Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

zdo

Developing Trader's State of Mind Discussion

Recommended Posts

True, it is not the tremble in your boots type fear, but it is the deer in the headlights type fear. Nonetheless, it is fear.

 

Fear in trading is more like intuition for traders who are taking risks that are too big for their accounts. When one takes risks that are too big, his mind's built in accounting program is letting him know that he is heading down a destructive path.

 

To remedy the situation, one needs to use much better risk management.

 

No, I would not characterize it as "deer in the headlights" type fear because a few of these people met their margin calls so they could stay with their position. More likely, it was ignorance combined with a lack of fear - a deadly combination.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, I would not characterize it as "deer in the headlights" type fear because a few of these people met their margin calls so they could stay with their position. More likely, it was ignorance combined with a lack of fear - a deadly combination.

 

 

Hi gosu,

 

In my homegrown mind, these People are completely disabled by fear ...yes they may meet their margin call but it is because they cannot face the reality of closing the position.... the pain is too great..... and I am not referring to money.

 

I do not see fearlessness in this action ....your choice of 'ignorance' in the sense that they have no idea how they truly function would be a more apt description.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SUIYA

 

The root of emotional regulation as I work with it is about initially disrupting an already established pattern that triggers an unwanted behavior repetiore, whether it's avoidance based or impulse based. In trading these hard wired patterns are vastly skewed toward fear based patterns. That's why my emphasis is so focused there. I'll get 10 fear cases to 1 impulse case. The major difference in working with people who have impulse problems is the amount of time invested in teasing apart the triggering mechanism of the established pattern of impulse.

 

There will be subtle (or not so subtle) antecedents before the on set of an impulse reaction. Most of these will go unnoticed because familiarity has moved them from the foreground of awareness to the background of awareness. As you learn how to slow down the process of the impulsive cascade, the person learns how manage the arousal of the emotion behind the impulse by disrupting elements within the chain of reaction.

 

The major way I use in decoding an impulse is by slowing down memory of an event so that with each sweep back through the memory, the linkage between the different elements becomes part of working awareness. Before the motivation of the impulse happens (attack), there will be a build up of emotional energy and the body will be cued for action. It is these that the client has to learn and have counter measures for. In addition there will be conditioned response to the triggering antecendent that disrupts the ramping up of energy (the impulse) in the neural circuitry.

 

In some cases it is simply biology that has run amok and simple mindfulness is applied as a safe guard. Other times meaning is a contributing factor to the maintaince of the impulse. I can't tell you how many traders have something to prove to someone (usually dead) about their worth, adequacy, mattering, or power that is at the root of the impulse. Other times the impulse is simply a piece of our biology that needs to be under better management.

 

What you cause me to consider here is actually building a learning system just for impulse. In speaking with you here, I've discovered that I have considered impulse to be a subset of fear (which it usually is). This is a bias that I need to examine.

 

Thanks

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SUIYA

 

What you cause me to consider here is actually building a learning system just for impulse. In speaking with you here, I've discovered that I have considered impulse to be a subset of fear (which it usually is). This is a bias that I need to examine.

 

Thanks

Rande Howell

 

my pleasure if it adds to the discussion.....and I think that is largely what gosu is also talking about. While as JohnW mentions the calm exterior may still hide fear, sometimes an issue might be nothing to do with fear (unless of course you subscribe to the idea that fear and love is the base to EVERYTHING :))

Sometimes (Randes experience is 1 in 10) as you say it might be biology, it might be the extra chocolate bar, or beer at lunch..... regardless I appreciate that the mechanisms/process/solutions all seem to reside in similar methods to recognize and then temper the fear/impulse response.

(much the same as taking a breather before replying instantly to a thread on a forum that gets us riled up...:angry:, or even feeling like we need to have the last word ....not sure if that is driven by fear, :haha: or impulse :doh:)

thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote=SIUYA;130855 (unless of course you subscribe to the idea that fear and love is the base to EVERYTHING :))

.

 

exactly ... this is one of those big decisions that form the cornerstones of our lives ...and it is the basis of my view and my Wife's view on life... and yes it has been greatly tested and has grown stronger as a result.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To all in the Developing Traders State of Mind group:

 

I just posted an article under Articles/Psychology whose title is

 

"If I KNOW How to Tade and Manage Rsk, Why Can't I Do It When the Money Counts?"

 

It is useful for the learning occurring in the course. It hasn't been vetted yet by TL so it's not got a link.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally got around to skimming some of the recent ‘argument’ postings -

 

The phrase “fear based patterns” is emphasized and all of a sudden we see all kinds of dancing around… we’re reminded that “fear can be useful” and that it’s “not the tremble in your boots type fear” necessarily, and “Fear is just not the overriding emotion in trading that it's made out to be” etc etc. Toss in a few dispersions about the “failures” seeking help in such services – when in reality most of (and certainly the best) clients of coaching and trading syschologists are already high in the pareto – and the whole thread is dragged back into a misguided focus.

