Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

steveshutts

Week 7

Recommended Posts

Anna, say you had of taken that short yourself. Would you still be holding the full position? I know that you would be looking for potential demand zones to scale some of the position. Price has failed to trot on past this mornings support at the pivot, would you now be looking at closing this trade?

This is purely hypothetical, of course, but its nice to get ideas. I must admit, if i was in this trade now, i would be thinking that price has lost all momentum with the figures out in 15 mins, i would close it for a small profit.

Scaling has not really been an option on this one yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  steveshutts said:
I must admit, if i was in this trade now, i would be thinking that price has lost all momentum with the figures out in 15 mins, i would close it for a small profit.

 

Scaling has not really been an option on this one yet?

 

On the prev graph (large hourly) the bog standard wave or trend is down, yeah? Lower highs/lower lows.

 

The highlighted squares showed the confluence (pivot-fib) zone @ 1.9540 as 1st line hurdle for Cable to negate the near term momentum? Price needed to scale that zone in order to flip the bias from short to long?

 

From yesterdays short thru the lower top failure, the position is still live as price has failed to push back & threaten, so we're still in depressed mode? The bias remains to the downside.

 

This morning price has attempted a nudge off the larger 78.6/prev weeks low to attack the last swing high @ c550 & failed at the smaller 61.8% retrace, below todays R1 pivot, printing a favored doji bar with follow thru thrust.

 

Given the near term trend, (& until 9540-50 is hurdled) I'm sniffing shorts. I'm not remotely interested in longs until the Cable Bulls justify the strength.

 

Leading into the London Open, price was merely scraping the ground. It wasn't signalling anything worthy of execution until it popped up to check the space between the main pivot & R1.

 

Had the doji on the smaller frames printed a green bar beyond 9515, then it would have been a case of waiting to see what occured at the next upper level (9540-50)? It didn't, it printed red & the 1 & 5m confirmed the doji retreat in line with the trend.

 

So, according to my reading & near term expectation, it signalled "short continuation". I don't know about your interpretations or judgements etc, but wherever possible, I want to be running with the dominant flow. And the momentum remains down.

 

The 2 graphs below highlight the 15/5m signals with appropriate risk stops to test the intent & continued momentum.

 

If price pops down, stalls & reverses, & threatens my stops then I don't really want to be positioned, as the Bulls are obviously mounting an assault on the primary swing level?

 

The doji/61.8% line never really got threatened on the secondary attempts to re-take the early London spike up? So, the stops were safe.

 

That's my play on the early morning move.

 

Momentum still down: Prev swing high still intact: No real support for Cable Bull activity: Short stance remains the primary objective:

 

Our strategy models will obviously be different, carrying differing intent & objectives. Where you see no scale-out, I see decent 1st line profits? & vice versa.

 

Where my aim is to compound an existing position, yours might be a seperate jobbing or intraday entry. Trade planning is unique to the scenario & is determined by the initial objective(s).

 

To answer your question regards paring/exiting the short this morning? Yes, it was pared off as price failed to move thru the main pivot/38.2 Fib (9490) on the second attempt. The full position wasn't worth risking given the close proximity of the news print. But the fact it was a compound entry, the risk has already been absorbed from the original entry, & the intial trade was valid & in-line with the trend.

 

It's up to the market to tell us we're wrong! My job is to calculate risk, evaluate the potential for the initial move to offer decent reward & execute according to my strat signals. As long as my/our parameters are in synch with leverage & appropriate sizing, if it goes belly up Buk & his hoppo's take up the slack.

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=777&stc=1&d=1171363495

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=778&stc=1&d=1171363512

gbp85.gif.f2563a46b369ea603c8c0c686fb0ae76.gif

gbp86.gif.002c1b110879a72e5656848cb257e1df.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anna,

 

Thanks very much for you detailed description of events. I am glad that i am starting to see for myself the analysis that you describe. Although, often lacking the confidence to put these trades on. However, i believe that if i can stick to this strat and keep spotting them then my confidence will grow.

I must admit, i feel more comfortable executing from these timeframes, even though they can prove to be a little tricky at times.

Its interesting that you have not placed your stop at the extreme point, ie outside of the high. Why is that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Swissy at interesting confluence zone although showing no signs of stalling as of yet. Just posting, not thinking of trading, waiting for US Trade Balance figures.

Conflicting signal here is the trendline break on the small hourly.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=779&stc=1&d=1171367227

13022007_chart5.thumb.gif.d6e07dc3e412c1925109798d6aafa7c2.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  steveshutts said:
I am glad that i am starting to see for myself the analysis that you describe. Although, often lacking the confidence to put these trades on.

