Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

RichardCox

Using the ADX Indicator to Identify Market Tops and Bottoms

Recommended Posts

A great number of Forex technical strategy tutorials on the web suggest that new traders avoid looking for tops and bottoms within a larger trend. There are many occasions where this is sound advice, as this form of contrarian trading will require traders to position themselves against the general momentum in a market, to, in effect, “stand in front of a moving train” or to “catch a falling knife” as this behavior is often described. But even though these are very real factors, it cannot be denied that accurately identifying tops and bottoms in the market will allow traders to enter at the most preferable levels and allow us to “buy low and sell high.”

 

So, the essential question traders should ask themselves is not whether looking for tops and bottoms is a sound approach but rather which method is best for accurately forecasting when a trend has run its course and ready for a reversal. Here we will use a combination of indicators to achieve this: A 20 period EMA, a 40 period EMA and a 14 period Average Directional Movement Index (ADX). In this strategy, all time frames will be considered but trades will only be based on one time frame at a time.

 

 

ADX as Basis for Reversals

 

The basis for this trade relies on the ability of the ADX to measure trend strength while the 20 EMA acts as a support and resistance level. With this in mind, we look for charts where the 30 is 30 or above, which shows the current trend is strong. Starting with longer term time frames (Daily charts) as these are generally move valid. We can then move to the lower time frames if nothing is seen matching this criteria. If a currency pair shows an ADX over 30 multiple time frames, we opt for the longest term chart.

 

 

Position Entries

 

After identifying a strong trend, we look for prices to bounce off of the 20 EMA (for buy positions). For sell positions, we look for prices to fail at the 20 EMA. Stop losses can then be set below the 40 EMA, as this area is expected to hold given the underlying trend strength. The difference between the 20 and 40 EMAs also gives the trade some protection against false breaks.

 

 

Exiting the Trade

 

When establishing trade targets, we use our chart’s Bollinger Bands to identify the standard deviations from historical price action in the currency pair, and then set the profit target to the outside band. What is interesting about this approach is that the profit target can be adjusted later, based on whether or not the Bollinger Band expands or contracts. Always close the trade when prices test the outer Band.

 

In addition to this, a Fibonacci or Trailing Stop method can also be employed when determining profit targets. Fibonacci traders can set targets at the 1.618 extension of the AB move from the previous trend move. In this case, the trade entry effectively acts as point C in the overall price movement. A final method is to simply trail the stop loss once prices move in the forecasted direction. Stops are trailed to just below the previous candlestick low (for longs) or just above (for shorts). The trade is then allowed to unfold on its own until the trailing stop is triggered.

 

 

Final Points to Remember

 

Here we suggest that there are three potential methods for choosing a profit target in each trade but it should always be remembered that only one of these methods should be employed at a time. Never start with one method and then switch to another in the same trade. Last, the trade should always be closed if the ADX moves below 30, as this signals the trend as longs its underlying strength. Testing this trade requires active monitoring of the charts, as there are many instances where the trade needs to be adjusted manually. This trading method is not ideal for traders who are generally inactive and rely on previously determined levels.

 

Below is a Short (Selling) trade example in real time, using a 1-hour time frame, in EUR/USD:

 

adxindicator.png

 

 

In the example above, Sell positions are initiated when the ADX rises above 30 and prices find resistance at the 20 EMA. The scenario would be reversed for Long (Buy) positions.

5aa710d775532_ADXIndicator.thumb.png.3a94080af594a17a4c32093ac0109d5e.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At times it seems difficult to have adx above 30 on Fx pairs. So I think you can lower that number to 25 .

What consideration do give DMI's in your system? Don't you consider them when entering the trade? ADX just tells you the strength of the trend, but it is the DMI that tell you in which direction to trade, I believe.

 

 

A great number of Forex technical strategy tutorials on the web suggest that new traders avoid looking for tops and bottoms within a larger trend. There are many occasions where this is sound advice, as this form of contrarian trading will require traders to position themselves against the general momentum in a market, to, in effect, “stand in front of a moving train” or to “catch a falling knife” as this behavior is often described. But even though these are very real factors, it cannot be denied that accurately identifying tops and bottoms in the market will allow traders to enter at the most preferable levels and allow us to “buy low and sell high.”

 

So, the essential question traders should ask themselves is not whether looking for tops and bottoms is a sound approach but rather which method is best for accurately forecasting when a trend has run its course and ready for a reversal. Here we will use a combination of indicators to achieve this: A 20 period EMA, a 40 period EMA and a 14 period Average Directional Movement Index (ADX). In this strategy, all time frames will be considered but trades will only be based on one time frame at a time.