 

Folks, a broad physical, mental, soul, and spirit orientation exists which is based in ‘creative opportunity based patterns’. About one percent of the human population currently ‘has got it going on’. At the ‘first body’ level / physically / neurologically the “amygdali” (and associated regions - actually every 'cell') literally do a habitual 180 in orientation (without loss of the threat based option when it’s needed, btw)…parallel shifts occur in other ‘bodies’, mental, etc … Globally, many previous identifications are simply (but not necessarily easily) dropped, etc.

 

This thread is for those who are interested in that. It is not for those who are interested in manipulating, explaining, surviving, etc. “fear based patterns”

 

All the best,

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Finally got around to skimming some of the recent ‘argument’ postings -

 

The phrase “fear based patterns” is emphasized and all of a sudden we see all kinds of dancing around… we’re reminded that “fear can be useful” and that it’s “not the tremble in your boots type fear” necessarily, and “Fear is just not the overriding emotion in trading that it's made out to be” etc etc. Toss in a few dispersions about the “failures” seeking help in such services – when in reality most of (and certainly the best) clients of coaching and trading syschologists are already high in the pareto – and the whole thread is dragged back into a misguided focus.

 

Folks, a broad physical, mental, soul, and spirit orientation exists which is based in ‘creative opportunity based patterns’. About one percent of the human population currently ‘has got it going on’. At the ‘first body’ level / physically / neurologically the “amygdali” (and associated regions - actually every 'cell') literally do a habitual 180 in orientation (without loss of the threat based option when it’s needed, btw)…parallel shifts occur in other ‘bodies’, mental, etc … Globally, many previous identifications are simply (but not necessarily easily) dropped, etc.

 

This thread is for those who are interested in that. It is not for those who are interested in manipulating, explaining, surviving, etc. “fear based patterns”

 

All the best,

 

zdo

 

Dear zdo

I understand I am only allowed to ask questions.!!

What the ..... are you talking about?? (devil)

 

Kind regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dear zdo

I understand I am only allowed to ask questions.!!

What the ..... are you talking about?? (devil)

 

Kind regards

bobc

 

bobc,

 

...talking about potential for true health...

in 'trading', but not just in trading...

depending on the aspect perspective, it goes under different handles...

"effortless high performance", etc. etc.

What the ..... are you talking about?? ;)

To me, it's starting to look like past a certain point , "talking " can become an obstacle for participants.

 

re: "I understand I am only allowed to ask questions"

In the ideal only those who are active in the course would be posting in this thread...

but conversations about the underlying principles and issues being presented are not being censored.

Plus

:helloooo:

another new or existing thread is only a couple clicks away... same or new and different players would jump right in if you push the right buttons.

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi gosu,

 

In my homegrown mind, these People are completely disabled by fear ...yes they may meet their margin call but it is because they cannot face the reality of closing the position.... the pain is too great..... and I am not referring to money.

 

I do not see fearlessness in this action ....your choice of 'ignorance' in the sense that they have no idea how they truly function would be a more apt description.

 

What do you think they feared that they were disabled? Maybe they just liked to gamble and got a thrill out of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Finally got around to skimming some of the recent ‘argument’ postings -

 

The phrase “fear based patterns” is emphasized and all of a sudden we see all kinds of dancing around… we’re reminded that “fear can be useful” and that it’s “not the tremble in your boots type fear” necessarily, and “Fear is just not the overriding emotion in trading that it's made out to be” etc etc. Toss in a few dispersions about the “failures” seeking help in such services – when in reality most of (and certainly the best) clients of coaching and trading syschologists are already high in the pareto – and the whole thread is dragged back into a misguided focus.

 

Folks, a broad physical, mental, soul, and spirit orientation exists which is based in ‘creative opportunity based patterns’. About one percent of the human population currently ‘has got it going on’. At the ‘first body’ level / physically / neurologically the “amygdali” (and associated regions - actually every 'cell') literally do a habitual 180 in orientation (without loss of the threat based option when it’s needed, btw)…parallel shifts occur in other ‘bodies’, mental, etc … Globally, many previous identifications are simply (but not necessarily easily) dropped, etc.

 

This thread is for those who are interested in that. It is not for those who are interested in manipulating, explaining, surviving, etc. “fear based patterns”

 

All the best,

 

zdo

 

zdo

 

Thank you. I will work more diligently to keep from getting suckered into these. Thanks for your leadership and direction.

 

Rande Howell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zdo,

Do not go to South America with Mr. Jones/Randell

bobc

 

:rofl:

 

Thanks… but no need to go to S.A.

Could sit right here and ‘commit suicide without really trying’…

or

 

 

...

