Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

2012trader

Do You Use The Elliott Wave To Trade?

Recommended Posts

Hi Siuya,

 

What do you mean by "value bet" in this context?

 

 

(one reason I dont really like poker jargon (analogies fine) in trading :2c:)

 

A value bet in trading for me is in the context of what the market is doing (people talk about the flow, the mood, the pattern etc) and then how best to react to it. The value is in knowing how to play it in the context of the pattern you recognise it as. (The word value has a few meanings as well - value of the context, value of the pattern, value of the pattern in the context, value of the strategy to apply given the context and the pattern)

 

We look at patterns for a reason - they are meant to work in a particular way. If they dont then what else will/can they do....and then you can play to where the value is in that pattern as it plays out.

There is more than one way to play something, and the flexibility to go either way, or the ability to play only to your strengths is important.

 

so what I mean in this example is that - if you think this is a possible 5 wave move in the EURUSD that has been slowly grinding up, there are a number of ways to play it - I stated a few. ie; if you think this pattern is genuine, and valid, then where is the value in the pattern.

- if you are bearish, then you go with the move down, but recognise that a tight stop has more value at this stage than a loose one....why, because markets do react, and so at this stage it might collapse but its more likely to react violently.

- if so you can choose to either try and pick the bottom - wave equality, first reaction, three line break, whatever.

- if not you can ride it.

 

However if your strengths are in going long, or your naturally bullish, or still bullish for what ever reasons, then you best bet (value) is in picking the bottom as a long.....as the pattern implies the end of a reactionary move in a grinding up trend.

 

So you can get lots of value out of it either way.....point is as often said here that things are strategy/system dependent and that various patterns have various ways of playing them and the value is how to do it.....regardless of which (long or short) is right and works out. Think of the best case scenario - short, buy it near the bottom, reverse and go long....now that's trading!

 

(I hope that makes sense)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m awful (but I’m not as bad as they say I am), but I won’t disrespect you and call you an anal-yst ;)

I see and know what you’re saying and I won’t really try to convince you. The whole business of wave phenomena has a better explanation, imo, in Summation of Cycles anyways. But for other readers who may be exploring serious EW – if you’re really going to get into EW, build a construct grounded in the principle that if it’s not impulsing it is correcting … and in that context, price always DOES get the memo … and that EVERY corrective wave does have a logical count … comprehensive coverage (without "silly X's and Y's and who knows what else" ) is accomplished by adding a few more ‘patterns' to your repertoire ( ie make sure you fully understand Neely )

 

Example: To “ If a five wave EW pattern has a wave 4 that overlaps wave 1 slightly is it not a 5 wave EW pattern. The unbending rule followers say no it is not. “ I would respond – as true impulse is so rare, if a 3rd wave hasn’t cleared 1 enough to make any overlapping a very tiny possibility, an alternative corrective count is always indicated / advised anyway. With the overlap it likely still IS a correction, not a bull or bear impulse. The ‘time’ spent in clear impulse is minimal. ‘Time’ spent in ‘obvious’ 3 wave corrections is also minimal. Combined those ‘logical” / pretty / easy 5’s and 3’s, make up far, far less than 50% of the action. To master EW, the real work is knowing where you are in each (usually complex) correction (and that "it" is actually present 100% of the time …)

 

...

… Assume discontinuity... ie avoid settling and assuming continuity!

“The way of the Tao is reversal“ L. Tzu...

 

...again, my posts herein are for those who might be considering seriously studying EW - not for those who have been curious and have formed some impressions ... and not for those who occasionally see a wave ;) - not that there's anything wrong with occasionally 'seeing' a count...:rofl:

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

...

 

... my posts herein are for those who might be considering seriously studying EW - not for those who have been curious and have formed some impressions ...

 

 

 

Sorry, zdo, I keep my mouth shut! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've studied EW for years and have a nice collection of books, software, newsletters, and a thick binder of personal notes. My conclusion up to this point: there is never a need to count past 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever do any broceanography?

Counting waves to scarf the big rhinos? Avoid close outs? Predict an A-frame?

