the longer term uptrend. This means trading contrary to those with short term outlook (typically retail traders and those who are easily shaken out of positions) and aligning oneself with heavily capitalised institutions who have moved the market to where it is by accumulating inventory (positions which they will typically add to as the short-term outlook traders are shorting).

 

Buying pullbacks in trends works.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think what you describe is pretty much what MysticForex's method aims to exploit, isn't it?

 

The concept would be to buy a short term downtrend/breakdown, buying a position from those who are shorting this short term downtrend, in favour of the longer term uptrend. This means trading contrary to those with short term outlook (typically retail traders and those who are easily shaken out of positions) and aligning oneself with heavily capitalised institutions who have moved the market to where it is by accumulating inventory (positions which they will typically add to as the short-term outlook traders are shorting).

 

Buying pullbacks in trends works.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I am describing selling at support in an uptrend and taking money from weak longs who enter and begin scaling out immediately or have stops that are very close to their entry. Or, buying at resistance in a down trend when I suspect that there are weak shorts who have entered and are trying to call a short term top.

 

My definition of a weak trader has nothing to do with a traders ability to make consistent profits. it has to do with his patience or conviction to stay in a trade. I, in fact, fit neatly into my definition of a weak trader when I day trade. As such, there is nothing wrong with being weak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am describing selling at support in an uptrend and taking money from weak longs who enter and begin scaling out immediately or have stops that are very close to their entry. Or, buying at resistance in a down trend when I suspect that there are weak shorts who have entered and are trying to call a short term top.

 

My definition of a weak trader has nothing to do with a traders ability to make consistent profits. it has to do with his patience or conviction to stay in a trade. I, in fact, fit neatly into my definition of a weak trader when I day trade. As such, there is nothing wrong with being weak.

 

In that case I had misunderstood you - I think that you would in fact be taking the other side of trades made by a system such as the one MysticForex describes!

 

When you enter short at support in an uptrend, are you not concerned that, although the weak longs may be forced out (I will, after a contract has moved a few thousand dollars against me), the stronger hands who are controlling the long term state of the market will be eager to continue accumulating and pushing the market higher? This would theoretically put you on the other side of not only weak traders but also massively capitalised institutions who, regrettably, we have to consider to be 'strong hands'.

 

Thanks,

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In that case I had misunderstood you - I think that you would in fact be taking the other side of trades made by a system such as the one MysticForex describes!

 

When you enter short at support in an uptrend, are you not concerned that, although the weak longs may be forced out (I will, after a contract has moved a few thousand dollars against me), the stronger hands who are controlling the long term state of the market will be eager to continue accumulating and pushing the market higher? This would theoretically put you on the other side of not only weak traders but also massively capitalised institutions who, regrettably, we have to consider to be 'strong hands'.

 

Thanks,

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

I am concerned about anyone who is opposite me. The highly capitalzed long term traders are often pushing down to steal the positions from the weak longs. A weak long frequently becomes supply pretty quickly. A long term trader would rather remove a weak long trader at lower prices than to start marking up prices and have the weak long puke his position at higher prices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If gbp was not so weak lately, gbp/chf had a nice potential for 1.56..

 

Yes. They have in effect pegged the chf to the euro. The euro weakness the past few days has had it's effect on the swissy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some good posts here. Please contribute. If anyone has something they are watching that falls into what we are talking about here, ie: selling/buying on bounces/dips. buying/selling @ support/resistance, feel free to post it.

 

 

Today EUR/USD has caught my eye. 1 HR chart. Stoch overbought. Looks like price is bouncing off the 200 sma. OR... it could break through. If that is the case I am thinking the stoch will STAY overbought and we would not have entered. If the trade does open I see the next area of support ( recent ) @ 12650. We will have to see where it opens to determine S/L.

 

If we do break to the upside we could see 12860.

euscot.thumb.gif.3a5269420886e411bfcbf0d257fcd765.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't follow a lot of pairs, 5 - 7 at most. None of them are in an uptrend, mostly downtrend. And I think we will see mostly short covering for the next few days.

 

In any event we do have a setup on the A/U 1 HR.

auscot.thumb.gif.d15110f13ea7e03be499a08db8c721e2.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like this will open soon. I intentionally did not post TP and S/L.

Where would You put them?

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

auscot.thumb.gif.2bf61986911e4a86846bd7668ded02fd.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We also have a pending buy setup forming on USD/CAD.

Though with Home Sales out in 20 minutes I might be inclined to stand aside if it opens during the news candle.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

cadscot.thumb.gif.4d4f5162f913b144f798e91069e57cad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, we are back to GBP/CHF.

 

Price is close too, but below the 200 SMA, the stoch is overbought.

If the trade opens with price below the 200 sma, S/L will go above the 200SMA.

TP will be the next area of support @ 14850 making for very nice R/R.

gcscot.thumb.gif.6e9b5082be5c6fcb9bbd94cbdd7584c3.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.