Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mohsinqureshii

Gold Bullish or Bearish

Recommended Posts

We just touched a great low last week. My plan is to scalp a couple ticks along the way, with a bullish bias into this week.

 

 

I suppose a bounce continuing is in the cards for the next day or two or longer but I'm waiting for the downtrend to resume before entering again.

5aa711bdb3448_SpotGoldweek250213(DFB).png.99ad1422a6a705ff0b074bc104e22ab3.png

Edited by kuokam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont have a view on gold.......but a friend emailed this through to me on his thoughts....FWIW

 

"something to think about re gold.

 

At the end of every quarter large US funds (those with greater than 100mil under management) have to file at 13F form with the SEC. The funds have 45 days after the end of the quarter to file the 13F. This disclosure from each fund discloses their listed US assets.

 

John Paulson is the world's biggest gold bull. He has over $3.5 billion in the Gold etf (GLD). It constitutes about 20% of his fund holdings. As of the 31st of Dec his holding has not dropped when compared to previous quarters. If gold sees any further weakness and his hand is forced ---- it could get very very messy.

 

Any broad US$ strength could see this happen................"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gold Miners Come Clean on Costs After Lost 6 Years: Commodities

 

Gold Miners Come Clean on Costs After Lost 6 Years: Commodities - Bloomberg

 

"Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX) and Goldcorp Inc. (G), the two biggest producers by market value, have begun reporting “all-in sustaining costs” for the first time. The new measure averaged $941 an ounce between the two companies in the fourth quarter. That’s 50 percent higher than the $626 average so-called cash cost they disclosed in the preceding three months."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sold at 1608 for 30 point profit.

And I am sure I have left some money on the table.

But tomorrow we have a Neptune Venus conjunction which is bad news for Gold and Silver..

So tomorrow could be the high with a big drop ahead into early March..

All the bears... get ready.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gold Miners Come Clean on Costs After Lost 6 Years: Commodities

 

Gold Miners Come Clean on Costs After Lost 6 Years: Commodities - Bloomberg

 

"Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX) and Goldcorp Inc. (G), the two biggest producers by market value, have begun reporting “all-in sustaining costs” for the first time. The new measure averaged $941 an ounce between the two companies in the fourth quarter. That’s 50 percent higher than the $626 average so-called cash cost they disclosed in the preceding three months."

 

Yep - I have been sucked into 'buy the miner' to replicate the metal before.....never trust an accountant - its all smoke and mirrors. :haha: - miners, prospectors and company directors are all above board....:doh:

 

So does this mean - gold is actually more expensive to mine and hence shortages of supply are likely to occur, OR the other numbers from the gold miners about reserves and production cant be believed, OR if you have a view on something, a texas hedge aint the best thing to use.

 

................... :offtopic::offtopic:

Did you see the other article about Jamie Dimon saying Banks have too much capital

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-26/dimon-says-banks-to-have-more-capital-than-they-know-how-to-use.html

 

......somehow in my warped mind i see a lot of this as being related.

Edited by SIUYA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gold Miners Come Clean on Costs After Lost 6 Years: Commodities

 

Gold Miners Come Clean on Costs After Lost 6 Years: Commodities - Bloomberg

 

"Barrick Gold Corp. (ABX) and Goldcorp Inc. (G), the two biggest producers by market value, have begun reporting “all-in sustaining costs” for the first time. The new measure averaged $941 an ounce between the two companies in the fourth quarter. That’s 50 percent higher than the $626 average so-called cash cost they disclosed in the preceding three months."

 

Hi SunTrader,

I have always wondered how Barrick, operating in a First world country can have lower costs than South Africa,a third world country.

Goldfield and Anglogold have always reported FULL costs and they have been severely discounted (.But their PEs are still too high.)

I think Barrick is heading for a BIG fall.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep - I have been sucked into 'buy the miner' to replicate the metal before.....never trust an accountant - its all smoke and mirrors. :haha:

.....

Agree and feel the same (or more so) can be said about the bankers.

