Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

What One Thing Would You Pass On?

Recommended Posts

If I could pass a message back to myself 7 years ago it would be to not go live until I had thoroughly tested a simple system. When I think back it amazes me that I thought I would be able to make money without a properly thought out and tested system of somekind, whether completely mechanical or with some discretion involved. There are many tools available to new traders to enable them to learn how to trade such as trading simulators (my top recommendation) and demo accounts but how many actually have sat and traded a half thought out system on a simulator to get an idea of how it trades in real time?

 

That would be the one thing that I would pass on to new traders, get yourself some system ideas (search for trading strategies on a search engine and go through the simple ideas you can find there) and then test the daylights out of anything and everything. If you can't make money trading it on a simulator then you probably won't make money trading it on demo and therefore you probably won't make money trading it live. So why bother? If you haven't even bothered to do the above and you are trading by the seat of your pants you will most likely lose money anyway, and quickly!

 

To all experienced traders, what one thing would you pass on to a trader just starting out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

100% agree....test it (I too have wasted money but more importantly time)

and adding to the same theme - dont be a perfectionist and try and get the tops and bottoms (it can be done...sure sure) but as a new trader - just look to get a profitable piece of something first, get on the trends, go with them, dont worry about trying to pick every turn and collect every pip.....first just get a slice of the pie.

 

eg; if the EURUSD has fallen 100 ticks and you captured 25 then thats better than it falling 100 and you loosing while trying to capture 50 ticks.

 

This will ideally stop you doing marginal trades - those are the ones whereby you sell at support trying to get a few extra ticks, after the instrument has already fallen. Look at where the odds are something will happen - if I think this is going to fall from here (plan) then am I better of waiting to enter on a rally away from support, wait for a second time to push through support, or are the odds high that it will bust through support the first time. (execution). If you miss a trade its not the end of the world. (circumstances dependent)

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure I would of used a simulator back in the day too, however they do not teach you one of the hardest aspects of trading: controlling emotion. Nor are they very accurate in terms of volume or fills.

 

Personally, I would of avoided listening to the many bellwether analysts and done more of my own due diligence/modeling.

 

At the end of the day, learning the hard way is usually the most effective. I would of cared less about my alpha tracking error and focused more on higher growth plays as opposed to momo bounces.

 

Technical analysis is most certainly not the only thing to focus on as you will be correct about the same amount of times as someone only using fundamental analysis will. (Slightly over 51%). This is the number one thing that pisses me off about internet trading forums, is that 90% of the focus is on charting, yet it will yield nearly the exact same outcome as someone who can properly utilize fundamentals.

 

Also, I would also look into, passive and active management and decide which best suites your needs. It is a lot cheaper to make ~6% with a vangaurd ETF than it is to potentially lose everything and not beat the market after taxes/transaction costs.

 

Contrary to the above posts, I would NOT recommend Forex to someone new to trading, learn to scalp before you kill.

Edited by Elitny

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I could pass a message back to myself 7 years ago it would be to not go live until I had thoroughly tested a simple system. When I think back it amazes me that I thought I would be able to make money without a properly thought out and tested system of somekind, whether completely mechanical or with some discretion involved. There are many tools available to new traders to enable them to learn how to trade such as trading simulators (my top recommendation) and demo accounts but how many actually have sat and traded a half thought out system on a simulator to get an idea of how it trades in real time?

 

That would be the one thing that I would pass on to new traders, get yourself some system ideas (search for trading strategies on a search engine and go through the simple ideas you can find there) and then test the daylights out of anything and everything. If you can't make money trading it on a simulator then you probably won't make money trading it on demo and therefore you probably won't make money trading it live. So why bother? If you haven't even bothered to do the above and you are trading by the seat of your pants you will most likely lose money anyway, and quickly!

 

To all experienced traders, what one thing would you pass on to a trader just starting out?

 

 

Hello, Dear traders!

 

One thing that I did totally pass on was - I did forget that loosing is part of the trading. Really - I was looking to win every trade! lol...

 

Only after some time when I grasp the idea that loosing is part of trading I was able to see the whole wood behind one tree.

 

 

So - do not forget - loosing is part of it!

