Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

jswanson

S&P Intraday Price Study

Recommended Posts

In this post I would like to explore the intra day action of the market to determine if we can find an edge. I'm going to be using the S&P E-mini futures market, but the principals here could be applied to any market. In particular, I'm interested how different times of the day affect different trading strategies. The trading day, as defined by the U.S. open and close, for the S&P is seven and a half hours. That translates to 390 minutes. When can thus break the day up into three 130-minute periods. Lets also explore the times before and after the regular day session. To do this we can add a 130-minute period before the market open (Pre-Market) and a 130-minute period after the market closes (Post-Market). We have broken a trading day into the following periods:

 

Six Market Sessions

 

  1. Pre-Market, 06:20 - 08:30
  2. The Open, 08:30 to 10:40
  3. Midday, 10:40 to 13:50
  4. The Close, 13:50 to 15:00
  5. Post-Market, 15:00 to 17:10
  6. Trend Following and Mean Reversion

 

Now that we have these various times defined, I want to create a simple trading system to see if I can find an edge. The system should be very simple. I'm not looking to create a trading system but, I am attempting to locate clues as to what might work during a particular period. To keep this simple, I'm going to explore trades on the long side only and will be looking at the trading days between 1/1/2006 and 12/31/2011.

 

In general terms, we can attempt to trade the market with either a trend following type strategy, or a mean reverting strategy. Trend following implies the market is moving in a direction and we expect it to continue. On the other hand, a mean reverting strategy means we expect the market to reverse soon, thus we position trade opposite of the current market direction. To determine which type of trading strategy would work better during these time periods I'm going to create two simple entry methods.

 

For the trend following entry rule I will use the momentum calculation and open a long position if the momentum is above zero. For the mean reversion entry rule I will use a 9-period RSI and enter a long position when the value is below 25. The system will not have any stops. A single trade is entered and the position is closed at the end of the period. We are allowing only one trade per day. Slippage and commissions are not deducted.

 

 

Trending System Entry = 12-period Momentum is greater than 0

Mean Reversion System Entry = 12-period RSI < 25

 

Market Mode Filter

 

I often will make use of a market mode filter when I'm developing a trading system. This filter breaks the market into two distinct modes: bull or bear. We will use a 200-period simple moving average on a daily chart to determine if we are in a bull or bear market. A bear market is when price is below the 200-period moving average. A bull market is when price is above the moving average. Using this filter will limit our long trades to only be taken when price is trading above the 200-period moving average on a daily chart. In other words, we will be taking trades in the direction of the overall market trend.

 

 

Bull Market = price > 200-daily simple moving average

 

Testing Trend Following Characteristic

 

BULL MARKET: I created an EasyLanguage strategy to first test the trend following characteristics of the five different periods. Below is a bar graph representing the net profit for each period. Period 1 starts on the left-hand side through period 5 on the far right-hand side. What this shows is during a bull market there is an edge with momentum trading during the Midday period and The Close period. This seems contradictory to what many may think. According to these results, momentum trades don't seem to do well during the morning. Instead they do better during the lunch time and at the end of the day.

 

Trend-Bull.png

 

BEAR MARKET: Lets switch things up a bit. Lets now only take long signals during a bear market. In other words, we will now only take our long trades when price is trading below the 200-day SMA. This is opposite of the test we just performed above. It is also counter to the prevailing major market trend. Below is a bar graph representing the net profit for each period. This makes a huge difference. During a bear market there seems to be and edge for momentum trades during the last minutes of the trading day. How many times have you seen price rally into the close during a bear market? I've seen it many times and this study shows it.

 

Trend-Bear.png

 

Both bull and bear market exhibit late day momentum bias to the up-side. This phenomena is even more pronounced during a bear market. Trying to build a trading system to exploit this edge may be worth investigating.

 

Testing Mean Reversion Characteristic

 

BULL MARKET: Now I will test using our mean-reversion trading system rules over the five different periods. Below is a bar graph representing the net profit for each period. The clear winner here is The Close period.

 

Mean-Reversion-Bull.png

 

BEAR MARKET: Now I will test using our mean-reversion trading system rules over the five different periods during a bear market. Below is a bar graph representing the net profit for each period. The clear winner here is the Pre-Market Period.

