Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

lastninja2

Trading volatile FUTS, <10 second trades, "price action" only?

Recommended Posts

If anyone here trades in this manner, I'd like to hear your thoughts on this approach, if you are willing to share.

 

Get rid of indicators, market profile etc, maybe just a few simple charts to keep track of the most important levels, but otherwise price ladders all the way. Not watching for reloading bids/offers per se (which lend itself, IMO, to trade lasting >10 seconds). Possibly heavy use of market orders during big momentum moves?

 

I know it can be done, I'm just curious to dig a little deeper in to this approach. Do such traders wait for stop runs, or perhaps regard stop runs as "artificial momentum" so to speak, and best avoided?

 

Realise its a peculiar thread - and I'm not holding my breath. But maybe, just maybe, a couple of guys have experience with this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

r/r far less than 1 I believe.

The rush being, the longer you are in the market, the greater the risk.

I like the idea of a low r/r because I think it aligns itself more closely with human nature ...

i.e. "better to snatch those profits from the table before the market steals them away from me"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  lastninja2 said:
r/r far less than 1 I believe.

The rush being, the longer you are in the market, the greater the risk.

I like the idea of a low r/r because I think it aligns itself more closely with human nature ...

i.e. "better to snatch those profits from the table before the market steals them away from me"

 

You're essentially talking about scalping that's different than typical day trading.

 

For scalping to work, you need a special low commission rates that the typical day trader doesn't get (e.g. high contract trader, exchange seat). In addition, you need to have a high percentage of winners because scalpers aren't usually trying to capture points...they're usually trying to capture ticks. Also, you need to be using a broker platform and charting/data software that's suitable for scalping.

 

If the above isn't in place...don't bother getting into scalping. You'll be better off just doing typical day trading.

 

P.S. I wonder why you didn't use the word "scalping".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

 

I have access to favourable comms, platforms and execution speeds.

No conspiracy behind lack of using the word "scalping". To be honest I have a natural dislike for terms like price action, scalping. As someone brought up in another thread, its not always clear what a person means when they use these terms.

 

Taking 7 ticks on a slow mover like FESX over the course of 5 minutes, is to me, well... I pretty much still call it scalping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  lastninja2 said:
If anyone here trades in this manner, I'd like to hear your thoughts on this approach, if you are willing to share.

 

Get rid of indicators, market profile etc, maybe just a few simple charts to keep track of the most important levels, but otherwise price ladders all the way. Not watching for reloading bids/offers per se (which lend itself, IMO, to trade lasting >10 seconds). Possibly heavy use of market orders during big momentum moves?

 

I know it can be done, I'm just curious to dig a little deeper in to this approach. Do such traders wait for stop runs, or perhaps regard stop runs as "artificial momentum" so to speak, and best avoided?

 

Realise its a peculiar thread - and I'm not holding my breath. But maybe, just maybe, a couple of guys have experience with this.

 

Micro scalping is my specialty. The first problem is that Futures traders are overly committed at a given price and, therefore, stop out frequently, because you will be wrong a proportion of the time, and any market will move against you.

 

In theory, your approach sounds good, but it fails miserably because of the inevitability of Stop Losses. This is not obvious, but once you understand it, you can develop a Survivable and Profitable method of trading, but you have to reduce your Risk and move into a trading instrument which allows you to greatly reduce the Risk which leads to Stop Outs.

 

The only solution to making money in trading is to Stop Out rarely.

 

The only way to do that is to have the ability to distribute your risk over a wide range of pricing, and Futures traders do not have the capital to do this.

 

Solution: In my case, move from Euro futures to EUR/USD Forex with an ECN brokerage, which is MB Trading. With specialized software, and Forex precision I can spread my risk of 1 Euro FX contract widely, in increments of 1/10th or even 1/100th of a Euro FX contract commitment. I can sustain price movements against me of 20, 30, 40 ticks or pips without breaking a sweat. And I do not have to pay commission, but I actually EARN CREDIT for 95% of my Entries and Exits through adding liquidity to their ECN.

 

Result: I almost never have to Stop Out with a loss. If I do have to "reduce" my position, that is the same thing as a Partial Stop, and affects only a small proportion of my position. In the meantime, any Entry which I make that goes into Profit, is immediately profit-taken and that residual income offsets my open position, which may be underwater.

 

Eventually these partial profits outweigh any drawdowns and Net profit is positive.

 

This is the only Survivable way to trade, and it defines a "Risk Envelope" within which you are comfortable, which MUST be planned to permit you comfortably to sustain a WIDE range of pricing against you, which will occur. It is at these times of "price adversity" that you must AVOID Stop Losses.

 

HyperScalper

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.