Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

Soultrader

Bid-Ask Tape Indicator

Recommended Posts

Hi Blue Ray,

 

You have done a great job coding Hubert's "secret" Divergence indicator.

 

I was trying to create an exit for one of my strategies based on that indicator. But no success. What I want to do is very simple: If I am Long and 2 consecutive Red histogramm bars are in place I want to exit. And opposite for Short trades.

What I wrote is this:

If MP = 1 and BAVolDiff[1] <= 0 and BAVolDiff <= 0

then begin

Sell ("SX1") from entry (LEdelta") next bar market;

end;

Something is not working correctly with this line, I am not getting exits at right place

Would you be so kind and may be help me with it. I am not a very good programmer but very good with pattern recognition.

 

Best Regards,

 

Ancharka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blu,

Thanks so much. I have been waiting for this alarmed Delta Diver for a long time now. You are the greatest.

 

Questions:

1. Do we have to set our own alert or does it happen automatically per the code?

2. If we want the Show Me and the alert do we have to add both ELD's to a chart?

 

Again, much thanks.

 

Bryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Ancharka said:
Hi Blue Ray,

 

You have done a great job coding Hubert's "secret" Divergence indicator.

 

I was trying to create an exit for one of my strategies based on that indicator. But no success. What I want to do is very simple: If I am Long and 2 consecutive Red histogramm bars are in place I want to exit. And opposite for Short trades.

What I wrote is this:

If MP = 1 and BAVolDiff[1] <= 0 and BAVolDiff <= 0

then begin

Sell ("SX1") from entry (LEdelta") next bar market;

end;

Something is not working correctly with this line, I am not getting exits at right place

Would you be so kind and may be help me with it. I am not a very good programmer but very good with pattern recognition.

 

Best Regards,

 

Ancharka

 

Hi Ancharka

 

It looks okay to me, what I would do is remove the = and also check that intrabar order generation is not enabled. Apart from that, I'm unsure.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

 

 

Edit: This shouldn't make any difference, but give it a try as sometimes TS is a bit funny with exits:

 

If MP = 1 and BAVolDiff[2] > 0 and BAVolDiff[1] < 0 and BAVolDiff < 0

then begin

Sell ("SX1") from entry (LEdelta") next bar market;

end;

Edited by Blu-Ray
Added some coding

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  marketguy said:
Blu,

Thanks so much. I have been waiting for this alarmed Delta Diver for a long time now. You are the greatest.

 

Questions:

1. Do we have to set our own alert or does it happen automatically per the code?

2. If we want the Show Me and the alert do we have to add both ELD's to a chart?

 

Again, much thanks.

 

Bryan

 

No Probs Bryan,

 

1. Just format the indicator and click on " enable alerts".

2. No, I coded alerts into the "Show Me" as well, so you would just need to add that ELD to your chart, just remember that the alert will fire off after the bar has finished.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Edited by Blu-Ray
Spelling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  dovetree said:
Hi Blue Ray,

 

Thanks for that, but I have one small request though, ELD's cant be read by 2000i could you please post as an ELA or just the code so I can get it into TS.

 

Thanks

 

Dovetree

 

Yes sorry, I realised this later on, here you go:

 

inputs:

 

UpColor(green),

DnColor(red),

UpDivergence(Blue),

DnDivergence(Magenta);

 

vars:

LL(0),HH(0);

 

if date <> date[1] then begin

LL = low;

HH = High;

end;

 

if Low < LL then LL = Low;

if High > HH then HH = high;

 

if upticks > downticks then value1 = (upticks-downticks) else value1 = -(downticks-upticks);

 

plot1(value1,"ticks");

 

if plot1 > 0 then setplotcolor(1,upcolor) else setplotcolor(1,dncolor);

 

if low = LL and value1> 0 then begin

setplotcolor(1,UpDivergence);

Alert( "New Low_Divergence");

end;

 

if high = HH and value1< 0 then begin

setplotcolor(1,DnDivergence);

Alert ("New High_Divergence");

end;