 

I read the news but trade off the chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi SunTrader,

I have always wondered how Barrick, operating in a First world country can have lower costs than South Africa,a third world country.

Goldfield and Anglogold have always reported FULL costs and they have been severely discounted (.But their PEs are still too high.)

I think Barrick is heading for a BIG fall.

regards

bobc

Could be. I don't follow the miners that closely to have an opinion either way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Speaking only technically- A bounce off the 1530-1550 support zone could be expected on the weekly chart...i'll wait a week more and see if the trends goes bullish at this suppport- then will take a 3-5 weeks long position in it...Gold is precious anyway afterall..:cheers::cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Speaking only technically- A bounce off the 1530-1550 support zone could be expected on the weekly chart...

Careful. The more price visits a zone the more likely, at some point, that zone will no longer hold.

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gold, however, has been in a trading range since September, and the limits of a trading range can hold for quite some time.

 

You should know by Monday or Tuesday. Don't know if I'd wait for 50.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gold, however, has been in a trading range since September, ....

 

Oct -2.94%

Nov -0.28%

Dec -2.32%

Jan -0.73%

Feb -5.09%

 

It is clear to me, at least, once again that the range it has been trading in is not a trading range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
-

Depends on how one defines "trading range":

It depends on how one crop a chart to show their bias.

 

You previously mentioned from high last Sept.

 

This is what it looks like to me, Lower highs, lower lows, lower highs - well you get the picture by now. I hope so anyway:

Gold.thumb.png.7551d7380863ddf1a4e104648b4b6f1f.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

XAU/USD DAILY as of Friday, 01 March, 2013

Wave 4 of moderate (13%) amplitude has crossed a threshold where the probability of a failure is higher. This wave could turn into an impulse wave 1 of opposite trend.

The present wave patterns are:

fast amplitude (8%): bearish wave 1

moderate amplitude (13%): bullish wave 4

Gold / US Dollar is long term Bearish as the 144 days moving average of 1,669.25 is decreasing. The Relative Strength Index is at 35.09 in the neutral territory. The Relative Momentum Index is at 23.05 in the oversold territory. An important indicator for Elliott waves, the Elliott oscillator is at -44.63, in negative territory; this is a bearish sign. An equally important indicator, the STORSI is at 81.09. This value is in the overbought territory.

gold-wave-d.thumb.png.76d2597b0877cc3eda6587fee1b554f4.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
XAU/USD DAILY as of Friday, 01 March, 2013

Wave 4 of moderate (13%) amplitude has crossed a threshold where the probability of a failure is higher. This wave could turn into an impulse wave 1 of opposite trend.

The present wave patterns are:

fast amplitude (8%): bearish wave 1

moderate amplitude (13%): bullish wave 4

Gold / US Dollar is long term Bearish as the 144 days moving average of 1,669.25 is decreasing. The Relative Strength Index is at 35.09 in the neutral territory. The Relative Momentum Index is at 23.05 in the oversold territory. An important indicator for Elliott waves, the Elliott oscillator is at -44.63, in negative territory; this is a bearish sign. An equally important indicator, the STORSI is at 81.09. This value is in the overbought territory.

 

Well autotrader

Thats quite a mouthfull.

I think EW is fantastic,but I struggle to find the waves before the event.

I think you can invest , but you can only TRADE the 5th wave with some certainity

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It depends on how one crop a chart to show their bias.

 

You previously mentioned from high last Sept.

 

This is what it looks like to me, Lower highs, lower lows, lower highs - well you get the picture by now. I hope so anyway:

 

No bias. An instrument is either trending or ranging. Gold stopped trending in Sep '11. The chart I posted is of that period. You may be referring to some other post when you refer to "last" Sept. Since then it has been bouncing between 1800 and 1535+/-. Each trip from top to bottom within the range may be considered a trend, but it is not the same sort of trend that price is in once it departs from the range, such as the trend beginning in July '11.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No bias. An instrument is either trending or ranging..

 

Your words, not mine:

 

"Gold, however, has been in a trading range since September."

