Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

wshahan

Week Two Trades-Spookywill

Recommended Posts

8:25 AM CST

 

Pre opening comment

 

The Globex session double bottomed at 1360.50, and prices have rotated up through Friday’s high volume node and have reached Friday’s over/under price of 1374 which also is above Friday’s spike high. If prices remain above 1372, we will enter long. If they fail at 1374, we would expect rotation back towards Friday’s low.

 

At this juncture, we missed the trade off the Globex low; however, we have traded up through Friday’s high volume area, so look for a possible retest of Friday’s high.

Edited by wshahan
title mistake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8:45 AM CST

 

 

We have an upside failure at the 1374 level. Go short for a retest of the Friday lows and possibly the Globex low.

 

The bottom of Friday's high volume node is 1369-1370, this is a support area. Penetrating here would lead to lower prices.

Edited by wshahan
add on

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 AM CST

 

We got a retest of the Globex low, and so far it has held.

 

Prices dropped from our sell point at 1374 to 1360.75, one tick off the Globex low.

 

Day traders either met their profit targets and closed their positions or took a partial profit. 10 points in the ES is generally a good point to take at least a partial profit.

 

I took my profit and am observing. See below regarding rotation. Also see the post on spikes. Our highest probability for today was rotational trade within the spike area, and so far that is what we have gotten.

 

Volume and value continue to build at or just below Friday’s low, so we may get lower prices later in the session. We also could, one more time, get rotation back up towards the original high volume mode, 1369 to 1374.

 

I think the most likely case from a trader’s stand point is for another short to develop. This would be negated by taking out this mornings high. Only time will tell.

 

The original was to go long for a retest of Friday’s high with a recommendation to reverse if 1374 held. It did, so I reversed at 1373 and covered at 1362 when the Globex low held.

 

We now have 1366.50 as our high volume point. This level looks like it is going to fail, if it does, I will go short again for a run at the Globex low. The stop should be at 1368.

Edited by wshahan
wording

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10:47 AM CST

Update 2

 

There was a retracement and another opportunity to go short at my price or better. (1366.50)

 

We got a quick 4 points on the short fast. We now have a double bottom on the 30 min chart at 1362.50. True day traders can take a quick 3 points here (1363.50 or better..)

 

As I said before, prices could sit here for a while, but we continue to build volume lower.

 

Personally, I m going to wait for a retest of 1362.25. Then we will see if prices don’t go lower.

 

Spookywill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice calls, Will.

 

Looks like your method is pretty straightforward:entries based on prior swing points. Sounds solid enough to me. Can't really see where one needs to see any backtesting data to substantiate the power of this methodology. (Not saying this to put anyone down, just stating my opinion).

 

Talk soon,

Phantom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12:12 PM CST

Update 4

 

If you took a profit on the short, here is another opportunity to reenter short at 1366.or better, stop at 1368.25.

 

Prices could go either way from here, but volume favors shorts.

 

Spookywill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12:46, For some reason, this update did not post. What we have is the intra day trend change to the upside that I warned about. Do not attempt to fade it at this time, I will update.

 

 

 

12:12 PM CST

Update 5

 

________________________________________

Could you please post a screenshot for us. It would help with clarity in trying to understand your previous posts. Thank you.

 

 

My objective is for you to learn and “own” what I am doing. This means you need to have your own chats. I am using a standard o-h-l-c 30 minute bar chart with a volume histogram (volume at time) at the bottom. I also have a volume histogram on my dome for volume at price.

 

I am using the Open E Cry data feed if that helps. If you create my chart and post it, I will be happy to comment on it.

 

12:30 Update.

 

Prices are attempting to go higher. We now have a three print buying ledge at 1367, so we should get higher prices in the immediate term. You can go long at 1367 or lower.

Edited by wshahan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1:43 Update.

 

I played the intra day trend change poorly, and I will discuss it after the close. I was too focused on volume and simply missed the price action/pattern development.

 

Right now we have volume dry up 1369.75, and we have a the potential for an exhaustion failure.

 

Prices will move from here, it could go either way. Conservative traders should stay out.

 

I am going to favor the short side here and I have entered short at 1369.50, stop at 1372.00

 

This is a highly aggressive trade, but it has a great risk/reward potential. Only time will tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nice calls, Will.

 

Looks like your method is pretty straightforward:entries based on prior swing points. Sounds solid enough to me. Can't really see where one needs to see any backtesting data to substantiate the power of this methodology. (Not saying this to put anyone down, just stating my opinion).

 

Talk soon,

Phantom

 

And nice job to you Phantom of leading the cheer. But making snide remarks about another's request is unbecoming of a head cheerleader. You do not add anything to the Spookster's calls so if you can limit yourself to smiling and jumping up and down and baring your ass a little, the people in the stands watching will appreciate it. Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3.07 CST Update.

 

I have an order in to close my short at 1364.50 which just got executed. As this is a day trading exercise, close now at 1364.50 or better for a 5 point profit.

 

Prices now got to 1362.75 so hopefully you got a better price than I did!

Edited by wshahan
wrong time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And nice job to you Phantom of leading the cheer...

