Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

carltonp

Price Pause Strategy

Recommended Posts

Hello Traders,

 

I'm trying to formulate a strategy that might take advantage of price pause after an instrument has paused.

 

Let me provide an example.

 

I have written a program that will alert me to when a price has paused for 5, 10 or 15 seconds. Also, the program will show me how many times a price has paused at the aforementioned seconds during, say a 5 min interval.

 

The strategy that I deploy using the formula is as follows:

 

YM (mini-dow) has reached an overbought/oversold stage on 5min chart. During the overbought/oversold stage the price pauses for 5 seconds at, say 11000. The price moves to 11005, and then 11008, but returns to 11000 and pause again for 5 seconds. The price then moves to various other prices but then returns to 11000 and then pauses for 10 seconds. This is all happening during the 5 min bar interval.

 

So, my strategy is to wait for a pullback on the following 5 min interval a enter at 11000 in the direction of the current trend.

 

So, my question is, can someone please tell me how I might improve on that stratey?

 

Alternatively, can someone please tell me if they deploy a strategy using price pauses in their trade setups? And any ideas would be great.

 

Cheers

 

Carlton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Carlton,

 

Most data providers have data pauses (stalls) due to bandwidth issues many times per trading day. These pauses or bottleneck of the data can last a few seconds. In addition, there's the issue of such occurring several times per day due to issues with the ISP.

 

Thus, with the combination of these data pauses occurring via data providers, ISP or computer issues...how will you be able to determine if it's a real price pause or an data stall via your data provider, ISP or computer connection. :confused:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  wrbtrader said:
Hi Carlton,

 

Thus, with the combination of these data pauses occurring via data providers, ISP or computer issues...how will you be able to determine if it's a real price pause or an data stall via your data provider, ISP or computer connection. :confused:

 

HI wrbtrader,

 

That is a good question, and one that I probably could never answer with all certainty. However, a very polite engineer at IB kindly did some tests with me and for 30 mins we both synchronized on clocks and watched the pauses independently.

 

Having said that, I will never know for sure.

 

The question still remains: is this a strategy, worth pursuing in your opinion, if valid?

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you can do a latency test to see how many hops and the time delays between you can your broker.

 

there are free website that can do it for you,

also, IB's website has instructions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
you can do a latency test to see how many hops and the time delays between you can your broker.

 

there are free website that can do it for you,

also, IB's website has instructions.

 

Thats cool. Tams, thanks.

 

I notice that nobody wants to stick there neck out and comment on the strategy - same with ET. Don't understand why....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  carltonp said:
Thats cool. Tams, thanks.

 

I notice that nobody wants to stick there neck out and comment on the strategy - same with ET. Don't understand why....

 

maybe that tells you something about the theory?

I don't know, I am open for ideas. Maybe the proposal needs more research and refinement?

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
maybe that tells you something about the theory?

I don't know, I am open for ideas. Maybe the proposal needs more research and refinement?

 

Thats interesting because traders are usually quick to comment on theories that are seen as not having any edge what-so-ever ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  carltonp said:
Just applied the tracert command and the output shows a healthy connection....

 

You need to look at the number of hops.

the more hops between you and the broker,

the more chances for error.

 

when you are designing a strategy,

you have to take into account all the variables,

including those that are beyond your control.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
You need to look at the number of hops.

the more hops between you and the broker,

the more chances for error.

 

when you are designing a strategy,

you have to take into account all the variables,

including those that are beyond your control.

 

Hi Tams, just spent the last 45 mins watching todays recording. I have data feed coming in from both esignal and IB. I have checked every pause and compared them both and the pauses have all been in sync with each other.

 

Therefore, there is a problem it would be coming from my PC or my ISP, and I don't think there is any issues with either my PC or ISP.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  carltonp said:
Hi Tams, just spent the last 45 mins watching todays recording. I have data feed coming in from both esignal and IB. I have checked every pause and compared them both and the pauses have all been in sync with each other.

 

Therefore, there is a problem it would be coming from my PC or my ISP, and I don't think there is any issues with either my PC or ISP.

 

Cheers

 

I am not saying there is a problem, or the will be a problem.

 

When you first try tracert, you reported everything is ok.

