Jump to content

Welcome to the new Traders Laboratory! Please bear with us as we finish the migration over the next few days. If you find any issues, want to leave feedback, get in touch with us, or offer suggestions please post to the Support forum here.

  • Welcome Guests

    Welcome. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest which does not give you access to all the great features at Traders Laboratory such as interacting with members, access to all forums, downloading attachments, and eligibility to win free giveaways. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free. Create a FREE Traders Laboratory account here.

MadMarketScientist

Occupy Wall Street Is Getting Ugly

Recommended Posts

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin

 

“Alex Jone’s” checklist

 

> Organize the organized – chk

> Organize the unorganized … :cheers:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BY EMILY MALTBY AND ANGUS LOTEN

 

More than half of $4 billion in federal funds disbursed this year to spur small-business lending by community banks was used to repay bailout funds that the banks received under the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program.

 

The Small Business Lending Fund was meant to raise capital at smaller banks, which tend to lend more heavily to small businesses, in the hopes of jump-starting growth and employment. But instead of directly lending to small businesses, many of the banks used the money to rid themselves of higher-cost TARP debt and tougher restrictions.

 

"It was basically a bailout for 100-plus banks," said ...

 

Basically they used the money to free themselves so that they could pay themselves bonuses again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More than half of $4 billion in federal funds disbursed this year to spur small-business lending by community banks was used to repay bailout funds that the banks received under the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program.

 

Basically they used the money to free themselves so that they could pay themselves bonuses again.

 

This kind of behavior infuriates me .. I am praying these demonstrations cause REAL change. I will be going to NYC on business in two weeks and will join for a day.

 

MMS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys, Occupy Wall Street started a few weeks ago, then today U.S. Payrolls Rise 103,000 in September, Jobless Rate at 9.1% came out today.

 

IS IT ME OR IS THERE SOMETHING FISHY GOING ON??

 

Are the numbers fudged to pacify what's going on at present?

 

Mind boggling ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guys, Occupy Wall Street started a few weeks ago, then today U.S. Payrolls Rise 103,000 in September, Jobless Rate at 9.1% came out today.

 

IS IT ME OR IS THERE SOMETHING FISHY GOING ON??

 

Are the numbers fudged to pacify what's going on at present?

 

Mind boggling ....

 

It is you. the numbers are not fudged. But it may be a good idea to shield your bedroom with tinfoil just in case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I used tin foil on everything.... just in case.

 

especially bbq corn on the cob --- add a knob of butter and my secret chicken stock and a pinch of sugar ... yum

 

lol just playing around and bored :) ... enough!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This kind of behavior infuriates me .. I am praying these demonstrations cause REAL change. I will be going to NYC on business in two weeks and will join for a day.

 

MMS

 

MMS, it will be interesting to hear your report to find out if you still believe this movement will result in real benefit after seeing it up close. I am not so optimistic.

 

Someone got up in front of a crowd at Occupy LA, the west coast's version of Occupy Wall Street, and asked the question to the crowd: "Capitalism, thumbs up or thumbs down?" Most in the crowd responded with thumbs down. They seemed to be comprised of mostly anti-capitalists, pro-big government advocates, and various no-nothing ignoramuses.

 

I certainly do not believe that the banks and Wall Street are angels, and targeted reasonable regulation is necessary, but I would be a little more inclined to look favorably on the protestors if they moved their operation 230 miles down the road to Washington, D.C. where the real genesis of the bubble and subsequent burst occurred.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MMS, it will be interesting to hear your report to find out if you still believe this movement will result in real benefit after seeing it up close. I am not so optimistic.

 

Someone got up in front of a crowd at Occupy LA, the west coast's version of Occupy Wall Street, and asked the question to the crowd: "Capitalism, thumbs up or thumbs down?" Most in the crowd responded with thumbs down. They seemed to be comprised of mostly anti-capitalists, pro-big government advocates, and various no-nothing ignoramuses.

 

I certainly do not believe that the banks and Wall Street are angels, and targeted reasonable regulation is necessary, but I would be a little more inclined to look favorably on the protestors if they moved their operation 230 miles down the road to Washington, D.C. where the real genesis of the bubble and subsequent burst occurred.

 

I do not like that the unions have gotten involved. With unions it is going to take the direction of getting lost in a right and left battle. More control, regulation, etc, by the government isn't my idea of improvement for anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If these morons get thier way, we are all doomed.

 

Capitalism *IS* the economy. Take it down, and you take down the entire economy. Then no one has a job, or means to support themselves and we all starve.

 

It does not take much brain power to understand that reality...yet some how, they don't.

 

The funny part, is most of the Brokers that reside in the buildings they are protesting have apprenticeship programs. If they take some time off of protesting, clean up and make an effort, they too can be the 1%. How Ironic is that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If these morons get thier way, we are all doomed.

