Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

solfest

Whose Game Are You Playing?

Recommended Posts

After a few years of trading I have come to the realization that the key to winning is all in my head. This is a psychological battle with myself. The market participants are irrelevant. There is no giant war against the big banks or hedge funds or you my fellow independents. The game (war sounds so nasty) is me against me. Or as I once penned Bad Solfest against Good Solfest.

 

I have an edge and the key to success is to only trade within that edge. Good Solfest follows that plan, Bad Solfest wants to make up new rules every time he has a losing trade. Bad Solfest tries to play everyone’s game, Good Solfest only wants to play his game.

 

Let me put this another way, wander over to your bookshelf and pick up your well thumbed copy of Trading in the Zone, by Mark Douglas. Douglas has a great analogy on page 102 about casinos. He states a casino has a 4.5% edge over all the players in the game of blackjack. A small edge. The casino is very confident in their edge, they don't question it, they don't get concerned if they lose money to some players. They know they have an edge and if the game is played by their rules they will win in the long run. How do they know this? They have stats, millions and millions of games played.

 

They know.

 

If someone comes into their house and tries to change the rules (they call it cheating) they take them into a room with no windows and break their kneecaps. That's how we know if we want to play we have to play by their rules. We also know that if we play enough we will lose and they will win. Why people play a game with that reality is beyond me. Or is it the same reason people keep trading even though they are losing money every month?

 

The successful trader has to be "the house". The game has to be yours not someone else’s. It's your game because you set the rules, your plan is the rule book, and you have set the standards for the game.

 

There are two issues that must be done right in order for your "casino" to be profitable, your plan must have an edge and you must never deviate from the plan.

 

How do you know what your edge is? Stats, stats, and more stats. It's all you have; it's the only way to know. Do you have them? If you don't have the stats to back up your plan and you are trading live you are a dead man. You are not the casino, you are the drunk tourist from Hoboken, and let me repeat, you are a dead man.

 

Get the simulator out of the closet and get yourself a database of trades that means something. If the edge is not there with the current plan you have some work to do.

 

Now let's assume the stats are there, the edge is solid, now all you have to do is execute. Why is that so hard? Recency bias? We humans are stupid? No, no that's a little harsh, we're just emotional, and the emotions that come roaring out when we are dealing with money are ego, fear, and greed.

 

How do we combat these emotions? How do we act like the casino with the small edge? We keep our stats and we measure our success based on something other than money.

 

We know what we have to do, so let's measure our success on how well we do it. It’s our game and we keep the score. The game is not scored by profit or loss but by how many plan certified trades you take. You lose points by missing qualified trades and by taking muts (made up trades).

 

You can figure out the scoreboard any way you want along those lines. Make adherence to the plan the only thing that matters.

 

You are the house, the casino, so when you let the other players into your establishment make sure you only play against them by your rules.

 

If you cheat (don't play by your own rules) I will come to your house, take you into a windowless room and break your kneecaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Let me put this another way, wander over to your bookshelf and pick up your well thumbed copy of Trading in the Zone, by Mark Douglas. Douglas has a great analogy on page 102 about casinos. He states a casino has a 4.5% edge over all the players in the game of blackjack. A small edge. The casino is very confident in their edge, they don't question it, they don't get concerned if they lose money to some players. They know they have an edge and if the game is played by their rules they will win in the long run. How do they know this? They have stats, millions and millions of games played.

 

They know.

 

If someone comes into their house and tries to change the rules (they call it cheating) they take them into a room with no windows and break their kneecaps. That's how we know if we want to play we have to play by their rules. We also know that if we play enough we will lose and they will win. Why people play a game with that reality is beyond me. Or is it the same reason people keep trading even though they are losing money every month?

 

The successful trader has to be "the house". The game has to be yours not someone else’s. It's your game because you set the rules, your plan is the rule book, and you have set the standards for the game.

 

There are two issues that must be done right in order for your "casino" to be profitable, your plan must have an edge and you must never deviate from the plan.

 

How do you know what your edge is? Stats, stats, and more stats. It's all you have; it's the only way to know. Do you have them? If you don't have the stats to back up your plan and you are trading live you are a dead man. You are not the casino, you are the drunk tourist from Hoboken, and let me repeat, you are a dead man.

 

Get the simulator out of the closet and get yourself a database of trades that means something. If the edge is not there with the current plan you have some work to do.

 

Now let's assume the stats are there, the edge is solid, now all you have to do is execute. Why is that so hard? Recency bias? We humans are stupid? No, no that's a little harsh, we're just emotional, and the emotions that come roaring out when we are dealing with money are ego, fear, and greed.

