Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mohsinqureshii

Gold Bullish or Bearish

Recommended Posts

...

The short term trend is now UP

Time for a rethink.

 

bobc

:confused: :rofl:

what do PM's do around full moon?

( what I have read and what actually happens is different...;) )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Boston Strangler is going to get you zdo

 

Indeed - he will get me … :roll eyes: unless they quickly pass a ban on assault backpacks and close that garage sale loophole on pressure cookers…

 

One more time, bob b… what do PM’s do around the full moon ?

 

(2 people are spying on you) View Now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Indeed - he will get me … :roll eyes: unless they quickly pass a ban on assault backpacks and close that garage sale loophole on pressure cookers…

 

One more time, bob b… what do PM’s do around the full moon ?

 

(2 people are spying on you) View Now

 

Hi zedo

PM's will trade sidewise or weaken around the full moon

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jim Rogers, in Money morning :

 

"If it gets to $1,200, I hope that I'm smart enough to buy even more," he said. "If it gets to $1,100, I hope I'm smart enough to buy even more. Speak to the chartists ... the technicians ... and [look at] the retracements, or whatever they call them. A 50% retracement is not unusual. A 60% retracement is not unusual. You can do the same math that I can. You can figure out what a 40%, 50% or 60% retracement would mean for someone."

 

Here's his key point. With declines that steep - taking gold prices down to $1,150, $950 or $750 an ounce - a lot of would-be gold investors will literally throw in the towel, and will abandon gold. That's when negative sentiment will have been maximized, and gold will have bottomed.

 

"Until people start accepting reality instead of denying reality, we're not going to make the bottom," he said. "Until a lot of people just pack it in and throw gold out the window ... then gold will make a beautiful bottom and we can all participate in a multi-year bull market."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Until a lot of people just pack it in and throw gold out the window ... then gold will make a beautiful bottom and we can all participate in a multi-year bull market."

Or watch it flatline for a long while before a new bull market might start.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Out of the trading range, yes. And if one had been paying attention to what price was doing on the 8th and 9th, he would have been short on the 10th, not looking for a 20pt upside on the 12th.

 

Since you asked. :)

 

Now, of course, we're holding in a previous trading range that formed some time ago, but that is of course of no interest here, so whatever happens will likely be a surprise to those who aren't prepared.

 

Hey DB, why did you go short on the 10th if price is holding support?

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=35862&stc=1&d=1366753867

5aa711dc281f9_10-4gold.png.224af5fdb68fca5658a234e75377042a.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All markets or just the metals, Bob?

 

 

 

Hi zdo

Tomorrow is Full Moon + a partial lunar eclipse + a big solar flare (condition red)

It usually takes a few days but Big trouble coming.

Expect markets to weaken.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All markets or just the metals, Bob?

 

Hi kuokom

I cant answer that with authority.I am still learning.

The basis of my study is we are wired to astronomical conditions.

The tides etc

The female is hardcore wired to the Lunar cycle .... 28 days.

The male is hardcore wired to ............??

Changes in external conditions cause excitability in us.

So a X flare from the Sun makes us do stupid things.

 

I think its all about the biggest force in the universe... magnetism.

How it works is the problem

 

My theory is that BIG markets with lots of participants ( S & P ) are affected more than a small market like Gold/ Silver.

You come from Luxemburg.

That indcates the DAX. Thats a Big market.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Woaw! Keep learning. I am sure you will still make good calls here.

Thanks in advance !

 

 

Hi kuokom

I cant answer that with authority.I am still learning.

The basis of my study is we are wired to astronomical conditions.

The tides etc

The female is hardcore wired to the Lunar cycle .... 28 days.

The male is hardcore wired to ............??

Changes in external conditions cause excitability in us.

So a X flare from the Sun makes us do stupid things.

 

I think its all about the biggest force in the universe... magnetism.

How it works is the problem

 

My theory is that BIG markets with lots of participants ( S & P ) are affected more than a small market like Gold/ Silver.

You come from Luxemburg.

That indcates the DAX. Thats a Big market.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the best article I have read on the BIG FALL in Gold

bobc

My A/V blocked two attacks from that site which speaks loudly to me as to the validity of it.

 

Unless of course JPM is responsible for that too. :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The short term Gold trend remains UP

Gold bumped 1440, 3 days ago and is back there, a small resistance.

A market moving up in a lunar red period is a sign of strength.

Heres an easy trade for me...

Buy the breakout above 1440 with a tight stop below 1440.

I might have to wait a few days

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The short term Gold trend remains UP

Gold bumped 1440, 3 days ago and is back there, a small resistance.

A market moving up in a lunar red period is a sign of strength.

Heres an easy trade for me...

Buy the breakout above 1440 with a tight stop below 1440.

I might have to wait a few days

regards

bobc

 

Not sure if it'll go further..the demand for the Gold ETF is still weak and Goldman Sachs is now another investment banking firm sending out a bearish prospect of the metal in the near term...i hope Gold gets where its being predicted ($1200-$1260) so i can get some big long positions in it..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey DB, why did you go short on the 10th if price is holding support?

Might have better luck getting a reply to your question than I did to my simple agree or disagree one over on his topic but he maybe unsubscribed here.

 

But I got one for you, isn't investing dot com a free charting service.

 

And if so, unless someone doesn't trade for a living (you might not??), why wouldn't they use something a little more ummm "less free"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not sure if it'll go further..the demand for the Gold ETF is still weak and Goldman Sachs is now another investment banking firm sending out a bearish prospect of the metal in the near term...i hope Gold gets where its being predicted ($1200-$1260) so i can get some big long positions in it..

 

Hi Ammeo

How did you work out the above? My broker ,IG Markets, tells me 74% of their Gold clients are LONG.

I also hope it gets to 1200. Thats a BIG short sale.

BUT at the moment.....

Gold is now trading at 1476.

New stop at 1470. I am tempted to add another 5 contracts, but every time I do that the market retraces.

My target is now 1500 .Pure greed.

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I doubled my gold position today ... anyone else use this dip as a buying opportunity?

 

MMS

 

MMS, Yes using this “dip” as a buying opportunity (and by dip I’m thinking you mean the downdraft that started back in early Oct 12)… but certainly I’m not doubling up.

I’m buying incrementally more PMs when SI goes below .67… so far only two fills – one at 23.67 and one at 22.67 for an avg price of around 23.10 SI (and equivalent AU).

For a lot of such campaigns, I scale in in a manner I’ve described elsewhere… shorting USDINR, etc. (somewhat similar to the process 1a2b3cp4pp has been describing - sans options, btw) but in this particular case, I’m using stops. … and in this particular case I’m using a tight stop at ~22.30… and may move it to b.e. as early as this coming Sun night.

If I get stopped out I will just start over with three loads at 21.67 and proceed from there…( and also be prepared to stop back incrementally in if it goes back up.)

 

ie i'm projecting high probs of lower prices

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Ammeo

How did you work out the above? My broker ,IG Markets, tells me 74% of their Gold clients are LONG.

I also hope it gets to 1200. Thats a BIG short sale.

BUT at the moment.....

Gold is now trading at 1476.

New stop at 1470. I am tempted to add another 5 contracts, but every time I do that the market retraces.

My target is now 1500 .Pure greed.

regards

bobc

 

i just read some Articles on the web here and there and followed a few market commentators...

 

its never about how many retail traders are long in an asset at the moment, its more about supply and demand and Gold currently has a lesser demand at the big corporate firms and banks....+ what i said was a long term view (call it a couple of months or more) with no technicals involved..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.