Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

2012trader

Do You Use The Elliott Wave To Trade?

Recommended Posts

...very interesting … 20 + days since op and not a single peep…

 

Understandable, in so far as for over a decade now the stock market continues in corrective waves, instead of in impulse waves, … and as Glenn Neely so accurately put it… the work / test of ew traders is in how well they count and trade corrective patterns…

 

…this low response rate in TL, may be indicative of a whole generation where ew is a lost art…

 

…tangent

[social Mood Watch] Summit 2011 Video: Bob Prechter Explains How Investors Herd

 

Also understandable, in that most ew counts will still be done on dollar unadjusted charts… and are subsequently skewed, screwed, or just plain old suck…

 

 

in contrary mode I’m thinking now may a good time for noobs to explore it and for experienced traders to dust off the ew books again

- not that the corrective period is over yet… but if you know how to trade ending or ended corrective phases, the impulse waves, when they come again will be ‘easy’

- and not that I espouse ew or recommend 'everyone' learn ew… I have all kinds of issues with it... 1) summation of cycles 'explains' how so many ew's can turn out not like they are 'supposed' to and has taken me much further in projecting possible outcomes than even the very best ew analyses ( btw, though, I don't regret any of the long hours I put into trading EW long ago 2) and, (yes disturbingly) for me, the "ew's" of one time frame are not 'fractals' of larger timeframe ElliottWaves' s as the traditional and consensus models posit... etc. etc...

 

Still...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Prechter is a stupid man.To be a permabear in a bull market ...

 

I don't track Prechter's market calls at all.

:Curious:

...How long has he been a permabear?

(... and how long has it been a bull market ? )

 

 

“Nature does not hurry, yet everything is accomplished.” - Lao Tzu

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused:

 

...As usual i will be completely ignoring convention

hey mitsu, this is confusing … celebrating your own inner innovator…while denigrating Ralph, et al, who on many levels, personified and were shining examples of “ignoring convention” in their day…

 

 

 

 

“...pushing measurement very far gets you to weird things” Alder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:confused:

:helloooo:

 

… are we (completely) identifying Elliott Wave and / with Robert Prechtor yet?

 

… are we mixing messages yet?

 

"It is the same with all things. What starts out being sincere usually ends up being deceitful. What was simple in the beginning acquires monstrous proportions in the end." Chuang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still :confused :)

 

 

:confused:

 

incongruencies btwn...

 

...get a songbook...

?

or

...writing a song...

?

 

 

... my confusion is maybe just from the tone of your first posts about Robert, permabear, bull market, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good luck Mitsubishi - if you take something - like EW - and try and improve it, etc; then if you go down the path of trying to create a model that explains everything and becomes a model that the market has to fit I think you will struggle.....now I know you are probably not saying this :)

and while Precter may be a fanatical devotee - so are many other perma bulls, bears and they usually have their day in the sun. Often its better to be nown for something than being a flipper with no conviction - it makes for good tv.

 

For my :2c:

Elliot wave theory is a good generalist theory of how the markets work/swing/move - in waves.

Now those waves might as often be seen in a series of 5 and 3 wave counts.

Period.

 

Personally - if I see something that in the context of other things - eg; support, resistance, 50% retracement in an existing trend - AND - I can clearly see 5 waves or I can see that a 3 wave retracement would also co-incide with a 100% of the A wave to C waves then it gives me a higher conviction for the trade. I am interested in counting the interior waves to try and then predict what is going to happen in the future - no.

 

(much like Tom Demark - 9-13-9 counts, they are indications and a general theory of how markets appear to move) -

are they predictive? Only if you want to be frustrated and proved wrong like so many of our predictions :) ---- as opposed to anticipations of possibilities/probabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EW is like any technique. Works some of the time, some of the times not.

 

The fanatics believe there is always a wave count present.

 

Just a matter of finding it and labeling it.:doh:

 

Mystery X and Y waves, and elaborate 5 wave corrections.

 

Prector will believe this going to the end of his own personal 5th wave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EW is like any technique. Works some of the time, some of the times not.

 

The fanatics believe there is always a wave count present.

 

Just a matter of finding it and labeling it.:doh:

 

Mystery X and Y waves, and elaborate 5 wave corrections.

 

Prector will believe this going to the end of his own personal 5th wave.

 

I found it interesting to learn about the "young" Elliott who only knew about 3s and 5s. There were no inviolate rules or even Fibonacci stuff. Then, as you say, the need to explain every wiggle set in and with it the infamous X wave, etc. For me, I'm young at heart and travel in young Elliott's footsteps especially when they mesh with other indicators.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You want a simple life don't you zdo?.

