Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

achalk

Risk and Time in The Market

Recommended Posts

Can anyone refer me to any reference work on risk and time in the market.

 

E.g. if two strategies have equal returns but one has the trader in the market longer than the other, how do we calculate the strategies' relative risks?

 

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can anyone refer me to any reference work on risk and time in the market.

 

E.g. if two strategies have equal returns but one has the trader in the market longer than the other, how do we calculate the strategies' relative risks?

 

Thanks.

 

Are trying to determine the relationship between time and risk?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

E.g. if two strategies have equal returns but one has the trader in the market longer than the other, how do we calculate the strategies' relative risks?

 

Thanks.

 

Usually the strategy which takes the larger number of trades is better assuming other performance metrics are same.

 

Say a Strategy A keeps the trader in market for first two hours while Strategy B keeps the trader in market for full day. Both take same number of trades and have the same performance metrics. In this case Strategy B is better because it is validated for longer time in the market. If there is a regime change in opening session of the market, B is less likely to be effected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Usually the strategy which takes the larger number of trades is better assuming other performance metrics are same.

 

Say a Strategy A keeps the trader in market for first two hours while Strategy B keeps the trader in market for full day. Both take same number of trades and have the same performance metrics. In this case Strategy B is better because it is validated for longer time in the market. If there is a regime change in opening session of the market, B is less likely to be effected.

 

But strategy B keeps the trader's capital at risk for longer. Is it not, therefore, a more risky strategy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But strategy B keeps the trader's capital at risk for longer. Is it not, therefore, a more risky strategy?

 

See it this way... strategy B has been validated in a better way by keeping (managing) the trader's capital for a longer time.

Edited by Do Or Die
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
See it this way... strategy B has been validated in a better way by keeping (managing) the trader's capital for a longer time.

 

Would you rather lend your cash to someone for a week to earn $100, or to someone else for a month. Lending for a week only means I can get a risk-free return for the other free weeks, and is hence the more rewarding strategy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Would you rather lend your cash to someone for a week to earn $100, or to someone else for a month. Lending for a week only means I can get a risk-free return for the other free weeks, and is hence the more rewarding strategy.

 

You can also argue on similar lines- "would you rather make $$$$ from 100 sales or from two sales" on the number of trades a system makes (everything else remaining same.)

 

Your take, I'm over with this post icon6.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can also argue on similar lines- "would you rather make $$$$ from 100 sales or from two sales" on the number of trades a system makes (everything else remaining same.)

 

Your take, I'm over with this post icon6.gif

 

Strategy B has worse performance since it took longer to make the same amount of money :roll eyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can anyone refer me to any reference work on risk and time in the market.

 

Thanks.

I don't know any reference work about, but if there is any , many "...it depends on ..." should be included.

In previous posts ,replies were based in personal experience.

I believe in cash, taking quick profits and cash again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If generally one strategy takes longer than another, then it probably has different risk parameters anyway as a market's price movements on longer timeframes are larger. So I'm not sure comparing two strategies of different average length in the market is useful.

 

What I would say is this. If you have a certain strategy, the longer you have the trade on without it showing signs of moving your way, the more likely it is to not achieve your targets before taking you out. Of course this would depend on current market activity, volatility etc., but over all, if it's not doing what you think it should be, chances are there's a good reason and others in similar positions will end up needing to exit too.

 

Maybe you should plug in your trade data into excel. For each strategy you could simply plot length of time against profitable or not per trade. See whether you can determine any patterns.

Edited by TheNegotiator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NFLX Netflix stock, with a solid top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX  
    • NFLX Netflix stock, with a solid top of range breakout, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?NFLX  
    • It depends. If you have lots of money that you can buy a house without a loan and if you don't have any parents to sponsor then it is a good idea. Otherwise it might be a bad idea depending where in Canada you are heading to. I earned a good middle income in my home country and I migrated to Vancouver 5 years ago at the age of 35. I had to start right from the bottom, lowest of the low.. Now i am finally earning a middle income in Canada but I still cannot afford to buy a one bedroom apartment. Having left behind friends, family and home, most of the times I think it is not worth it.   In short, do not migrate if you already have a good life in your home country and you are happy. Only migrate to Canada if you really have to leave your home country say there is a war or something really bad. Discrimination still exists here and its really tough for newcomers unless you are super rich. Good luck. David Chong, Quora  
    • This is bigger than the internet. Bigger than mobile. Bigger than social media.   While everyone was distracted by stock market fluctuations and political theater…   Most people have NO IDEA what just happened last week with ChatGPT.   Their new memory feature allows ChatGPT to remember EVERYTHING about you across all your conversations.   Think about that for a minute...   While most tech companies have been collecting mere breadcrumbs about you - your likes, your clicks, your browsing history - OpenAI is now collecting the most valuable dataset in human history: your complete psychological profile.   This is Zuckerberg x 5,000.   The more you use ChatGPT, the more it understands you, becoming a supercharged reflection of yourself that improves at an exponential rate.   Are you a regular ChatGPT user?   Consider whether it’s time to turn off the “you can train on my information” feature. To prevent your data from being used for training while still using the memory feature:   Disable Model Training: Navigate to Settings > Data Controls. Toggle off "Improve the model for everyone". Manage Memory Settings: Go to Settings > Personalization > Memory. Here, you can: Turn off memory entirely. Delete specific memories. Use Temporary Chat for sessions that won't be saved or used for training. Now the investment implications…   Why This is Bigger Than You Think Consider this: the relationship between humans and ChatGPT is evolving beyond a mere tool.   People are now treating these AI assistants as friends, confidants, and even romantic partners.   I'm not making this up - there are already documented cases of people ending real human relationships to pursue “connections” with their AI companions.   A viral Instagram meme shows a person going through life with a glowing, featureless humanoid figure - representing ChatGPT - as their companion.   The post has over 1.1 million likes and comments like "Bro ChatGPT is like my best friend. Ain't even ashamed to say it" with 25,000 likes.   But here's where things get really interesting for investors and entrepreneurs...   Three Things to Watch For starters, hardware is the next big thing for the big players.   The iPhone form factor is dead.   It hasn't meaningfully changed in nearly a decade. The next evolution in hardware will be designed specifically to interface with these AI companions.   OpenAI is already working on hardware with Johnny Ive, the legendary designer behind the iPhone and iPod. But you can’t ignore Elon Musk’s edge here.   So what does all of this mean for you?   The companies that control the personal AI relationships will be worth trillions. OpenAI and Elon Musk will have the coziest moats. We're witnessing the birth of a new internet - one built on agents that can communicate with each other across platforms. Google's new agent-to-agent protocol allows AI agents to work together without sharing internal memories or tools. The hardware companies that create the perfect interface for these AI companions will dominate the next decade of technology. And almost nobody is talking about what this means.   My prediction? Within five years, most people will have a personal AI that knows them better than anyone else. And they will interact with it in ways that seem foreign today.   (And, yes, it will almost certainly have dystopian elements.)   In the meantime, the biggest gains won’t come from household names. And, right now, James is seeing a prime opportunity to invest in the most under-the-radar plays in AI…   For dirt cheap. By Chris C. Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/use-chatgpt-protect-yourself-now
    • KBH KB Home stock, nice day and rally off the 50.82 support area, from Stocks to Watch at https://stockconsultant.com/?KBH      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.