 

 

ADX as Basis for Reversals

 

The basis for this trade relies on the ability of the ADX to measure trend strength while the 20 EMA acts as a support and resistance level. With this in mind, we look for charts where the 30 is 30 or above, which shows the current trend is strong. Starting with longer term time frames (Daily charts) as these are generally move valid. We can then move to the lower time frames if nothing is seen matching this criteria. If a currency pair shows an ADX over 30 multiple time frames, we opt for the longest term chart.

 

 

Position Entries

 

After identifying a strong trend, we look for prices to bounce off of the 20 EMA (for buy positions). For sell positions, we look for prices to fail at the 20 EMA. Stop losses can then be set below the 40 EMA, as this area is expected to hold given the underlying trend strength. The difference between the 20 and 40 EMAs also gives the trade some protection against false breaks.

 

 

Exiting the Trade

 

When establishing trade targets, we use our chart’s Bollinger Bands to identify the standard deviations from historical price action in the currency pair, and then set the profit target to the outside band. What is interesting about this approach is that the profit target can be adjusted later, based on whether or not the Bollinger Band expands or contracts. Always close the trade when prices test the outer Band.

 

In addition to this, a Fibonacci or Trailing Stop method can also be employed when determining profit targets. Fibonacci traders can set targets at the 1.618 extension of the AB move from the previous trend move. In this case, the trade entry effectively acts as point C in the overall price movement. A final method is to simply trail the stop loss once prices move in the forecasted direction. Stops are trailed to just below the previous candlestick low (for longs) or just above (for shorts). The trade is then allowed to unfold on its own until the trailing stop is triggered.

 

 

Final Points to Remember

 

Here we suggest that there are three potential methods for choosing a profit target in each trade but it should always be remembered that only one of these methods should be employed at a time. Never start with one method and then switch to another in the same trade. Last, the trade should always be closed if the ADX moves below 30, as this signals the trend as longs its underlying strength. Testing this trade requires active monitoring of the charts, as there are many instances where the trade needs to be adjusted manually. This trading method is not ideal for traders who are generally inactive and rely on previously determined levels.

 

Below is a Short (Selling) trade example in real time, using a 1-hour time frame, in EUR/USD:

 

adxindicator.png

 

 

In the example above, Sell positions are initiated when the ADX rises above 30 and prices find resistance at the 20 EMA. The scenario would be reversed for Long (Buy) positions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
At times it seems difficult to have adx above 30 on Fx pairs. So I think you can lower that number to 25 .

What consideration do give DMI's in your system? Don't you consider them when entering the trade? ADX just tells you the strength of the trend, but it is the DMI that tell you in which direction to trade, I believe.

 

Changing the ADX threshold is fine as long as it is understood that this lowers the probability of success in the trade. The upside, of course, is that more trade opportunities will become available. As far as the DMIs, confirmation there can absolutely be taken into consideration but with this trading strategy, direction is based more on the way price behaves in relation to the moving averages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Talking of higher time frames, on my daily charts, ADX is under 30 mark since end january, and most of the time price was above mm20. Which time frames did you use?

 

ADX going under a treshold might indicate a mere consolidation zone and not the end of the trend, imho.

 

Changing the ADX threshold is fine as long as it is understood that this lowers the probability of success in the trade. The upside, of course, is that more trade opportunities will become available. As far as the DMIs, confirmation there can absolutely be taken into consideration but with this trading strategy, direction is based more on the way price behaves in relation to the moving averages.

5aa710d9ea1ec_SpotFXEUR_USD(DFB).png.d810c0faf04bad853b5ad26acd9a2708.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Talking of higher time frames, on my daily charts, ADX is under 30 mark since end january, and most of the time price was above mm20. Which time frames did you use?

 

ADX going under a treshold might indicate a mere consolidation zone and not the end of the trend, imho.

 

It looks like your readings are coming from a daily chart, the trade in the first example in on an hourly time frame. I agree with your point about consolidation, so the same trade wouldn't be viable on the longer term time frames.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a chart to illustrate the trade I just took selling Gold, using ADX / DMI . Only problem is the MA200 that might prove a strong support. Let's see what happens.

Edit: just set stop at BE , 1665. No TP for now.

5aa710db4b406_Gold(DFB).png.55912f0d19b1fd9d9535bbd759891955.png

Edited by kuokam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.