Of course things are ok. Why wouldn't it?

 

On your above test, you reported that the esignal and IB feed are the same.

Of course they are they same, why wouldn't they?

 

What you have observed is of very little value.

Let me explain.

 

 

Please take a look at the tracert report again. How many hops are there?

 

Mine has 14 hops.

Only the first 3 hops belong to my ISP.

ie. even though I have paid premium to subscribe to a fast internet,

the extent of my influence is only 3 hops !!!

the rest of the hops belong to other ISPs along the route.

If one of them has a hiccup, you are affected.

 

I am not saying someone will have a hiccup.

I am not saying internet is not reliable,

and I am definitely not saying your strategy is not workable because someone somewhere during the next one hundred years will have a 100 millisecond hiccup.

 

What I am saying is, you have to look at all the variables,

and see if you can control/depend on those variables.

 

Let's go back the the observation you made in the previous post.

Of course the esignal and IB data are the same...

if they go through the same hops, they will have the same latency -- ie. same results.

 

Next, you have to look at your current average latency,

and then divide that into your "Pause" Strategy threshold.

 

ie. you have to take samples of your tracert... to see how stable is your latency.

I have a 122 ms latency right now. It might be 60 ms tomorrow, or 250 ms in the next second.

You have to find out if you have a dependable varaible.

 

If the pause you are working on is 1 second,

and take my example, my latency is 122 ms (I will round it up to 200 ms, because you always round up),

then I would assume my expected error will be 20%. (200 ms of 1 second)

 

I don't know if it would work for you, maybe, maybe not. If it is acceptable, then by all means continue with the hypothesis. Otherwise even if it is a good theory, you are limited by our current technology.

 

Hope it makes sense.

Edited by Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tams,

 

Thanks for the detailed response - really appreciate it mate. Below is the output from tracert - its not so great.

 

 

 

 

 

It totally makes sense about what you said about esignal and IB (don't know what I was thinking :-)

Edited by carltonp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  carltonp said:

I notice that nobody wants to stick there neck out and comment on the strategy - same with ET. Don't understand why....

 

I'm looking at what I consider to be something similar to what you are describing. But I think I'm looking at a different side of the cube. (As opposed to the other side of the coin. Which implies something two dimensional.) ;)

 

Personally, I think what you are doing is worth investigating. You have stated that you have found a way to know when there is a price pause. So you are capturing and analyzing intrabar price behavior. I'm doing something very similar, but I'm focusing on the price surge rather than the price pause, which, in a sense might be kind of the same as what you are doing. Maybe just the other side of the coin. Or a different side of the cube. :rofl:

 

Probably no one is commenting, because it's not a well known or widely used practice. I feel that those price pauses and price surges are a critical part to understanding price behavior. The objective is to find out how the market behaves and take advantage of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tams,

 

I wonder if you, or indeed any trader that trades YM, verify some prices for YM today?

 

As you're aware, I have been trying out a strategy that revolves around when prices pause.

 

Below is a list of times that the price of YM paused and the length of time it paused:

 

 

14-10-2011 15:00:58.58 Highlight 10 seconds, value =11536

14-10-2011 15:02:08.08 Highlight 10 seconds, value =11535

14-10-2011 15:03:25.25 Highlight 10 seconds, value =11533

14-10-2011 15:04:03.03 Highlight 10 seconds, value =11533

14-10-2011 15:04:39.39 Highlight 10 seconds, value =11534

14-10-2011 15:04:44.44 Highlight 15 seconds, value =11534

14-10-2011 15:05:19.19 Highlight 10 seconds, value =11534

14-10-2011 15:06:27.27 Highlight 10 seconds, value =11533

14-10-2011 15:06:44.44 Highlight 10 seconds, value =11533

14-10-2011 15:06:49.49 Highlight 15 seconds, value =11533

 

 

I'm sure there are traders that, like me, record their trades. Can you please look back and tell me if you noticed that the price paused at any of those times?

 

For example, the first trade on the list paused from 15:00:48 to 15:00:58 and so on....

 

This is really important, so you're help will be greatly appreciated.

 

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
here's my data from IB (in ET time)

 

enjoy

 

Tams, I've been pouring over the figures line by line.

