Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mohsinqureshii

Gold Bullish or Bearish

Recommended Posts

Before NFP 830am announcement it ............. dropped.

 

The move up was immediately thereafter.

 

hmmm, i was on the bigger timeframe, the minimum i go is 30 mins, lesser TF is headache sometimes...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My technical view for GOLD next week.

Currently gold is playing inside 1180.21 to 1267.39 range (Consensus Area).

 

So, if next week gold can not stay above 1267.39, i think gold will be back playing inside 1180.21 to 1267.39 range again.

But, if next week gold can stay above 1267.39, so i think gold will be playing inside 1267.39 to 1433.41 range (previous Consensus Area).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am thinking we are only in 3 waves down of final wave 5 of 5 so if Friday's low is taken out yet another correction to bear trend is over and downtrend resumes. Then 1100-1000 within reach.

 

If Oct 15th low 1252 is breached to the upside, with a close above this, then wave count is incorrect and probably 1400 at least should be reached.

 

If am favoring the first scenario until price says otherwise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am thinking we are only in 3 waves down of final wave 5 of 5 so if Friday's low is taken out yet another correction to bear trend is over and downtrend resumes. Then 1100-1000 within reach.

 

If Oct 15th low 1252 is breached to the upside, with a close above this, then wave count is incorrect and probably 1400 at least should be reached.

 

If am favoring the first scenario until price says otherwise.

 

Long Gold at breakout 1248

First target 1275

Real target 1322

Looks like a home run coming.;)

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am thinking we are only in 3 waves down of final wave 5 of 5 so if Friday's low is taken out yet another correction to bear trend is over and downtrend resumes. Then 1100-1000 within reach.

 

If Oct 15th low 1252 is breached to the upside, with a close above this, then wave count is incorrect and probably 1400 at least should be reached.

 

If am favoring the first scenario until price says otherwise.

 

Hi SunTrader

We all have our methods

Counting waves is very subjective. If you get it right, its a big winner.

 

Now watching Bond yields is objective. As long as the yield stays below 3 %, gold will rise.

Easy :helloooo:

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Long Gold at breakout 1248

First target 1275

Real target 1322

Looks like a home run coming.;)

regards

bobc

Close above as in daily close, not high penetration.

 

But let me add another qualifier to this:

 

Daily close above the daily close of that date and not just the low. On my chart that is 1275 or your first target.

 

GL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi SunTrader

We all have our methods

Counting waves is very subjective. If you get it right, its a big winner.

regards

bobc

Yes I have my methods but one thing that isn't subjective is, the trend is still the trend and until such time as it changes ..... and its been down for a long while now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yesterday's news.

 

But nonetheless Nanex should know the CME doesn't trade stock...... "so as not to trip the CME's stop logic and halt the stock". Or a better job of editing.

 

Dear SunTrader

We all realise you had a tough childhood, up in them Kentucky hills.....

but you are becoming a cynic. Never a good word.

Tomorrow morning, try this famous Dale Carnegie idea. :2c:

Say to yourself

"I realise I should have been long Gold, at least up to 1275 .

I will try and change my ways" :haha::haha:

Your friend

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dear SunTrader

We all realise you had a tough childhood, up in them Kentucky hills.....

but you are becoming a cynic. Never a good word.

Tomorrow morning, try this famous Dale Carnegie idea. :2c:

Say to yourself

"I realise I should have been long Gold, at least up to 1275 .

I will try and change my ways" :haha::haha:

Your friend

Bob

Born and raised in the Big Apple. Plenty of tunnels but no hills.

 

And I'm a realist, not a cynic and that is why I trade with the trend.

 

You've been trying to get me to go long a couple of times already. Why? Find it bit lonely doing so? :)

 

Because when its all said and done dollars are made with the trends and pennies (2 or more) are made with the counter trends.

 

Back in my youngin days I took a Dale Carnegie course. True story.

