Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

traderxman

Balanced Areas

Recommended Posts

Came across this site

 

Emini Day Trader - Market Profile, Volume and Proprietary Software to Day Trade the Emini S&P

 

this guy shows the colored volume bars indicating price rejection and also acceptance...looks like he takes a couple of higher volume bars. (i.e. you will note the bars color changes with higher volume) then creates a balanced area...then looks to trigger at the middle of balance. He has charts to decipher..

 

BTW I have no affiliation and may have more details to share if anyone may be interested. Not looking to get this guy courses sold by NO means. I already have it, at least b4 he came out with this software to draw the middle.

 

Any comments on this concept with anyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mats: market auction trading system.

 

I was into this prior to finding Volume Spread Analysis.

 

Actually the fact that there were so many times when the market would have higher volume bars and then change direction lead me to re-evaluate the method. Instead of just moving down to the balance line and then turning up, the market would continue lower, for example. It neglects the fact that weakness comes in on strong bars and strength comes in on weak bars.

 

I liked the Market Profile elements underlying it. Plus the fact that there are no indicators.

 

I do think that is has some value. He does use Squat Bars, or Volume Churn Bars. I think some other elements maybe valid. Would love to hear more about it.

 

Do you use this method? Did you take the course, or just "decode" it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup its MATS alright...

 

squat bars, jump bars, HHV & HV bars...whole new volume numbers to input for each day etc etc.

 

Balanced Area MAtrix...BAM for short :)

 

It is EXACTLY like you mentioned about the inconsistent useage of volume along the lines of market reversals.

 

I have spent a fair penny and my time looking into volume...cisco futures and LDB data...I honestly have to say that perhaps I may have missed something as Dave Johnston from MATS is convinced it is the best thing since sliced bread, however I digress :)

 

I am currently using geometry (my take from Drummond Geometry)

 

SoulTrader has placed together a terrific environment. Keeping the salivating vendors at bay with alot of his and some others input on various edges.

 

I am liking this place alot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread got me thinking about MATS. I really like that is uses no technical indicators. Moreover, I like that its concepts are rooted in Market Auction Theory .

 

At one point I was working with this method (not the real one, but my attempt to decode it from what is on the site and what Dave Johnson told me) and did find some value. The problem was many times at tops and bottoms it would be wrong. This lead me to VSA. It does a good job of determining tops and bottoms-the result of imbalances of supply and demand.

 

Since both methods do have volume at their core, I have been thinking if it is possible to combine the two. Still looking at it but Here is what I have so far.

 

A Balance Area is formed when there are two or more paintbars in a row. On the first non-paintbar, after the Balance Area is established. Note there are 3 Balance Areas on this chart. The middle one is a HV Balance Area.

 

This Balance Area is interesting. Note that the first bar is wide spread up bar on High volume that closes in the middle of its range. VSA tells us that a bar like that must contain Selling (supply). The next bar is key. This bar closes below the previous bar . Therefore, the first bar could not of been all buying. If it were buying , then why is the next bar (this one) down?

 

So while the Balance Area is created basically by the range of one bar, we know it is a selling Balance Area. Check out the small "c" on the second bar. This is a Volume Churn, or squat bar. We have volume higher than the previous bar and an equal or lesser range. Buyers have stepped in on this bar and are keeping prices supported. Market Makers, who can see both sides of the market, are keeping the range narrow as they can see Buy orders on their books and thus expect higher prices.

 

Note that we now see an area where the bulls and the bears are indeed "fighting" for control of the market. Mats would place an order one tick below the midpoint to go short a Selling Balance Area. However, I like the idea of waiting to see either a NO Demand bar (x's above a bar) or a Volume Churn bar. We could also look for Up thrusts preferably inside the Balance Area.

 

There is a squat and a No Demand bar that could be used to enter at the first selling Balance Area on the chart. The close of the squat is inside the BA which is ideal. The No Demand is just outside but within reason. Of course, if you short on the squat, then the No Demand is only there to give you some confidence and not trade entry.