 

Its interesting that you have not placed your stop at the extreme point, ie outside of the high. Why is that?

 

Nothing too mysterious re the stops placement. If you look at the 5m, the emergency exit hits on the open of the doji bar (2nd of the 3 bar reversal) on that frame. Anywhere from there to the top of the 3rd bar in that combo (9517) was appropriate for that entry.

 

The confidence comes with familiarization & awareness. That takes a whole lick of time, as it does with any instrument. I'm certain once you cement your appropriate strats together & tune them into the specific environment(s), the confidence with increase.

 

A case of walking before running? Get one fine tuned first before moving onto the next one!

 

Also, as long as you're executing well inside your size to account parameters, there'll be one less problem to concern yourself with. If you can't absorb the odd slippage occurance due to an adverse spike or price shunt, then you're placing excessive emotional stress on your model.

 

That's one of (if not the primary) the most important pieces of the jigsaw when planning your trades ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the talked about trade. If i had of taken it, there are two ways i could have played the scale out. I could have set a limit at 85 + spread and taken out some there to cover risk. I would have left my stop where it was as moving the stop to break even would not have been wise with the action so close. That was near term support but i would have drastically been cutting my profits short if this ran on, like it has been over the last few days.

It soon becomes obvious on your bottom line, if you do this too often as a couple of losses can put you quickly back at the break even stage. The other option, one which i prefer, but obviously a little trickier to execute, is to use price action to determine the scale out.

The problem us retail traders face is obviously the spreads at these short time frames. If i had of shorted this at 9508 on my platform, by the time it was obvious that 9485 had provided support and a higher low was formed, the price i would have got to scale would have been 9504, which really doesn't warrant a scale?? Its these times which then play on your mind, you know that things aren't looking A1 but you only really have 2 options, close the position or continue with the risk, but knowing that a data release is imminent.

A difficult decision for the inexperienced, especially when it has to be made so quickly. I suppose, i would have closed the trade, taking a miniscule profit, but preserving my capital for another trade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  texxas said:
Nothing too mysterious re the stops placement. If you look at the 5m, the emergency exit hits on the open of the doji bar (2nd of the 3 bar reversal) on that frame. Anywhere from there to the top of the 3rd bar in that combo (9517) was appropriate for that entry.

 

 

Thats an interesting placement of stops Anna. I have never used the opens of bars, always above/below the trigger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  steveshutts said:
Its these times which then play on your mind, you know that things aren't looking A1 but you only really have 2 options, close the position or continue with the risk, but knowing that a data release is imminent.

 

A difficult decision for the inexperienced, especially when it has to be made so quickly. I suppose, i would have closed the trade, taking a miniscule profit, but preserving my capital for another trade.

 

Which brings you back to aims & objectives?

 

If you're expending precious energy concerning yourself with hand wringing, then you need to step back & work on your priorities.

 

If your account balance & platform execution deem it unworkable to adopt that specific process, then you need to tailor your strat to those variables?

 

Bounce off the strengths you already possess. Put that on the back burner & focus on the issues which will return the more positive results?

 

If that equates to triggering a couple decent opp's per day & running for 20-30 pips, then so be it.

 

If it means sitting back & waiting for an appropriate (potential) larger opp kicking away from a prev swing level/prior weekly H-L/trend failure zone etc etc & swinging in on lower than normal size to get you into a +1 or 1.5c move staggering larger stops, then that's cool too.

 

But you're gonna have to prioritize & determine which style fits your kit bag & cut it accordingly. Otherwise you'll end up spinning around in circles.

 

More importantly, it'll mess with your head - far more serious!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  texxas said:
This appears suspect to a drop back to the 234.70 (50%) support line in the short term unless this mid-term behaviour gets shaken out?

 

 

Gearing up for some each-way action at this interim s&r zone torero huh? :)

 

That big bad 50% Fib aint too far away if it fails to grab this ledge!!

 

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=780&stc=1&d=1171371881

cross124.gif.e106fca255e5d875e57aca82befa18fa.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I'm watching GBPJPY, tex. Although I somehow don't see NY session as risk takers, don't know why. I would rather wait for London or Tokyo to ride it. This is something I noticed about NY, it will continue London's session or reverse it timidly, not too violent. I'm talking mainly about GBPUSD and GBPJPY. Any thoughts on this view?

 

Is this 78.6% retracement (9400) still in play? This looks like a promising area (big 00s).

