Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

joshdance

The Close of a Bar is Meaningless

Recommended Posts

If we are talking a highly traded market (such as ES) and on a 5 minute basis or above then the close, on most bars on a reputable data providor such as Genesis, esignal, TradeStation etc, should be the same, scrubbed or not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Patuca, you still do not get it, and it is a very simple concept. BH sums it up nicely:

 

The timeframe is a discrete structure arbitrarily imposed on continuous data.

...

If you don't "get it" from this post, then you should probably give up, because it really doesn't matter too much anyway . . .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You're back. Great! Now you can be curator of this thread again.

 

Cos I'm damn well sick of it . . .

 

:)

 

BlueHorseshoe

LOL mr horseshoe...take two alka seltzers and you will be back in the saddle again :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(why do i get the feeling that i will regret ever posting this...i wonder?:doh: )

 

because ... weil es ist dumm :rofl: ;)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

...suppose each of us created our own close. oh wait - we already do that now...

…still darkness forever :)

 

Everything to the left on your chart is free information but it only includes as many closes as there are ticks in everything to the left on your chart...be careful how many closes you include to the left.

 

...and every market does currently have just one bar - on a timeframe that is the life of the instrument... and that timeframe is no more or less ludicrous than any other timeframe / representation in use...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Suppose there was no close, then it would be just one bar on every market,

just think about it, darkness forever! :wtf:

 

If there were no close... then everyone would be trading naked... ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whats that? did you say vibrations mitsubishi? TA just got rescued from staggered time frames and now we have to deal with VIBRATIONS? what is wrong with you people? mitzy get rid of the emini cooper and get on a harley you'll get all the vibrations you can stand.

 

you say no God? i suppose all your common sense vibrated right out of your head....

 

one day you WILL change your mind.........

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Each daily bar is mathematically connected.I have done the research and continue the research.You can debate it all you want,but i can take the most obscure index ,and there are hundreds and i will find the same thing because it is universal.We can't agree on that because i am not going to demonstrate it.

But the clue is today's high will be on the daily bar.5 minute bar,hourly bar,same for the low,open and close.

the "hidden" knowledge of misubishi...ok how much do you want to reveal this knowledge? moderator please put a big golden C under mitzy handle...

 

now mitzy if the last sentence were true you wouldn't have blown 6 accounts (per your own words) and you certainly would not be on a forum debating with the likes of patuca...why you would be so filthy rich nobody could get you clean again...why you could stake everyones account on TL...if you are such a nice person..why don't you just do that?

 

vibrations .......come on ...give me a break......

 

ps mitsubishi's new handle is "the revibrator" :missy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The definitive answer appears to be that there is no definitive answer:) WRONG

..................

On the other hand many of you will be trading the same levels as me having arrived at that price by another method.The only definitive answer is that we will never get universal agreement on this,but that won't change the maths which occurs waaaay beyond chance or coincidence.

 

thats cleared it up for me!

I am vibrating in the apartment as my clothes are spinning mercilessly in the washing machine......if i shake enough the random forces of nature might make me depress the buy button.....or maybe the sell button.......

 

if there is madness in the method but it works go for it....

 

and yes Patucca, maybe its time to bring participation in a meaningless meandering thread to a close....thanks for the reminder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good traders have a knave doing their laundry.

 

The close is NOT meaningless.

 

24 hour dynamics aside, the close is a bookkeeping entry.

 

HOWEVER, it is a price point that can be used to influence. To keep participants "in". Over the weekend for example.

 

It is the ONE price the public "looks at". It is the price most less nimble institutions "look at".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The close is NOT meaningless.

 

The thread is called "The Close of a Bar is Meaningless," and the first few posts point out that the settlement at the end of the day is an altogether different story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The thread is called "The Close of a Bar is Meaningless," and the first few posts point out that the settlement at the end of the day is an altogether different story.

 

From the replies in all these ~30 pages, it appears your earnest effort to carefully structure the content and wording of your original question did not matter one bit …

:confused::roll eyes:

 

joshdance, would you share (if you have time and energy) if you’ve ‘learned’ anything valuable re your original question from the replies in the thread …and what.

...and do you still have questioning re the topic? Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would say so, catalyzed by your last unintelligible 27 posts in 4 days (out of 65 posts). Rubbish to sort through, and a waste of server space.
LOL dreamer of staggered time frames. you still don't get it eh. they don't exists. period. anything that does exists such as OHLC ...statistics (for mr horseshoe) patterns...etc...etc...etc are all structures imposed upon the data feed of price and volume or that come out of, or result from the feed, but what you brain can't get is that that doesn't make them meaningless.. is the high meaningless? is the low meaningless? if one is meaningless then perhaps they all are as they come from the same source..do you get it now??

 

actually the problem is the high and low vibrate but the close doesn't..LOL:haha:

Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The thread is called "The Close of a Bar is Meaningless," and the first few posts point out that the settlement at the end of the day is an altogether different story.
very selective eh..some closes have meaning...others don't.....whatever floats your boat..or sinks it... Edited by Patuca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From the replies in all these ~30 pages, it appears your earnest effort to carefully structure the content and wording of your original question did not matter one bit …

:confused::roll eyes:

 

joshdance, would you share (if you have time and energy) if you’ve ‘learned’ anything valuable re your original question from the replies in the thread …and what.

...and do you still have questioning re the topic? Thanks.

no it appears he didn't

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gee Josh, thanks for the distinction!!!!!!!!!!!

 

In fact there is NO close of a bar. Hinges upon the timeframe of selection and the platform used.

 

 

I just realized WHY I haven't been "here" for months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The close has significant power and may be magnified on multiples if within the same direction. The period in which the close falls on has significance, for example, you have a 30 day close and you have the end of the month close, "the close of the bar is meaningless.... EXCEPT... no exceptions , like saying a fib is meaningless... EXCEPT.

 

The close of any bar carries direction and algorithmic adjustment.

 

Lets give the micro bar close of a lesser power , yet deserves a power. Everything has a power force that ultimately reflects in the market, right down to the prediction of weather. A tick up or down has meaning, may the annual close carry a higher power. currently compiling countIF formulas on multi time frames. this is imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
very selective eh..some closes have meaning...others don't.....whatever floats your boat..or sinks it...

 

After all of these posts, covering everything that could be said on this issue, some don't get the distinction made (and why) between a daily bar and a minute-based one?! Oy... And now new posters clearly didn't read anything earlier (though, I guess, who can blame them!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
    • UTZ Utz Brands stock, watch for a bottom breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?UTZ
    • FL Foot Locker stock, nice breakdown follow through at https://stockconsultant.com/?FL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.