 

Hopefully, Traderxman will find the time to share some of what he knows. I do think it is worth pursuing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where is a good place to start learning about VSA?

I am currently taking the cisco short course but after some reading on TL I am starting to think that it might be a waste as I could have received the same info from Mind Over Markets.

 

How accurate would you say VSA is at finding tops/bottoms?

 

Thanks,

Jonathan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes PivotProfiler, I'm getting kinda interested in this VSA stuff you're writing about. Any place you recommend to learn a bit more of the basics of it?

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I truly believe that by combining Volume Spread Analysis with Market Profile/Auction Market Theory one can create a powerful way to view, understand and trade the markets.

 

All markets are governed by the laws of Supply and Demand. Specifically, the imbalances of supply and demand brought about by Professional (or Smart Money) traders.

 

The place to begin is with the book, Master the Markets by Tom Williams. Currently it is only available at Tradeguider.com. They have told me that they are looking for a publisher for wide spread (no pun intended) distribution. Personally, I do not like the tradeguider software and that is ultimately what they are about. However they do offer a lot of free information on VSA.

 

Tom Williams took the Wyckoff (concepts) course and expanded on the concepts. Wyckoff looks at price and volume. Tom looks at volume, spread (range of bar) and closing price.

 

Friday morning 0815 EST they are running a public demo. Go to the web site and click on enter site, if you are interested. Tomorrow (3/9) will be interesting as it is a big "news day". Professional money uses news driven events to manipulate the market. There should be ample opportunities to see them in action. Of course, many of you will be trading the event yourselves, but if not check it out.

 

On the site there are a number of webinars that can be viewed for free. There are also some webinars on the CBOT site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  PivotProfiler said:
This thread got me thinking about MATS. I really like that is uses no technical indicators. Moreover, I like that its concepts are rooted in Market Auction Theory .

 

At one point I was working with this method (not the real one, but my attempt to decode it from what is on the site and what Dave Johnson told me) and did find some value. The problem was many times at tops and bottoms it would be wrong. This lead me to VSA. It does a good job of determining tops and bottoms-the result of imbalances of supply and demand.

 

Since both methods do have volume at their core, I have been thinking if it is possible to combine the two. Still looking at it but Here is what I have so far.

 

A Balance Area is formed when there are two or more paintbars in a row. On the first non-paintbar, after the Balance Area is established. Note there are 3 Balance Areas on this chart. The middle one is a HV Balance Area.

 

This Balance Area is interesting. Note that the first bar is wide spread up bar on High volume that closes in the middle of its range. VSA tells us that a bar like that must contain Selling (supply). The next bar is key. This bar closes below the previous bar . Therefore, the first bar could not of been all buying. If it were buying , then why is the next bar (this one) down?

 

So while the Balance Area is created basically by the range of one bar, we know it is a selling Balance Area. Check out the small "c" on the second bar. This is a Volume Churn, or squat bar. We have volume higher than the previous bar and an equal or lesser range. Buyers have stepped in on this bar and are keeping prices supported. Market Makers, who can see both sides of the market, are keeping the range narrow as they can see Buy orders on their books and thus expect higher prices.

 

Note that we now see an area where the bulls and the bears are indeed "fighting" for control of the market. Mats would place an order one tick below the midpoint to go short a Selling Balance Area. However, I like the idea of waiting to see either a NO Demand bar (x's above a bar) or a Volume Churn bar. We could also look for Up thrusts preferably inside the Balance Area.

 

There is a squat and a No Demand bar that could be used to enter at the first selling Balance Area on the chart. The close of the squat is inside the BA which is ideal. The No Demand is just outside but within reason. Of course, if you short on the squat, then the No Demand is only there to give you some confidence and not trade entry.

 

Hopefully, Traderxman will find the time to share some of what he knows. I do think it is worth pursuing.