 

Mean-Reversion-Bear.png

 

Here we see our best edge can be found in the pre-market hours during a bear market. Below is a graph that combines all our results into a single image.

 

Conclusions

 

The graph below may look a little confusing at first. Focus one the bars above the zero line. That's what we are interested in since they show the most net profit. Ask yourself, which bars are the largest?

 

If looking to create an intra-day trend following system there is one clear choice, locating an opportunity to go long during The Close period while within a bear market. It's seen as that large green bar during period four which almost hits $10,000. This conclusion seems counterintuitive but that's often the nature of the markets. For an intra-day mean-reversion strategy, a good place to start would be during the Pre-Market period while within a bear market. This can be seen with the large red bar during the first period. Also note how many bars are below the zero line. This suggests that shorting during the day may have a slight edge vs. going long.

 

Is it not strange the two largest edges for both mean reversion and trend following strategies are going long during a bear market? How odd is that! Yet, it's not so strange when you take into account other studies. In fact, this article's strange conclusion is also supported by a previous study that demonstrates much of the points gained in the S&P market over the past 10 years have occur during the overnight session. In other words, the up-side edge during the day session is not overly strong. It seems we are seeing this over-night affect within this study as well.

 

This is a rather simple study, but such studies can often point you in the right direction when gathering ideas on trading systems. Of course it is possible to discover a intra-day trend trading system that will do well. But this study is a great starting point on where to look for potential edges. In short we are asking, where might be the low hanging fruit?

 

This type of study can also be applied to any other instrument. Likewise, we only explored longs during this study. Adding a shorting study would also help build a more complete picture. Other ideas could include, using different indicators for our trend following and mean reversion trading systems. Likewise, it would also be important to vary the look-back period for our indicators. We used a 12-period-look back for both indicators. By testing a range of values, say between 6-14, we can demonstrate the robustness of the edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jswanson said:

Focus one the bars above the zero line. That's what we are interested in since they show the most net profit. Ask yourself, which bars are the largest?

 

An interesting study. However, I'd be much more intrested in other metrics (profit factor, maximum drawdown, symmetry of long and short performance) before focussing on Net Profit as you suggest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  BlueHorseshoe said:
An interesting study. However, I'd be much more intrested in other metrics (profit factor, maximum drawdown, symmetry of long and short performance) before focussing on Net Profit as you suggest.

 

Those would be interesting as well. I'm simply providing a starting point...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So item 1

 

Do you believe this sample size is significant......I can see the time period, but what is the actual number of data points? and what leads you to believe that you have a "a significant data sample".

 

Do you account for the element of stationarity (if so.....how)

 

Your classification of bull vs bear markets uses the 200 period MA (bull market above/bear market below)....what evidence leads you to believe that markets exhibit symmetrical behavior?

 

 

Thanks

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jswanson

Your post is very interesting

I would like to test your ideas in my market (South Africa )

This market is open from 8.30 am to 5.30pm + a low volume overnight market.

Do I still divide by three given these longer trading hours?

Were your 130 minute periods simple convenience or is there some reasoning behind the choice.?

regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  jswanson said:
I'm going to be using the S&P E-mini futures.... The trading day, as defined by the U.S. open and close, for the S&P is seven and a half hours..That translates to 390 minutes

 

Is it ?..Does it?

 

ES RTH is 9.30am to 4.15 pm est = 6.75 hrs (405 mins)

 

anyway, 7.5 hrs = 450 mins...(390mins =6.5hrs)

 

What am I missing or am I just tired ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  steve46 said:
So item 1

 

Do you believe this sample size is significant......I can see the time period, but what is the actual number of data points? and what leads you to believe that you have a "a significant data sample".

 

Do you account for the element of stationarity (if so.....how)

 

Your classification of bull vs bear markets uses the 200 period MA (bull market above/bear market below)....what evidence leads you to believe that markets exhibit symmetrical behavior?

 

 

Thanks

 

The sample size may be significant or it may not. A rolling test over a longer period may be interesting as well so see if we can find any ebb and flow on how the market evolves.

 

The 200 SMA has a lot of weight behind it. I've done numerous studies over the years that show the value of this MA. I don't think I posted any here however.

 

No account for stationarity.

 

Remember, this is not a trading system. It is a market study, one of many that may help to highlight important market characteristics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  bobcollett said:
Hi jswanson

Your post is very interesting

I would like to test your ideas in my market (South Africa )

This market is open from 8.30 am to 5.30pm + a low volume overnight market.

