Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Aston01

What Am I Missing with My Slope Calculation Code ?

Recommended Posts

I seem to be having a little bit of an issue with my slope calculation and was hoping someone could double check that I had written it properly.

 

The issue is basically that even with the slope degree input adjusted to extremes, some of these flat spots still trigger differently. If working properly the small transition in the middle should have stayed magenta as opposed to going green for 2-3 bars and back to magenta. Am I missing something in my code ?

 

MASlope.jpg

 

 

Here is a snippet of the EasyLanguage code in question.

 

Inputs: 
SlopeAv(5); 

Vars; 
Slope(0); 

Avg = average( Close, length) ; 
Slope =(TLSlopeEasy(Avg,1,SlopeAv)); 

if colorMode = 1  
then setplotcolor[1](1, iff( Avg <Avg [1] and (Slope < .01 ), magenta, green ) ); 
plot1 (Avg , "Avg ");

 

 

Below is a snippet from the diagnostics file (area highlighted in blue is where the color shift occurs). Am I missing something ...seems like just the type of scenario I was trying to smooth. The answer could be staring me in the face and I might not be seeing it.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1111214 1419Avg 3.48Avg[1] 3.51|slope -0.04|condition FALSE

1111214 1419Avg 3.45Avg[1] 3.48|slope -0.03|condition FALSE

1111214 1420Avg 3.42Avg[1] 3.45|slope -0.03|condition FALSE

1111214 1420Avg 3.40Avg[1] 3.42|slope -0.03|condition FALSE

1111214 1420Avg 3.38Avg[1] 3.40|slope -0.03|condition FALSE

1111214 1420Avg 3.37Avg[1] 3.38|slope -0.02|condition FALSE

1111214 1420Avg 3.36Avg[1] 3.37|slope -0.02|condition FALSE

1111214 1420Avg 3.35Avg[1] 3.36|slope -0.02|condition FALSE

1111214 1421Avg 3.34Avg[1] 3.35|slope -0.01|condition FALSE

1111214 1421Avg 3.34Avg[1] 3.34|slope -0.01|condition FALSE

1111214 1423Avg 3.35Avg[1] 3.34|slope -0.01|condition FALSE

1111214 1424Avg 3.35Avg[1] 3.35|slope -0.00|condition FALSE

1111214 1426Avg 3.35Avg[1] 3.35|slope 0.00| condition FALSE

1111214 1429Avg 3.36Avg[1] 3.35|slope 0.00| condition FALSE

1111214 1429Avg 3.36Avg[1] 3.36|slope 0.00| condition FALSE

1111214 1429Avg 3.36Avg[1] 3.36|slope 0.00| condition FALSE

1111214 1430Avg 3.36Avg[1] 3.36|slope 0.00| condition FALSE

1111214 1430Avg 3.36Avg[1] 3.36|slope 0.00| condition FALSE

1111214 1430Avg 3.36Avg[1] 3.36|slope 0.00| condition FALSE

1111214 1431Avg 3.35Avg[1] 3.36|slope -0.00|condition FALSE

 

Any help would be much appreciated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The code you posted is not the code that produced the chart you posted. When asking for help it is best if your chart includes the symbol name in the picture. The symbol should be set to exchange time. This enables calibrating a test case to the aproximately 14:30 time (on this unknown symbol) using some code other than the code you posted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the middle should have stayed magenta as opposed to going green for 2-3 bars and back to magenta. Am I missing something in my code ?

 

if colorMode = 1

then setplotcolor[1](1, iff( Avg <Avg [1] and (Slope < .01 ), magenta, green ) );

plot1 (Avg , "Avg ");

 

The color is controlled by 'Avg' being up or down since the last bar. Avg <Avg [1]. If you wanted it delayed, wouldn't you need to check multiple bars?

 

To change color down it would need to pass this test:

 

Avg <Avg [1] and Avg[1] < Avg [2] and Avg[2] < Avg [3]

 

otherwise stay the same color, or display a neutral color.

 

var: ChangeDown(False), ChangeUp(False);

 

ChangeDown = Avg <Avg [1] and Avg[1] < Avg [2] and Avg[2] < Avg [3];

ChangeUp = Avg >Avg [1] and Avg[1] > Avg [2] and Avg[2] > Avg [3];

 

if ChangeDown then

setplotcolor[1](1, magenta )

else if ChangeUp then

setplotcolor[1](1, Green );

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The formula for slope is slope=(endprice-startprice)/length; A threshold can be optimized to filter out undesirable slope levels.

input: threshold(.1);
var: avg(0), slope(0);

avg=average(c,10); 
slope=(avg-avg[10])/10;

if slope > threshold then setplotcolor(1,green) 
else if slope < -threshold then setplotcolor(1,red);

plot1(avg,"avg");

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for confirming, that is the classical definition. Many people use the regression line slope also.

 

another effective (and more robust) way to determine direction (actually a form of "slope") can be the SDX - signed direction index

 

SDX

 

Tom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
another effective (and more robust) way to determine direction (actually a form of "slope") can be the SDX - signed direction index

 

SDX

 

Tom

 

Tom, I'm trying to translate sdx. Please post source code. From the formula, I understand S=Speed but I don't understand the line below.

 

S(i) = P(i) - P(i-1) i= 1, ... , k-1

 

If i represents an index from 1 to 10 what does k represent? ... a 1 point increment in grid? Can you help me visualize k in the code below?

 

for i=1 to 10 begin
   s(i)=p(i)-p(i-1);
end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi onesmith

 

thanks for asking.