 

So, does the following mean the price paused at 11534 for six seconds? I guess not.

 

20111014,15:04:30,11534.000000,2

20111014,15:04:34,11534.000000,3

20111014,15:04:36,11534.000000,1

 

I'm trying to establish if anyone has observed the price pausing at the times I noted them to pause.

 

 

 

 

Cheers

Edited by carltonp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some ideas, don't know if they could help:

 

- 5 min timeframe

In my view time based charts are not really helpful.

The timeframe is always chosen arbitrarily and bigger timeframes can lead to jumping into a move quite late.

Alternatives are volume based charts or just to look at pure ticks.

 

- Disconnect from quote feed provider / holes in data

I recorded many days of tick data from different data providers while constantly checking data integrity.

Sure there are sometimes holes in the data with every provider. But they occur quite infrequently.

Approaches like checking old (historical) data with other people probably will not lead too far because they cannot really establish confidence in future data integrity ("Past Performance Doesn’t Predict Future Results").

 

A suggestion for monitoring the data stream:

Subscribe to different symbols (some that show high liquidity / activity) that are not too strongly related. If the "price pause" occurs for multiple symbols at the same time there is a high chance of connection problems. Therefore the signal should be discarded.

If the pause is only for your target symbol not for the others it might be a valid pause.

For example if you want to watch YM, might choose CL and ZN to give this additional information.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  carltonp said:
Tams, I've been pouring over the figures line by line.

 

So, does the following mean the price paused at 11534 for six seconds? I guess not.

 

20111014,15:04:30,11534.000000,2

20111014,15:04:34,11534.000000,3

20111014,15:04:36,11534.000000,1

 

I'm trying to establish if anyone has observed the price pausing at the times I noted them to pause.

 

Cheers

 

There were no price updates,

don't know if the price paused.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
There were no price updates,

don't know if the price paused.

 

Hi Tams,

 

I'm afraid I'm not making myself clear. Looking at the sample of prices and times again that you provided below.

 

Between 15:04:30 and 15:04:36 the price was 11534 - that is six seconds.

 

My question is, did the price pause at 11534 For six seconds?

 

20111014,15:04:30,11534.000000,2

20111014,15:04:34,11534.000000,3

20111014,15:04:36,11534.000000,1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  carltonp said:
Hi Tams,

 

I'm afraid I'm not making myself clear. Looking at the sample of prices and times again that you provided below.

 

Between 15:04:30 and 15:04:36 the price was 11534 - that is six seconds.

 

My question is, did the price pause at 11534 For six seconds?

 

20111014,15:04:30,11534.000000,2

20111014,15:04:34,11534.000000,3

20111014,15:04:36,11534.000000,1

 

I think there is a misunderstanding of terminology here.

 

When I first read about your "pause" theory, I thought you meant there were no trading, thus the pause.

 

but you meant the trading was going on, but the price did not change. ie they were trading at the same price.

 

so yes, the price did not change between 15:04:30 and 15:04:36. There were 6 trades during that time, they were all consummated at 11534. Maybe they were traded at bid price, ,maybe they were traded at ask price, but they were traded at the same price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
I think there is a misunderstanding of terminology here.

 

When I first read about your "pause" theory, I thought you meant there were no trading, thus the pause.

 

but you meant the trading was going on, but the price did not change. ie they were trading at the same price.

 

so yes, the price did not change between 15:04:30 and 15:04:36. There were 6 trades during that time, they were all consummated at 11534. Maybe they were traded at bid price, ,maybe they were traded at ask price, but they were traded at the same price.

Whoopee.

 

My program works. I reviewed every single price pause you provided and my formula was able to call it.

 

Cheers mate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  Tams said:
I think there is a misunderstanding of terminology here.

 

When I first read about your "pause" theory, I thought you meant there were no trading, thus the pause.

 

but you meant the trading was going on, but the price did not change. ie they were trading at the same price.

 

so yes, the price did not change between 15:04:30 and 15:04:36. There were 6 trades during that time, they were all consummated at 11534. Maybe they were traded at bid price, ,maybe they were traded at ask price, but they were traded at the same price.

 

It gives me the confidence to build on my strategy.

 

Thanks Tams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.