Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Trading Psychology with Jason Jankovsky

Recommended Posts

For those of you that missed it. Check out the interview on trading psychology with Jason Jankovsky through our TL! Audio. It's given me new insights on my trading. What fascinating is his setups are based on trader mistakes. I have yet to completely organize my thoughts but will keep this thread updated on some new ideas and trading strategies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Listening to that made me remember that I've thought in the past about developing a strategy to take the opposite side of common losing trading strategies. We all know that a lot of traders will use MA crossover strategies on 5 minute charts and that these strategies are always losing strategies. A consistent losing strategy is just as good as a consistent winning strategy as long as you buy when the strategy is telling you to sell and sell when it's telling you to buy. It's difficult to find a way to incorporate that into a trading strategy though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jason Jankovsky is the man!

 

Mark Douglas' stuff is great as well!

 

JAJ has three great CBOT webinars.

 

its scary to hear JAJ took 10 years to understand this stuff.

 

Just survive the learning process everyone the end of the tunnel is your pot of gold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish he would have shared something more specific on how to exploit what he was talking about. He basically said losers move the market (a variation on JC's "the market's move because they have to"), but he didn't say anything on how to know when this is happening. I sensed this frustration in the interviewer as well.

 

Is the answer in his book?

 

 

I'm not sure I buy his point about zero-sum markets either. The cash market is not zero-sum, the futures market is. But the index futures market is based on the cash market. If trade SPY or I trade ES I'm trading essentially the same price movement. So if I'm trading SPY is it not zero-sum and if I trade ES it is zero-sum? If I buy an index mutual fund or a future contract and keep rolling it over I'm basically doing the same thing. Is one zero-sum and the other not? That makes no sense.

 

Technically an index future contract is "zero-sum." But it's based on something which is not. The whole zero-sum thing is a carnard. Everyone gets something out of the markets. The winners get money and the losers get lessons. It's win-win if you want it to be. The problem is losers don't gain anything from losing, that's why it seems like an ultimate loss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps we can ask him the next time he stops by in the chat room. I am also very interested in picking up his book as I have not yet read it myself. I have decided to take a deeper look in understanding the psychology behind price action. I am slowly starting to realize that all these pivots, fibs, etc.. may not be the ideal way to trade. They only work because of the imbalance of supply vs demand at these levels. I figured the heck with them... might as well keep a chart naked with volume only and determine supply vs demand and the psychology behind the losers. (of course I am not ready to do so yet but perhaps in the near future?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the chapter names of his book, its mostly pretty standard stuff. Solid, but nothing spectacular.

 

Soul, see my points about zero-sum below and tell me what you think if you are of a mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
Perhaps we can ask him the next time he stops by in the chat room. I am also very interested in picking up his book as I have not yet read it myself. I have decided to take a deeper look in understanding the psychology behind price action. I am slowly starting to realize that all these pivots, fibs, etc.. may not be the ideal way to trade. They only work because of the imbalance of supply vs demand at these levels. I figured the heck with them... might as well keep a chart naked with volume only and determine supply vs demand and the psychology behind the losers. (of course I am not ready to do so yet but perhaps in the near future?)

 

He sees the light, sort off.;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  GCB said:
I wish he would have shared something more specific on how to exploit what he was talking about. He basically said losers move the market (a variation on JC's "the market's move because they have to"), but he didn't say anything on how to know when this is happening. I sensed this frustration in the interviewer as well.

 

Is the answer in his book?

 

Its an intangible skill in my opinion.

 

If you've ever had a losing trade get out of hand, you'll know what he's talking about. If you've never had one trade get out of hand, you'll never understand what one goes through mentally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be interested to hear what he has to say

 

I am a bit confused because I thought he did use fibs and MA's and S/R etc. etc. in his trading.

 

Is this just to get an idea of what everyone is looking at?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  GCB said:
Looking at the chapter names of his book, its mostly pretty standard stuff. Solid, but nothing spectacular.

