Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

audreybrine_mba

Algorithmic Trading for Individual Investors - a Survey for My Course Paper

Recommended Posts

Hi Friends,

 

I am an MBA student who is preparing a paper on "Algorithmic Trading for individual investors". I need to get a pulse on the popular tools, platforms, strategies etc. so that I understand what resources are available to an individual investor today. For this I have prepared a survey of a maximum of 13 questions (all multiple choice questions) and would be really grateful if you guys could participate in it. The survey is anonymous since the intention is just to understand what is available today for the average investor to jump into the algorithmic trading space.

 

Please click on the survey at https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/WQBLG3Z Thank you in advance.

 

Cheers!

Audrey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This survey is an inappropriate solicitation. I was spammed with an email notification of it's existence because I automate strategies and chose to subscribe to the Automated Trading subsection of this forum. Here's how I score our moderator's choice to leave this topic up.

 

+ Eyeballs viewing this spam contribute to revenue while spam remains.

 

- Sincere topics and replies vanish because I choose quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This survey is an inappropriate solicitation. I was spammed with an email notification of it's existence because I automate strategies and chose to subscribe to the Automated Trading subsection of this forum. Here's how I score our moderator's choice to leave this topic up.

 

+ Eyeballs viewing this spam contribute to revenue while spam remains.

 

- Sincere topics and replies vanish because I choose quality.

 

Hi onesmith,

 

This is a community and everyone is entitled to their opinions and preferences. And there might be some people who would like to help a student out and take his survey. No harm done is there? If you don't want to take the survey just ignore the thread.

 

thanks,

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Will you be sharing the results with respondents?

 

Howard

 

Hi Howard,

 

Yes, I will surely share my findings on the sites where I have posted this survey. I am aiming for around 500+ hits to get a feel of the "real" world which is interested in algo trading.

 

Right now I have got about 100 results, and the most striking point I found so far is that despite the fact that quite a few people are interested in algo trading, there are not too many dedicated platforms for algo trading. For example, so far about 85% of the respondents say they build their own platforms via own database, historical data subscriptions etc. Most of the popular trading platforms do not focus as such on algo trading; they are just general trading platforms with support for a specialist who would like to do algo trading. A one stop shop is missing!

 

I will keep you updated with the detailed results. And thanks to all those who filled out the survey so far.

 

Cheers,

Audrey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Audrey,

 

It might be helpful if you could define what you mean by 'algorithmic trading'. Technically, anything that involves a specific series of sequential steps could be considered 'algorithmic', such as starting my car, or making my favourite cocktail, but the term has generally become synonymous with High Frequency Trading.

 

Assuming that you have the latter in mind, you may wish to reconsider the topic of you thesis. HFT is dependent upon a distinct technological advantage that costs tens of millions of dollars. The maintanence of such a system, let alone its development, requires the input of dozens and dozens of people with world-class specialist experience and skills. In short, it's not something you can do in the back of your garage on a laptop, and the notion of an 'individual algorithmic trader' is nonsense.

 

I hope that this post comes across as constructive and is not just dismissive of your request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Audrey,

 

Assuming that you have the latter in mind, you may wish to reconsider the topic of you thesis. HFT is dependent upon a distinct technological advantage that costs tens of millions of dollars. The maintanence of such a system, let alone its development, requires the input of dozens and dozens of people with world-class specialist experience and skills. In short, it's not something you can do in the back of your garage on a laptop, and the notion of an 'individual algorithmic trader' is nonsense.

 

I hope that this post comes across as constructive and is not just dismissive of your request.

 

You should start with that quote.... I suppose it depends on definition. Check the SEC definition of HFT and you will be starkly suprised. I was suprised to find out that a system that I designed is considered a HFT system. And I designed it by myself, on X_86 gear. A $500 system that I now make a living off of. Preparing the paperwork now for a fund launch, so it is possible. I designed it in a garage, with a server running in a closet. lol

 

Check out Tradebot Systems in KC Missouri, they pocket $50k a day. Their solo designer started in a basement (no BS) with a $10k investment.