 

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I'd pass on to traders just starting out:

 

  • Learn price action. Fancy indicators and robotic trading techniques are no substitute for knowing price action. Try taking all your indicators off the chart, maybe leave a moving average and volume. Chart some trades, figure out how to enter and what exit targets to use. Learn how to identify trends and chop and waves. Learn price patterns. Trade this way in a simulator for a month. You'll be surprised. I can now look at a crude oil chart with only price and volume and see right away whether price is trending or about to reverse, and where I should place my orders. Books by John Hill are useful for this learning.
  • Draw by hand your trades on a chart for at least 5 days or 50 trades before going to the simulator. That way you know better what to look for in real time.
  • Use the simulator. Don't go live until you can demonstrate a winning record for 3 weeks, like 13 out of 15 winning days if you're day trading. This is hard work. Your live performance will be worse than your simulated performance, due to the emotions attached to having real money at risk. If you can't do well in simulation, you will fail when going live.
  • Everyone knows that under-capitalization is dangerous, but so is over-capitalization, because an inexperienced trader can just as easily lose a large account as a small one. For me a good rule of thumb is the starting account should be 7-10X the margin requirement for 1 contract for whatever you're trading.
  • Money management isn't just to determine order size. There's another kind of money management for setting limits on when to quit for the day. How much can you lose before you quit for the day? How much must you win and by what time, to allow you to continue? For example I have a rule "If my 1-contract losses exceed $300, or if I'm profitable but haven't exceeded $200 in profit by lunch time, STOP, my day is done. If I have exceeded $200 I continue as long as I'm above $200."
  • If possible, find a mentor who is successful at what you're trying to do, not someone who makes a living teaching others, but someone who trades for a living.
  • Discipline. Be consistent in applying your rules. It is so tempting to make changes and exceptions, to try un-tested ideas as you go along. Resist doing that. If you get a new idea, test it thoroughly.

That's from the top of my head. I'm sure others will come up with other useful nuggets of advice.

 

About learning to code: Not necessary. I'm an experienced programmer, and I find that to be a useful and helpful skill, but it isn't mandatory. A couple experienced and highly successful traders I know (one has been trading for a living 35 years) couldn't write code if their lives depended on it. They know price action, and use two or three basic indicators to add some clarity.

 

-A

Edited by amatulic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The one thing I would pass on:

 

All my losses until I became a profitable trader (as a bonus, emotional pain is also included in the package).

 

If the person getting them is motivated enough, he or she could use them to learn from them and to adapt until they have found a trading style suitable for his or her personality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with almost all of the previous posts...

 

One thing to add: Simplicity, Simplicity, Simplicity. Find the minimal inputs to allow you to align with the market...

 

It takes courage not to lean on redundent price based lagging indicators.. yet that is what most tend to do at some time in their development... Do not be fooled by the exotic software packages loaded with indicators and impressive charts... they are really a Pandora's Box...you could open it and get lost in all the noise... and waste time energy and brain cells...

 

Price behavior, pattern recognition, volume.. also possibly basic bar charting..none of the complex patterns just the basics and you will have a foundation...

 

Everyone wants to know how to enter a trade. That is the easiest part...risk management and exit are where the financial rubber meets the road.

 

Find just ONE repetitive pattern/setup, test it, develop confidence in it, and prove to yourself you can execute it on a consistent basis... Have a rule based exit strategy that you have tested and execute on a consistent basis.. Do this on Sim and see where your numbers/probabilities are... Statistically valid? Go make $, and learn another setup you don't need many..

 

If it doesn't work in SIM? Back to the drawing board... KISS... I think we become profitable when we can find the "simple" tools that align closly with our personalities - that is where the search can take time... IMHO.

 

"Nothing To It But To Do It"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The second thing I would pass on:

 

Patience ! Rome was not built in a day. Or, Everything comes to those that wait.

 

I fully agree.

 

"Patience" is different than "price action" as method of trading and can be more effective. Recently one of the signals service based on "price action" gave these results:

+60p; -60p; -60p; +30p;

 

Don't know the future series, but above short series one ended negative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rome was not built in a day.
... because that was a government enterprise :rofl:

 

I would pass on ... that the higher TF rules all.

 

Had I known that 8 years ago, and learned to view at least 4 different TF using

this principle, then ... who knows how much smoother my ride might have been!

 

A Ferrari is a good, smooth ride, btw :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would I pass on?

 

There are many things to consider, but several of the most important that I would consider are the strength of my offensive line, distance to first down, the hands and ability of my receivers, and the time left on the clock. If the conditions were right, then I would certainly try to pass on 1st and or 2nd down. In most cases, though, I would not pass if we had 1-4 yards for a first down and we were on 3rd down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.