Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Stop Hunting Strategies

Recommended Posts

It is widely understood that the forex is the most widely leveraged financial asset market in the world and this has some implications that many traders fail to consider. To get some perspective, standard margin levels in equity markets is 2:1. In options and futures, these levels rise to 10:1 and 20:1, respectively. Meanwhile, many retail traders trade using leverage of as much as 500:1 for a single trade. While using leverage of this type might seem reckless to many, it is obviously still a widespread occurrence and, as a result, it remains clear that stop loss strategies are even more important in forex than in other markets.

 

Without well managed stop loss strategies, many new traders will catch themselves in precarious positions and in many cases will unnecessarily deplete their entire trading accounts. Luckily, there are strategies for avoiding this that are relatively easy to implement. In equity markets, many traders (usually using no leverage) might avoid using stop losses entirely and simply use patience to wait for prices to turn to a more favorable level. But most forex traders do use some sort of stop loss strategy and here we will look at some strategies to capitalize on the way stop losses are commonly used in forex markets.

 

Stop Hunting

 

With the unique character of the FX market, stop hunting has proven to be a successful strategy for a wide section of the market. Some traders have moral hang ups relative to this method (as it does require heavy losses to be accrued by those trading on the other end), it has to be remembered that trading is a business, not a charity and if a trader willingly places his stop loss in the wrong area, there is nothing wrong with identifying this as an opportunity and taking advantage of it.

 

Stop runs flush out weak positions and allow the longer term, dominant trends to reestablish themselves. Investment banks and hedge funds are famous for running stops as a means for generating sustainable momentum in the market. The fact is, this practice is so prominent that many traders do not even realize it and these players are likely to accrue losses as a result.

 

Psychological Levels

 

Specifically, since most traders pay attention to psychological levels ending in 00 (such as 1.3200 in EUR/USD) stops tend to be placed under or above these areas more than others. Knowing that this is a common occurrence in forex is valuable information, as it suggests that retail traders should know to set their stop losses in more unusual areas. This helps to avoid being victimized by excess volatility created by the herd mentality. Instead, traders should be looking at this more as an opportunity for profitability. Because these markets are so heavily influenced by stop loss momentum, there are many instances for short term trading opportunities.

 

Trading Setups

 

For trading setups, mirroring big speculative stop hunting requires a short term price chart and a single technical indicator. When prices are approaching a psychological 00 figure, draw horizontal lines 20 points above and below the level. This becomes the critical trading zone, as it allows for high probability and momentum based setups. Once markets have entered this region speculators will be hunting for stops on the other side of the figure.

 

Longs can be taken on an upward approach into the trading zone, with 15 point stop losses (as this level would then be outside the trading zone, and successful trades will rely on building momentum). Initial profit targets can be set at the risk level (15 points) with the second profit target set at twice the risk level (30 points. This allows the trader to quickly exit the position as the weak selling trades are stopped out and a quick momentum thrust is seen. A final point is that since these trades are based on momentum, they should only be taken in the direction of the larger trend and in conjunction with your indicator readings, which should show that the current move is not over extended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all very interesting, but can you provide any evidence to support your claims? If I had done as you suggest above in the USD/JPY spot market at every available opportunity over the last five years, say, then what would have been the outcome?

 

Until you provide something more specific than what could essentially be a load of made up nonsense (not that I'm suggesting this is what it is, just that there is no evidence to the contrary), then this is just a nice idea and not something that has obvious value.

 

BlueHorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is all very interesting, but can you provide any evidence to support your claims? If I had done as you suggest above in the USD/JPY spot market at every available opportunity over the last five years, say, then what would have been the outcome?

 

Until you provide something more specific than what could essentially be a load of made up nonsense (not that I'm suggesting this is what it is, just that there is no evidence to the contrary), then this is just a nice idea and not something that has obvious value.

 

BlueHorseshoe

 

 

I have been trading Eurdollar FX for several years now, and see NO evidence for what has been stated above -- no, i do not know the exact correlation of eurodollar FX futures with said pair on Forex, but if the correlation would be near 100%, this strategy would be pretty useless, even more so, a loosing strategy

 

TR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The cat is clearly out of the bag on this strategy. Maybe that's why I've seen "the zone" increase from ~10 to 15, 20 , 35 units over the last few years.

The Brookwood Triple bank-shot strategy: Fade the people fading the people who are fading the faders (fading the noobs).

But, Mr. Cox, point taken! One of the few lines on all my charts: The .00 line.

:beer:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have been trading Eurdollar FX for several years now, and see NO evidence for what has been stated above -- no, i do not know the exact correlation of eurodollar FX futures with said pair on Forex, but if the correlation would be near 100%, this strategy would be pretty useless, even more so, a loosing strategy

 

TR

 

Don't worry about the bogey man stop hunters. I'm amazed at how many superstitions are created around a business that is very straightforward.

 

What some people also miss is that the eurodollar futures has de-facto 1:1200-2000 leverage on its contracts.

After writing this I realized that TR was referring to EURUSD equivilant futures contract. But just to make the point that futures has high leverage too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't worry about the bogey man stop hunters. I'm amazed at how many superstitions are created around a business that is very straightforward.

 

What some people also miss is that the eurodollar futures has de-facto 1:1200-2000 leverage on its contracts.

After writing this I realized that TR was referring to EURUSD equivilant futures contract. But just to make the point that futures has high leverage too.

 

Indeed it has been circling around 1,3200 a lot of times last days, and i did not see any, repeat ANYof the so called hunting effects.

I just keep relying on my simple volume bars which does not need me to think psychology all the time....

 

TR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is all very interesting, but can you provide any evidence to support your claims? If I had done as you suggest above in the USD/JPY spot market at every available opportunity over the last five years, say, then what would have been the outcome?

 

BlueHorseshoe

Yes, Mr. Cox,

for your modest but informative post, please provide Mr. Horseshoe with five years of Time&Sales at zero-lines for his specific instrument. Otherwise how could we possibly trust what you are saying?:rofl:

And Mr. Horseshoe, Mr. Cox did indeed say you could take longs (and their corolary: shorts) into the "zone', so your JPY trades might have turned out ok.Just maybe not using monthly charts.

I must say I feel this is a sort of soft-trolling, this "show us five years (why not ten?Volatility can change...) of data to support your claims or #$%^ off". Why not just look at a 5 minute chart and see what happens at so-called psychological levels for yourself? Let your eyes be the judge before you reflexively nay-say.Mr. Cox might not trade the same way as you do, yet there may be some validity to what he is offering. My ¥.0002.Oh, and Mr. traderunner1, I can't see anywhere in the post about arbitraging the cash market. Perhaps you could point that out. Folks are just blabbering without even trying to understand. What has become of the youth...:doh:

-Brookwood

Edited by Brookwood

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote name= Mr. traderunner1' date=' I can't see anywhere in the post about arbitraging the cash market. Perhaps you could point that out. Folks are just blabbering without even trying to understand. What has become of the youth...:doh:

-Brookwood[/quote]

 

Don't know what you mean with arbitraging the cash market. I only know i am making a more then decent living over the last 6 years just simply trading with volume bars on the ED FX futures market--- no news, no nothing , very very simple system.

 

cheers

 

 

 

TR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I analyzed this technique a few years ago just after I had learned simple coding.

 

Unfortunately the very bright idea has absolutely zero edge in practice.

 

Trust me when I say I tried thousands of variations of this theory (automated) and there is simply nothing to be exploited.

 

/ McKeen

Edited by McKeen
misspelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.