Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

Let's Create a Simple System for Beginners.

Recommended Posts

Even though the Thread says "Beginners", I am starting it in the Forex section because it's what I am most familiar with.

 

I would like participation from beginners and veterans alike. Lets see if we can put together something where a beginner would be able to make a few Pips a week. Let's keep it as simple as possible ( K.I.S.S. ). Let's try to use as few indicators as possible. Let's have a least a 2:1 R/R. We won't discuss position size, or % of return/loss on account ( if the thread is active, these things can come later ).

 

If someone thinks they can improve on it, please make a suggestion.

 

NOTE TO BEGINNERS ! Do not trade these systems. If you think they have potential, then back test them on at least 100 trades. Then forward test them ( DEMO ) on at least 100 trades.

 

Here's my submission. It's a simple breakout called the NY Box. I didn't create it, it's been around for while.

 

 

EUR/USD. 5 min chart. Draw a box over the candles from 6 am to 8 am. Make sure you include the high and the that was reached during that time period. When a candle closes above or below the Box, Trade in that direction. Let's use a 10 pip S/l and a 20 Pip TP.

Todays Box would have looked like this:

nybox.thumb.gif.811ddca508c6d7c263742290b537a1c4.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"If someone thinks they can improve on it, please make a suggestion."

 

try adding guideline number 1

 

"only take positions in the direction of the trend when it enters the box."

 

The trend being subjective - but in my case a visual look at your chart tells me in the example, it was down, so only take shorts if they break below the low of the box.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"If someone thinks they can improve on it, please make a suggestion."

 

try adding guideline number 1

 

"only take positions in the direction of the trend when it enters the box."

 

The trend being subjective - but in my case a visual look at your chart tells me in the example, it was down, so only take shorts if they break below the low of the box.

 

I don't think it will become too complicated if we add 2 MAs, say 200 sma and 50 sma.

Then obviously if the 50 sma is higher than the 200 it is trending up, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This sure looks like a great system! Thanks.

 

I tried out today on the EU. However, if price were to break on the downside, it would hit the 1.33 resistance level and hence the potential for big gain may not be there.

 

After experimenting with a few pairs, I find the GU more viable. But has entered on 50% retracement on a demo a/c as the closing candle that break the box was huge. Nearly hit 20 pips. Unfortunately the price went up after that. Still in the trade, see how it goes....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Far be it for a beginner like me to challenge the wisdom of the masters, but here goes. A way of keeping faith with the KISS concept would be to stringently test any rule proposed to be added, before adding it.

 

Siuya's and Mystic's rule proposes adding a test of trend to the system, being the 50/200 SMA crossover. However, the original system already contains a trend test, implicitly - the 2h box itself. It defines the trend with reference to a breakout beyond the 2h box's High and Low.

 

As today's chart in the above post shows, the box's intrinsic test of trend might be a better test because it is current, rather than looking back too far. Also it is amenable to smaller trend changes, whereas a 200MA has a lot of inertia and will "miss" a lot of a new trend development. Maybe the proposed MAs are too slow for the limited stop-loss / take-profit moves proposed in this system?

 

Hence I propose that the 50/200 MA test remain a "probationary" rule addition at best - to only be added if it can be shown to be better than the simple box trend test.

 

Btw, thanks for starting this thread Mystic. I'm looking forward with much interest to see where it goes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also think we should impose a time limitation. If the trade does not open by XX time, the Box is void and we wait for tomorrows Box....

 

Also, This Friday is NFP. I don't usually trade on NFP days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I also think we should impose a time limitation. If the trade does not open by XX time, the Box is void and we wait for tomorrows Box....

 

Also, This Friday is NFP. I don't usually trade on NFP days.

 

Also, it's Good Friday, so no real trading going on.

 

I do not want to be a thread spoiler, so I will make one comment and then observe only. This is NOT personal, and nothing against you Mystic, or anyone else contributing.