 

I think the big reason that individuals can do this now is solely because of technology. We have access to brokers and DMI. The Primes are still tough, but the small primes and mini primes all offer apis to connect. I think they all offer market data and pretty effecient order routing. Obviously, the primes have the the best algo's but you can't get an account with them without $1B(I think, it's up there) in assets. Government got this one right with reg NMS that actually helped out the little guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You should start with that quote.... I suppose it depends on definition. Check the SEC definition of HFT and you will be starkly suprised. I was suprised to find out that a system that I designed is considered a HFT system. And I designed it by myself, on X_86 gear. A $500 system that I now make a living off of. Preparing the paperwork now for a fund launch, so it is possible. I designed it in a garage, with a server running in a closet. lol

 

 

If what you're saying is true, then it would appear that I stand corrected! However, I'm assuming that you'd agree that you're in a very small minority of those who posess anything like the skill base to do so. To save me trecking away to read the SEC's definition, would you provide a summary? And, if you're willing to divulge the information, with what frequency your own system trades, and what type of instruments?

 

I'm guessing the paperwork involved in setting up a fund is as much hassle as setting up an HFT system, isn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
a very small minority of those who posess anything like the skill base to do so.

 

Thats the thing too, languages are getting easier. And you can use easier higher level languages anymore. I bet the trend continues. I've seen people using excel to trade, or a matlab, or an R plugin, that's a lot easier to learn than c++.

 

To save me trecking away to read the SEC's definition, would you provide a summary?

Well, it keeps changing... lol. One of the best reads and a must for anybody who hasn't read it is the concept release from the sec "concept release on equity market structure"

(1) the

use of extraordinarily high-speed and sophisticated computer programs for generating, routing,and executing orders; (2) use of co-location services and individual data feeds offered by exchanges and others to minimize network and other types of latencies; (3) very short time-frames for establishing and liquidating positions; (4) the submission of numerous orders that are cancelled shortly after submission; and (5) ending the trading day in as close to a flat position as possible (that is, not carrying significant, unhedged positions over-night).

 

 

And, if you're willing to divulge the information, with what frequency your own system trades, and what type of instruments?

I don't do a lot of fancy. I do a portfolio, which is different from a lot of the HFT guys. But I can still do a couple hundred trades a day.

 

I'm guessing the paperwork involved in setting up a fund is as much hassle as setting up an HFT system, isn't it?

Hassle is other peoples money. It's a regulated industry, so you have to pull your pants down in front of Barack to invest for other people... up to a certain point. I'm going the RIA route now.

 

Getting started you can trade a retail account which is easy to set up, but day trading restrictions are a gotcha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thats the thing too, languages are getting easier. And you can use easier higher level languages anymore. I bet the trend continues. I've seen people using excel to trade, or a matlab, or an R plugin, that's a lot easier to learn than c++.

 

Thanks for the resonse. I disagree with you about the languages aspect - I'm a perfectly proficient programmer in several languages, and pretty confident that I could teach myself C++ if I wanted. But I think the main barriers to HFT are broader technical issues - for example, I wouldn't have a clue about how to go about obtaining the low latency order routing that the HFTs enjoy. And I think that most people at the large HFT firms would be equally ignorant - it's my understanding that they tend to be made up of specialist teams, each of which only really understand their own job.

 

Anyway, as I said before, its impressive that you've managed to get such a system off the ground single-handedly, so good luck for the future and for your capital management enterprise!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Algorithmic is not HFT. Traders have been trading algorithmically for years and thats been available to retailers for probably since the computer came out. As stated, HFT is distinguished by requirement for co-location,automation, and speed.

 

Some of the early definitions that came out originally wanted to say anyone who was a day trader was an HFT trader but that misses point completely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.