Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

LiukK

EasyLanguage Help Needed

Recommended Posts

Hi all guys :)

 

I started studying EasyLanguage not long ago and I'm still a newbie.

 

I need a little help about a part of code of the TS I'm developing.

 

I want the TS to open a position at the "ConditionLong" signal, and, once the first position have been opened, I want it to open other positions of the same size and in the same direction every "X" points.

 

I tried to code it but the TS only opens the first position but not the others...

here is the code:

 

If marketposition = 0 and ConditionLong Then Buy next bar At High + 1 point stop;
If marketposition > 0 then buy next bar at entryprice + X points stop;

 

Thank you in advance for your help ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi all guys :)

 

I started studying EasyLanguage not long ago and I'm still a newbie.

 

I need a little help about a part of code of the TS I'm developing.

 

I want the TS to open a position at the "ConditionLong" signal, and, once the first position have been opened, I want it to open other positions of the same size and in the same direction every "X" points.

 

I tried to code it but the TS only opens the first position but not the others...

here is the code:

 

If marketposition = 0 and ConditionLong Then Buy next bar At High + 1 point stop;
If marketposition > 0 then buy next bar at entryprice + X points stop;

 

Thank you in advance for your help ;)

 

Maybe if you tried something like this:

 

If marketposition = 0 and ConditionLong Then Buy next bar At High + 1 point stop;
If marketposition > 0 and Close >= entryprice + X then buy next bar at High points stop;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe if you tried something like this:

 

If marketposition = 0 and ConditionLong Then Buy next bar At High + 1 point stop;
If marketposition > 0 and Close >= entryprice + X then buy next bar at High points stop;

 

Hi Tradewinds and thank you for the answer! :)

 

however unfortunately it doesn't work because it opens just one position...

 

I try to explain pratically what I need:

 

once the first position is entered, say at 100, I want to pyramide it and buy other position every 20 points... so 100, 120, 140, 160...and so on...till the condition to close is met.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Market Position will only return 1, 0, or -1

 

CurrentShares will return how many you are long or short.

 

MarketPosition * CurrentShares will return true position with a + or - sign.

 

Hi UrmaBlume and thank you for this detail!

 

However even changing the code I posted before this way:

If marketposition * CurrentShares = 0 and ConditionLong Then Buy next bar At High + 1 point stop;
If marketposition * CurrentShares > 0 and Close >= entryprice + X then buy next bar at High points stop;

the problem still persist.

 

I think I'd need something like a "lastentryprice" word in order to accomplish the code...

 

something like:

If marketposition = 0 and ConditionLong Then Buy next bar At High + 1 point stop;
If marketposition > 0 and Close >= [color="Red"]lastentryprice[/color] + X then buy next bar at High points stop;

 

I'm sure there is something like this of which I'm not yet aware of :crap:

 

Anybody knows how to help me please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi LiuKK,

 

Have you checked the Pyramiding Check Box ? in the Format strategies--> Properties for All--> General--> Allow upto [ ] ???

 

Good Luck,

EasyTrader_I.

 

Hi EasyTrader_I! :) and thank you for the answer.

 

Yes, that box is flagged...and still doesn't work.

 

I really can't understand what is wrong with this code... :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I think I'd need something like a "lastentryprice" word in order to accomplish the code...

 

something like:

If marketposition = 0 and ConditionLong Then Buy next bar At High + 1 point stop;
If marketposition > 0 and Close >= [color="Red"]lastentryprice[/color] + X then buy next bar at High points stop;

 

This is from the Easy Language help:

 

Returns the entry price for the specified position.

 

EntryPrice(Num)

 

Where Num is a numeric expression representing the number of positions ago (up to a maximum of ten).

 

Remarks

This function can only be used in the evaluation of strategies. It does not require an input, however, by using the input Num, you can obtain the specified value from a previous position, up to ten positions ago.

 

Example

EntryPrice(2) might return a value of 101.19 as the entry price of 2 positions ago on a chart of Microsoft stock.

 

Are you entering a number for how many entry orders back the entry was? You need to use the syntax:

 

EntryPrice(1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, the "EntryPrice" reserved word does not need the "NUM" input to be designated, BUT I think that the MarketPosition reserved word DOES need the "NUM" input to be designated:

 

MarketPosition(1)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Possibly the condition entryprice+X points stop is not met because the market falls after your first buy and the order never executes. Is that maybe?

Hi equatrader and thank you to try to help me :)

Unfortunately this isn’t the problem because it doesn’t opens other positions even if the price go my way and reach the entry price+X points leve and goes even much further...

 

This is from the Easy Language help:

Are you entering a number for how many entry orders back the entry was? You need to use the syntax:

 

EntryPrice(1)

 

Tradewinds, this is enlightening!

I just wanted to buy X points over the last entry so “entry price(1)” would be perfect!