11ths and 17ths … sometimes… sometimes not

ie works for a few sets then doesn’t…

 

frankfx, I would make sure your friend's failure was attributable to EW itself...

there's a huge difference btwn knowing EW and being able to successfully trade EW...

one of the best utilizations of the theory is in measuring and setting risk... don't know his particulars, but it sounds like he didn't get that part

 

not that knowing isn't important though...

In fact, most standardized, simple EW is so incomplete it is dangerous... I've never seen an EW artist thrive who wasn't way up on top of bifurcation... an aspect of the process most 'knowledgable', practiced, time spent studying EW'ers have never considered or even heard about ... and won't read about in most books or articles on the subject either...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mit,

 

In replying to my posts, I hope you are just trying to save ppl from the elliotwave with these posts. No need to be very concerned though... TL is no place for budding Elliotticians… they wouldn’t bother…However, it is the very nadir-ishness of EW herein that interests me…

 

Here’s a little bit of perception management review on how I see EW.

Trading Chaos by Bill Williams - Page 2

"Then one day it hit me – there is not one Elliott Wave pattern (and how it unfolds for real instead of the way it’s ‘supposed’ to) that can not be fully comprehended via the Summation of Cycles principle…" zdo

 

I keep posting ‘about’ it now for weird reasons. It was an Elliotician who correctly gave me a studied opinion in Feb 99 that the most likely outcome was a long sideways correction in index prices, and that in dollar adjusted terms it would be a more serious correction, that it would entail increasing institutional (funds, hft, ‘professionals’ ) influence (with accompanying decreasing ‘public’ participation)... and less and less interest in EW's ?? Fortunately, I ‘resonated’ with his projection and that was a catalyst in much adaptation and development in my trading – not going deeper into EW btw, but diversifying into methods to exploit corrections and congestions .

 

“That which is unsustainable WILL collapse” period.

… same person also advised me that circa 2013 was likely another ‘sea change’ time in the big (not all elliott) waves in the sky…. for a time, more ‘crowds’ in more time frames would look elliotty again – for a time, impulse waves would be clearly impulse waves… So, it’s not really about ElliottWaves per se… an ElliottWaver was just the catalyst. I’m just preparing to make major adaptations again in my trading … hopefully, I’ll stay nimble enough…

 

EW is a social study – and notice I didn’t use the ‘social science’ term. If I were to use it, I would never drop below a day time frame and even that fast would probably be a mistake. (but ironically, for anyone who is interested, EW has less hook up with phi harmonics on the longer timeframes than it does (episodically) on the short time frames – go figure :) )

 

 

 

 

It still appears that the market did not care about the triangle and dropped when something it did care about happened.

Now he is saying he expects 5 waves down now that this pullback is underway and that we have only had 3.Not sure why he has that bias.Since the main trend is up i would have thought that 3 waves counter trend would be more likely

“Then one day it hit me – there is not one Elliott Wave pattern (and how it unfolds for real instead of the way it’s ‘supposed’ to) that can not be fully comprehended via the Summation of Cycles principle… “ zdo

...in several of my systems, if a setup occurs I’m getting in period – even if price is ANYTHING but confirming it

 

 

in general,EW's.always appear to be bearish in far greater numbers rather than neutral or bullish....or is that just me?
Must be you. ;)

.. in the big picture I described above we are in a long bear correction… don’t know for sure, but maybe even logically, there would be more neutral or bearish formations forming in such an environment… yet... perception is worse than reality most of the time and

perception is leaky in any case... so...

 

 

 

….

 

yep, it must be you. ;) …otherwise I would have to be surprised there’s no Beyond Elliott thread by Mitzu ever?

but sadly no widening the horizons here

just closure, shutting down… and digs

 

Since the main trend is up

??? wtf mit

Again, more shutting down, instead of going ‘beyond’. ;)

See http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/12423-beyond-taylor-45.html#post161924

Please open us a Beyond Trend thread :rofl: ;) .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Real Crisis: "People Have Lost Trust In The Government And The Market" | ZeroHedge

I noted this because it reminded me of something my old EW teacher told me way back in the late nineties… while he was (very accurately, btw) projecting the decade + ‘correction’ that started ~ 2000 . He termed it something like “the stock markets will all be institutional by the end of it, the public will be out…”. I didn’t understand… (:haha:still don’t really :) ) … but

 

Good EW work = quality socionomics work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.