Do I still divide by three given these longer trading hours?

Were your 130 minute periods simple convenience or is there some reasoning behind the choice.?

regards

bobc

 

The division of the market is largely arbitrary. In general, I tried to break the U.S. day session into the open session, lunch time session and end-of-day session. But there is nothing to stop you from testing larger or smaller intervals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Moyyim said:
Is it ?..Does it?

 

ES RTH is 9.30am to 4.15 pm est = 6.75 hrs (405 mins)

 

anyway, 7.5 hrs = 450 mins...(390mins =6.5hrs)

 

What am I missing or am I just tired ?

 

Error on my part. That should read 6.5 hours.

 

From 15:00 I include in the Post-Market period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • NFLX Netflix stock watch, local support and resistance areas at 838.12 and 880.5 at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX
    • Hello citizens of the U.S. The hundred year trade war has leaked over into a trading war. Your equity holdings are under attack by huge sovereign funds shorting relentlessly... running basically the opposite of  PPT operations.  As an American you are blessed to be totally responsible for your own assets - the govt won’t and can’t take care of you, your lame ass whuss ‘retail’ fund managers go catatonic  and can't / won’t help you, etc etc.... If you’re going to hold your positions, it’s on you to hedge your holdings.   Don’t blame Trump, don’t blame the system, don’t even blame the ‘enemies’ - ie don’t blame period.  Just occupy the freedom and responsibility you have and act.  The only mistake ‘Trump’ made so far was not to warn you more explicitly and remind you of your options to hedge weeks ago.   FWIW when Trump got elected... I also failed to explicitly remind you... just sayin’
    • Date: 7th April 2025.   Asian Markets Plunge as US-China Trade War Escalates; Wall Street Futures Signal Further Turmoil.   Global financial markets extended last week’s massive sell-off as tensions between the US and its major trading partners deepened, rattling investors and prompting sharp declines across equities, commodities, and currencies. The fallout from President Trump’s sweeping new tariff measures continued to spread, raising fears of a full-blown trade war and economic recession.   Asian stock markets plunged on Monday, extending a global market rout fueled by rising tensions between the US and China. The latest wave of aggressive tariffs and retaliatory measures has unnerved investors worldwide, triggering sharp sell-offs across the Asia-Pacific region.   Asian equities led the global rout on Monday, with dramatic losses seen across the region. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index tumbled more than 8% shortly after the open, while the broader Topix fell over 6.5%, recovering only slightly from steeper losses. In mainland China, the Shanghai Composite sank 6.7%, and the blue-chip CSI300 dropped 7.5% as markets reopened following a public holiday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index opened more than 9% lower, reflecting deep concerns about escalating trade tensions.           South Korea’s Kospi dropped 4.8%, triggering a circuit breaker designed to curb panic selling. Taiwan’s Taiex index collapsed by nearly 10%, with major tech exporters like TSMC and Foxconn hitting circuit breaker limits after each fell close to 10%. Meanwhile, Australia’s ASX 200 shed as much as 6.3%, and New Zealand’s NZX 50 lost over 3.5%.   Despite the escalation, Beijing has adopted a measured tone. Chinese officials urged investors not to panic and assured markets that the country has the tools to mitigate economic shocks. At the same time, they left the door open for renewed trade talks, though no specific timeline has been set.   US Stock Futures Plunge Ahead of Monday Open   US stock futures pointed to another brutal day on Wall Street. Futures tied to the S&P 500 dropped over 3%, Nasdaq futures sank 4%, and Dow Jones futures lost 2.5%—equivalent to nearly 1,000 points. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, down more than 20% from its recent highs, while the S&P 500 is nearing bear territory. The Dow closed last week in correction. Oil prices followed suit, with WTI crude dropping over 4% to $59.49 per barrel—its lowest since April 2021.   Wall Street closed last week in disarray, erasing more than $5 trillion in value amid fears of an all-out trade war. The Nasdaq Composite officially entered a bear market on Friday, sinking more than 20% from its recent peak. The S&P 500 is approaching bear territory, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average has slipped firmly into correction territory.   German Banks Hit Hard Amid Escalating Trade Tensions   German banking stocks were among the worst hit in Europe. Shares of Commerzbank and Deutsche Bank plunged between 9.5% and 10.3% during early Frankfurt trading, compounding Friday’s steep losses. Fears over a global trade war and looming recession are severely impacting the financial sector, particularly export-driven economies like Germany.   