No, I only go “simple” when I’m forced to by low coping or mental energy,… I naturally tend to complexity.

 

…ever wonder what happened to our OP?

…wonder why he asked the OP ? ?

…wonder why only one of us, Obsidian, has categorically answered his YN question. The rest of us have hem hawed around with it...

 

I thought your basic point is that many have abandoned EW but maybe there are people trying to adapt the basic idea..if i am,there are probably others

My basic point was to answer OP’s question. An answer of quality would have been a straight up “No” – but I went off with some “quality BS” ( re “quality BS”:), see http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/money-management/12243-drawdown-2.html#post141015 ...TL would be much better off, imo, if we all put our quality here and put all our BS and “quality BS” over on ET or some place… me, included… I estimate less than 10% of my posts are really of quality… and even that estimate may be generous self delusion)

 

The fanatics believe there is always a wave count present

not just “fanatics” … all bonafide Elliotticians ‘believe’ a wave count is present…

during pure impulse monowaves where they obviously 'know', of course, but also even in complicated corrections when they can't definitively come up with more than 2 or 3 alternative counts. Dedicated Ellioticians must be prepared for impulse waves so they must delve into the complexities. To a ‘true’ Elliottician - EW is “working” all of the time...

 

Along those lines, is it really helpful to dabble?

… to use EW “when they mesh with other indicators” ?

… to have a trade supported when “see something that [agrees] in the context of other things”, but not counting the ”inner waves”?

… to “adapt the basic idea” ?

... to accomodate superficial 'EW' as an ancilliary construct ?

just wondering ???? On some levels this is a confusing thread...

 

more at http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/technical-analysis/9763-advice-all-stop-fighting-trend-3.html

Edited by zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Knowing the 'right' sets of beliefs to hold is never easy, but it is especially difficult at large turning points because, by definition, most people are holding onto old beliefs. Running against the crowd is difficult for everyone and impossible for many...

The tricky part is that our beliefs are usually hidden from us. Without conscious examination, they escape notice: lurking, shaping, and coloring our daily lives. Worse, beliefs quite often are not ‘ours’ in the sense that we create them by our individual thoughts and experiences. Instead, they are gifted to us by…

 

Dangerous Ideas - Blogs at Chris Martenson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I studies EW and actually used Tom Joseph's Software Advanced GET for a year about 12 years ago. As EW users know (I assume) EW is always clear in the rearview mirror... You don't know what wave your in until it unfolds & whether it is a minor or Major, etc... based on your timeframe...

 

I could not trade with it but it did help me see market structure a bit better, if only in hindsight and as another poster said it gave me a frame of reference for aligning retracements... If we have a flag developing on say a 15m and the pole of the flag would be a wave 3 then the retracement wave 4 would be where I would add or enter for the wave 5... of course is it wave 5 of the minor wave or are you entering at the 5th wave of bigger wave 3? If you know what I mean... I really see the same thing in a bar/candle chart and (for me) I do not worry about FIB Projections though I know some use them.. A deadend for me...

 

:2c:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Results of the survey are in!

Here are the stats for the TL sample ;) (for those who are face reading impaired, that was a :wink; )

 

73,978 Do not use Elliott Wave

4 Use Elliott Wave in a supplementary, confirmational, etc. role

0 Use Elliott Wave exclusively

 

"Nothing comes to a standstill sooner than movements that are brought about by so many people" Arnold Schoenberg

 

 

For the 4 :)

Which Method Can Traders Use to Confirm an Elliott Wave Count? | Elliott Wave International | Safehaven.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Life and trading would be so easy if only I could convince other traders to coordinate price movement to form a channel more often especially when counting current waves. And not by looking at historical data.

 

EWI is great at theory.

 

And even they sometimes botch it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That is interesting and probably not surprising that the original source is the best place to start any investigations.Do you (or anyone else) have any links you can post here?

 

You can find a few pages about the "young" Elliott in "Dynamic Trader" by R. Miner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are some freebies available at

 

Elliott Wave International: Expert Market Forecasting using the Elliott Wave Principle

 

It is a free membership and has a tab called Free stuff - It even has a 280 pages book free that you can read online.

 

 

Currently I believe (I am not an expert)

I believe that EUR/USD as I write is in a corrective wave

and I am long with a target of 1.3110

I still believe the EUR/USD will go to 1.3150 but I want to play safe and

I shall post a jpeg tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW - Just thought of this as a current example....and it was not too hard to see in real time, as the last two days down have been severe in recent comparative daily moves.