 

 

 

bobc twin, stop asking me to fkn talk to you ‘normal’

We don’t have time for that. :)

 

Are you thoroughly and gratefully dead?

How many times have you practiced dying?

How many times have you died?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Week 3

Great session. Thanks, Rande.

 

In my view, this is some real breakthrough work in creating practical access to ‘normals’ for working with material that typically gets stuck in merely the 'theoretical'…

 

 

 

Hope Rande has some more material on “shadow” work - Those protective AND regressive tendencies in the background that thrust themselves into the fray when changes are implemented, etc. … I woke up to some of those this morning .

Maybe he has already covered it but I’m too slow to have realized what to do.

My love for myth, carl, and archetypes is higher than average by a good shot but somehow…some of us are on the blinder, muter, and deafer end of the scale with this ‘inner’ work… especially when it comes to emotions represented by inner ‘figures’.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Week 3

Great session. Thanks, Rande.

 

In my view, this is some real breakthrough work in creating practical access to ‘normals’ for working with material that typically gets stuck in merely the 'theoretical'…

 

 

 

Hope Rande has some more material on “shadow” work - Those protective AND regressive tendencies in the background that thrust themselves into the fray when changes are implemented, etc. … I woke up to some of those this morning .

Maybe he has already covered it but I’m too slow to have realized what to do.

My love for myth, carl, and archetypes is higher than average by a good shot but somehow…some of us are on the blinder, muter, and deafer end of the scale with this ‘inner’ work… especially when it comes to emotions represented by inner ‘figures’.

 

zdo

 

What most traders come to recognize is that the Orphan archetype in its shadow form has been center stage in their trading. From there, ruler (discipline) and warrior (courage) have been serving the Orphan, which puts them in shadow form.

 

The 4 element course is way too short to made an in depth study of the shadow side of the archetypal energies. I recommend Carol Pearson's Awakening the Heroes Within. She also has a archetypal index called the pmai that I use with my individual clients. It's a powerful tool. It is the lack of awareness of self that gets traders in trouble.

 

Rande

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rande.

I’m running a minor parallel analytical-like process along with the actual processes and questions come up like the following -

why just “orphan” as a starting state?

is mindlessness, in the ways you are using the term in the course, a key dynamic of “orphan”?

or is generalized mindlessness what makes it shadowy ?… ie I’m having some trouble understanding how orphan isn’t always in 'shadow' form (because it is a dev. stage, etc) ??…

 

Links relevant to the course for any of the other participants who are interested

 

honing in on flavors of ‘orphan’ etc.

The Agency of the Orphan: Archetypes | Anna Craycroft

 

orphan is preample to the hero’s journey. The first step in generalized hero’s journey is a separation from the ‘whole’ – separation from family, tribe, collective, normalcy, ( self ?) whatever…moving / developing is the ‘journey’ with its inevitable hazards and challenges… and the completion of the journey is a return to what the orphan/hero was separated from ( and also carrying something attained in the journey that the ‘whole’ needs…)

 

The ‘flavors’ of orphan that ‘move’ / develop

The Orphan Strikes Back: The Significance of Luke Skywalker's Orphan Origin, by Reihla

 

possibilities and stages of moving from ‘stuck’ orphan

Lost and Found: The Orphaned Hero in Myth, Folklore, and Fantasy by Terri Windling: Summer 2007, Journal of Mythic Arts, Endicott Studio

 

widening the context

Myss Library | Sacred Contracts | The Four Archetypes of Survival

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zdo

 

I intentionally force a square peg into a round hole. Archetypes make more sense if seen from an emotional point of view, where emotions are biological in nature and not psychological. Orphan in biological terms is our limbic system. It is this adaptation driven by fear that is at the core of moving from a fear based trading mind to a probability based trading mind. Our mindlessness to our Orphan nature is what keeps us trapped in self limiting beliefs from my perspective. The empowered side of Orphan is also where our resilency is rooted. Very necessary in trading. Most traders initially simply want to get rid of the Orphan, but it is rooted in our emotional brain so we can't. We can learn to re-grow it so that it becomes a working part of the team of the self. Developing Mindfulness, or awareness of our humanness, as we trade really opens up the possibility or reorganizing the self for more effective trading where our fear is detangled from uncertainty. This is where we can start developing a mindset to manage ambiguity.

 

Rande

 

Thanks Rande.

I’m running a minor parallel analytical-like process along with the actual processes and questions come up like the following -

why just “orphan” as a starting state?

is mindlessness, in the ways you are using the term in the course, a key dynamic of “orphan”?

or is generalized mindlessness what makes it shadowy ?… ie I’m having some trouble understanding how orphan isn’t always in 'shadow' form (because it is a dev. stage, etc) ??…

 

Links relevant to the course for any of the other participants who are interested

 

honing in on flavors of ‘orphan’ etc.