 

Soul, see my points about zero-sum below and tell me what you think if you are of a mind.

 

I honestly do not know GCB. I mean what about ETF's as well? Is that a zero-sum game? I understand what you are getting out in terms of everyone is getting something out of the market. But I do think Jason was referring in monetary terms. One loses money while one gains money.

 

This is definitely not a new concept to trading but has me thinking in a very new way. Strategies can be based on trader psychology. The shorter the timeframe, the more we see the shift in trader emotions. (through the constant swings in the markets) If traders buy at VAH for example but price fail to lift, those traders must sell to limit their losses or from the pain of loss. This will create selling presuure in the markets hence a short opportunity exists through their mistakes. Thus we see more probability of price cruising to VAL. Or if short term buyers exist at S1 and lifts price, they will need to sell eventually before the close to lock in profits or if they have hit their specific exit point. Which means we are expected to see sell orders by these traders in the near future. Hence, when they sell is a good time to short. Price will only lift further when new market participants step in to buy. So we need to see fresh buying either from the short term buyers or long term buyers. I know this sounds extremely simply with the basic concept of supply vs demand. But I have never fully incorporated trader psychology 100% into my trading. It was always about price action in terms of "market is making a higher low" or "buying volume exists at S1" but never entirely thinking about the traders who bought/sold earlier and will need to liquidate/bail. I truly believe that once I am able to master the trader psych side in price, I will be much better spotting out better trading opportunities. I hope this makes sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
But I do think Jason was referring in monetary terms. One loses money while one gains money.

 

This is definitely not a new concept to trading but has me thinking in a very new way.

 

But I have never fully incorporated trader psychology 100% into my trading. It was always about price action in terms of "market is making a higher low" or "buying volume exists at S1" but never entirely thinking about the traders who bought/sold earlier and will need to liquidate/bail. I truly believe that once I am able to master the trader psych side in price, I will be much better spotting out better trading opportunities. I hope this makes sense.

 

It does indeed help to know that emotions are driving the buying and selling, because that's the only way to make any sense of it. I'm just never sure which emotions are at work in what combination and why they continue for the time periods they do. What for example, happens on those days when the market sells off and just keeps selling off all day? How come hardly anyone steps in and buys? And what about reversals days, just why do buyers step in? And what about reversal days that reverse twice? Why the heck is going on? Well, in a sense it really doesn't matter. It's really just people freaking out back and forth. He's right about that.

 

I'm not trying to be the devil's advocate. The market does what it does. It's really like a flock of demented birds, everyone just follows everyone else. It keeps going in one direction until it doesn't go that way anymore. The trick is to get in the move early. Takes nerve and a bit of insight, and the discipline to manage whatever happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jankovsky does say in his book that 80-90% of price movement in the markets is just losers liquidating their positions. This is a startling statement, but worth considering.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zero sum game was a term invented under the umbrella of game theory and it has very specific meaning

 

the futures market IS zero sum. it HAS to be. the structure of the market determines that

 

the cash market is NOT zero sum. it cannot be. the structure of the market again determines that.

 

it is true that spy moves in concert with ES. But one MARKET is not zero sum. The other is.

 

I came to trading with a love of game theory.

 

What you have to understand about the term zero sum is it refers to the SYSTEM as a whole, not an individual traders experience. That is key. If you are trading Spy, you are not trading within a zero sum game system. If you are trading ES you are.

 

This says nothing about YOUR trading. It merely is a description of the structure of the system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  GCB said:
Jankovsky does say in his book that 80-90% of price movement in the markets is just losers liquidating their positions. This is a startling statement, but worth considering.

 

 

It might be so, however:

 

1. We know from Market Profile that those short covering moves don't last, there is no real demand behind them.

 

2. We also know that it is precisely 80-90% of market movements and trades that don't amount to anything better than a total of zero, while the whole positive impact comes from the remaining 10-20%.....so.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.