 

 

Pivot : are does paintbars on TS ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Trader_JG said:
Where is a good place to start learning about VSA?

I am currently taking the cisco short course but after some reading on TL I am starting to think that it might be a waste as I could have received the same info from Mind Over Markets.

 

How accurate would you say VSA is at finding tops/bottoms?

 

Thanks,

Jonathan

 

Just a quick post.

 

While this is not the best time of day/night to trade, we often can see good set ups.

 

Here we force Professional Money to show itself at the POC.

 

Note that we get a red paintbar. This bar closes on its low with higher volume. The low close tells us that this is a weak bar. The next bar, however, is narrow and has greater volume with an equal close. A close that is also in the middle of the range. There is demand (buying) in this bar.

 

Two bars later, we see a narrow bar that closes on its lows on volume less than the previous two bar- NO SUPPLY. Perfect place to get long. Tom Williams really likes this type of set-up.

 

Two more bars later, we see a bar that closes lower than the previous bar, closes on or near its high, makes a lower low, and has volume less than the prior two bars-THIS IS A TEST.

 

The Smart Money is testing for supply. If you missed the first entry, here's another chance to get on board.

 

Catching tops and bottoms is nice, but getting into a trade knowing you're on the same side as the Smart Money is better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pivotprofiler,

 

I always do enjoy reading your posts. Can you explain a little further on why the narrow bar is a test? I do understand the concept behind the previous bars... but am unable to fully comprehend why that narrow bar becomes a test for supply. I see volume is low.... did the markets test for supply near the low of the bar? In other words, sellers were not interested in selling so low so buyers stepped in to close the bar near its high? Thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the VSA book. It is good. The problem is that the methods need a few more examples for me to understand them. Would be really good if someone could just walk through a few more charts with thoughts on VSA methods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Soultrader said:
Hi Pivotprofiler,

 

I always do enjoy reading your posts. Can you explain a little further on why the narrow bar is a test? I do understand the concept behind the previous bars... but am unable to fully comprehend why that narrow bar becomes a test for supply. I see volume is low.... did the markets test for supply near the low of the bar? In other words, sellers were not interested in selling so low so buyers stepped in to close the bar near its high? Thank you

 

Thank you for the kind words. May I say the feeling is mutual.

 

As for the chart shown.

 

The No Supply bar is a narrow bar that closes on its middle or low with volume less than the previous two bars.

 

With volume less than the previous two bars, we know that there was no real selling pressure or interest. VSA teaches us that 85% of a volume bar is Professional Activity. And it is their activity that we are interested in mirroring. If the bar is low than they are not interested. (of course 85% of a low number is still more than zero- so they are still present.)

 

In VSA, however we look at relative volume. That is, volume compared to the one bar ago or two bars ago. We are not concerned with actual volume numbers. We do look at actual volume as well, but again not number but we gauge actual thru the use of moving average of volume. For example, the tradeguider charts have the relative volume bands and when a volume bar is in the salmon colored area, it is Ultra High.

 

As for the test. This test is not a narrow range test. The ideal test bar would have a narrow range, close below the previous bar, close on or near its high and have volume less than the previous two bars.

 

Tom does not look at the open but I think sometimes the open helps. In this bar look at what must of been the case:

 

1. the bar opens and price is 'marked' down

2. buying comes in and pushes price up

3. Price trades higher than the open to make a high

4. Price settles back down where it opened on the close.

 

In candle terms this is a Doji.

 

From the VSA perspective, the Smart Money is not interested in lower prices. But before they mark prices up, they need to be sure there are not any sellers. What the Smart Money usually does not want is to do is buy supply at higher prices. They would rather buy up the "paper" at lower prices and then sell to the retail trader at higher prices.

 

So they purposefully take price down to see(test) if there is interest. If the volume is high, then the market is not quite poised to rise. If it does rise, the up move is muted and price tends to go back and retest in the area of the original test.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  walterw said:
Pivot : do you have a shareable version of does mats (type) paintbars ? cheers Walter.