The Agency of the Orphan: Archetypes | Anna Craycroft

 

 

 

Rande Howell

orphan is preample to the hero’s journey. The first step in generalized hero’s journey is a separation from the ‘whole’ – separation from family, tribe, collective, normalcy, ( self ?) whatever…moving / developing is the ‘journey’ with its inevitable hazards and challenges… and the completion of the journey is a return to what the orphan/hero was separated from ( and also carrying something attained in the journey that the ‘whole’ needs…)

 

The ‘flavors’ of orphan that ‘move’ / develop

The Orphan Strikes Back: The Significance of Luke Skywalker's Orphan Origin, by Reihla

 

possibilities and stages of moving from ‘stuck’ orphan

Lost and Found: The Orphaned Hero in Myth, Folklore, and Fantasy by Terri Windling: Summer 2007, Journal of Mythic Arts, Endicott Studio

 

widening the context

Myss Library | Sacred Contracts | The Four Archetypes of Survival

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly some of you may find these extracts of interest.

 

Krishnamurti on Fear

 

If letting go of fear of the unknown creates a perpetual state of curiosity, then everything from Trading to Rande's work and beyond has a natural tendency to fall into place.

Edited by johnw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi zdo

...

What has happened to the four other participants in this exercise?

Maybe they dont understand Hayek?

 

Turns out I have the only "orphaned limbic system" on TL. Everyone else is healed.

 

I am also the only TL member who doesn’t understand Hayek…Mostly, I can’t seem to make the necessary connections between his various models.

Everyone else understands, so if you were to explain you would only be explaining it to one person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Possibly some of you may find these extracts of interest.

 

Krishnamurti on Fear

 

If letting go of fear of the unknown creates a perpetual state of curiosity, then everything from Trading to Rande's work and beyond has a natural tendency to fall into place.

 

Thanks johnw.

 

Excerpts from the link:

“The mind is the maker of fear “ …gonna have to call bs on that one

 

...paradoxically, I'm not calling bs on what follows that first quote

“(The mind is the maker of fear); and when it analyses fear, seeking its cause in order to be free from it, the mind only further isolates itself and thereby increases fear. When you use analysis to resist confusion, you are increasing the power of resistance; and resistance of confusion only increases the fear of it, which hinders freedom. In communion there is freedom, but not in fear."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks johnw.

 

Excerpts from the link:

“The mind is the maker of fear “ …gonna have to call bs on that one

 

...paradoxically, I'm not calling bs on what follows that first quote

“(The mind is the maker of fear); and when it analyses fear, seeking its cause in order to be free from it, the mind only further isolates itself and thereby increases fear. When you use analysis to resist confusion, you are increasing the power of resistance; and resistance of confusion only increases the fear of it, which hinders freedom. In communion there is freedom, but not in fear."

 

Granted, his work may not be easy to grasp ... but at least you have read the piece addressing fear.

Further on into his work, Krishnamurti addresses the subject of 'judgements'

Edited by johnw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

johnw ... on the subject of judgements, in my case Krishnamurti would be "preaching to the choir" :) ...

 

Related to the thread (and Rande can correct me if I'm off (or explain why) ) ... seems he uses the term 'assessments' instead of 'judgements' in the practical application work of the course...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
johnw ... on the subject of judgements, in my case Krishnamurti would be "preaching to the choir" :) ...

 

Related to the thread (and Rande can correct me if I'm off (or explain why) ) ... seems he uses the term 'assessments' instead of 'judgements' in the practical application work of the course...

 

OK, assessment it is then ...'gonna have to call bs on that one' is an assessment

'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
zdo

 

What most traders come to recognize is that the Orphan archetype in its shadow form has been center stage in their trading. From there, ruler (discipline) and warrior (courage) have been serving the Orphan, which puts them in shadow form.

 

The 4 element course is way too short to made an in depth study of the shadow side of the archetypal energies. I recommend Carol Pearson's Awakening the Heroes Within. She also has a archetypal index called the pmai that I use with my individual clients. It's a powerful tool. It is the lack of awareness of self that gets traders in trouble.

 

Rande

 

How much self-awareness does a person need to avoid trouble in the markets?

 

If a person knows all about orphans, rulers and warriors, and whether or not they are in shadow form, does it mean he has self-awareness?

 

More to the point, can a person extract from the markets without self-awareness?

 

 

In any case, I like how you admit that your 4-week course is too short and lacks "a powerful tool" you use only with your individual clients. I think that is called the "upsell" in marketing parlance. I'm sure if you offered it to zdo for free he would become your bosom buddy for life, or at least your ultimate shill. The "pmai" is it? To awaken the inner heroes? I think a pack of Yu Gi Oh cards does the same. I see the kids having a lot of fun with them after school at the local McDonald's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.