 

But by your definition any market that is not trading at an alltime high is within its previous range and therefore rangebound.

 

And yet again another lower low today inside your trading range. :roll eyes:

 

Did you ever think others look at other timeframes besides .... forever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your words, not mine:

 

"Gold, however, has been in a trading range since September."

 

But by your definition any market that is not trading at an alltime high is within its previous range and therefore rangebound.

 

And yet again another lower low today inside your trading range. :roll eyes:

 

Did you ever think others look at other timeframes besides .... forever.

 

But I did not say "last" September. My mistake. I apologize.

 

And, no, something that isn't an an all-time high isn't necessarily ranging. It can reverse and begin a downtrend. Look at '00-'02. But if price bounces up and down repeatedly within a range, then it's range-bound, i.e., it's bound by the upper and lower limit of the range. Gold has been bouncing up and down in a range for nearly two years.

 

As for a lower low today, that depends on what it is lower than. It has yet to reach the last swing low on the daily chart.

 

As to whether or not others look at different intervals and timeframes, of course. But it pays to know where and when price is most likely to reverse. Some people like to be in and out, in and out. I'd rather short at resistance or buy at support and just hold it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Muir

On a 2 year chart, gold definitely has been in a trading range, each intermediate swing very tradable.

For 6 months SPX/GC or whatever, $INDU/GDL (or if you use stockcharts, I believe it's it's a colon, e.g. $DOW:GOLD) has been on a beautiful unbroken up trendline.

Last 3 days have been frustrating, as GLD (or GC or MGC) has shown just unbelievable weakness, just as it looked like it could break the trendline on the intermarket charts.

If gold can not rally now with the sequester upon us....

 

GC has been tradable, it's the timeframe used, so yes, anyone that looks at a 2 year chart will see a trading range, pull out further and you can see when the uptrend was broken from 09, pull in and I can see 3 or 4 trends broken hinges...

 

But, yes, it is close the lower range of the 2 year trading range, but seems anemic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But I did not say "last" September. My mistake. I apologize.

 

And, no, something that isn't an an all-time high isn't ......

A lower low is just that.

 

If we can't agree on that basic point.... time to move on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A lower low is just that.

 

If we can't agree on that basic point.... time to move on.

 

Depends on what it's lower than. If lower than the previous day, yes, though that's not necessarily important. If it bounces off support, go long. If it doesn't, keep your short, assuming you went short in October, or at least November.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Depends on what it's lower than. If lower than the previous day, yes, though that's not necessarily important. If it bounces off support, go long. If it doesn't, keep your short, assuming you went short in October, or at least November.

I don't look at everything in the markets through a wyckoff prism.

 

On a daily basis or higher - a lower low (and/or lower high) is important by itself. But what is even more important are lower lowS (and lower highS) and if you like LL/LH pivots since the alltime highs.

 

This I only mention in regards to the trend - not whether or not to go long or short.

 

There are other things (time, price, pattern) I look to to determine trend and also again whether or not and where to enter a trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't look at everything in the markets through a wyckoff prism.

 

On a daily basis or higher - a lower low (and/or lower high) is important by itself. But what is even more important are lower lowS (and lower highS) and if you like LL/LH pivots since the alltime highs.

 

This I only mention in regards to the trend - not whether or not to go long or short.

 

There are other things (time, price, pattern) I look to to determine trend and also again whether or not and where to enter a trade.

 

 

Don't you think gold could be forming a HL at point 2, relative to the low at point 1?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=35076&stc=1&d=1362319017

5aa711c330289_Goldetfdaily.png.1197c250c2c2b16853ad9f1c4626ba03.png

5aa711c335b1b_golddaily.png.546c3c68d0d3dda6de84901182ba3fe1.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you think gold could be forming a HL at point 2, relative to the low at point 1?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=35076&stc=1&d=1362319017

 

Yes, it's possible. We'll only know in hindsight. The real issue is what, where, when and if are you going to do something about it.

 

Gringo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.