 

This thread, while well meaning, is the reason so many beginners struggle; I know I did, and while I take responsibility for my own trading, wasting my time with these kinds of ideas is one thing that kept me from improvement when I first started 5 years ago.

 

You come up with an idea -- a logical one, IMO: to trade a breakout of the 2 hour window before the NY market opens. Okay, simple enough, and logical enough.

 

But wait, we have to optimize it. So, we talk about trend. So we add 2 moving averages. No matter that they're crossing all over each other like a DNA helix, just look for which one has the greater value at 8am.

 

But wait, we need to optimize it more. So we add a time limit.

But what if the range is too large (as it is this morning)? Let's limit the size of the "box" to ... And let's say that we will only buy a breakout when the RSI is ...

 

And on, and on, and on, we go. And in the end we have a "system" which has done nothing but taught people how to mindlessly follow rules, and pay no mind to context, current events (FOMC minutes today anyone?), or market sentiment.

 

At least the box idea was simple -- a bit naive mind you, and bound for failure over the long term, but simple.

 

Now, instead of taking a step back and reexamining their approach to the market, people will see this and want to look for similar ideas--similar in what respect? Similar in the respect that they don't learn the instrument they are trading, but rather they learn to draw their box, and wait for the candle to close, and place their order, and pray/hope.

 

And here is the real issue: you could backtest this strategy, and it may have a 65% win rate in the last 12 months, with a great positive expectancy. But you know what? It doesn't matter, because the person following this "system" has not learned to trade. And when this "system" goes ka-put (and it will, they all do over a large sample size), what does the trader do now? Draw the box from 6:30 to 7:30? Try it on another instrument? Consult more forums and ask for people's ideas on more systems?

 

So my contention is that seeking systems, strategies, setups, and the like--they're all an attempt at a shortcut around the inevitable, namely, learning the market one is trying to trade and extract profits from.

 

I won't make any more posts on this thread because I respect your goal and intentions Mystic, but this was my comment and now I'm done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Also, it's Good Friday, so no real trading going on.

 

I do not want to be a thread spoiler, so I will make one comment and then observe only. This is NOT personal, and nothing against you Mystic, or anyone else contributing.

 

This thread, while well meaning, is the reason so many beginners struggle; I know I did, and while I take responsibility for my own trading, wasting my time with these kinds of ideas is one thing that kept me from improvement when I first started 5 years ago.

 

You come up with an idea -- a logical one, IMO: to trade a breakout of the 2 hour window before the NY market opens. Okay, simple enough, and logical enough.

 

But wait, we have to optimize it. So, we talk about trend. So we add 2 moving averages. No matter that they're crossing all over each other like a DNA helix, just look for which one has the greater value at 8am.

 

But wait, we need to optimize it more. So we add a time limit.

But what if the range is too large (as it is this morning)? Let's limit the size of the "box" to ... And let's say that we will only buy a breakout when the RSI is ...

 

And on, and on, and on, we go. And in the end we have a "system" which has done nothing but taught people how to mindlessly follow rules, and pay no mind to context, current events (FOMC minutes today anyone?), or market sentiment.

 

At least the box idea was simple -- a bit naive mind you, and bound for failure over the long term, but simple.

 

Now, instead of taking a step back and reexamining their approach to the market, people will see this and want to look for similar ideas--similar in what respect? Similar in the respect that they don't learn the instrument they are trading, but rather they learn to draw their box, and wait for the candle to close, and place their order, and pray/hope.

 

And here is the real issue: you could backtest this strategy, and it may have a 65% win rate in the last 12 months, with a great positive expectancy. But you know what? It doesn't matter, because the person following this "system" has not learned to trade. And when this "system" goes ka-put (and it will, they all do over a large sample size), what does the trader do now? Draw the box from 6:30 to 7:30? Try it on another instrument? Consult more forums and ask for people's ideas on more systems?

 

So my contention is that seeking systems, strategies, setups, and the like--they're all an attempt at a shortcut around the inevitable, namely, learning the market one is trying to trade and extract profits from.