 

Can't you tell ....................... it didn't help. :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi SunTrader

We all have our methods

Counting waves is very subjective. If you get it right, its a big winner.

 

Now watching Bond yields is objective. As long as the yield stays below 3 %, gold will rise.

Easy :helloooo:

regards

bobc

Hey Bob

 

Read this one again. Don't you mean yield above 3% gold is good to buy?

 

Sun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Bob

 

Read this one again. Don't you mean yield above 3% gold is good to buy?

 

Sun

 

Hi SunTrader,

I am not very good at this but I will try....

I have never traded Bonds, but I "dealt " in Preferecnce Shares in my first job on the stock exchange......1968

And Prefs are very similar, just a much smaller market

 

Bonds are inversely related to interest rates

If a bond pays less interest , it is worth more

eg $100 bond pays 3% pa = $3 pa.... everything is in balance

Interest rate falls to 2.9% =$2.90 pa... the guy who issued the bond has a lower cost, but the poor bond holder is getting less, so the price will adjust

 

For the bond issurer

100 =2.9

x = 3

Therefore 100 x 3 / 2.9 = $103.45 ... a nice capital gain.

 

For the bond holder

100 = 3

x = 2.9

Therefore 100x 2.9 /3 = $96.66

 

The bond holder has suffered a Capital loss (unless he holds to maturity)

So he will sell his bond and Buy something else...... maybe GOLD

 

I think a Bond dealer should add a bit more to my poor explanation

But at the end of the day, if interest rates are below 3%, (which was the high ) Gold will rise.

regards

bobc

 

PS I think you know all this , so I am wondering why you asked the question? :confused:

 

PSS.. Low interest rates will be the destroyer of our wealth, but thats another thread

 

PSSS. Gold back to $249. I am getting nervous

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paging Bob C. pick up the "White Courtesy Phone" and phone home.

 

Oh ok nobody pages anymore.

 

But hope you are not still bullish? Yet!

 

Hi SunTrader

And I did see this, but after the last three lines of my attachment,and not one person offered support,what would you do? Would you carry on posting on TL

bob

 

PS mitsubishi sent me a PM

I talk to Silver by email

But my friend Patuca is gone

My_friends.png.a7b26e1e6037eee395c09c884dbdae88.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi SunTrader

And I did see this, but after the last three lines of my attachment,and not one person offered support,what would you do? Would you carry on posting on TL

bob

 

PS mitsubishi sent me a PM

I talk to Silver by email

But my friend Patuca is gone

Oh sorry to see this, for the first time, totally unjustified (IMO) rant leveled in your direction.

 

And actually if anyone has been known to throw's a child's tantrum around here it is Steve Matrix. But the lest said about him the better.

 

I don't blame you for being a stranger here but I'd just ignore the idiots. I've had to do the same over on f...x factory.

 

Meanwhile yes I do know bonds and their yields are inversely related. But I have read conflicting opinions lately about whether or not rising yields would be bullish for Gold this time. I know historically they have. Wish I kept a link from one of the story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So JP Morgan said you need an astrologer. Lol... reminds me of this "grand tradeur" I once saw on a french program asking his astro what the charts were saying

 

JP Morgan never said that. Barry Rosen said that JP Morgan said that.

 

JP Morgan could give a shit what the markets did. He was interested in earning fees, commissions, etc and trading with privileged information. I said that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the price may go south (large swing) in next two weeks, but before that it has to reach 1260-1268, to satisfy the technical pre-requirements. Large selling order is accumulating around 1268. If 1275 breaks, then it will head to 1300.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the price may go south (large swing) in next two weeks, but before that it has to reach 1260-1268, to satisfy the technical pre-requirements. Large selling order is accumulating around 1268. If 1275 breaks, then it will head to 1300.

And how do you determine that?

 

And if so then why would it break 1275 if there is a large selling order below it?

 

I see 1260-1270 being a strong resistance zone after previously being support but nothing special about 1275.

 

And 1300 other than being a BRN mean nothing technically also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.