 

Capitalism *IS* the economy. Take it down, and you take down the entire economy. Then no one has a job, or means to support themselves and we all starve.

 

It does not take much brain power to understand that reality...yet some how, they don't.

 

The funny part, is most of the Brokers that reside in the buildings they are protesting have apprenticeship programs. If they take some time off of protesting, clean up and make an effort, they too can be the 1%. How Ironic is that?

 

US capitalism isn't "capitalism". Our system is more akin to corporatism which is a shade of fascism which is socialism for the wealthy.

 

The conservative media tends to focus on the 50% who reap more benefits from the federal govt than they pay. It is also fair to focus on the percentage of those at the higher income levels who use the USA and its congress to make money and they pay only a small fraction of their income in taxes. You could easily argue that the rich reap more than the poor from US policy and should pay more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, unless one think about it the "big money" is politically actually socialists. Paves the way for discriminating monopoly and keeps away new competition. One can see it in Europe also where government is making it more difficult to impossible for new businesses. It has made me even more anti Socialist. And yes, centralizing shit makes it even easier to control the whole lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
US capitalism isn't "capitalism". Our system is more akin to corporatism which is a shade of fascism which is socialism for the wealthy.

 

The conservative media tends to focus on the 50% who reap more benefits from the federal govt than they pay. It is also fair to focus on the percentage of those at the higher income levels who use the USA and its congress to make money and they pay only a small fraction of their income in taxes. You could easily argue that the rich reap more than the poor from US policy and should pay more.

 

Actually, you are correct. However, the protesters desire to destroy what we have, and usher in some sort of New, modern evolved system that looks remarkably like Soviet Communism is still going to destroy what we have.

 

To genuinely improve things, we need to restore real capitalism, and restore the Constitution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Actually, you are correct. However, the protesters desire to destroy what we have, and usher in some sort of New, modern evolved system that looks remarkably like Soviet Communism is still going to destroy what we have.

 

To genuinely improve things, we need to restore real capitalism, and restore the Constitution.

 

Totally agree. The thought is good, but sorry enough they do not know the history behind it. They see Socialism or Communism as some kind of utopia, but if they knew they would have known that western corporations owned the big factories in the Soviet and western taxpayers money was used to keep it alive (Professor A*n*t*h*o*n*y S*u*t*t*o*n - T*h*e B*e*s*t E*n*e*m*y M*o*n*e*y C*a*n B*u*y)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would be a little more inclined to look favorably on the protestors if they moved their operation 230 miles down the road to Washington, D.C. where the real genesis of the bubble and subsequent burst occurred.

 

I've always seen a huge downside to protesting. The protests can get people's attention, and create a movement, but it should be possible to get people's attention and create a movement without the protest. It should be possible, . . . . maybe it isn't?

 

So what's the answer? How does the general population get the government motivated to make good changes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've always seen a huge downside to protesting. The protests can get people's attention, and create a movement, but it should be possible to get people's attention and create a movement without the protest. It should be possible, . . . . maybe it isn't?

 

So what's the answer? How does the general population get the government motivated to make good changes?

 

It worked here. MMS made some quick changes regarding vendor status almost as fast as the thread regarding vendors appeared.

 

Maybe we should all complain about not having a GGW feed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's important to consider what motivates people. People are motivated by the ability to make their lives better. Unless progress is being made, then people give up hope and become unmotivated. In the U.S. and other open society's, people are motivated by the freedom to pursue their personal goals. And people are motivated by the potential to make profit. If a government limits the citizens ability to pursue their personal goals, and makes it very difficult to make a profit, then motivation declines. As motivation declines, productivity, innovation and profitability plummet.

 

But ironically, even though the U.S. is a free and open society, and people are free to pursue profit, the economy is in decline. Some is wrong here. There must be some other factors involved. So what is missing? What does an economy need to work well?

 

  • Educated people - Check, we have that.
  • A good enough infrastructure - Check, we have that.
  • Natural Resources - Check, we have that.
  • People willing to take risk, hoping for a reward, - There will always be people for that.
  • People willing to work to get a paycheck - Yes, we have that.

 

Just like in a sports game, all the teams need to play by the same rules, and there needs to be officials penalizing people for breaking the rules. This is where the problem comes in. The game is profit, but each nation is playing by it's own rules. It's like playing a baseball game with other team, and you only have 3 strikes at bat, but they get 10 strikes before being called out. It's a lot more difficult to win the game playing by those rules. So how do the rules get manipulated? Currency exchange rates, that's how.

 

But the protestors may not know or care about the economics involved in the problem with the declining middle class, or how personal behavior and motivation is tied to a particular governmental system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've always seen a huge downside to protesting. The protests can get people's attention, and create a movement, but it should be possible to get people's attention and create a movement without the protest. It should be possible, . . . . maybe it isn't?

