Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

zdo

Fx and interest

Recommended Posts

Anyone up here on TL specializing in trading the higher interest paying pairs (for the interest) ??

 

big picture, methods and techniques stuff you can share ?? thx.

 

For example, I've had some good results using cycles with pairs long the AUS, NZD and also, for the last 15 months or so, the INR.

For INR, the spreads / transaction costs are abysimal...but interest payments are great and more than offset costs if hold for longer period.

 

Any pro's or specialist who can contribute some insights into playing the high rate countries?? Many thanks.

InterestOffsetsHighTransactionCosts.thumb.png.835b23be82f81d71121cd38187698ec3.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

never really played it from the point of view of only interest rates, but I guy I knew about two years ago put together a great model from a portfolio point of view and traded the carry spread. According to him it worked best from a portfolio point of view as there are always the shocks that carry you out, and you need to diversify a bit, and take the longer term view on it.

Otherwise it something I have never really looked at, except from the point of view of understanding the big effect interest rates can have on such models.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lazy, sloppy entries, avg price ~54.28 (horizontal cursor line on (hard to see) attachment)

and a very ugly spread

but ka ching on the daily interest payments - for over a month now :)

INR.thumb.png.cba95ad8b3b4de3b7f520be97de75aeb.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... and out. (actually 80% out)

 

...mostly for moving funds to other opps right now... ie wouldn't be surprised to see USD go down even more in this pair for a couple more months. As I mentioned before, the daily interest in this trade far more than offsets additional transaction costs.

 

Long AUDUSD, AUDJPY, NZDUSD, and NZDJPY, etc have also been a good trades lately but the daily interest, while good, is not great like in short USDINR

 

...same questions from OP re methods,etc are still open... thanks

 

Have a great weekend all,

 

zdo

OutIINR.thumb.png.944c6272775732961b3221bf8a2a182f.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Obsidian said:
you may want to check try/jpy

 

Thanks. I have looked at them … for me with TRYJPY in comparison to AUDJPY, etc

they are all pretty correlated directionally in price…

so more looking for sweet spots in the planned holding periods. ie it would be better for holding period in TRYJPY to be longer in relation to AUDJPY's, etc … full point difference in the spreads but (only :) , nothing to sneeze at) ~1.75 diff in the rates.

 

Wonder why the INR isn’t more liquid / spread is so high?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Zdo - thought you might like this comment from the article

 

Australia

 

“There’s too much froth in the Australian currency,” which economic fundamentals indicate ought to be worth 90 to 95 U.S. cents, Ridout, outgoing head of the Australian Industry Group, said in an interview in Sydney yesterday. She said “speculative” buying stoked by rate differentials had spurred the local dollar, which traded at $1.0791 late yesterday.

 

so is it speculative buying OR the interest rate differentials pushing the AUD.....I would have thought that the interest rate differentials where part of the economic fundamentals. I love when the two get intertwined to push a barrow. :)

 

and this doozy.....

"The so-called Aussie has appreciated 54 percent since the end of 2008," yeah after collapsing first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Obsidian said:
try/jpy 2.2 pips spread...hmm I should check this pair more often...

 

Yep… me too. Great spread or not, it seems to always be an afterthought mkt for me… go days without any thoughts of it at all … still, with it engaged and active or not, have been building a small sized long position since early April.

 

Also, trying to build a larger ~53.40 avg price short position in USDINR…

USDINR spread sucks! But the interest – ka ching !

TRYJPY.thumb.png.16c79d5782c72c6f44a6509faa6a6390.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Quote
What is it that makes Keynesians so insanely self destructive? Is it their mindless blind faith in the power of government? Their unfortunate ignorance of the mechanics of monetary stimulus? Their pompous self-righteousness derived from years of intellectual idiocy? Actually, I suspect all of these factors play a role. Needless to say, many of them truly believe that the strategy of fiat injection is viable, even though years of application have proven absolutely fruitless. Anyone with any sense would begin to question what kind of madness it takes to pursue or champion the mindset of the private Federal Reserve bank… Quantitative easing has shown itself to be impotent in the improvement of America’s economic situation. Despite four years of free reign in central banking, employment remains dismal in the U.S., the housing market continues its freefall, and, our national debt swirls like a vortex at the heart of the Bermuda Triangle. Despite this abject failure of Keynesian theory, the Federal Reserve is attempting once again to convince you, the happy-go-lucky American citizen, that somehow, this time around, everything will be “different”.