 

Still working on them.

 

If you're interested in the idea, take a look at Traderxman's posts about the method. Take a volume histogram and determine a way to classify volume as high, ultra high, average, etc.

 

In Tom's book he says to compare the last 30 periods. (Tradeguider-the company that bought the rights to Tom's work, will not disclose what they use for their volume bands). On an aside, this makes at least some of what TG does Black Box in my opinion.

 

Anyway, I place a simple 30 period moving average on volume. Then I use standard deviations of that to determine various levels. This would seem to be vary close to what MATS does. Mats trades off a 1 min chart but also looks at Market Profile. Probably a typical 30 min profile. So using a 30 minute average seems to fit into the Auction Market Theory concept as well as standard VSA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cisco futures has an extensive site on Auction Market Theory.

 

I have given what I have, in terms of "code" up to this point:

 

1. define average volume over some period x. For me, X=30.

2. Define 4 more levels of volume based on a deviation of the average.

3. why four? Mats has 4 paintbars: blue, green (cyan on the tradestation chart shown on the site),pink, and purple. Black bars are neutral (green on tradestation version shown).

 

The same idea is used in VSA as one way of determining how much volume a particular bar represents.

 

With the lowest volume bars (blue), there are a few other requirements. Like they be climbers or drifters (see Bill Williams' trading chaos). Also most of the blue bars are buying or selling bars.

 

Here buying bar refers to a bar that take out its previous bars high and not the low. A selling bar has a lower low than the previous bar but not a higher high.

 

Below we have a good example of what may be possible with the combination of "mats" and VSA. The first thing we see is stopping volume/climatic action. This bar has high volume that stops the preceding downtrend. With high volume and closing off the lows and the next bar up, we know there must of been Buying (demand) in this bar.

 

A few minutes later, a High Volume Balance Area is formed. We know it is a buying Balance Area, because the low is made before the high of the Balance Area. This concept comes from Mats. With VSA we know we have recently seen stopping volume. Hence we are looking to see if the market responds to the upside.

 

Ideal, we want to look for a No Supply sign within the Balance Area. Price moves out and then comes back inside. Note that the bar that represents No Supply does close within the Balance Area.

 

Remember, A balance Area is formed when there are two or more successive paintbars. When the next bar is a non paintbar (green) The balance Area is formed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok good Pivot.... I notice your chart is not Tradestation... on what platform are you charting ? does the platform has programing ? and last how do you get volume for forex ¡¡¡? certainly unusual ¡¡ cheers Walter.

 

 

pd: very nice inputs Pivot, are you familiar with this guys Technical Analysis QQQ Trading Nasdaq 100 Stock chart S&P 500 market timing system ? they also teach volume analisis

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  walterw said:
ok good Pivot.... I notice your chart is not Tradestation... on what platform are you charting ? does the platform has programing ? and last how do you get volume for forex ¡¡¡? certainly unusual ¡¡ cheers Walter.

 

 

pd: very nice inputs Pivot, are you familiar with this guys Technical Analysis QQQ Trading Nasdaq 100 Stock chart S&P 500 market timing system ? they also teach volume analisis

 

 

sorry Pivot but I am still very curios about your chart platform... cheers Walter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Visual Trader (VT) thru CMS. Yes there is volume in forex. It's the best kept secret. Volume is activity and therefore tick volume works as well as actual volume.

 

Esignal provides tick based volume data for forex. Tradeguider.com has a fact sheet on the data if you are interested. Nowadays some spot forex brokers provide volume. True it is only representative of their platform but it works nonetheless.

 

As far as the program language, it is basically the same as used in MetaStock. Which is one major reason why I like it. No new language to learn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those of you successfully trading MP, do you solely use VSA to take a position at MP and Pivot levels or do you also trade on moving averages looking at RSI etc?

 

I'm trying to put together a strategy but I keep changing it and hence losing $$ :(

 

Jonathan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.