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Blu-Ray said:
Hi Ancharka

 

It looks okay to me, what I would do is remove the = and also check that intrabar order generation is not enabled. Apart from that, I'm unsure.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

 

 

Edit: This shouldn't make any difference, but give it a try as sometimes TS is a bit funny with exits:

 

If MP = 1 and BAVolDiff[2] > 0 and BAVolDiff[1] < 0 and BAVolDiff < 0

then begin

Sell ("SX1") from entry (LEdelta") next bar market;

end;

 

 

Good Morning, Blu-Ray

 

Thank you very much for your input. I am going to try it today and see if it will work. I will let you know.

 

Best Regards,

Ancharka

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Blueray,

 

The only problem with the code I see so far for 2000i is upcolor and down colour etc. These words again are not recognised.

 

Will have to add some type of line like

If value > than 0 colour green, or value <0 color red etc.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blu ray, I thank you agian for the work. It appears the following code works with 2000i.

 

vars:

LL(0),HH(0);

 

if date <> date[1] then begin

LL = low;

HH = High;

end;

 

if Low < LL then LL = Low;

if High > HH then HH = high;

 

if upticks > downticks then value1 = (upticks-downticks) else value1 = -(downticks-upticks);

 

plot1(value1,"ticks");

 

if plot1 > 0 then setplotcolor(1,green) else setplotcolor(1,red);

 

if low = LL and value1> 0 then begin

setplotcolor(1,blue);

Alert( "New Low_Divergence");

end;

 

if high = HH and value1< 0 then begin

setplotcolor(1,magenta);

Alert ("New High_Divergence");

end;

 

 

The solution seems to be working OK but if you can see a problem with the code I would appreciate your further input.

 

thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  swansjr said:
Yeah, thanks blu ray. Looking forward to seeing your results.

 

Can anyone provide information or a link to the conceptual premise behind this indicator and how it might be used? I'm looking at the attached jpg files and it's not clear to me what's going on.

 

I think the guys over at TTM did a free seminar on "market delta" this week which seems very similar to this indicator. Does anyone have the link to the recording?

 

Thanks.

 

here you go (from a new member)

http://clicks.aweber.com/y/ct/?l=7Iw8p&m=1gyDIE7Q_Aub5r&b=Xzn_7j_Ckjtc0grpBToSzA

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  sean said:
is DeltaDivergence indicator give signal only at the hi and low of the day?

 

Sean, That is a very catalytic question! Please start a collaboration thread over in coding subsection and we'll brainstorm and code some techniques to turn this thing on at good places in extremes of swings (of sufficient quality and size) that aren't outside current range of the day... thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just started using it ...have it on a 1 min chart on the YM. I got one signal today early in the morning...at the time it was the new high (although briefly).

 

My understanding is it will give signals whenever there is a divergence and not necessarily when a new high/low is hit. I plan to monitor it over the next week so hopefully I will know more later and can report back.

 

TTM suggested it be used only when new highs/low are hit as a counter trend signal (eg. fade the high).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  dede said:
I just started using it ...have it on a 1 min chart on the YM. I got one signal today early in the morning...at the time it was the new high (although briefly).

 

My understanding is it will give signals whenever there is a divergence and not necessarily when a new high/low is hit. I plan to monitor it over the next week so hopefully I will know more later and can report back.

 

TTM suggested it be used only when new highs/low are hit as a counter trend signal (eg. fade the high).

 

Hi dede

 

No, it will only fire off a signal at the low or high of the day. But as zdo just mentioned if people agreed we can easily change it to the lowest low of x bars or something.

 

Cheers

 

Blu-Ray

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I belong to TTM and get JC's video newsletter at night. It gives me access to thier discussion forum etc. I posted that the TL version of the DD Indicator is available here for free. They removed my post. I tend to like JC and Hubert, but those guys really seem to be about the $$. My assumption is that they have a ton of it, but yet everything they sell is for a heafty price. It's like the Hieken Ashi bars. They call it the TTM Trend and even to this day they still sell it when you can find it for free at TL or maybe on the TS forum. They don't want to give anything away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

drsushi,

Thanks for making such a bold move to post that on TTM's forum. I have been a member and I also like the guys. It seems that with their success and the large number of people subscribed to TTM. they are constantly attempting to cash in.

