Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Mysticforex

TL Exclusive! Rob Booker/Boris Schlossberg Webinar!

Recommended Posts

The reason I am discussing Monday Accelerator is that it is impossible that Rob Booker did not realise in the 2-3 years that he taught it that Monday accelerator does not work.

He chose the period of 2007 because in the first 8 months of 2007 it produced good results.

 

This in my dictionary is a SCAM

 

In Jan 2009 I was in Scottsdale Arizona, sitting next to Rob. We were teaching a 3 day live seminar. I was teaching the Bossilator, Rob was teaching the Monday Accelerator.

Rob was still pumped and very excited, and actively trading the MA on his own acct.

( Like I said earlier, I didn't care for the method ).

Could Rob have been wrong? YES. Could Rob be an Asshole? YES ( I have lots of friends who are assholes, sometimes I'm even an Asshole ).

Would Rob intentionally mislead people? I just don.t think so.

 

The reason I started this thread was because I thought the idea he had using the ichimoku cloud thingy was interesting, and may have some potential for future development ( I have already applied them to my Bossilators and think it may provide earlier entries on shorter TFs ).

 

I am sorry about the fact that the video was loaded with "suscribe now" "buy now" banners. To be honest I don't even notice that stuff any more. And Rob certainly does not need my help with marketing himself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why are you discussing me ?

Discuss Rob Booker's method - the Monday accelerator

why did Rob Booker sell us this method when it does not work at all ?

Nothing works - huh ? - Do you really know Forex ?

This is not a good defense of Rob Booker at all

 

Why are you discussing me ?

IMHO because if you wish to actually learn to trade there are certain things you generally need to do. But its not about you really.....its about the mindset

 

There is no need to discuss Rob - and I am not defending him - I am merely pointing out that you dont seem to have learnt much apart from bitterness and spite towards any vendors -

from your point of view he is a scammer. period. (DONT BE FOOLED AGAIN)

from my point of view he is probably an expensive "educator"

 

His Monday accelerator does not (appear) work, and anyone wishing to test or try it can do so. Maybe it did work for a certain period of time--- did you even test it yourself for the period it was meant to work?

Is there anything to discuss, given that those who want to could probably test it, is there likely to be a discussion after this thread - suggestion - set one up to discuss an idea rather than say "I was sold this, I did not test it, but it sucks, I was ripped off as it lost money --- please discuss"

 

Nothing works.....not at all. Some things work very well for some periods.

This is the point ---- you seem very binary. "He is a scammer", "It does not work".....

 

Even taking my quote out of context ---- from "does not work all the time - nothing does" to "Nothing works".

 

Again, sorry if this all sounds harsh, but its not an attack on you.....

A few questions if I may.....

 

how many other seminars/websites/trading rooms/get rich quick ideas have you subscribed to both a....prior to and b....since your experience being discussed?

 

how much cash have you spent as a proportion of your trading capital on these?

 

What have you learnt?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would Rob intentionally mislead people? I just don.t think so.

 

When asked - why does Monday Accelerator not work in the period of September to December 2007 Rob answered people are travelling between Switzerland and England and hence the Monday Accelerator does not work

 

First thing...why does Monday Accelerator work - Because during the period of 2007 Jan - August the market was ranging for GBP/CHF

When a person enters the trade - he does not know if market will range or trend...

hence this kind of mathematical method is IMHO one of the worst methods...

But the question is ...a seasoned person who taught the same thing for 3 years

namely Monday Accelerator definitely received comments from his students - maybe not strong enough but everyone in my group said

"It did not work " - translated "I lost money"

Still - Rob kept teaching the same thing....and chose the same period....correct..?

This points to one simple thing

 

Rob Booker did not care - he sold us snake oil

and this is my final post...on this subject

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why are you discussing me ?

IMHO because if you wish to actually learn to trade there are certain things you generally need to do. But its not about you really.....its about the mindset

 

 

Attack the messenger...

That is your philosophy...

This is not good and I repeat...Discuss Rob Booker's methods and not the messenger...

Goodbye !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Siuya, Josh and others are kindly trying to show you the right way to learn in this business. You should forget about your bitterness about RB and listen. You could receive more than what you paid for here for free, but it is your choice to continue ranting and arguing.

Just hope you don't trade as well with so much emotion.

 

 

 

Attack the messenger...

That is your philosophy...

This is not good and I repeat...Discuss Rob Booker's methods and not the messenger...

Goodbye !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would Rob intentionally mislead people? I just don.t think so.

 

Thats a question that only Rob Booker can answer.

 

Clearly rforexdad has an issue with whats being taught, as do other posting on other forums. However, I do think he has a valid point, IF a vendor is encouraging students to verify the method by backtesting over a particular time period and/instrument, then that is highly unethical. Most people with limited experience and a copy of trade station could find a simple strategy that worked well historically in backtesting. The important point of course is that most new trades dont understand these issues, nor do they understand how simple it is to curve fit. Therefore they are easily fooled by the limitations of backtests.

 

In the early days, I'd say that Rob Booker was most definately a victim of being "fooled by randomness". I wouldnt classify Rob as a trader, but he's comes across as someone who at one point at least tried, and more importantly someone whose done a reasonable amount of basic backtesting, and I would have hoped that he'd seen the light by now.

 

For all I know maybe Rob is providing the system to his students simply as an exercise in backetesting, and an illustration of the limitations of designing systems using these sort of methods, but if he's claing the system is profitable, and selectively backtesting to verify those claims, thats unethical, and he should be called on it.

 

I believe Rob's a CTA these days, and his performance is presumably a matter of public record so anyone whose thinking of paying for training at least has the opportunity to check him out and determine if he walks the walk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.