 

So what's the answer? How does the general population get the government motivated to make good changes?

 

I have no problem with peaceful protest and many times it can be quite effective. Whatever one thinks about the Tea Party protests their effects were profound in the last election. But, there are protests for good causes and protests for not so good causes, so one has to look at what the protestors are protesting about and what they want. Funny enough, the Tea Party protests and the Wall Street Protests are kindred spirits in a way. Both know that something has gone seriously wrong with the system. However, they seem to have completely opposite remedies. The Tea Party essentially said government is too big and has too much influence, reduce it. Occupy Wall Street, though having no coherent message, seems to be made up of people who would expand the size and scope of government. So, depending on one's beliefs, one protest is for a good cause and one protest is for a not so good cause.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've always seen a huge downside to protesting. The protests can get people's attention, and create a movement, but it should be possible to get people's attention and create a movement without the protest. It should be possible, . . . . maybe it isn't?

 

So what's the answer? How does the general population get the government motivated to make good changes?

 

“a good place to start may be to demand more personal freedom while curbing the rights of multinational corporations and the government itself.”

 

Obama and Congress ARE Wall Street, Geithner IS the Federal Reserve - Now What? - BlackListedNews.com

 

Protest is conflict manipulation not resolution. Resolution requires a creative act (whether preceded by a destructive act or not)… so a good place to start may be to demand and create more personal freedom while curbing the rights of multinational corporations and the government itself… the previous constitution left too many backdoors available to those who would encroach on individual sovereignty... and individual sovereignty is key to humanity’s maturation out of ‘childhood’

 

re "How does the general population get the government motivated to make good changes?" ...several of the founders realized once statism encroached too far, a host of individuals would have to tear the existing gov’t down and create a new one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Follow-up: NYPD- Praetorian Guard

NYPD Cops are literally on the Wall St. payroll.

 

"The taxpayer has paid for the training of the rent-a-cop, his uniform and gun, and will pick up the legal tab for lawsuits stemming from the police personnel following illegal instructions from its corporate master. Lawsuits have already sprung up from the program."

 