 

Since you are interested in a recent value of the "direction", you limit your computations to a recent number of price variations ("moves" from a gridline to another). The (k-1) would represent how many latest distinct price changes you are considering to assess the recent "direction".

 

When you use equispaced gridlines (and do not use weighting), you can just simplify as follows (which is immediately intuitive to visualize):

             Number of "UpMoves" - Number of "DownMoves"
sdx =     --------------------------------------------------------------------   *  100
                              Number of all "Moves"  

 

intending here "UpMoves", "DownMoves", "Moves" as the distinct price "moves" from a gridline to the adjacent one.

 

[ The distance between gridlines depends on your "timeframe" (similar to when you measure time, you may be interested in microseconds variations, or you may just be intested in minutes, depending on what you are doing).

 

(I often use a distance between gridlines equal to 0.1% of the price.) ]

 

Let me know if something unclear here.

 

 

Tom

 

 

Tom, I'm trying to translate sdx.

[...]

If i represents an index from 1 to 10 what does k represent? ... a 1 point increment in grid? Can you help me visualize k in the code below?

 

for i=1 to 10 begin
   s(i)=p(i)-p(i-1);
end;

Edited by tommaso

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Date: 31st March 2025.   Trump Confirms Tariffs on All Countries, Sending Stocks Lower.   The NASDAQ continues to trade lower due to the US confirming the latest tariffs will be on all countries. In addition to this, bearish volatility also is largely due to the higher inflation data from Friday. The NASDAQ declines to its lowest price since September 11th 2024. Core PCE Price Index - Inflation Increases Again! The PCE Price Index read 2.5% aligning with expert forecasts not triggering any alarm bells. However, the Core PCE Price Index rose from 0.3% to 0.4% MoM and from 2.7% to 2.8% YoY, signalling growing inflationary pressure. This increases the likelihood that the Federal Reserve will maintain elevated interest rates for an extended period. The NASDAQ fell 2.60% due to the higher inflation reading which is known to pressure the stock market due to pressure on consumer demand and a more hawkish Federal Reserve. Boston Fed President Susan Collins recently commented that tariffs could drive up inflation, though the long-term impact remains uncertain. She told journalists that a short-term spike is the most probable outcome but believes the current pause in monetary policy adjustments is appropriate given the prevailing uncertainties. Although, certain investment banks such as JP Morgan actually believe the Federal Reserve will be forced into cutting rates. This is due to expectations that the economy will struggle under the new trade policy. For example, JP Morgan expects the Federal Reserve to delay rate cuts but will quickly cut towards the end of 2025. Market Risk Appetite Takes a Hit! A big factor for the day is the drop in the risk appetite of investors. This can be seen from the VIX which is up almost 6%, Gold which is trading 1.30% higher and the Japanese Yen which is the day’s best performing currency. Most safe haven assets, bar the US Dollar, increase in value. It is also worth noting that all indices are decreasing in value during this morning's Asian session with the Nikkei225 and NASDAQ witnessing the strongest decline. Previously the stock market rose in value as investors heard rumours that tariffs would only be on certain countries. This bullish swing occurred between March 14th and 25th. Over the weekend, President Donald Trump indicated that the upcoming tariffs would apply to all countries, not just those with the largest trade imbalances with the US. NASDAQ - Technical Analysis In terms of technical analysis, the NASDAQ continues to obtain indications that sellers control the price action. The price opens on a bearish price gap measuring 0.30% and trades below all Moving Averages on all timeframes. The NASDAQ also trades below the VWAP and almost 100% of the most influential components (stocks) are declining in value.     The next significant support level is at $18,313, and the resistance level stands at $20,367.95. Key Takeaway Points: NASDAQ falls to its lowest since September 2024 as the US confirms tariffs on all countries, adding to inflation concerns. Core PCE inflation rises to 0.4% MoM and 2.8% YoY, increasing the likelihood of prolonged high interest rates. Investor risk appetite drops as VIX jumps 6%, gold gains 1.3%, and safe-haven assets outperform. NASDAQ shows strong bearish momentum, trading below key technical levels with support at $18,313 and resistance at $20,367.95. Always trade with strict risk management. Your capital is the single most important aspect of your trading business.   Please note that times displayed based on local time zone and are from time of writing this report.   Click HERE to access the full HFM Economic calendar.   Want to learn to trade and analyse the markets? Join our webinars and get analysis and trading ideas combined with better understanding of how markets work. Click HERE to register for FREE!   Click HERE to READ more Market news.   Michalis Efthymiou HFMarkets   Disclaimer: This material is provided as a general marketing communication for information purposes only and does not constitute an independent investment research. Nothing in this communication contains, or should be considered as containing, an investment advice or an investment recommendation or a solicitation for the purpose of buying or selling of any financial instrument. All information provided is gathered from reputable sources and any information containing an indication of past performance is not a guarantee or reliable indicator of future performance. Users acknowledge that any investment in Leveraged Products is characterized by a certain degree of uncertainty and that any investment of this nature involves a high level of risk for which the users are solely responsible and liable. We assume no liability for any loss arising from any investment made based on the information provided in this communication. This communication must not be reproduced or further distributed without our prior written permission.
    • PM Philip Morris stock, top of range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?PM
    • EXC Exelon stock, nice range breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?EXC
    • UTZ Utz Brands stock, watch for a bottom breakout at https://stockconsultant.com/?UTZ
    • FL Foot Locker stock, nice breakdown follow through at https://stockconsultant.com/?FL
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.