Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Robert2617

Ward's_EMA_Power

Recommended Posts

{===========================================}

{=== _Ward's_EMA_Power =====================}

{===========================================}

 

{This indicator is used help you decide

whether to take a trade or get out of a

trade. It uses EMA cross overs to color

the radar screen cells green, yellow or

red depending on which direction the

"signal EMA" (XAverage1) is moving.

 

This is basically a RadarScreen Indicator

for a "ribbon" of EMAs.

 

By default, the cells will light up in

order letting you know how "strong" or

"weak" the trade indication. You can

also load two instances of this indicator

setting the averages in sequence 4 through

10 on the first and then 4, 11, 12, 13,14,

15 and 16 on the second to make a bar of

tweve cells. This looks really cool if you

like things like that.

 

Also, this indicator gives signals letting

you know if the EMA is rising (+), falling

(-) or the same as last bar (=).

 

Remember, trading is risky so use this

indicator at your own risk! I hope this

helps make your trading a little more fun.}

 

{Note: Make sure you load at least enough

additional bars of data for the longest

EMA that you use!}

 

Below I have attached a couple of screenshots. One shows what the EMAs "see" on a chart and the other is to illistrate that you could still have a clean chart if you wanted to or use some other indicator along with this one.

 

I was trying to create an EMA crossover trade indicator using two EMAs. Then it hit me. If two EMAs are good, wouldn't 12 be better? Then you could see how strong or weak the signal is or know if you should stay in a trade or not. Some people say EMAs lag because they are a result of history. To overcome this you may be able to do the following. You could set the indicator to use say 25 tick bars (or less) while you look at and trade off of a 1 minute chart. That way you are getting trade signals from the indicator before your chart even shows what is happening!

 

In the images, I have two instances of the indicator loaded in the same RadarScreen. The settings on the first instance are 4,5,6,7,8,9,10 and on the second 4,11,12,13,14,15,16. I also have loaded 200 additional bars of data. Signals happen when the 4 EMA crosses over or touches any of the other EMAs.

 

You don't have to use two instances of this indicator for it to work properly. The defaults are setup for 1. Some people don't want to use up 2 indicators worth of valuable desktop real estate. :)

 

Enjoy!

emapower.thumb.gif.d9a6172739eb3496e75c1786863bb9eb.gif

emapower2.thumb.gif.d2aac05189e8464b6069827d957d3cc7.gif

WARDS_EMA_POWER.ELDFetching info...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure. Everything keys off of XAverage1. As it moves, touches or crosses any other XAverage, the cells light. Green means it is above it, red below it and yellow for the same as it. Then, the +,-, and = signs tell you which way between each Xaverage the Xaverage1 is pointing.

 

Some say trade when a 4 EMA crosses an 8 EMA (or the 3 and 6 or whatever). This indicator is more sensitive than that on the first few EMAs and less sensitive on the later EMAs at default settings. It is up to you to decide how many greens or reds it takes for you to make a trade. One green? Three greens? Five? That is up to you. Also, just say you are in a long trade and all your lights are green. Price has a pullback, and the first 2 lights turn red. You know you should stay in the trade for more profit because you have previously decided that it takes at least four reds before you make a trade. You can use it to put you in a trade and to take you out. But you have to see it live and decide what your tolerance/risk levels are.

 

Probably best to watch the the same interval chart and Radar at first to see how it behaves. Then make a decision of what works best for you.

 

And by the way, I started writing this indicator this past Friday afternoon and only had 3 plots at that time. It was after the close of the day, last night, when I decided to add 3 more so I haven't even seen this in action yet, in all it's glory! However, I do feel confident that it will work as intended. :)

 

My idea is to use it as a "strength meter". With only 3 plots it was working and looked great. With 6 or 12 it should rock. I tested it on multiple symbols, time frames and looked at magnified charts to make sure it was working properly. If you notice any oddities, let me know and we can adjust it.

 

One thing I did notice is that when price is flat, you may get all of one color depending on which way price is slightly trending. So you do still need to look at the chart. At those times, note that price is flat and then when price makes a break one way or the other, you'll know what to do. It appears to work best at up and down times. Keep that in the back of your mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I just subscribed today to Radar Screen to try out your indicator. I have seen a lot of post on TS Forum about the Motherlode indicators Avery wrote. Are you familular with his stuff? Also, since I am a Radar beginner do you have any tips or other favorite indicators you might sugest?

 

thanks,

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am familiar with Avery's work and because of his work I got RS too! hahahah

 

My favorites of Avery's are the _Gridiron_II_SR15, SMAA_ROC and SMAA_LLMACD. I'm trying out SMAA_VolumeSpike. I also like a lot of the others but I found myself over indicated!

 

I think the best one by far is the Gridiron Pivots. I can't see myself trading without it.

 

I created a couple basic color coded indicators to compliment the one's I just mentioned. I haven't put them on the downloads section here yet but you can find them here: http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/18/ts-radarscreen-1127-2.html#post5925

 

So for now I have:

 

Rate of Change

Fast MACD

Slow Stochastics

On Balance Volume

Volume Spikes

12 EMAs

Tick and Trin

Time and Sales

Tick Delta

HA Paint Bars

 

All that and a crisp clean chart to look at. All put together it looks like the screenshot attached. I use my mouse wheel on the top left RS to change between the chart intervals. Scroll and click.

 

There is another really good RS indicator you should try. That one is called "Tradable Symbols" and it can be found on the TS forums.

tradetop.thumb.gif.97333e6712343b90b6218418682ec9c3.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boiled down and in a nutshell. There were complaints from the people trying to sell indicators because everytime TRO saw something new, he would code it. Then somebody reported that in his eld files he has "I will gladly except all donations. Send them to P.O.Box bla bla bla" so that was the opportunity to banish him. That broke some rule or something. It went something like that but I wasn't there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK back on topic. I did some more testing tonight (Sunday the 25th) and it looks like the default settings were too sensitive. I found the best results when I started the XAverages at 4 and then 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 for a single instance of the indicator. If you do two, do 4, 6,8,10,12 etc on the first and 4, 18,20,22,24 etc on the second.

 

I've updated the indicator's defaults and attached it.

 

============

 

Tested it some today (Monday the 26th) live. It works as planned. Using one instance at default settings with 200 bars of data added, worked perfectly! However, using two instances of it with one point increments (4,5,6,7,8,9, etc) for the EMAs is too sensitive. The spread between the EMAs must be two points (4,6,8,10,12,14 etc). You can play with it to see what works best for you but I say use a 2 point spread. Cheers.

Wards_EMA_Power.ELDFetching info...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.