 

I won't make any more posts on this thread because I respect your goal and intentions Mystic, but this was my comment and now I'm done.

 

Hey, I was wondering, do you have any ideas for what sort of PRICE ACTION a system should use? You know, the sort of PRICE ACTION made for a good SET UP?

 

Just asking

:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Joshdance - I think you are 100% correct - and maybe, just maybe the thread might help this. :)

 

Developing a system using computers is the easy part - optimising it to make a fit a time frame, instrument or type of market is even easier. Using it to trade profitably over a long period of time - not so easy.

 

Learning that a lot of this "might" be a complete waste of time is probably not a waste of time. :2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ Joshdance...

 

Agree with what you are saying. I am not trying to invent something, I don't think I have ever had an original thought in my life ( at least none that I remember ).

I am trying to get people to think, fan an ember maybe.

nybox.thumb.gif.6c00a766d3df3660e1cb62c258afa64c.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tried the method on GU and it earns 20 pips. Done a backtest on a few major pairs that day and it looks promising.

 

Will explore further this NY box.

 

Many thanks, Mysticforex!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Mysticforex

Why did you pick the time period 6am -8am when the market is flat /low volume.?

Kind regards

bobc

 

Exactly. And we are hoping to see which way the market breaks once NY opens.

Also, in my first post I stated I didn't invent this, it has been around a long time. That is how it has always been done. Maybe a slight variation or tweak here and there.

 

It's just a framework. Let's see where WE can take it. In a week or two, when we have beaten it to death we can move on to something else.

 

This is a Trader's Laboratory, let's experiment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly. And we are hoping to see which way the market breaks once NY opens.

Also, in my first post I stated I didn't invent this, it has been around a long time. That is how it has always been done. Maybe a slight variation or tweak here and there.

 

It's just a framework. Let's see where WE can take it. In a week or two, when we have beaten it to death we can move on to something else.

 

This is a Trader's Laboratory, let's experiment.

 

Hi Mysticforex

And if the market is flat , there is no trend.And thats an important part of Darvas box trading.Now I dont want to move the time to the open because then we will miss the open.So I will move my box to the last swing high/low.Just before the flat market.This could be during the night session or yesterdays close.I like yesterdays close because of my Taylors TT bias.

As joshdance pointed out, we start out with something simple, and I have made it complicated

regards bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great thread, is there anyone that can test the rules as they are applied to see how they would have done historically?

 

I've got DAX data but no FX data on that time frame.

 

The opening range is not just at the US open, the DAX and the FESX open far earlier. i used to look at the first 30 minutes, some use the first 15 minutes on CL. Once you have the system proven on the US open, you could also test it on the EUR open as well. You test these varied times as well.

 

BTW, we are not optimizing yet....we haven't even tested anything.:roll eyes:

 

In addition to these times, you could consider another opportunity after the lunch break. The market can seem to reconsider the trend during a bite to eat!

 

Also, i would recommend that to start with, as you mentioned...we take profit at 2 x risk. Then we can look at optimizing a stop later.

 

Just a few ideas.

 

Cheers,

 

XS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is a great thread, is there anyone that can test the rules as they are applied to see how they would have done historically?

 

I've got DAX data but no FX data on that time frame.

 

The opening range is not just at the US open, the DAX and the FESX open far earlier. i used to look at the first 30 minutes, some use the first 15 minutes on CL. Once you have the system proven on the US open, you could also test it on the EUR open as well. You test these varied times as well.

 

BTW, we are not optimizing yet....we haven't even tested anything.:roll eyes:

 

In addition to these times, you could consider another opportunity after the lunch break. The market can seem to reconsider the trend during a bite to eat!

 

Also, i would recommend that to start with, as you mentioned...we take profit at 2 x risk. Then we can look at optimizing a stop later.

 

Just a few ideas.

 

Cheers,

 

XS

 

 

European traders could do the same and call it the London Box.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.