 

How do we combat these emotions? How do we act like the casino with the small edge? We keep our stats and we measure our success based on something other than money.

 

We know what we have to do, so let's measure our success on how well we do it. It’s our game and we keep the score. The game is not scored by profit or loss but by how many plan certified trades you take. You lose points by missing qualified trades and by taking muts (made up trades).

 

You can figure out the scoreboard any way you want along those lines. Make adherence to the plan the only thing that matters.

 

You are the house, the casino, so when you let the other players into your establishment make sure you only play against them by your rules.

 

If you cheat (don't play by your own rules) I will come to your house, take you into a windowless room and break your kneecaps.

 

Casinos have a statistical edge which is permanent and can be tweaked up or down by changing the rules that you have to play by.Very, very different from a trading edge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Casinos have a statistical edge which is permanent and can be tweaked up or down by changing the rules that you have to play by.Very, very different from a trading edge.

 

An edge is an edge. You either have one or you don't. If you do then all you have to do is stick to the plan.

 

I do realize there are a myriad of reasons why doing that is so hard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright then you are almost there....now just remove the dramatic verbage and you've got it

 

First of all, the general concept you outline is correct....after you get the technical issues out of the way, the last real obstacles are psychological in nature....and they are (in order of importance) focus, discipline, execution and risk management....

 

FOCUS

 

There are plenty of smart people in the profession.....they are like high wattage light bulbs...extremely bright, but the light shines in all directions....to be successful in this profession "once the bell rings" you need to focus like a laser on the data that really matters......In terms of finding an edge...there are valid, viable behavior-based edges all around us....in my office we (I) find them the way I was trained to...by observing the way my target market trades and finding little niches that repeat...thats step 1....then you have to understand why (step 2) and finally you have to confirm the behavior (data collection and analysis) which is step 3.....and for those interested, for this last step I go back manaually to locate 400 data points (my estimate of a "statistically significant" sample size).

 

DISCIPLINE

 

Once you have verified that your "behavior" can be traded....you have to be disciplined (in a way that you already seem to understand)....you only trade that behavior or (assuming you have more than one setup) those that conform to your "rules"

 

EXECUTION

 

This is all about desire to succeed....for the "behaviors" that I trade, I have to get up very early or stay up late (depending on the day of the month). In other words I have to be willing to do what others won't....and finally I have to be willing to "take every trade"....because if you don't...you are "randomizing" your results....(you refer to Mark Douglas...he would understand exactly what I am saying)....the bottom line is that you show up every day...you take all the trades, you manage risk exactly as your plan outlines, and you take profits exactly as you planned....otherwise at the end of the year, the result you get is going to be a function of random chance, instead of your edge.

 

RISK MANAGEMENT

 

This last part is at least as important as any of the others. If you don't understand risk management including proper position sizing, even with a great edge, you aren't going to be able to grow your account efficiently....why does that matter? Because markets change and when you have an edge, you had better take advantage of it while you can...anything can happen, you can get sick, family obligations can get in the way, you can experience "technical difficulties"....etc...so you make the most it while you can...I like "fixed fractional" for position sizing.

 

Sounds like you have a decent understanding

 

Good luck getting to the finish line...

 

Steve

Edited by steve46

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good post Solfest. Steve's was even better but you get the credit for spurring him on anyway. :)

 

The three steps to an edge are very important with step two an important way of minimizing data mining errors. I don't get quite as many data points as Steve but have always put any new idea through the back test then forward test (paper). Its surprising how often the forward test reveals issues that need to be resolved for a really effective edge.

 

Finally the points about discipline and taking each trade are absolutely critical - without them your edge is grass. A couple of useful books that aren't in the normal trader's set for anyone wanting to deal with discipline issues are:

 

- The Practicing Mind Bringing Discipline and Focus into Your Life by Thomas Sterner. Its surprising how a book by a musician / piano tuner can relate to the processes and practice that is trading.

 

- You Are Not Your Brain by Jeffrey Schwartz generalizes the treatment of OCD to face up to the problems that traders seem to experience turning Mark Douglas's (yes read his books too) prescription into reality.

 

and

- Your Brain at Work by David Rock which overlaps elements of You Are Not Your Brain in a way that is very relevant to the design and execution of good trading processes.

 

The second and third books deal with learning and neuroplasticity without the new agey psychobabble pseudoscience that seems to be adopted by some of the people bringing it to the trading community.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

The article is very useful. I am a new trader. How can I backtest a system? Also, is there a template for creating the plan.

 

Read Trading in the Zone, Enhancing Trader Performance, Trade Your Way to Financial Freedom, and Way of the Turtle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.