Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

TheNegotiator

Will Stimulus Ever Work?

Recommended Posts

Will stimulus packages being implemented the world over ever work and are they in so deep that they have to make it work?

 

Central banks keep pumping money into the system and really we keep going nowhere. If you were trading and you were buying and buying a stock but it wasn't budging, what would you think might play out next? Well my guess is there might be a good deal of downside risk. If others were buying too, that'd only serve to amplify any break.

 

I suspect that we are too dependent on big corporations for economic recovery and this is at the heart of the problem. But back to the 'solution'.

 

I think a nice metaphor for the way we are right now is we're in a kind of "economic biostasis" if you will. As we become more dependent on the drugs(economic stimulus and government intervention) we become more susceptable to infection(economic shocks/extremes) when they're taken away. So the question is how and when will we be weaned? The original plan was for the economy to have begun to have picked up by now and to start to withdraw stimulus slowly. But the ecomony still isn't great is it? So it didn't work that well before so why not give some more drugs? What happens to an addict when they go cold turkey?

 

I don't know what they're going to do, but my feeling is if they don't change their approach, the result in the end won't be pretty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Negotiator,

Great post.

 

re Metaphors … I like a spinning top metaphor, wobble and end dynamics, etc… a spinning top accelerated by ‘printing’ and fattened and heightened by derivatives, etc.

 

Domestic and international dynamics “makes it much harder to notice what is actually going on. … the money system is like a treadmill that requires continuous economic growth, even if the real standard of living remains stagnant. . . . This need for perpetual growth is another fact of life that we tend to take for granted in modern societies, and one that we usually do not associate with either interest or our money system” Nystrom

 

‘They’ will not “change their approach” ever. Money inflation, stimuli, however it’s couched, is beneficial to them. We are the ones who must change their approach – not by modifying the existing fiat money systems but by replacing them completely. Thinking and working (with them) in the consensus world view only prolongs their regime and intensifies the ultimate pain to the many… each of us either supports the spell casting or we don’t – period. We each assent to the consensus and ‘label’, etc. anyone who threatens that homeostasis, etc or we do the opposite. There’s not much middle ground really. Beware ‘conservatives’ of the current system, the current constitution, etc. The current system was a great try, but it was structured and morphed to let ‘maritime law’ etc etc slip in, - > yielding gradually snowballing corruptions ...

 

Have you read up on Austrian type economics, Mises, Fakete, and more currently, the foundational works of Casey, Amerman, Gnazzo, Kirby050206Graft, Schiff, etc?

 

zdo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on what you means as "work".

 

Does spending money as inefficiently as possible ever work?

 

The market will clear all ills better than any unnatural method. The problem is that letting things happen naturally will not get your party reelected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

zdo,

 

Thanks! I can't say I have read those guys, but then I'm no economist. I do however, try to get a feel for the way we might move based on broader economic scope. I'm also always open to opinions and to listen/learn from others.

 

MM,

 

Lol. Too true on all accounts! I believe the market can help cure but it needs a little motivation. I think that's the view of big ben too, but he's gone a little trigger happy!

Edited by TheNegotiator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will stimulus ever work? So far the only places it ever worked was in a mainstream economist's head or an insane politician's gut...

 

The fed has been 'stimulating' since its inception in ever increasing degrees - and the ones it has ever worked for at all were the very first recipients of any new money... didn't really even help them in the long run... 'banks' were the first recipients of last major stimulus and they are ultimately in the same mess as ever...

 

The federal gov't has been 'stimulating' state and local gov'ts in increasing degrees for decades now (to centralize more power) ... never worked yet

You Know That Your City Has Become A Hellhole When

 

Here's what happened when they 'stimulated' education

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/student-loan-racket-complete-infographic

Edited by zdo
no reason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Stimulus does work, short term.. It keeps the politicians in power and it creates inflation.

Inflation is good for stocks and commodities. They go up.

Thats good for us traders. There is movement.

Inflation is very bad for the man in street. His lifestyle falls.

 

The real problem is unemployment and it has been with us for hundreds of years.

In olden days , when the serfs started grumbling,the king formed an army and marched off to Moscow. That took care of a 100,000.

Today we have sent our inventions to Asia to be made . The jobs are gone .

They wont return so we have stuctural unemployment.

 

Technology has always solved our problems in past.

The 50s saw the space race.

The 60s saw the Beatles

The 70s saw nothing. USA standing still

The 80s saw the arms race.

The 90s saw the computer.

The 00s saw the cellphone

Is there a new technology that can turn us round?

The iPad will change our way of doing business

But we sent it to China to be made.

 

There is only one way to solve unemployment.

Balanced trade.

And thats the start of isolationism. A swearword with mainstream economists.

I remember writing a final exam on International Trade. The question was easy. Discuss the comparative advantage.I can make shoes cheaper than you . You can make socks cheaper than me . We trade.Now if you can make both shoes and socks cheaper , I am

dead. To keep me busy I'll open a bank to keep all your money. Does this ring a bell?

Now the bank has failed and the stimulus is there to keep the bank open so some of us have jobs.

 

Balanced trade means you can only sell as much as you buy.

So I will sell you shoes and you will sell me socks.Even if my shoes are so expensive. Otherwise , no trade.

Of course there will be inflation . Thats fine for us traders.

The world economy will shrink,but the jobs will return to America!!

 

As a closing comment....

Did anyone see the Inflation report yesterday?

Producer prices at wholesale level rose 6.9% for 12 months

The retailers must add a margin .So inflation is about 9%. Unless the retailer sold the goods at a loss. Somebody is not telling the truth.

 

Please note these are my thoughts and ideas. And the research is minimal.

I await the onslaught.

Regards

bobc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bob - "The 70s saw nothing. USA standing still"

 

The 70s had Disco Fever - there was no way it was standing still !!

 

On a lighter note - :2c: - stimulus woks for for a short period of time, whereas real policies for incentives (isn't that what the system thrives on) work over the long term....so in answer to the question...Will Stimulus Ever Work?....no.....just ask Japan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thx for reminding us... I don't bang that drum often enough anymore Another part for consideration is who that money initially went to...
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • How long does it take to receive HFM's withdrawal via Skrill? less than 24H?
    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.