 

Well, well. If it ain't my short, little, fat criticizing buddy from the West Coast! So glad to hear from ya, as always...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[COLOR="DarkRed"]

MONDAY WRAP UP

[/color]

 

 

Today was another terrific trading day. Weopened the US session with a sharp decline lasting an hour. It resulted in a retest of the Globex low at 1360.50, reaching within one tick of that low. This was followed by two and a half hours of consolidation between 1362 and 1367 (Friday’s range low was 1363.75) and included a retest of the low which failed at 1361.75 at 11:00 AM CST.

 

From there we had a 90 minute rally to 1371.75 and failed. Prices then declined into the close, reaching a low at 3:05 CST of 1362.75.

 

The bottom line was we had a rotation al of trading at the low end of Friday’s range. Value continued to migrate lower with the high volume node in the 1364 to 1367 area down from 1370.50 to 1373 on Friday. The settlement was 1364.90 versus 1365, virtually unchanged.

Volume was marginally higher at 1,959,509 contracts.

 

I made 5 trade recommendations today, 4 of which made money, and one lost half a point. The trades are detailed as to rationale in the posts; here is a summary of the results. They returned a total of 21.5 ES points to anyone who followed them. I made one trading mistake which I will discuss in some detail in the hope it might be helpful to others.

 

Trades: Entry Time Long or Short Entry Price Exit Price Points gained or (lost)

 

1. 8:35 Short 1373.00 1364.00 11.0

 

2. 10:15 Short 1366.50 1363.00 3.5

 

3. 12:12 Short 1366.50 1367.00 (.5)

 

4. 12:35 Long 1367.00 1369.50 2.5

 

5. 1:35 Short 1369.50 1364.50 5.0

21.5 points

profit.

 

A very nice day!

 

Three positive days, twenty-seven more to go. Only time will tell.

 

 

 

 

My error was around trades 3 and 4. I was waiting for a break to new lower prices and I was focusing on the migration lower of volume. Thus I shorted for the second time at 1366.50. What I missed by focusing on volume was that we had a clear trend reversal pattern forming from 11.25 to 12:20 indicating prices were going higher. Had seen this, I would have gone long at 1363 or so instead of going short at 1366.50 only to have to reverse go long at 1367.

 

Either way, I go short at 1369.50.

 

What I did netted 2 points. Going long from 1363 would have netted 6.5 points, quite a difference.

 

 

The principle is to not have a stake in an outcome. In this case I was focused on a new low rather than being open to what the market was telling me. Today’s lack of being open only cost me 4 points on a big win day. I was lucky.

 

In the past this has been a very costly error for me. The trap was that by the time I figured out the problem, it had become very costly. Today I rarely get caught in this trap, and, like today, I don’t lose big money when I do. I share this with you in the hope that discussing situations that are difficult for me will help you become more conscious of them and possibly aid you in identifying them as problematic for you.

 

Hope it was helpful,

 

Spookywill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

417 7:51 AM CST

 

The Globex session tied the April 11th low at 1359.25 and then rebounded to 1373.50, slightly below yesterday’s Globex high of 1375.50. The housing numbers to date have had no effect on price.

 

While I see nothing to suggest we have reached a significant bottom, one has to respect the current strong price move from the Globex.

 

My premarket play was to short the e-mini at 1372.50, stop at 1374. Thus we are risking 1.5 points with a possible potential of trading to 1360 during the session.. The probability of this trade is so-so, but the risk/reward is eight to one. This is a trade I will take every day. And if I get stopped out, that is the cost of trading.

Edited by wshahan
time/date missing a digit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8:03

 

I did get stopped out at 1374. I set my stop too low, it needed to be at yesterday's high, 1375.25.

 

The equities look like they will push higher on the USopening. I will look at it before making another trade.

 

Spookywill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I got stopped out by 2 ticks (time now is 8:40 CST. My methodology expects to get stopped out frequently, it is the cost of doing business. Credit it to the Tuesday blahs.

 

I completely understand the pressure of posting trades online as I do it every day, and I make some utterly dumb trades, some yesterday in fact. In this case though, not so much Tuesday blahs as WAIT for the market open.. after such upside, it's almost a given that at the opening bell the market will at least TRY to push it up. It's so easy to see from a third party (like myself), when I'm not in your driver's seat as you are. So, not a criticism, just an unbiased perspective.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10:CST.

 

 

I obviously got stopped out for the third time at 1377. No excuses, and I had ample time to get out with a small profit or to break even which I didn't take.

 

I will write about my mistakes this evening.

 

We are coming late to the party, and we are missing a pullback and a potential long trade entry while I am writing.

 

Three losses in a row, time to take a looong break.

 

 

 

Spookywill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We are coming late to the party, and we are missing a pullback and a potential long trade entry while I am writing.

 

Actually this looks like the first good short opportunity of the day so far to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10.50

 

You are so right, joshdance, I was impatient, and I sat and watched an overlapping bar in the 30 min. chart at 9:00 that clearly indicated higher prices. We traded down to 1371.25 an I just sat here and watched the reversal go to new highs. No excuse for that.

 

I was tired and half asleep and should not have been trading, and I know better than to trade in such a situation, but I was implusive and I did. Such is life. I took three losses in a row and that says back off.

 

Bad day,

 

Spookywill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.