Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Igor

Careful! - The Media Will Steer You to the Poor House

Recommended Posts

Lately we've seen markets ignore what most people perceive to be negative market moving news.

 

We've also seen markets ignore what most people perceive to be positive market moving news when prices have a muted reaction.

 

But one very common misperception is thinking that markets are moving because of how individual investors are trading.

 

It’s simply not true. Studies show that 60% of trading volume is automated -- based on algorithms. These algorithms trade on many indicators that are overlooked by almost every mainstream service.

 

Believe it or not -- and this is going to sound totally impossible to some -- the media is constantly drilling into your head a false picture, false assumptions, and pretty much lots of B.S.

 

If analysts or the media have nothing to say, or if they say: “I don’t know,” then they will cease to exist. So they just spit out whatever they can to stay in business.

 

You don’t want to know how I could know this for a fact. But ask any insider in the financial media business who truly knows, and they can say the same. It’s scary. I’m talking MAJOR networks where they create stories and where the talking head “analyst” has an earpiece with someone telling them what their opinion should be.

 

Sure, much of the time, they are correctly reporting on why markets are doing what they are doing in the short term, when it’s obvious, but they almost never get it right when it comes to the FUTURE, and that’s because the short-term movements they report on have virtually no predictive power in the stock market. Their hedge: There’s usually no way to prove that the reasons they give for market movements aren’t accurate.

 

The real predictive power of short, medium and long-term is in technical analysis. If markets are moving in a trend, then THAT’S what’s going on -- and nothing more. Big investors don’t decide to start buying or selling stocks and then, as soon as they do, call media outlets and show them their cards. The media often just attaches a reason for movements in the market and -- as scary as it seems -- convince the world that what they are saying is a fact.

 

It’s like astrology. One can read ...

 

“The New Moon in Sagittarius offers up new possibilities for adventure. This is a great day to plan a trip to a place you've always wanted to go.”

 

… and then look around and find several possibilities for adventure. The horoscope seems to be spot on.

 

I admit, this comparison may be a stretch, but after being an investment insider in many aspects of the business for 15 years, I can tell you it’s really not very far off. And the astrologist isn’t putting a major part of your life at risk. If anything, they make you more positive. The financial media does serious damage to your investment account -- no joke!

 

Markets can only move when people are acting on their sophisticated research. They don’t move on “stories” as much as they move on “action”.

 

Why do bear markets bottom out long before the economic recovery is “underway,” and the before media starts reporting reasons for the bounce?

 

Think about this: rookie money manager are able to literally move stocks 20%, 50% or 100% if they were small cap stocks that only traded 50,000 - 100,000 shares per day. This was with NO NEWS on the company. Just based on their humble opinion that it was worth more.

 

In fact, anyone reading this article can use what they have in the market to actually move certain stocks up 30% or so, if those stocks trade light enough volume. I’m talking illiquid stocks.

 

This is because a) there aren’t many shares outstanding, and b) there isn’t much of a market (not many sellers of the stock you’re buying).

 

But when a few people can change directions of stocks like Exxon Mobil, Intel and Microsoft that have 5-8 billion shares outstanding and trade 20m to 200m shares per day, you know those people have the cash to get the true story. And when the market closes, you’ll hear the media creating reasons why it happened (they have 5 easy canned reasons that apply to any move -- just in case).

 

Listening to those reporting on what financial markets are doing can often do more harm than good. If everyone knows this already, then why do they bother to keep listening?

 

ANSWER: Because they don’t feel confident enough to formulate their own opinion on the market. But I’m telling you right now you DO have that ability. You can formulate your opinion based on what the power players with the market-moving money are telling you. They are speaking to you whether you know it or not, just as a crime scene speaks to a crime scene investigator, or the way a body speaks to a doctor or coroner. Big players leave clear footprints, and history repeats itself.

 

Price action tells the true story.

 

You can formulate your opinion by understanding technical analysis. These players are casting their votes with dollars every day. You just have to do two things:

Understand how to hear what they are telling you (simple education of technical analysis that anyone can grasp).

 

Actually bother to listen to what you’re hearing (which means fighting your own human emotion that causes the most seasoned technical analysis veterans to stray from their time tested indicators and systems).

 

Syndicated from Tycoon Report

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess US has fund managers and investment banking institutions looking after the portfolios on behalf of their clients.
    • There are many resources related to forex trading available on forums like babypips and forexfactory etc.
    • Candle stick pattern is one of the easiest charting patterns available to learn and make money. However, new traders never learn about the skills needed for earning money but they rush for making money and eventually lose their money.
    • Nothing wrong with being a ‘progressive’. Nothing wrong with being a ‘conservative’.  Very generally, ‘conservatives’ have preponderance of the here and now neurotransmitters, prefer empirical references, the rule of law, and value individual agency (It has been said that conservatives love humans and progressives love humanity) . Very generally, ‘progressives’ are dopaginaric - driven by passion for a better possible future, prefer references to others  (Example Karmela won’t answer questions with facts.  She cites the opinion of 18 ‘experts’), have a penchant for rule by man/mobs not by law , and value ‘societal' agency.  However, excesses of either tendency indicates mental illness, collective malaise, and has consequences.  When either camp is systematically captured by control seekers and/or, situationally by mobs, the whole is lessened. A key sign that is occurring is when one side no longer allows disagreement.  Progressives have  currently gone crazy in those excesses and are no longer allowing anything but unithought... examples - You can still be a vocal pro choice republican.  Try being a vocal pro life democrat. For snicks just try it.  You’ll get cancelled.  Bust a myth about blacks in America, true up the real  history of Republicans ending slavery and what has happened since, how the democrats are the party of the KKK, how Obama did not a fkn thang for blacks in general, be a black republican, etc.    You will get canceled in a heartbeat. Step up and question the social agendas of federally subsidized schools at a board meeting... get treated like shit and also get an immediate case number with the FBI ... Question the requirements to watch and lickkiss the 'rainbows' and also make sure your kids show up for it, not to mention fund transitions out of your pocket and see what you get ‘labeled’ Question mainstream media bias - even just to mention that biased, agenda driven narrative is different from truth in reporting - and see what happens to your voice... Excesses have consequences... imbalances have consequences... just sayin’
    • SBUX Starbucks stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 99.81 at https://stockconsultant.com/?SBUX
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.