 

That said ... :)

... and notwithstanding...

I would like to thank Ben. Almost overnight, the (in the red) 'risk-on' (AUD,NZD, etc) and interest paying (mostly INR, but some TRY, etc) positions I have been building went significantly KaChingable if closed

 

However -

  Quote
...The only surprise left is a negative one. Chairman Bernanke and his fellow doves will soon realize the consequences of over-promising and under-delivering. It works better the other way around, but now it's too late.
CHSmith

 

...so moving stops into the green...

 

Also, discussed entry plan with SI and AU a while back with MO - which is also working ok...

but would not be surprised at all to see that move retrace back quickly (and maybe beyond)

:haha:... it's been a long while since my own little subjective internal wall of worry for the inner bull to climb got triggered... will be processing and clearing that bs/ideation this weekend big time

 

Have a great weekend all.

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, not really addressing your question.

 

It reminds me of when someone turned me on to something we called "The HedgeHog".

 

In 2008 my broker was paying 2.8 pips a day for a long position on GBP/JPY, 7 days a week,

365 a year. Someone told me about opening an acct with a "non interest" broker. Short with the "non interest" broker, long with the interest paying broker . Set TP an SL accordingly ( both positions close out together ). I did it for about 4 months . The hardest part was the bank wires to even out the accts when they closed. After bank wire fees it came out to about $160 a week. Call me stupid, but I stopped because it felt like cheating.

 

I wouldn't mind a real return of a "Carry Trade".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Mysticforex said:
Sorry, not really addressing your question.

 

It reminds me of when someone turned me on to something we called "The HedgeHog".

 

In 2008 my broker was paying 2.8 pips a day for a long position on GBP/JPY, 7 days a week,

365 a year. Someone told me about opening an acct with a "non interest" broker. Short with the "non interest" broker, long with the interest paying broker . Set TP an SL accordingly ( both positions close out together ). I did it for about 4 months . The hardest part was the bank wires to even out the accts when they closed. After bank wire fees it came out to about $160 a week. Call me stupid, but I stopped because it felt like cheating.

 

I wouldn't mind a real return of a "Carry Trade".

 

I do not think that is cheating :cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Obsidian said:
I do not think that is cheating :cool:

 

 

I'm as greedy as the next person, :cool: Thinking about it now it was probably a matter of size. I was using 1 standard of per side. If I had been using say 5 lots per side, for about $800 or so aweek I would have gooten over the cheating feeling. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

fwiw, lifted 60% of USD/INR shorts earlier this morning ... probably it's a bit early, but...

 

placing an array of sell orders above and (for now, far) below to re-enter...

 

ideally will move/creep those stop entry orders that are below back up close to price

 

I like this play because, if you hold it for some time, the interest income ameloriates much more of the risk than many other FX position trades...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Obsidian said:
I wonder if there is broker which will let me have a swap free subaccount in addition to a regular account so that I can get rid of wire fees :rofl:

 

re the subtopic on interest/noninterest accts : What about just scaling back (and slowing down) ...

and ordering and sending checks via snail mail to maintain relative 'balance'... ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  zdo said:
fwiw, lifted 60% of USD/INR shorts earlier this morning ... probably it's a bit early, but...

 

placing an array of sell orders above and (for now, far) below to re-enter...

 

ideally will move/creep those stop entry orders that are below back up close to price

 

I like this play because, if you hold it for some time, the interest income ameloriates much more of the risk than many other FX position trades...

 

thanks for reminding INR, while watching mostly major currencies, i miss better opportunities which less traded currencies offer...

 

at the moment i only hold a small try/jpy position which i opened around beginning of september

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

try/jpy is at the top of channel...I wonder if it will go back to 42.xx again...waiting to hear what BoJ will say tomorrow

 

meanwhile keeping an eye on usd/inr...54.00-54.50 seems important

tryjpy29.thumb.jpg.2d767fd2dfc7e9c477e2504f5b6dee2c.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.