So I changed the code this way:

 

If marketposition = 0 and ConditionLong Then Buy next bar At High + 1 point stop;
If marketposition > 0 then buy next bar at Entryprice(1) + X points stop;

 

 

Unfortunately the problem still persisted and the TS opened just the first position.

 

Then I tried to experiment another way:

I changed the pyramid filter from a constant number of points (X) to a fraction of the ATR:

var1 = AvgTrueRange( ATRLength ) * NumATRs;

If marketposition = 0 and ConditionLong Then Buy next bar At High + 1 point stop;
If marketposition > 0 then buy next bar at Entryprice(1) + var1 stop;

 

And, surprisingly to me, it worked! :confused:

 

But not the way I was looking for, because it opens positions even if the price goes down till the exit condition is met. :crap:

 

I want it to pyramid adding positions only if the price goes in the right direction…precisely every X ATR (or X points) from the last entry price...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
var: x(0), mp(0), cs(0), np(0), step(2);

mp=marketposition;
cs=currentshares;
np=entryprice+cs*step;

if mp=0 and d=1111102 then buy next bar market;
if mp>0 then buy next bar np stop;

if cs<>cs[1] then begin
   x=text_new(d,t,np,"next="+numtostr(np,2));  text_setstyle(x,1,2);
end;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
var: x(0), mp(0), cs(0), np(0), step(2);

mp=marketposition;
cs=currentshares;
np=entryprice+cs*step;

if mp=0 and d=1111102 then buy next bar market;
if mp>0 then buy next bar np stop;

if cs<>cs[1] then begin
   x=text_new(d,t,np,"next="+numtostr(np,2));  text_setstyle(x,1,2);
end;

 

 

Hi onesmith, and thank you for the reply! :)

As I said in the first post I’m still a newbie in programming and, honestly, I’m not yet so skilled to understand totally the code you posted. :embarassed:

 

Anyway I tried it but again it wasn’t doing what I’m looking for

 

I write here the full code of this (“simple once coded”) trading system:

 

Inputs: Price(Close), LenA(10), LenB(100), ATRLength(20), NumATRs(1) ;

var:  mp(0), var0(0), var1(0), var2(0);

mp=marketposition*currentshares;
var0 = Average(Price, LenA);
var1 = Average(Price, LenB);
var2 = AvgTrueRange( ATRLength ) * NumATRs;


Condition1 = var0>var1;
Condition2 = var0<var1;


If mp = 0 and Condition1 Then Buy next bar At High + var2 stop;

If mp > mp[1] then buy next bar at entryprice + var2 stop;

If mp > 0 and Condition2 Then sell next bar at market;

 

Basically I want the TS to open positions perpetually at step of an ATR fraction till the condition to close them is met... like the TS of the Richard Dennis's turtles but with a limitless number of positions.

 

How people can code this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

// CrossPrice is set to H of bar when FastAvg crosses above SlowAvg.

// PreviousPrice stores most recent EntryPrice.

 

// if mp=0 then NextPrice is CrossPrice+atr.

// if mp=1 then NextPrice is PreviousPrice+atr.

 

var:  fast(0), slow(0), atr(0), cs(0), crossPrice(0), previousPrice(0), nextPrice(0);

fast=average(c,10);
slow=average(c,100);
atr=AvgTrueRange(20);
cs=currentshares;

if fast>slow then begin
   if fast crosses above slow then begin
       crossPrice=H;    nextPrice=crossPrice+atr;
   end;
   if cs>0 then begin
       if cs>cs[1] then previousPrice=maxlist(open,nextPrice);
       nextPrice=previousPrice+atr;
   end else nextPrice=crossPrice+atr;
   if crossPrice>0 then buy next bar nextPrice stop;
end else sell next bar market;

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
// CrossPrice is set to H of bar when FastAvg crosses above SlowAvg.

// PreviousPrice stores most recent EntryPrice.

 

// if mp=0 then NextPrice is CrossPrice+atr.

// if mp=1 then NextPrice is PreviousPrice+atr.

 

var:  fast(0), slow(0), atr(0), cs(0), crossPrice(0), previousPrice(0), nextPrice(0);

fast=average(c,10);
slow=average(c,100);
atr=AvgTrueRange(20);
cs=currentshares;

if fast>slow then begin
   if fast crosses above slow then begin
       crossPrice=H;    nextPrice=crossPrice+atr;
   end;
   if cs>0 then begin
       if cs>cs[1] then previousPrice=maxlist(open,nextPrice);
       nextPrice=previousPrice+atr;
   end else nextPrice=crossPrice+atr;
   if crossPrice>0 then buy next bar nextPrice stop;
end else sell next bar market;

 

Onesmith...you're great, I really don't know how to thank you enough...

the TS works perfectly now :thumbs up:

there are so many things I still don't know and your help have been really invaluable :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.