Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

mohsinqureshii

Gold Bullish or Bearish

Recommended Posts

This is probably one of the worst times of the year to trade Gold.

 

The price has been moving sideways to down - mid term -

 

Also many will be away, volume thins and volatility picks up.

 

Also things don't always make sense right now. Fundamentals and techs are skewed.

 

And news as we can see doesn't always have the desired reaction or usual reaction.

 

Long term seems bearish bt short term cant say anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just watching some key levels, like 1.63 and 1.64 (the 100 and 200 Moving average of hourly chart), and downside support maybe at 1.60 which is the 100 Moving average of daily chart. I also keep a eye on BOE rate hike talking, you know...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gold has been acting strange since yesterday US session, and since now is saturday I think it is not wise to make an entry. PS: recent ressistance around 1199 looks rather weak, I would not enter short on retest. I think above 1208 should be reached today, but it could be after new low.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW for anyone who is interested, if you read/listen to those on kingworldnews (massively bias gold/silver bulls) they often refer to the COT report (Commitment of traders). The Commitments of Traders (COT) reports provide a breakdown of each Tuesday’s open interest for markets in which 20 or more traders hold positions equal to or above the reporting levels established by the CFTC.

 

http://news.goldseek.com/COT/

 

It is interesting to see the change in COT from the highs in 2011 to now, but it is also fascinating that commercials are no longer adding heaving amounts of shorts, but rather longs in the past couple of months, and the large speculators are reducing there exposure to the short side also.

 

Anyway food for thought its an interesting data set that can give you an idea of where the market sentiment is sitting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forecast is range bound - 1350 has to go to complete 1400 and 1420 to 1550

 

downside, risk is all below 1187 as of now, 1200 has to go with 1210 first also 1190 in the immediate sense.

 

Ten year UTL Looks strong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a pump and dump. In a pump and dump the perception is that there is too much demand to go lower, so the gold market will go higher to deal with the perceived demand. Demand can be weak shorts who are not committed to the downside and will cover quickly with a small gain or loss, providing favorable entry to other more committed shorts. And/Or, it could be weak longs trying to catch a bottom, but who will also sell against their own position by scaling out as the gold market moves higher. Weak Longs have stops at breakeven and or just below the lows. The stops will eventually provide liquidity for highly capitalized, committed shorts.

 

A description of weak only pertains to the traders commitment to a particular direction, and not his ability to trade. It is possible to be a good trader who is a weak long or short. Conversely, it is possible to be a bad trader who is very committed to a direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  kuokam said:
Happy 2014 all!

Any explanation of yesterday's monster move ?

Huh?

 

Monster move. Where? Not in Gold.

 

A monster move in Gold would be $50 or more up or down.

 

Anyway did you notice where it closed, just about where it opened. So the monster is back in its cage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you have the last $50 move ?

 

 

  SunTrader said:
Huh?

 

Monster move. Where? Not in Gold.

 

A monster move in Gold would be $50 or more up or down.

 

Anyway did you notice where it closed, just about where it opened. So the monster is back in its cage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  kuokam said:
When did you have the last $50 move ?

Me? I have two left feet.

 

But Gold had one on Oct 1st $55.05 to be exact.

 

Here the blue Paintbars (15) mark all the $50 or greater moves that happened in the last year or so:

5aa7120e2e21b_50moves.thumb.png.fb26e95d5b0aa819dddd8033ac837fd3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody cares you having 1000 feet. See, I talk of Gold futures and you show me the gold/dollar.

 

 

 

  SunTrader said:
Me? I have two left feet.

 

But Gold had one on Oct 1st $55.05 to be exact.

 

Here the blue Paintbars (15) mark all the $50 or greater moves that happened in the last year or so:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You certainly will never be able to feed your own useless self, let alone a person who is waiting for no good from you.

 

 

  SunTrader said:
You did this time.

 

I have that chart too but you can look it up yourself.

 

Shouldn't be too hard for a lazy azz who wants to be spoon feed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SunTrader said:
You did this time.

 

I have that chart too but you can look it up yourself.

 

Shouldn't be too hard for a lazy azz who wants to be spoon feed.

 

Hi SunTrader

Please post your Futures chart.

I would like to see if a big Futures move was followed by a big spot price move.

Can you overlay them?

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bobcollett said:
Hi SunTrader

Please post your Futures chart.

I would like to see if a big Futures move was followed by a big spot price move.

Can you overlay them?

regards

bobc

I can overlay them in same graph but they mash together (small price difference for the scaling) unless you want just a line on close chart.

 

Or a OHLC but one underneath the other.

 

Which?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SunTrader said:
I can overlay them in same graph but they mash together (small price difference for the scaling) unless you want just a line on close chart.

 

Or a OHLC but one underneath the other.

 

Which?

 

A line on close should work

Thanks

boc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  SunTrader said:
Ok here is a daily and a 5 minute of March futures contract (Green) and spot cash (Red):

 

Hi Sun Trader,

That was fast :):)

There is no difference, or very little .

There is no edge trading a future or the Spot....... except the cost.

 

I would welcome some comment on this statement.

 

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bobcollett said:

There is no difference, or very little .

There is no edge trading a future or the Spot....... except the cost.

Yeah. Only for a trader in the pits. But not too many of them nowadays.

 

I laugh when I see a post on TradeStation's forum asking how to code this or that idea for a 2 or a 5 or a 10 second chart.

 

:doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice clean 20 USD swing off the low before the NFP! As expected once again the number was not positive or in tune with the "ADP" number.

 

Unemployment slightly down but will likely come back up a bit in upcoming releases or at least stay around here back to 7.0%

5aa7120e5252c_Picture12.png.dab640a3a0e2fd1cd41063b43ec4f499.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.