Eurozone Growth at Risk   Eurozone officials are bracing for economic fallout, with Greek central bank governor Yannis Stournaras warning that Trump’s tariff policy could reduce eurozone GDP by up to 1%. The EU is preparing retaliatory tariffs on $28 billion worth of American goods—ranging from steel and aluminium to consumer products like dental floss and luxury jewellery.   Starting Wednesday, the US is expected to impose 25% tariffs on key EU exports, with Brussels ready to respond with its own 20% levies on nearly all remaining American imports.   UK Faces £22 Billion Economic Blow   In the UK, fresh research from KPMG revealed that the British economy could shrink by £21.6 billion by 2027 due to US-imposed tariffs. The analysis points to a 0.8% dip in economic output over the next two years, undermining Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ growth agenda. The report also warned of additional fiscal pressure that may lead to future tax increases and public spending cuts.   Wall Street Braces for Recession   Goldman Sachs revised its US recession probability to 45% within the next year, citing tighter financial conditions and rising policy uncertainty. This marks a sharp jump from the 35% risk estimated just last month—and more than double January’s 20% projection. J.P. Morgan issued a bleaker outlook, now forecasting a 60% chance of recession both in the US and globally.   Global Leaders Respond as Trade Tensions Deepen   The dramatic market sell-off was triggered by China’s sweeping retaliation to a new round of US tariffs, which included a 34% levy on all American imports. Beijing’s state-run People’s Daily released a defiant statement, asserting that China has the tools and resilience to withstand economic pressure from Washington. ‘We’ve built up experience after years of trade conflict and are prepared with a full arsenal of countermeasures,’ it stated.   Around the world, policymakers are responding to the growing threat of a trade-led economic slowdown. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba announced plans to appeal directly to Washington and push for tariff relief, following the US administration’s decision to impose a blanket 24% tariff on Japanese imports. He aims to visit the US soon to present Japan’s case as a fair trade partner.   In Taiwan, President Lai Ching-te said his administration would work closely with Washington to remove trade barriers and increase purchases of American goods in an effort to reduce the bilateral trade deficit. The island's defence ministry has also submitted a new list of US military procurements to highlight its strategic partnership.   Economists and strategists are warning of deeper economic consequences. Ronald Temple, chief market strategist at Lazard, said the scale and speed of these tariffs could result in far more severe damage than previously anticipated. ‘This isn’t just a bilateral conflict anymore — more countries are likely to respond in the coming weeks,’ he noted.   Analysts at Barclays cautioned that smaller Asian economies, such as Singapore and South Korea, may face challenges in negotiating with Washington and are already adjusting their economic growth forecasts downward in response to the unfolding trade crisis.           Oil Prices Sink on Demand Concerns   Crude oil continued its sharp slide on Monday, driven by recession fears and weakened global demand. Brent fell 3.9% to $63.04 a barrel, while WTI plunged over 4% to $59.49—both benchmarks marking weekly losses exceeding 10%. Analysts say inflationary pressures and slowing economic activity may drag demand down, even though energy imports were excluded from the latest round of tariffs.   Vandana Hari of Vanda Insights noted, ‘The market is struggling to find a bottom. Until there’s a clear signal from Trump that calms recession fears, crude prices will remain under pressure.’   OPEC+ Adds Further Pressure with Output Hike   Bearish sentiment intensified after OPEC+ announced it would boost production by 411,000 barrels per day in May, far surpassing the expected 135,000 bpd. The alliance called on overproducing nations to submit compensation plans by April 15. Analysts fear this surprise move could undo years of supply discipline and weigh further on already fragile oil markets.   Global political risks also flared over the weekend. Iran rejected US proposals for direct nuclear negotiations and warned of potential military action. Meanwhile, Russia claimed fresh territorial gains in Ukraine’s Sumy region and ramped up attacks on surrounding areas—further darkening the outlook for markets.   Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Andria Pichidi HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • AMZN Amazon stock watch, good buying (+313%) toi hold onto the 173.32 support area at https://stockconsultant.com/?AMZN
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.