Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jswanson

Using Fear To Time The Market

Recommended Posts

Would you like to see a timing method that is 75% correct and consistently pulls money from the S&P 500 market since 1997? The following trading strategy is called the VIX Stretch Strategy and was found in a book called “Short Term Trading Strategies That Work” by Larry Connors and Ceasar Alvarez. The concept is executed on a daily chart of the S&P E-mini futures market and the rules are very simple.

 

  1. Price must be above its 200-day moving average
  2. VIX must be stretched 5% or more above its 10-day moving average for 3 or more days
  3. Exit when 2-period RSI crosses over 65

 

Simple yes, but also powerful.

 

A 200-day simple moving average (SMA) acts as a simple market environment filter by dividing the market into two major mode: bullish and bearish. Since the strategy only goes long, trades are initiated if the closing price is above the 200-day SMA filter.

 

The next rule utilizes the VIX which is a measure of the implied volatility of the S&P 500 index options. This is sometimes called the fear index. Why? You will see this index climb dramatically when the market sharply falls and market participants become fearful. Thus, spikes in the VIX index are often associated with steep or dramatic market selling. Since we are looking for a market downturn to open a long trade when we are within a longer term bullish trend, we use the VIX index to gauge the market downturn. Buying the dips within an overall bull market is a classic trading setup. It’s also interesting to note we are not simply using price action to gauge a market downturn. By using VIX to gauge the level of the market downturn we are measuring the increasing volatility seen in the S&P 500 index option prices. Thus we are not measuring a pullback in price directly, but indirectly.

 

The final rule is our exit rule which uses a 2-period RSI. Upon the close of the daily bar the RSI is calculated and if this value is above 65 we exit at the close. I coded these rules in EasyLanguage to see how well they would perform. It did rather well. The results below are from 1997 through March 2011. $20 for slippage and commissions was deducted per round trip.

 

VIX-Stretch-EQ-Curve.png

 

The code I used to generate the results is available at the bottom of this post. Is this a complete trading system? Please note the code used to generate these results has no stops! Most people would consider this a complete violation of the rules. I myself would not trade without stops. So a catastrophic hard stop may be added. In closing this timing strategy is a great seed idea for building a complete trading system. With a little creativity I’m sure you could turn this into a great system.

 

DOWNLOAD

 

Please note, the trading concept and the code as it is provided is not a complete trading system. It is simply a demonstration of a robust entry method that can be used as a core of a trading system. So, for those of you who are interested in building your own trading systems this concept may be a great starting point.

 

The EasyLanguage code (text file) can be downloaded here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for another great thread. I have read the book you reference, but never got as far as testing this particular strategy.

 

An interesting idea with the Connors methods is to use them to filter one another, for example requiring that both the VIX and the 3 Down Days condition you discussed in another thread are both met for an entry.

 

I think that the major issue for most traders here will always be the lack of a hard stop set at the time of entry. It would be interesting to know Connor and Alvarez's own views/research/methods for managing risk.

 

Bluehorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If my assumption about stops is correct ..... any stop loss will ruin this strategy. The next logical test is a quasi stop loss that inverts the logic and sells short.

 

Anyone have time to test this .. or already knows how that scenario would also ruin it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:
Thanks for another great thread. I have read the book you reference, but never got as far as testing this particular strategy.

 

An interesting idea with the Connors methods is to use them to filter one another, for example requiring that both the VIX and the 3 Down Days condition you discussed in another thread are both met for an entry.

 

I think that the major issue for most traders here will always be the lack of a hard stop set at the time of entry. It would be interesting to know Connor and Alvarez's own views/research/methods for managing risk.

 

Bluehorseshoe

 

The system only holds trades for a few days, max. With such a short hold time I would think deep in the money options would be a great way to trade this. Thus, you would have your downside risk controlled and have plenty of leverage for the ride up. However, this is just my guess. I don't trade options.

 

I also agree combining the different Connors methods would be interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jswanson said:
The system only holds trades for a few days, max. With such a short hold time I would think deep in the money options would be a great way to trade this. Thus, you would have your downside risk controlled and have plenty of leverage for the ride up. However, this is just my guess. I don't trade options.

 

I also agree combining the different Connors methods would be interesting.

 

Personally I just do this sort of thing without stops and very little leverage. I have wondered many times about employing options, but frankly I just can't be bothered trying to understand them.

 

As far as combos go, the strategy above is pretty much a combination of the VIX for entry with one of Connors beloved RSI rules for the exit, but I was referring more to a combined conditional entry(or exit) criteria.

 

I finally realised the other day that you're a vendor. And that you're in business with the very clever guy from Adaptrade whose code I have spent many hours typing out. As a rule I don't tolerate vendors well, but I did find your website very interesting and will undoubtedly return for a more throrough read . . .

 

Bluehorseshoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:
Personally I just do this sort of thing without stops and very little leverage. I have wondered many times about employing options, but frankly I just can't be bothered trying to understand them.

 

As far as combos go, the strategy above is pretty much a combination of the VIX for entry with one of Connors beloved RSI rules for the exit, but I was referring more to a combined conditional entry(or exit) criteria.

 

I finally realised the other day that you're a vendor. And that you're in business with the very clever guy from Adaptrade whose code I have spent many hours typing out. As a rule I don't tolerate vendors well, but I did find your website very interesting and will undoubtedly return for a more throrough read . . .

 

Bluehorseshoe

 

It's true! I'm a blood-sucking vendor. I'm also a cold hearted speculator. So be warned! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.