Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

DbPhoenix

Support & Resistance and Trading Trend

Recommended Posts

Put simply, support is the price at which those who have enough money to make a difference are willing to show their support by retarding, halting, and reversing the decline by buying. Resistance is the price at which those who have enough money to make a difference attempt to retard, halt, and reverse a rise by selling. Whether one calls this money professional or big or smart or institutional or crooked or manipulative or (fill in the blank) is irrelevant. If repeated attempts to sell below this support level are met by buying which is sufficient to turn price back, these little reversals will eventually form a line, or zone. Ditto with resistance.

 

A swing high or low represents a point at which traders are no longer able to find trades. Whether that point represents important support or resistance will be seen the next time traders push price in that direction. But everyone knows this point, even if they aren't following a chart. It exists independently of the trader and his lines and charts and indicators and displays. It is the point beyond which price could not go. Hence its importance, both to those who want to see price move higher and those who don't.

 

The following illustrates the potential support and resistance provided by swing points and zones. It also illustrates a means by which one can define "trend". If one doesn't understand trend, he’s going to have trouble understanding breakouts, retracements, and reversals. If he doesn’t understand support and resistance, he’s going to have trouble understanding how and where and when to enter and exit, much less where to take profits, assuming he has any.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28549&stc=1&d=1334778057

 

Traders must understand the characteristics of a trend day, even if interested only in intraday scalping. A trader anticipating a trend day should change strategies, from trading off support/resistance . . . to using a breakout methodology and being flexible enough to buy strength or sell weakness. A trader caught off guard will often experience his largest losses on a trend day as he tries to sell strength or buy weakness prematurely. Because there are few intraday retracements, small losses can easily get out of hand. The worst catastrophes come from trying to average losing trades on trend days.

 

Raschke

 

To determine the effects of supply and demand, look for breaches of either support or resistance within whatever interval you're trading, particularly a breach with a quick and strong recovery (which belies the breach and suggests strong buying interest [demand] or selling interest [supply], whichever the case may be). If one is trading trend over the longer-term, he has little to do but sit on his hands until price breaks out or breaks down. If he chooses to trade the shorter-term, he can buy failures to break through support and short failures to break through resistance during those “balancing” or “equilibrium” phases.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28550&stc=1&d=1334778057

 

To understand that price rises because demand -- or buying interest -- is greater than "supply" -- or selling interest -- is a no-brainer. The trick is to recognize these changes in balance or equilibrium in real time. Hindsight charts are fine for illustrating principles. In fact, they're nearly essential. However, one must then take the next step and translate those principles into a trading strategy that enables him to make decisions based on those principles in real time, e.g., "failure to breach". For example, one must at least locate in advance those areas or zones in which the aforementioned balance is most likely to change, then wait patiently until those changes actually occur, then act on what he observes.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28551&stc=1&d=1334778057

 

Note that as the interval gets smaller, the opportunities increase, but so does the necessity for strict rules. For example, one of the arrows has an asterisk, there to show that while the swing point is lower than the immediately preceding swing point low, it is higher than the more significant low made the previous Friday. Therefore, "higher low" has no intrinsic meaning. The trader must instead place all of this in context and define very clearly just what it is that he is looking for.

 

In this case, if the trader were not already in, he most likely would not enter long at this point but wait for confirmation of an uptrend and enter at the next higher low (this occurs the next day, Wednesday). Or he may go ahead and take the risk, entering on Tuesday. While doing so entails more risk, it also may mean a tighter stop, depending on how the trader manages stops. There is thus no "best" way to manage the trade. After all, the trader may have entered long at the previous Friday low (12/8) and never have closed his long trade.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=28552&stc=1&d=1334778057

 

Looking back at the first chart, it would seem that there are few if any opportunities during November/early December since price has “stalled”. But the above and the preceding charts demonstrate that it all depends on your point of view. Even the very last day, represented above, offers excellent opportunities for relatively easy profits.

 

The first step for a trader is to determine the current trend of the market.

 

The second step is to determine one's place in the current trend.

 

The third step is to determine the proper timing of one's entry into whatever it is he's trading.

 

-- Richard Wyckoff

Image1.gif.9416fc95c1dcb52983d4a56268580f10.gif

Image2.gif.d2d343d6b7c4799bd5126ab77f29ef89.gif

Image3.gif.76023c58371e0ecb75211131a89409dc.gif

Image4.gif.9e0d9eb80687bf7aa7c4e4245d0ea22a.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

DbPhoenix, do you require a specific number of bars to form to determine a swing high or low? I ask this question because when looking at a chart some swing highs and lows are larger than others, some are obvious and others are like mini swings. Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  nycdweller said:
DbPhoenix, do you require a specific number of bars to form to determine a swing high or low? I ask this question because when looking at a chart some swing highs and lows are larger than others, some are obvious and others are like mini swings. Thank you.

 

This was written as a blog post, a simplistic introduction to a subject that was given a much more detailed examination in the Wyckoff Forum and written largely for those who might be interested in the subject but didn't want to plow through hundreds of posts to find out.

 

I don't particularly care about the number of bars or even about the bars themselves, since bars are only one means among many to display what's going on with price movement. If you're genuinely interested in the subject, I suggest you look at several threads in the Wyckoff Forum: The Nature of Support and Resistance, Trading in Foresight, and Trend. If all of that whets your appetite further, study the Stickies. If you're particularly interested in swings, do an advanced search using my name and "swing*" as the keyword.

 

Db

Edited by DbPhoenix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.