Financial Giants Put New York City Cops On Their Payroll » Counterpunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • My wife Robin just wanted some groceries.   Simple enough.   She parked the car for fifteen minutes, and returned to find a huge scratch on the side.   Someone keyed her car.   To be clear, this isn’t just any car.   It’s a Cybertruck—Elon Musk's stainless-steel spaceship on wheels. She bought it back in 2021, before Musk became everyone's favorite villain or savior.   Someone saw it parked in a grocery lot and felt compelled to carve their hatred directly into the metal.   That's what happens when you stand out.   Nobody keys a beige minivan.   When you're polarizing, you're impossible to ignore. But the irony is: the more attention something has, the harder it is to find the truth about it.   What’s Elon Musk really thinking? What are his plans? What will happen with DOGE? Is he deserving of all of this adoration and hate? Hard to say.   Ideas work the same way.   Take tariffs, for example.   Tariffs have become the Cybertrucks of economic policy. People either love them or hate them. Even if they don’t understand what they are and how they work. (Most don’t.)   That’s why, in my latest podcast (link below), I wanted to explore the “in-between” truth about tariffs.   And like Cybertrucks, I guess my thoughts on tariffs are polarizing.   Greg Gutfield mentioned me on Fox News. Harvard professors hate me now. (I wonder if they also key Cybertrucks?)   But before I show you what I think about tariffs… I have to mention something.   We’re Headed to Austin, Texas This weekend, my team and I are headed to Austin. By now, you should probably know why.   Yes, SXSW is happening. But my team and I are doing something I think is even better.   We’re putting on a FREE event on “Tech’s Turning Point.”   AI, quantum, biotech, crypto, and more—it’s all on the table.   Just now, we posted a special webpage with the agenda.   Click here to check it out and add it to your calendar.   The Truth About Tariffs People love to panic about tariffs causing inflation.   They wave around the ghost of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff from the Great Depression like it’s Exhibit A proving tariffs equal economic collapse.   But let me pop this myth:   Tariffs don’t cause inflation. And no, I'm not crazy (despite what angry professors from Harvard or Stanford might tweet at me).   Here's the deal.   Inflation isn’t when just a couple of things become pricier. It’s when your entire shopping basket—eggs, shirts, Netflix subscriptions, bananas, everything—starts costing more because your money’s worth less.   Inflation means your dollars aren’t stretching as far as they used to.   Take the 1800s.   For nearly a century, 97% of America’s revenue came from tariffs. Income tax? Didn’t exist. And guess what inflation was? Basically zero. Maybe 1% a year.   The economy was booming, and tariffs funded nearly everything. So, why do people suddenly think tariffs cause inflation today?   Tariffs are taxes on imports, yes, but prices are set by supply and demand—not tariffs.   Let me give you a simple example.   Imagine fancy potato chips from Canada cost $10, and a 20% tariff pushes that to $12. Everyone panics—prices rose! Inflation!   Nope.   If I only have $100 to spend and the price of my favorite chips goes up, I either stop buying chips or I buy, say, fewer newspapers.   If everyone stops buying newspapers because they’re overspending on chips, newspapers lower their prices or go out of business.   Overall spending stays the same, and inflation doesn’t budge.   Three quick scenarios:   We buy pricier chips, but fewer other things: Inflation unchanged. Manufacturers shift to the U.S. to avoid tariffs: Inflation unchanged (and more jobs here). We stop buying fancy chips: Prices drop again. Inflation? Still unchanged. The only thing that actually causes inflation is printing money.   Between 2020 and 2022 alone, 40% of all money ever created in history appeared overnight.   That’s why inflation shot up afterward—not because of tariffs.   Back to tariffs today.   Still No Inflation Unlike the infamous Smoot-Hawley blanket tariff (imagine Oprah handing out tariffs: "You get a tariff, and you get a tariff!"), today's tariffs are strategic.   Trump slapped tariffs on chips from Taiwan because we shouldn’t rely on a single foreign supplier for vital tech components—especially if that supplier might get invaded.   Now Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion in American manufacturing.   Strategic win, no inflation.   Then there’s Canada and Mexico—our friendly neighbors with weirdly huge tariffs on things like milk and butter (299% tariff on butter—really, Canada?).   Trump’s not blanketing everything with tariffs; he’s pressuring trade partners to lower theirs.   If they do, everybody wins. If they don’t, well, then we have a strategic trade chess game—but still no inflation.   In short, tariffs are about strategy, security, and fairness—not inflation.   Yes, blanket tariffs from the Great Depression era were dumb. Obviously. Today's targeted tariffs? Smart.   Listen to the whole podcast to hear why I think this.   And by the way, if you see a Cybertruck, don’t key it. Robin doesn’t care about your politics; she just likes her weird truck.   Maybe read a good book, relax, and leave cars alone.   (And yes, nobody keys Volkswagens, even though they were basically created by Hitler. Strange world we live in.) Source: https://altucherconfidential.com/posts/the-truth-about-tariffs-busting-the-inflation-myth    Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/       
    • No, not if you are comparing apples to apples. What we call “poor” is obviously a pretty high bar but if you’re talking about like a total homeless shambling skexie in like San Fran then, no. The U.S.A. in not particularly kind to you. It is not an abuse so much as it is a sad relatively minor consequence of our optimism and industriousness.   What you consider rich changes with circumstances obviously. If you are genuinely poor in the U.S.A., you experience a quirky hodgepodge of unhelpful and/or abstract extreme lavishnesses while also being alienated from your social support network. It’s about the same as being a refugee. For a fraction of the ‘kindness’ available to you in non bio-available form, you could have simply stayed closer to your people and been MUCH better off.   It’s just a quirk of how we run the place and our values; we are more worried about interfering with people’s liberty and natural inclination to do for themselves than we are about no bums left behind. It is a slightly hurtful position and we know it; we are just scared to death of socialism cancer and we’re willing to put our money where our mouth is.   So, if you’re a bum; you got 5G, the ER will spend like $1,000,000 on you over a hangnail but then kick you out as soon as you’re “stabilized”, the logistics are surpremely efficient, you have total unchecked freedom of speech, real-estate, motels, and jobs are all natural healthy markets in perfect competition, you got compulsory three ‘R’’s, your military owns the sky, sea, space, night, information-space, and has the best hairdos, you can fill out paper and get all the stuff up to and including a Ph.D. Pretty much everything a very generous, eager, flawless go-getter with five minutes to spare would think you might need.   It’s worse. Our whole society is competitive and we do NOT value or make any kumbaya exception. The last kumbaya types we had werr the Shakers and they literally went extinct. Pueblo peoples are still around but they kind of don’t count since they were here before us. So basically, if you’re poor in the U.S.A., you are automatically a loser and a deadbeat too. You will be treated as such by anybody not specifically either paid to deal with you or shysters selling bejesus, Amway, and drugs. Plus, it ain’t safe out there. Not everybody uses muhfreedoms to lift their truck, people be thugging and bums are very vulnerable here. The history of a large mobile workforce means nobody has a village to go home to. Source: https://askdaddy.quora.com/Are-the-poor-people-in-the-United-States-the-richest-poor-people-in-the-world-6   Profits from free accurate cryptos signals: https://www.predictmag.com/ 
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
    • TDUP ThredUp stock, watch for a top of range breakout above 2.94 at https://stockconsultant.com/?TDUP
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.