 

Not to count waves etc, but when you see something like this forming, and has 5 waves down

now you can either do nothing. (This was my choice as I had shorted this morning got shaken out for a small gain, and headed out to do some chores, plus I am meeting someone this afternoon - lame, and a bugger but hey thats trading)

 

or

.....if its probably still worth a short if you can get in at a reasonable point BUT, - it tells me if the move down does not continue - get out ASAP, as the reversal will be severe.

or

.....look to get on the reversal - punting the bottom in some manner.

 

point is - this is how i use elliot waves when they seem to just show themselves, and I can then adjust for what I think I will do. Choices to cut or enter were many depending on what you like....the overall context is the important element for me.

 

http://www.traderslaboratory.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=28827&stc=1&d=1336050630

ElliotWaveExampleGIF.thumb.jpg.0ce540d900cd1735521d3fd244dec7f3.jpg

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

re ""Do You Use The Elliott Wave To Trade?""

 

... just for subversive snicks ;) (not) :)

 

The Golden Ratio is the founding lie of the West…
Drew Hempel

 

:missy:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
....

Drew Hempel

Who he?

 

And yes the benefit of EW counting (the roughly 50% of the time it is actually present) is to say not only a reversal is likely but at a minimum the trend is likely to be over soon and odds are against a new position taken in the direction of current trend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's not a trader... That's obvious :rofl:

 

re: "...the roughly 50% of the time it is actually present"

How could 'it' ever not be present ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
He's not a trader... That's obvious :rofl:

 

re: "...the roughly 50% of the time it is actually present"

How could 'it' ever not be present ?

Because sometimes price just doesn't "get the memo" and cooperate with a logical count.

 

That is when the EWers, who always follow the rules, label everything with X's and Y's

and who knows what else.

 

If a five wave EW pattern has a wave 4 that overlaps wave 1 slightly is it not a 5 wave EW pattern. The unbending rule followers say no it is not. I analyse my trades but don't call me an anal-yst. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Because sometimes price just doesn't "get the memo"...

 

...

 

 

 

I like that one :)

 

It's comical how people sometimes try to make sense of the markets... I have to admit I've never seriously analyzed the EW theory, and hence, should not judge it superficially... but it never made sense to me why markets should have such predictable patterns (hence, my lack of motivation to analyze it).

 

I put Fibonacci numbers into the same category... but that's for another thread, I guess.

 

I hope that I don't get killed now by all the profitable traders out there who trade successfully based on EW or fibs... :stick out tongue:

 

Everyone should use what works for them...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I like that one :)

 

... but it never made sense to me why markets should have such predictable patterns (hence, my lack of motivation to analyze it).

 

I put Fibonacci numbers into the same category... but that's for another thread, I guess.

 

I hope that I don't get killed now by all the profitable traders out there who trade successfully based on EW or fibs... :stick out tongue:

 

Everyone should use what works for them...

 

Its not predictable, its often just a value bet.....both for Fib and for waves, and prices are just as predictable as the humans who create them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Its not predictable, its often just a value bet.....both for Fib and for waves, and prices are just as predictable as the humans who create them.

 

Hi Siuya,

 

What do you mean by "value bet" in this context?

 

I know this term only from poker, where you know you have the winning hand (or pretend to have it, which is a more sophisticated bluff) and bet an amount small enough for your opponent to call (giving him or her good odds) in order to extract extra money.

 

Do you mean betting a smaller amount on Fib or EW theories, as these are less likely to win (as opposed to my poker example)?

 