 

FOREXPLANE-GBPUSD-240MIN-78-6-RETRACE.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  torero said:
This is something I noticed about NY, it will continue London's session or reverse it timidly, not too violent. I'm talking mainly about GBPUSD and GBPJPY. Any thoughts on this view?

 

Is this 78.6% retracement (9400) still in play? This looks like a promising area (big 00s).

 

 

I think it depends a whole lot on the level reached & range geography during the NY shift torero. Certainly as London closes up for the day prices have a tendancy to drift, but then it's to be expected given the dissipation of volumes. Can't say I've really noticed any other peculiar behaviour other than that.

 

Yes, that Big Figure (1.94) shouldered the slide somewhat huh? It's yet to print a higher high off the initial pullback from todays 50% touch & last weeks lows, which appears to be rejecting this upkick quite nicely. So the Cable Bulls have their work cut out in order to tip the sway from Bearish to Bullish.

 

The mid-term shorts won't become concerned until price begins threatening c9490 (the 78.6 of todays H-L).

 

A decent handful of key data prints still due for release remainder of this week on both sides of the pond, so plenty more opp's to get stuck into no doubt!

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=781&stc=1&d=1171390422

gbp87.gif.9ef4462faf9e9b420ce8335c9220061a.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, over to long bias now with loads of data hitting the tape for the rest of the week. Price currently at resistance housing a confluence of events here:

Previous support zone, weekly pivot, 50% fib from move down off 9730, swing point on the 240.

We have retail sales out in an hour, and if these fall below expected then we could see a challenge of the next major resistance up at 9600, which is the next confluence zone. If its dollar positive then we could well see price get shoved back down to the 9500 zone. However, we will probably see some revised figures from previous months to throw a spanner into the works!

However, i am assuming that it would be more prudent to wait to see what happens at 15:00 when Bernanke hits the mike.

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=786&stc=1&d=1171457034

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=787&stc=1&d=1171457034

14022007_chart1.gif.6bb3dcf83876106777bbe5a92a2bea13.gif

14022007_chart2.gif.12ba540c1e85febc5f9566638027b248.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Torero,

If you look at my hourly chart they are in the same place, i have different fibs on my 240 yes.

My bias is long now and will wait. See what happens at the london open. Price has broken out of yesterdays high and may launch an attack on 9700. Retail sales this morning and if we get a positive print for the pound then could see it push on up??

The daily has printed a nice reversal bar on tuesday and then a thrust bar yesterday, so looking like it will be sniffing out 9730?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the move up off 1.94, especially thru 9560 has triggered some short covering for sure huh? Very good strength off the pivot yesterday & again today, with little or no pullback.

 

A whole plate full of data printing out of the States later too Steve, with the TICS & Industrial Production high on the watch list.

 

Could be another busy day by the looks!

 

nb: hmm, they didn't like the taste of those Retail Sales numbers then :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Price has been shoved back down into the 240 channel. Bit confusing as to where this is going now. Price is currently at a demand zone, confluence area so see what happens here. Could we see price push back up from this area or will the flow continue down?

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=791&stc=1&d=1171533516

15022007_chart2.gif.f875c3e6bbc2eaabdfdf63c81f76f67d.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're back in range mode Steve.

 

I've got interim support kicking in @ 9545-60, with upside barriers around the current range (78.6%) line @ 9660-70.

 

Todays pivot, 9575 is dictating the post UK news blow out. I'm using this small stall area as my guide into NY. If anything appetizing sets up I'll consider a strike, otherwise it'll be sidelined till NY wakes up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guessed I missed my cue to short, I stepped out for a bit and saw the move already finished :mad:

 

Oh well, next one. I want to see a rally before seeing a short setup.

 

I'm still watching GBPJPY and seeing we're near the support area (bottom of bull flag?).

 

FOREXPLANE-GBPJPY-DAILY-BOTTOM-BULL-FLAG.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  texxas said:
We're back in range mode Steve.

 

I've got interim support kicking in @ 9545-60, with upside barriers around the current range (78.6%) line @ 9660-70.

 

Todays pivot, 9575 is dictating the post UK news blow out. I'm using this small stall area as my guide into NY. If anything appetizing sets up I'll consider a strike, otherwise it'll be sidelined till NY wakes up.

 

Yeah, theres a nice pin bar printed on the hourly and 15, but as you say, have to wait until US comes in now to see whether they bring any demand to the table. When exactly is the US open, i have it as 13:00 GMT, is that correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.