 

A few weeks back, I actually got a recorded reminder call from Hubert about a free webinar. I know it was about the money.

 

I appreciate the education that they offer. But, thank God for TL, James, Blu-ray and folks like them.

 

Bryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bryan,

 

Thanks for your comments.

I don't know if it's a bold move or not. Maybe I shouldn't have done it, I don't know. Someone made a comment about Hubert saying that just before a free webinar for a new indicator he always says he has been secretly using the indicator. I never thought of the coincidence of him saying it, but I think the timing of his comments are a little suspect. From what I know about him he is a scalper and a tape reader. He even says give me tape and a execution platform and I can trade. I don't think he needs or wants any indicators. Also, being a member of thier site he gave me his cell number so I could call with questions because he hates to type. In the process of asking questions and says the indicators are basically worthless, 50/50 at best. Maybe I shouldn't repeat that here, but they charge over a grand for those things and he doesn't even think much of them. I look at the generosity coming from this website and I think thay maybe there are still good people in this world willing to help others without asking for something in return. Someone asks for a code change and it's done. I have no problem with TTM running a business etc, but I do have an issue with being gouged (sp) for every little thing.

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mrsushi,

You are a good guy. And there are lots of truly great and generous people in the trading world. I have met and continue to meet tons of them. As per Hubert and John, they are great salesmen (or at least Hubert is). Nobody is perfect. We all manipulate the facts, at times. Sure, Hubert is looking a little sleazy these days. And some in this forum will call them greedy.

 

But, the bottom line is, are they providing a valuable service? Are people's education in trading really deepening and their results improving. We all start from the simple. We just want some arrows to tell us when to get in and when to get out. In time, after painful losses, we learn (or never learn) that it isn't that simple. We (hopefully) learn that we need to understand how the market works and we need to learn to read that dynamic movement.

 

John and Hubert's motivations and priorities are in question. They seem to add more and more to the mix so that they can make more money. Any of those indicators (tools) they are offering can be used to positive purpose. I use some of them. But, I never use them in the often cut and dried way that those guys teach. I use them as information only.

 

But, adding so much also muddies the waters, and I think that teachers should make it their priority to clear the waters. To help their students get to a deeper place of understanding.

 

It has taken me over two years of indicator search/hell to start to understand that they are best used as training wheels or, at best, guides. The story is truly in the price action and volume.

 

So Hubert, as someone who is primarily a tape reader, knows this. Yet, he is constantly pushing all these training wheels. And offering simplistic techniques that work great sometimes but can never work consistently.

 

Getting back to your actions of posting the free indicators on the TTM site, I commended you on your boldness. I didn't think I knew knew you well enough to point out, what may be considered by some, your stupidity. Because, over all, I admire your action. Of course, they would get rid of the post ASAP. And, your relations with them are now different. And, you may be blackballed. But, you performed a service. And, hopefully, some people there took notice.

 

We're all learning together. And your contribution (even though J and H might not like it) helps the greater community. And, in the end, that's what matters most.

 

Whew. Long-winded response, huh? Take care.

 

Bryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Bryan David. Hopefully you dont feel bad about it. It was honest, thats all that counts. this seems such a rare thing in learning to trade these days !!

Thank goodness for the Traders Laboratory ! A true wanting to find the truth and David you have lived up to this and more.

Like you guys I have seen some things on TTM that I am not happy about.

The Hubert Indicator "sales Crap" was the final straw for me with TTM. eg "An indicator co-developed by Market Delta, a Mathematician and TTM !! lol...So it will be pretty expensive...."

Well they cut it down from an estimated $900 to the $499 in the end. But I think they have lost some people from it (including me !)

 

Best Regards

John

 

ps Thanks Blue-Ray also !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.