Regards,

k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Date: 8th April 2025.   Markets Rebound Cautiously as US-China Tariff Tensions Deepen     Global markets staged a tentative recovery on Tuesday following a wave of volatility sparked by escalating trade tensions between the United States and China. The Asia-Pacific region showed signs of stability after a chaotic start to the week—though some pockets remained under pressure. Taiwan’s Taiex dropped 4.4%, dragged lower by losses in tech heavyweight TSMC. The world’s largest chipmaker fell another 4% on Tuesday and has now slumped 13.5% since April 2, when US President Donald Trump first unveiled what he called ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs.   However, broader sentiment across the region turned more positive, with several markets rebounding sharply after Monday’s dramatic sell-offs. Japan’s Nikkei 225 surged over 6% in early trading, rebounding from an 18-month low. South Korea’s Kospi rose marginally, and Australia’s ASX 200 gained 1.9%, driven by strength in mining stocks. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng rose 1.6%, though still far from recovering from Monday’s 13.2% crash—its worst day since the 1997 Asian financial crisis. China’s Shanghai Composite added 0.9%.   In Europe, DAX and FTSE 100 are up more than 1% in opening trade. EU Commission President von der Leyen repeated yesterday that the EU had offered reciprocal zero tariffs on manufactured goods previously and continues to stand by that offer. Others are also trying again to talk to Trump to get some sort of agreement that limits the impact.   Much of the rally appeared to be driven by dip-buying, as well as hopes that the intensifying trade war could still be defused through negotiations.   China Strikes Back: ‘We Will Fight to the End’   Tensions reached a boiling point after Trump threatened to impose an additional 50% tariff on all Chinese imports unless Beijing rolled back its retaliatory measures by April 8. ‘If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long-term trading abuses by tomorrow... the United States will impose additional tariffs on China of 50%,’ Trump declared on social media.   If implemented, the new tariffs would bring total US duties on Chinese goods to a staggering 124%, factoring in the existing 20%, the 34% recently announced, and the proposed 50%.   In response, China’s Ministry of Commerce issued a stern warning, stating: ‘The US threat to escalate tariffs is a mistake on top of a mistake... If the US insists on its own way, China will fight to the end.’ The ministry also called for equal and respectful dialogue, though signs of compromise on either side remain scarce.   Beijing acted quickly to contain a market fallout. State funds intervened to support equities, and the People’s Bank of China set the yuan fixing at its weakest level since September 2023 to boost export competitiveness. Additionally, five-year interest rate swaps in China fell to their lowest levels since 2020, indicating potential for further monetary easing.   Trump Talks Tough on EU Too   Trump’s hardline approach extended beyond China. Speaking at a press conference, he rejected the European Union’s offer to eliminate tariffs on cars and industrial goods, accusing the bloc of ‘being very bad to us.’ He insisted that Europe would need to source its energy from the US, claiming the US could ‘knock off $350 billion in one week.’   The EU, meanwhile, backed away from a proposed 50% retaliatory tariff on American whiskey, opting instead for 25% duties on selected US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium tariffs.     Volatile Wall Street Adds to the Drama   Wall Street experienced wild swings on Monday as investors processed the rapidly evolving trade conflict. The S&P 500 briefly fell 4.7% before rebounding 3.4%, nearly erasing its losses in what could have been its biggest one-day jump in years—if it had held. The Dow Jones Industrial Average sank by as much as 1,700 points early in the day but later climbed nearly 900 points before closing 349 points lower, down 0.9%. The Nasdaq ended up 0.1%.   The brief rally was fueled by a false rumour that Trump was considering a 90-day pause on tariffs—rumours that the White House quickly labelled ‘fake news.’ The market's sharp reaction underscored how desperate investors are for any sign that tensions might ease.   Oil Markets in Focus: Goldman Sachs Revises Forecasts   Crude prices also reflected the uncertainty, with US crude briefly dipping below $60 per barrel for the first time since 2021. As of early Tuesday, Brent crude was trading at $64.72, while WTI hovered around $61.26.   Goldman Sachs, in a note dated April 7, lowered its average price forecasts for Brent and WTI through 2025 and 2026, citing mounting recession risks and the potential for higher-than-expected supply from OPEC+.       Under a base-case scenario where the US avoids a recession and tariffs are reduced significantly before the April 9 implementation date, Goldman sees Brent at $62 per barrel and WTI at $58 by December 2025. These figures fall further to $55 and $51, respectively, by the end of 2026. This outlook also assumes moderate output increases from eight OPEC+ countries, with incremental boosts of 130,000–140,000 barrels per day in June and July.   However, should the US slip into a typical recession and OPEC production aligns with the bank’s baseline assumptions, Brent could retreat to $58 by the end of this year and to $50 by December 2026.   In a more bearish scenario involving a global GDP slowdown and no change to OPEC+ output levels, Brent prices might fall to $54 by year-end and $45 by late 2026. The most extreme projection—based on a simultaneous economic downturn and a full reversal of OPEC+ production cuts—would see Brent plunge to below $40 per barrel by the end of 2026.   Goldman noted that oil prices could outperform forecasts significantly if there was a dramatic shift in tariff policy and a surprise in global demand recovery.   Cautious Optimism, But Warnings Persist   With both Washington and Beijing showing no signs of backing down, markets are likely to remain volatile in the days ahead. Investors now turn their attention to upcoming trade meetings and policy decisions, hoping for clarity in what has become one of the most unpredictable trading environments in recent years.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report. Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • CVNA Carvana stock watch, rebound to 166.56 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?CVNA
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.